‘I think they're extremely important': Champaign Co. Clerk breaks down voter turnout in Consolidated Election
URBANA, Ill. (WCIA) — Many spent Tuesday heading out to the polls to cast their ballots in this year's Consolidated Election. They're choosing who they want to lead their communities and schools, as well as where they want their tax dollars to go.
By 5 p.m. on Election Day, Aaron Ammons, the Champaign County Clerk, said about 6,000 people had voted in person that day and about 4,000 others voted early.
Once those ballots are counted, plus the ones in the mail, he estimates about 15-20% of voters will participate in this election, which is a pretty standard trend.
Champaign residents weigh property tax increase to benefit homeless shelter
This year, Ammons feels questions about the Champaign School Board and City Council are driving people to the polls.
'I think those are important for our community, for our citizens who live here, to talk to each other and have that direct contact because those policies impact you immediately at the local level,' he said. 'You're choosing your school board members, and your chiefs of police because city council members will vote on those things. These are things we talk about daily and I think they're extremely important.'
Voters hopeful election will rejuvenate Champaign school board
Locations across Champaign County are open until 7 p.m. Once they close, judges will begin counting. Ammons expects to have some unofficial results ready around 9 p.m. on Tuesday.
Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Politico
31 minutes ago
- Politico
Mayoral candidate Brad Lander burns through cash, putting him at home-stretch disadvantage
NEW YORK — Brad Lander's day job is overseeing the city's cash. As a mayoral candidate, he is burning through his own. The city comptroller had spent nearly $1 million more than any other candidate in the Democratic primary for New York City mayor, as of the latest data through May 19, yet he's still polling a distant third. And with a mandatory spending cap of roughly $8 million and just two weeks until the election, Lander finds himself at a significant disadvantage to opponents with more money for voter outreach in the final stretch of the race. The fiscal steward vying to replace Mayor Eric Adams has dropped $4.7 million on two television ads, a stable of consultants and staff salaries totaling more than $700,000, according to records from the city's Campaign Finance Board. He's left with $2.8 million, as of the latest disclosure period in May. By comparison, front-runner Andrew Cuomo had $5.7 million and second-place Zohran Mamdani, the democratic socialist lawmaker, had $4.5 million. Also in financial distress is City Council Speaker Adrienne Adams, who got into the race late and has $2.3 million in the bank. The candidates' updated finances will be published Friday. Lander paid $226,500 to fundraiser Jenny Galvin, $195,650 to pollster Global Strategy Group and $161,644 to consultancy BerlinRosen. Digital marketing and fundraising firm Authentic Campaigns netted $135,451, and the campaign even paid $35,677 to a firm that helps campaigns optimize spending. The spending hasn't really helped all that much. Lander is polling significantly behind Mamdani — the state assemblymember who has captured the progressive movement Lander hoped to tap into — and Cuomo, who is benefiting from more than $10 million worth of ads coming from two super PACs and the gratis services of a prominent lobbyist quietly powering his campaign. A government reform group has requested an investigation into Cuomo's use of that firm, Tusk Strategies. 'Conventional campaign wisdom is you unload most of your spending six to eight weeks out from the primary,' said Democratic strategist Trip Yang, who is not affiliated with any of the mayoral candidates. 'Brad is doing what he needs to, but for some reason it is not really breaking through in the polls.' Lander has banked more on broadcast and digital ads than Mamdani. That strategy is reminiscent of former Mayor Bill de Blasio's 2013 campaign, which did not feature a single piece of direct mail. The city comptroller has dropped $2.5 million on TV ads via Great American Media that feature him at the controls of a frontloader crushing Teslas in a junkyard and riding Coney Island's famed Cyclone while calmly taking notes on a legal pad. 'We will be up on broadcast, streaming, and digital every day through June 24th thanks to the grassroots support for our campaign from every corner of this city and a hunger from New Yorkers to end the Adams-Cuomo nightmare of corruption,' said Alison Hirsh, Lander's campaign manager, in a statement. A Lander spokesperson argued he has less cash than other top contenders because he started running earlier. Lander began raising money in February 2022, one month into his and Eric Adams' tenures, when each was presumably planning to run for reelection. As the mayor's political standing faltered, the comptroller started to see an opening to challenge the brash, Trump-aligned Democrat. By the time Lander announced his candidacy for mayor last summer, he had already spent a half-million dollars, public records show. In the ensuing three months before Mamdani announced his candidacy in October, the comptroller dropped another $200,000. Taken together, that accounts for the bulk of the discrepancy between Lander and Mamdani, the next-biggest spender in the race. As of last month, Mamdani had dropped $3.9 million, leaving him with $4.5 million in his war chest. Once he maxed out on fundraising, he cut a video suggesting his prospective donors give to Adrienne Adams, instead — a nod to the city's ranked-choice voting system that encourages partnerships to damage the front-runner. The democratic socialist Mamdani is employing a different strategy than the city comptroller, evidenced by a substantial investment in mailers as he inches closer to Cuomo in the polls. Mamdani's campaign paid direct mail firms Moxie Media and Century Direct Solutions — along with a printing company and a sticker firm — more than $400,000. A spokesperson said the campaign wanted to balance the success Mamdani has had producing viral social media videos with an effort to reach more analog voters. (The average age of the city's most active voters suggests they are not on TikTok.) In the home stretch with a significant polling advantage, Mamdani had $1.8 million more to spend than Lander. The comptroller announced May 20 that he had maxed out on fundraising, but some of that cash won't come through until June 20, the next public matching funds payout. Both are chasing Cuomo, who does not have money troubles, despite his disastrous turn before campaign finance regulators. After initially denying him matching funds based on systemic paperwork errors, the Campaign Finance Board fined the former governor $756,994 for improper coordination with a super PAC supporting him called Fix the City. The outfit has raised $10 million and spent around $8 million boosting Cuomo with television ads. A separate super PAC affiliated with the New York Apartment Association pledged to drop $2.5 million supporting the governor. Cuomo has spent $1.9 million and has $5.7 million left in the bank. Adrienne Adams was worse off than the city comptroller as of last month's filing. She entered the race late and has been scrambling for cash since. The board awarded her $2 million in matching funds last month, which led her to announce a broadcast ad shortly afterward. Even without sufficient money, she has been polling near Lander on the strength of endorsements from municipal labor union DC 37 and state Attorney General Letitia James. On Thursday, U.S. Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez endorsed Adrienne Adams as her second choice behind Mamdani, making the impact of her remaining cash reserves harder to predict.
Chicago Tribune
an hour ago
- Chicago Tribune
Chicago could force Uber, Lyft to hike driver pay
Rideshare companies like Lyft and Uber could soon be forced to pay Chicago drivers more if an ordinance up for debate Thursday moves ahead, a change the companies say would cause the cost of rides to skyrocket for passengers. Ald. Michael Rodriguez, 22nd, said his measure would make sure rideshare drivers make more than minimum wage and get paid when they wait for and drive to riders. But critics and the companies say the legislation will raise costs and could even put many drivers out of work. 'While prices have increased for years, pay for drivers has decreased,' Rodriguez said. 'Almost half the time, they are working, but not getting paid.' Rodriguez's ordinance would raise driver pay during rides to $1.50 per mile and 62.5 cents per minute in July 2026. It would also establish a $7 minimum driver payout for each trip. The City Council's Workforce Development Committee, chaired by Rodriguez, is set to discuss and vote on the measure Thursday. If it passes, it could face a final vote from all aldermen next week. That timeline is far too tight, Ald. Matt O'Shea, 19th, argued Monday afternoon. The Beverly alderman is concerned the ordinance could 'put a gaping hole' in the city's budget by making cost-averse Chicagoans less likely to take rides that generate tax revenue. 'We don't know what this is, but we do know in just a matter of months we are going to have the most difficult budget vote in the history of the modern era,' O'Shea said. 'Can we afford to take another hit?' O'Shea said 'everybody' believes rideshare drivers need to be paid better, but added that he fears the ordinance will make it more expensive for working class Chicagoans to take rides. It is unclear what effect the ordinance will have because the committee and the administration of Mayor Brandon Johnson, who has appeared to remain neutral throughout the debate so far, have not shared analysis, he said. In addition to pay raises, Rodriguez's ordinance would require fare breakdowns be shared with both riders and drivers. It would also add driver safety measures — like requiring passenger identities to be verified — and would reconfigure the driver disciplinary process by giving drivers a seven-day notice ahead of suspensions and details explaining why they have been deactivated. Both Uber and Lyft blasted the potential forced pay hike Monday. Lyft spokesperson CJ Macklin likened the ordinance to laws in New York City that have 'forced thousands of drivers out of the app for hours at a time.' 'This misguided policy could nearly double ride fares, pricing out communities that depend on us while reducing driver earnings as demand plummets,' Macklin said. 'We support fair driver compensation, but this disastrous proposal will leave riders, drivers and Chicago worse off.' A 500-person poll commissioned and shared by Uber and conducted by pollster Impact Research determined 62% of likely Chicago voters consider rideshare 'an everyday necessity' and 63% oppose the pay-hike proposal. 'The proposed legislation, as currently drafted, would dramatically raise ride costs for Chicagoans by nearly 40%, slash city tax revenues by tens of millions of dollars, and force workforce reductions impacting up to 10,000 drivers,' Uber spokesperson Josh Gold said. 'This approach risks undermining both affordability for riders and economic opportunity for thousands of working families.' Rodriguez's proposal faces considerable changes if lobbyists for the rideshare companies convince enough of his colleagues to vote against it. The companies are likely to place pressure on the City Council and on Johnson, who has so far avoided publicly taking sides. And the companies have pressured local politicians before. Uber used its presence on huge numbers of Chicago phones to share messages urging riders last month to act as the Illinois General Assembly weighed new rideshare taxes to fix a massive transit funding shortfall, and Lyft has shared similar political messages in the past. The ordinance comes amid a long-running feud by competing powerhouse unions to organize rideshare drivers. The Service Employees International Union Local 1 and Mechanics' Local 701 have backed the ordinance with their 'Chicago Gig Alliance' coalition. These unregulated rideshare corporations are reaping millions of dollars in profits off the backs of Chicago workers,' Ronnie Gonzalez, special representative to the machinists union's Midwest chapter, said at a City Hall news conference last month sparked by Block Club Chicago's reporting that Uber had overcharged local riders. 'It's time to hold these companies accountable and ensure that wealth created in Chicago stays in Chicago.' But the International Union of Operating Engineers Local 150 opposes the measure. The union, which has already signed a labor peace agreement with Uber to ease its driver-organizing efforts, believes it it is not 'the right timing' to move ahead on the pay raises, according to Marc Poulos, executive director of Local 150's labor-management group. Poulos said the New York-inspired legislation is 'fitting a square peg in a round hole.' While many drivers there are full-time professionals, many Chicago drivers work more flexibly for Uber and Lyft, he said. The ordinance could compel the companies to end that flexibility by making less dedicated drivers too expensive to employ, he said. He also believes the ordinance does not do enough for drivers regarding workplace injury and de-activation. 'There's just a number of things why we would love to see this ordinance be delayed,' Poulos said. But Rodriguez said he does not buy the claim that higher pay for drivers will lead to higher costs for riders. Prices have already risen, he said, and if they rise again, it 'would be a decision of the companies.' 'Industry will always say that the sky is falling when you're raising rates, but the fact is that we know increasing worker pay makes our economy better,' he said.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Schoharie County to be honored for voter turnout
The Schoharie County Board of Supervisors has announced that the county ranked first for voter turnout among 33 counties in New York with a population between 10,000 and 100,000 people in the November 2024 election. According to a news release rom the county, Schoharie had a 74% voter turnout rate in the November 2024 election. The 'Rejoice the Vote's' Votingest Award will be formally presented to the Board of Supervisors at its June 20 meeting on the third floor of the Schoharie County Office Building at 284 Main Street in Schoharie. The meeting will begin at 9 a.m. According to the release, the award is given by Rejoice the Vote, a non-profit, non-partisan project in Tompkins County 'whose mission is to honor this history of voting rights in the U.S. and to encourage a culture of voting as a critical right and a reason for joyful celebration.' Assemblyman Chris Tague, state Sen. Peter Oberacker and U.S. Rep. Elise Stefanik have been invited to the award ceremony, along with Election Commissioners Ken Schweigard and Clifford Hay, according to the release. Tague. R-Schoharie, said, 'It's an inspiring act of patriotism to see voters in Schoharie County showed up at the polls in November 2024 at such a high rate. One of the greatest civic challenges we face in the 21st century is inspiring voters to make their voices heard and show up on Election Day. A turnout rate of 74% in Schoharie County surpassed the turnout rate nationwide, and I feel so proud to represent a community that remains engaged and active in the voting process.'
