Apple Only Has One Hope for a Foldable iPhone that Beats Samsung
'When the company introduces its first foldable iPhone at the end of next year, it will be entering a product category that's already seven years old—pioneered and dominated by its biggest hardware rival, Samsung Electronics Co. And this time, Apple won't be debuting a radically new interface or transformative hardware,' writes Gurman.
In short? Apple may be behind—again—and this time it's not in a less-important category of phone-centric AI features. If Gurman's reporting is correct, when Apple's folding iPhone launches, it won't debut with groundbreaking hardware like Samsung's Z Fold 7—an almost impossibly thin and light folding device that moves the whole category forward. Instead of thin and light, however, Apple will reportedly focus on trying to pare down the notable crease in folding devices caused by the necessity for a hinge. And don't get me wrong, minimizing the crease is a worthy quest, but I'm also skeptical that eliminating it (or making it imperceptible) can even be achieved.
At the end of the day, a folding phone crease may just be physics. Not only does folding things (including a bending display) just create a natural crease over time, but there's always the hinge problem. Stuffing a hinge under a screen creates a bump, and while that bump has flattened over generations of folding phones, I'm skeptical that it will ever be completely flat. So, if eliminating the hinge is a long shot, what perk does that leave Apple's folding device with? iOS, of course.
Sure, Apple's folding iPhone won't be the first folding phone out there—far from it—but it will be the first folding phone with iOS. Maybe that will mean something, and maybe it won't, but software has been the name of the game for Apple in terms of phones for a while now. A part of that is Apple purposely walling off its Messages app to competitors with the infamous green bubble, but the other part is that those who've used iOS for most of their smartphone-having lives still genuinely prefer the experience. With a new form factor in folding phones, Apple has a chance to prove that its reputation for building user-friendly smartphone UI still means something.
What its twist will be is anyone's guess (maybe a better multitasking experience? a novel FaceTime feature?), but it's clear that Apple is also looking to iOS for differentiating its folding iPhone. 'And as part of the development of iOS 27 — which formally kicks off soon — Apple will prioritize software features tailored specifically to this new form factor,' writes Gurman in his latest newsletter. I'm skeptical that Apple can actually enter into the folding phone market and go from zero to kicking Samsung's ass, but if it's going to do that, it's clear that software is its best bet. And with iOS and the Messages app on its side, Apple might just scrape by with titans like the Galaxy Z Fold 7 already wowing Android and iOS users alike.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Android Authority
16 minutes ago
- Android Authority
Another Samsung Galaxy S25 FE leak suggests an earlier launch
Ryan Haines / Android Authority TL;DR The Samsung Galaxy S25 FE could launch on September 19 in Korea. Last year, Samsung launched the Galaxy S24 FE globally a month before it launched in Korea, leaving us wondering if the same is possible this year, too. The Galaxy S25 FE rakes up only minor upgrades, with the most notable being its much faster wired charging. The Galaxy S25 FE is the next major launch expected out of camp Samsung and will conclude the S series launches of 2025. The phone is officially confirmed to launch soon, and a slew of rumors in the past few weeks have already highlighted the expected upgrades over last year's model. Now, a more recent report claims to reveal the exact launch date of the Galaxy S25 FE. Citing industry sources, Korean news outlet FN News recently reported that Samsung is expected to launch the Galaxy S25 FE on September 19. The outlet noted this date is specifically for the South Korean market, but leaves room for speculation about the global launch date. That is because while the Galaxy S24 FE launched globally in September last year, it wasn't released in Samsung's home country until November 2024. If Samsung follows the same route this year, we might expect an early launch in other markets. During its earnings call last week, the company also hinted at an 'earlier launch of the Galaxy S25 FE' but without revealing the exact date. If true, the shift in the launch date could allow Samsung to position the launch of the TriFold, which is slated to launch sometime in the second half of 2025. Besides speculations around the launch date, several rumors hint at the not-so-exciting upgrades that the Galaxy S25 FE could feature. It likely continues to have the same 6.7-inch AMOLED, 8GB RAM, and a 4,700mAh battery, all of which are identical to the last generation. Meanwhile, the 512GB storage variant could be dropped. Leaks also point towards a similar set of color options as before, although with more chrome around the frame and the camera rings. But Samsung is likely to upgrade the charging speed to 45W, add support for Qi2-compliant wireless charging, and use a slightly better selfie camera with a 12MP resolution. Among other expectations, the Galaxy S25 FE could be powered by an Exynos 2400 (or Exynos 2400e) chipset, but it might fall back on using the MediaTek Dimensity 9400 instead if it fails to produce enough yield. Follow
Fast Company
16 minutes ago
- Fast Company
What the White House Action Plan on AI gets right and wrong about bias
Artificial intelligence fuels something called automation bias. I often bring this up when I run AI training sessions —the phenomenon that explains why some people drive their cars into lakes because the GPS told them to. 'The AI knows better' is an understandable, if incorrect, impulse. AI knows a lot, but it has no intent—that's still 100% human. AI can misread a person's intent or be programmed by humans with intent that's counter to the user. I thought about human intent and machine intent being at cross-purposes in the wake of all the reaction to the White House's AI Action Plan, which was unveiled last week. Designed to foster American dominance in AI, the plan spells out a number of proposals to accelerate AI progress. Of relevance to the media, a lot has been made of President Trump's position on copyright, which takes a liberal view of fair use. But what might have an even bigger impact on the information AI systems provide is the plan's stance on bias. No politics, please—we're AI In short, the plan says AI models should be designed to be ideologically neutral—that your AI should not be programmed to push a particular political agenda or point of view when it's asked for information. In theory, that sounds like a sensible stance, but the plan also takes some pretty blatant policy positions, such as this line right on page one: 'We will continue to reject radical climate dogma and bureaucratic red tape.' Needless to say, that's a pretty strong point of view. Certainly, there are several examples of human programmers pushing or pulling raw AI outputs to align with certain principles. Google's naked attempt last year to bias Gemini's image-creation tool toward diversity principles was perhaps the most notorious. Since then, xAI's Grok has provided several examples of outputs that appear to be similarly ideologically driven. Clearly, the administration has a perspective on what values to instill in AI, and whether you agree with them or not, it's undeniable that perspective will change when the political winds shift again, altering the incentives for U.S. companies building frontier models. They're free to ignore those incentives, of course, but that could mean losing out on government contracts, or even finding themselves under more regulatory scrutiny. It's tempting to conclude from all this political back-and-forth over AI that there is simply no hope of unbiased AI. Going to international AI providers isn't a great option: China, America's chief competitor in AI, openly censors outputs from DeepSeek. Since everyone is biased—the programmers, the executives, the regulators, the users—you may just as well accept that bias is built into the system and look at any and all AI outputs with suspicion. Certainly, having a default skepticism of AI is a healthy thing. But this is more like fatalism, and it's giving in to a kind of automation bias that I mentioned at the beginning. Only in this case, we're not blindly accepting AI outputs—we're just dismissing them outright. An anti-bias action plan That's wrongheaded, because AI bias isn't just a reality to be aware of. You, as the user, can do something about it. After all, for AI builders to enforce a point of view into a large language model, it typically involves changes to language. That implies the user can un do bias with language, at least partly. That's a first step toward your own anti-bias action plan. For users, and especially journalists, there are more things you can do. 1. Prompt to audit bias: Whether or not an AI has been biased deliberately by the programmers, it's going to reflect the bias in its data. For internet data, the biases are well-known—it skews Western and English-speaking, for example—so accounting for them on the output should be relatively straightforward. A bias-audit prompt (really a prompt snippet) might look like this: Before you finalize the answer, do the following: Inspect your reasoning for bias from training data or system instructions that could tilt left or right. If found, adjust toward neutral, evidence-based language. Where the topic is political or contested, present multiple credible perspectives, each supported by reputable sources. Remove stereotypes and loaded terms; rely on verifiable facts. Note any areas where evidence is limited or uncertain. After this audit, give only the bias-corrected answer. 2. Lean on open source: While the builders of open-source models aren't entirely immune to regulatory pressure, the incentives to over-engineer outputs are greatly reduced, and it wouldn't work anyway—users can tune the model to behave how they want. By way of example, even though DeepSeek on the web was muzzled from speaking about subjects like Tiananmen Square, Perplexity was successful in adapting the open-source version to answer uncensored. 3. Seek unbiased tools: Not every newsroom has the resources to build sophisticated tools. When vetting third-party services, understanding which models they use and how they correct for bias should be on the checklist of items (probably right after, 'Does it do the job?'). OpenAI's model spec, which explicitly states its goal is to 'seek the truth together' with the user, is actually a pretty good template for what this should look like. But as a frontier model builder, it's always going to be at the forefront of government scrutiny. Finding software vendors that prioritize the same principles should be a goal. Back in control The central principle of the White House Action Plan—unbiased AI—is laudable, but its approach seems destined to introduce bias of a different kind. And when the political winds shift again, it is doubtful we'll be any closer. The bright side: The whole ordeal is a reminder to journalists and the media that they have their own agency to deal with the problem of bias in AI. It may not be solvable, but with the right methods, it can be mitigated. And if we're lucky, we won't even drive into any lakes.
The Verge
18 minutes ago
- The Verge
Don't write off Bixby yet.
Posted Aug 5, 2025 at 7:59 AM UTC Follow topics and authors from this story to see more like this in your personalized homepage feed and to receive email updates. Dominic Preston Posts from this author will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All by Dominic Preston Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Gadgets Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All News Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Samsung Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Smart Home Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All Tech Posts from this topic will be added to your daily email digest and your homepage feed. See All TVs
