Historic seafood restaurant seen on Antiques Roadshow and Lovejoy forced to shut down after ‘terrible' rat infestation
AN HISTORIC sea food restaurant has been closed down court action after a rat infestation was discovered in the building.
The infestation in the grade II listed building in Maldon, Essex, was discovered by district council hygiene officers.
3
3
Maldon District Council took court action against Fish on the Quay which is located on Church Street.
Some parts of the historic building, which is used today as a restaurant, pub and a bed and breakfast, date back to the 15th century.
Hygiene officers visited the business after receiving a complaint and discovered a "horrendous" rat infestation.
Rodents at the restaurant were reportedly discovered licking tubs of honey and leaving droppings in the kitchen.
The infestation was said to be in the venue's kitchen, bar and cellar spaces and posed an 'imminent risk to the public."
After visiting on June 13 inspectors photographed rat droppings within the condiments, on top of a fridge in a kitchen storage area, in packaging, and behind a freezer in a storage shed.
The business has been closed until inspectors are satisfied that the issue has been addressed, pest control are reportedly on site on a daily basis.
Staff at Fish on the Quay, which is owned and operated by The Jolly Sailor Ltd, are working with the council to fix the problem.
A manager has vowed to reopen the venue in Hythe Quay, telling the BBC "everything is great."
Council leader Richard Siddall said however that "incredibly serious offences" had been identified a the venue.
Shocking moment pack of huge RATS swarm popular McDonald's
The council took the restaurant to court to apply for a Hygiene Emergency Prohibition Order which was granted.
The order means that the business cannot reopen until health risks are removed.
Council officers are reportedly working with staff to ensure the safety of visitors and neighbours following the discovery of the rodent infestation.
According to Sidall an "imminent risk to public health" had been identified.
The rat infestation on the premises was identified as ongoing and extensive.
Fish on the Quay has won several awards including a Diners' Choice award from OpenTable in 2022.
3
It also appeared on TV several times most notably when an episode of Lovejoy was filmed there in January 1992.
It has also appeared on Lawless heart in 2001 and The Antiques Road show in 2007.
The historic building was once a Customs house keeping an eye on boats going back and fourth up the River Blackwater.
Currently there is a sign outside the historic building reading: "We are closed! Sorry for the inconvenience."
Cllr Richard Siddall, Leader of Maldon District Council, said; 'Our officers took swift action against this business as soon as it became clear there was an imminent risk to public health.
'It is absolutely vital that food businesses are kept clean and in good repair in line with stringent food safety legislation.
"A failure to do so could potentially result in terrible consequences for the public and we will always take action against any owners not abiding by these laws.
'Whilst these are incredibly serious offences, we will work with the operator to improve the standards of cleanliness and make sure that they comply food safety standards before they reopen.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Simple blood test could provide first reliable diagnosis for ME
Scientists have found biological signatures in the blood of people with myalgic encephalomyelitis (ME), a breakthrough that could lead to the first reliable test for the debilitating condition. ME, also known as chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS), affects an estimated 400,000 people in the UK. Symptoms can include pain, brain fog and extremely low energy levels that do not improve with rest. These often become dramatically worse after even minor physical effort, a phenomenon known as post-exertional malaise. There is no cure and the cause is unknown. A diagnosis is typically made by ruling out other illnesses, a process that can take years. The new study, led by researchers from Edinburgh University, may mark a turning point. Using data from the UK Biobank, they compared blood samples from 1,455 ME patients with those of more than 131,000 healthy people and identified dozens of molecules that differed in concentrations between the two, as well as different cell counts. The changes in the ME patients, who all had mild to moderate forms of the disease, were largely related to chronic inflammation, insulin resistance and liver dysfunction. The findings were replicated in a group of American patients and healthy controls. Professor Chris Ponting, of the university's Institute of Genetics and Cancer, said: 'For so long people with ME/CFS have been told it's all in their head. It's not. We see [it] in their blood. 'Evidence of a large number of replicated and diverse blood biomarkers that differentiate between ME/CFS cases and controls should dispel any lingering perception it is caused by deconditioning and exercise intolerance.' The study found 116 'biomarkers' for ME in the blood of men and women with the condition — a key finding, because ME can affect the sexes differently. These markers did not change according to how active the patients were, consistent with the view that graded exercise therapy, which aims to gradually increase activity levels, is unlikely to be helpful. The strongest differences were found in people who reported post-exertional malaise, which may underscore its central role in the illness. Dr Sjoerd Beentjes, of the university's School of Mathematics, said: 'Blood differences are sometimes attributed to reduced activity levels rather than ME/CFS directly. Our study provides strong evidence ME/CFS affects blood traits through paths other than activity.' The authors stressed that the research was at an early stage with no guarantees a test would be possible. The government pledged last year to improve ME research and the NHS agreed to assess services for patients across England after an inquest into the death at 27 of Maeve Boothby O'Neill in 2021. She had suffered from ME since she was a teenager. The daughter of Sarah Boothby and Sean O'Neill, a senior journalist at The Times, she was left bedbound, unable to speak and malnourished. The coroner issued a prevention of future deaths report in October, the first of its kind for ME, and urged Wes Streeting, the health secretary, NHS officials and health bodies to take action to address the 'non-existent' care and lack of funding for research.
Times
2 hours ago
- Times
Last chance for MPs to think again on assisted dying
The assisted dying bill has split voters and MPs TOLGA AKMEN/EPA I n November, when the assisted dying bill had its second reading in the House of Commons, its sponsor Kim Leadbeater reassured fellow MPs that a vote in favour was only 'to continue the debate' and ' to subject the bill to line-by-line scrutiny'. That conversation — which permitted wavering MPs to interrogate their decision further — is drawing to a close. Today, MPs will vote on the third and final reading of the bill, after which it could go to the House of Lords. What has emerged from that 'line-by-line scrutiny', however, has chilled many legislators and observers to the core. Firstly, there is the nature of the scrutiny itself. Because this was not a government bill, but a private member's one, Ms Leadbeater was able to handpick the committee and exercise control over the witnesses called. It did not boost confidence in an impartial process. Indeed, four Labour MPs raised concerns that the committee's evidence was 'weighted towards those who were known to be supportive of the bill'. Of eight witnesses called from foreign jurisdictions with an assisted dying law, for example, not one was critical of how the legislation had played out — despite there being numerous experts with misgivings, such as Theo Boer of the Dutch Health Council. Formerly pro-euthanasia, he became horrified by the steady expansion of the system and its eligibility from what was first intended. Although the UK bill is being sold on the basis that it is strictly limited to those with a terminal diagnosis of less than six months, Mr Boer has warned that 'our safeguards were presented that way too.' In the Netherlands, assisted dying provision now includes children over 12 years old and those with psychiatric disorders. If the passage of this bill has been distinguished by procedural ruthlessness, that has been matched only by its intellectual woolliness. The absence of tight, ethical safeguards to protect the vulnerable — in particular those with mental health problems — has caused deep anxiety in organisations at the sharp end of patient care: the Royal College of Psychiatrists, the Association for Palliative Medicine, and the Royal College of Physicians have all raised serious concerns. Tellingly, the two ministers whose departments would be most involved in the bill's implementation, the health secretary Wes Streeting and the justice secretary Shabana Mahmood, are both opposed. Many safeguarding amendments have been shrugged aside. MPs who vote yes on Friday will be voting to permit doctors to raise the subject of ending a patient's life, including with people who have learning disabilities. The door is open for private contractors to get involved in running the service with no transparency obligations or cap on profits. And as the former prime minister Gordon Brown argues, the legal right to assisted dying would not be matched by any equivalent right to high-quality palliative care, making a cruel nonsense of real choice for many of those in extremis. Sir Keir Starmer has repeated his support for the principle of the bill, while distancing himself from the legislation. But should its proposals take full effect in 2029 as stipulated, close to the next general election, troubled voters who consider it a deal-breaker will inevitably connect it to the prime minister. There are many others, too, who back assisted dying in good faith, but this flawed bill delivers a far greater number of dangers than it does solutions. Before it is too late, its parliamentary supporters can, and must, think again.
BBC News
3 hours ago
- BBC News
Leeds maternity services now 'inadequate' after inspectors act on parents' concerns
Maternity services at two Leeds hospitals have been downgraded from "good" to "inadequate" by the healthcare regulator, because their failings posed "a significant risk" to women and from staff and patients around quality of care and staffing levels were substantiated by the Care Quality Commission (CQC) during unannounced inspections at Leeds Teaching Hospitals (LTH) NHS regulator has now issued a warning notice which requires the trust to take immediate action to improve. Neonatal services have also been downgraded from "good" to "requires improvement".Over the past six months, the BBC has spoken to 67 families who say they experienced inadequate care at the trust, including parents who say their babies suffered avoidable injury or death. We also talked to five whistleblowers who said the previous CQC "good" rating did not reflect response to the CQC downgrade, LTH said it had committed to improving its maternity and neonatal services at Leeds General Infirmary (LGI) and St James' University Hospital. 'At risk of avoidable harm' During its December 2024 and January 2025 inspections, the CQC found official regulation breaches relating to risk management, safe environment, learning following incidents, infection prevention and control, medicines management and of concern highlighted in the maternity units at both hospitals included: People being "not safe" and "at risk of avoidable harm" - while investigations into incidents, and points raised from these to enable learning, were not always evidentBabies and families not always being supported and treated with dignity and respectLeadership being "below acceptable standard" and not supporting the delivery of high-quality careStaff being reluctant to raise concerns and incidents - because "the trust had a blame culture"Staff, despite being passionate about their work, struggling to provide their desired standard of care because of staffing issues LTH provided evidence to the CQC showing it had reported 170 maternity "red flag incidents", indicating there had been staffing issues, between May and September CQC's findings also highlighted staffing concerns in neonatal services at both hospitals, with a shortage of qualified staff to care for babies with complex coming autumn, the trust says 35 newly qualified midwives are due to start work and it has also appointed additional midwifery leadership regulator will be monitoring the trust's services closely, including through further inspections - says the CQC's director in the north of England, Ann Ford - to make sure patients receive safe care while improvements are implemented."We would like to thank all those people who bravely shared their concerns," she said. "This helps us to have a better picture of the care being provided to people and to focus our inspection in the relevant areas." One family who told the BBC they believe their child would have survived had they received better treatment is Amarjit Kaur and Mandip Singh Matharoo, whose baby was stillborn in January CQC report highlights "how inadequate the service is, which leads to patient harm", they told us."Unfortunately, it's too little too late for our daughter Asees and us, but we hope that this will trigger serious change within the system and take the concerns of patients using the service more seriously."Fiona-Winser Ramm, whose daughter Aliona died in 2020 after what an inquest found to be a number of "gross failures", described the CQC's findings as "horrific"."The concerns we have been raising for five years have been proved true," she says. But she believes the CQC has been slow to act."The CQC inspected Leeds in 2023 and somehow rated them as being good. Let's be clear these problems haven't just appeared in the last two years, they are systemic."In response, the CQC said the 2023 inspection had been part of a national maternity inspection programme focussing specifically on safety and leadership, which found some areas for improvement, but also identified some good practice."As the independent regulator we are committed to ensuring our assessments of the quality and safety of all services are accurate and reflect the experiences of the people that use them," added Ann Ford. If you have been affected by the issues in this story, you can contact the BBC Action Line here All 67 families who have spoken to the BBC want an independent review into the trust's maternity services - and a group of them have asked Health Secretary Wes Streeting for it to be led by senior midwife Donna Leeds families also joined other bereaved parents from across England this week to urge Mr Streeting to hold a national inquiry into maternity safety - he is yet to make a executive of LTH, Prof Phil Wood, said in a statement: "My priority is to make sure we urgently take action to deliver these improvements."The trust is committed to providing "safe, compassionate care", he added, and has already started making improvements, including recruitment, and addressing concerns around culture."We deliver more than 8,500 babies each year and the vast majority of those are safe and positive experiences," he said. "But we recognise that's not the experience of all families." Do you have more information about this story?You can reach Divya directly and securely through encrypted messaging app Signal on: +44 7961 390 325, by email at or her Instagram account.
