logo
Gold rises as weak US data outweighs optimism from Trump-Xi call

Gold rises as weak US data outweighs optimism from Trump-Xi call

The Sun13 hours ago

GOLD rose on Friday and was set for weekly gains, as a spate of soft U.S. economic data outweighed initial optimism over U.S. President Donald Trump's call with his Chinese counterpart Xi Jinping, while investors awaited U.S. payroll data.
Spot gold was up 0.3% at $3,363.33 an ounce, as of 0548 GMT. Bullion has gained 2.3% for the week so far.
U.S. gold futures climbed 0.4% to $3,387.
Trump and Xi engaged in a rare leader-to-leader call on Thursday, addressing escalating trade tensions and disputes over critical minerals, though key issues remain unresolved.
'Some of the initial enthusiasm for risk appetite following the Trump-Xi call has started to wear off, which has enabled gold to creep higher,' said Tim Waterer, chief market analyst at KCM Trade.
The number of Americans filing new applications for unemployment benefits increased to a seven-month high last week.
Investors are now awaiting U.S. nonfarm payroll data, due at 1230 GMT, after a slew of data throughout this week highlighting labor market softness.
Economists polled by Reuters forecast nonfarm payrolls increased by 130,000 jobs in May, while the unemployment rate is expected to remain steady at 4.2%.
'The upcoming NFP release could be the catalyst for a breakout should the data produce a significant miss on either side of expectations,' Waterer said.
Federal Reserve policymakers indicated that inflation remains a greater concern than labor market cooling, suggesting a prolonged hold on monetary policy adjustments.
Gold, often seen as a safe-haven asset, tends to perform well during economic uncertainty and in low-interest-rate environments.
On the physical front, elevated gold prices dampened buying across major Asian hubs this week. Discounts in India hit their highest levels in over a month.
Spot silver fell 0.7% to $35.92 per ounce, hovering near a 13-year high, while platinum rose 1.7% to $1,149.85 and palladium was up 0.7% at $1,012.60. All three metals were headed for weekly gains.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

U.S. stocks rally after key jobs report
U.S. stocks rally after key jobs report

The Star

time32 minutes ago

  • The Star

U.S. stocks rally after key jobs report

NEW YORK, June 6 (Xinhua) -- U.S. stocks advanced on Friday, as investors reacted positively to the U.S. nonfarm payroll report and growing signs that tensions between U.S. President Donald Trump and Tesla CEO Elon Musk may be cooling. The Dow Jones Industrial Average rose 443.13 points, or 1.05 percent, to 42,762.87. The S&P 500 added 61.06 points, or 1.03 percent, to 6,000.36, surpassing the 6,000 level for the first time since late February. The Nasdaq Composite Index increased 231.50 points, or 1.20 percent, to 19,529.95. All of the 11 primary S&P 500 sectors ended in green, with energy and communication services leading the gainers by rising 1.98 percent and 1.88 percent, respectively. Consumer staples posted the weakest growth, up by 0.18 percent. The U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that employers added 139,000 jobs in May, exceeding economists' expectations of 125,000. The unemployment rate held steady at 4.2 percent. The numbers reinforced the labor market's resilience, even as ongoing trade uncertainty continues to weigh on economic sentiment. "The nonfarm payrolls report came in better than expected," Anthony Saglimbene, chief market strategist at Ameriprise, said in an interview with CNBC. "It's showing that the labor market is holding up very well in spite of kind of some slowing growth trends." "The key figures in the May jobs report are better than solid, they are strong... For the Fed, this likely means they can stay in wait-and-see mode," said economists with Bank of America Global Research. Markets responded to the jobs report by pricing out a July cut and "we remain comfortable with our view that the Fed won't cut this year," said the economists in a research note. While inflation and tariffs have dominated headlines, some economists warn that declining immigration could pose an even greater drag on growth. Deutsche Bank noted that reduced immigration may have a more damaging long-term impact on the economy than trade policies. "While everyone is focused on the impact of tariffs, the real story for the U.S. economy is the collapse in immigration: down more than 90 percent compared to the run rate of previous years, equivalent to a slowing in labor force growth of more than 2 million people," Deutsche Bank's strategist George Saravelos wrote in a note on Friday. "This represents a far more sustained negative supply shock for the economy than tariffs." Tesla shares rebounded 3.82 percent after Thursday's 14.26 percent plunge, pushing the electric vehicle maker's valuation below the one-trillion-U.S.-dollar mark. The recovery helped ease broader concerns tied to the public dispute between Trump and Musk. Most large-cap tech stocks also moved higher. Alphabet climbed 3 percent, while Apple, Amazon, and Meta Platforms each gained around 2 percent. Nvidia added 1.21 percent, and Microsoft edged up 0.58 percent to 470.38, a fresh all-time high. Broadcom shares, however, dropped 5 percent despite solid quarterly earnings, as the company's outlook failed to meet expectations. In the bond market, the yield on the 10-year U.S. Treasury note climbed to 4.51 percent, up from 4.39 percent the previous day, marking its highest level in two weeks.

US Supreme Court allows DOGE broad access to Social Security data
US Supreme Court allows DOGE broad access to Social Security data

New Straits Times

time37 minutes ago

  • New Straits Times

US Supreme Court allows DOGE broad access to Social Security data

WASHINGTON: The US Supreme Court on Friday permitted the Department of Government Efficiency, a key player in President Donald Trump's drive to slash the federal workforce, broad access to personal information on millions of Americans in Social Security Administration data systems while a legal challenge plays out. At the request of the Justice Department, the justices put on hold Maryland-based US District Judge Ellen Hollander's order that had largely blocked DOGE's access to "personally identifiable information" in data such as medical and financial records while litigation proceeds in a lower court. Hollander found that allowing DOGE unfettered access likely would violate a federal privacy law. The court's brief, unsigned order did not provide a rationale for siding with DOGE. The court has a 6-3 conservative majority. Its three liberal justices dissented from the order. Liberal Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson, in a dissent that was joined by fellow liberal Justice Sonia Sotomayor, criticised the court's majority for granting DOGE "unfettered data access" despite the administration's "failure to show any need or any interest in complying with existing privacy safeguards." In a separate order on Friday, the Supreme Court extended its block on judicial orders requiring DOGE to turn over records to a government watchdog group that sought details on the entity established by Trump and Musk. DOGE swept through federal agencies as part of the Republican president's effort, spearheaded by billionaire Elon Musk, to eliminate federal jobs, downsize and reshape the US government and root out what they see as wasteful spending. Musk formally ended his government work on May 30. Two labour unions and an advocacy group sued to stop DOGE from accessing sensitive data at the Social Security Administration, or SSA, including Social Security numbers, bank account data, tax information, earnings history and immigration records. The agency is a major provider of government benefits, sending cheques each month to more than 70 million recipients including retirees and disabled Americans. Democracy Forward, a liberal legal group that represented the plaintiffs, said Friday's order would put millions of Americans' data at risk. "Elon Musk may have left Washington, D.C., but his impact continues to harm millions of people," the group said in a statement. "We will continue to use every legal tool at our disposal to keep unelected bureaucrats from misusing the public's most sensitive data as this case moves forward." In their lawsuit, the plaintiffs argued that the Social Security Administration had been "ransacked" and that DOGE members had been installed without proper vetting or training and demanded access to some of the agency's most sensitive data systems. Hollander in an April 17 ruling found that DOGE had failed to explain why its stated mission required "unprecedented, unfettered access to virtually SSA's entire data systems." "For some 90 years, SSA has been guided by the foundational principle of an expectation of privacy with respect to its records," Hollander wrote. "This case exposes a wide fissure in the foundation." Hollander issued a preliminary injunction that prohibited DOGE staffers and anyone working with them from accessing data containing personal information, with only narrow exceptions. The judge's ruling did allow DOGE affiliates to access data that had been stripped of private information as long as those seeking access had gone through the proper training and passed background checks. Hollander also ordered DOGE affiliates to "disgorge and delete" any personal information already in their possession. The Richmond, Virginia-based 4th US Circuit Court of Appeals in a 9-6 vote declined on April 30 to pause Hollander's block on DOGE's unlimited access to Social Security Administration records. Justice Department lawyers in their Supreme Court filing characterised Hollander's order as judicial overreach. "The district court is forcing the executive branch to stop employees charged with modernising government information systems from accessing the data in those systems because, in the court's judgment, those employees do not 'need' such access," they wrote. The six dissenting judges wrote that the case should have been treated the same as one in which a 4th Circuit panel ruled 2-1 to allow DOGE to access data at the US Treasury and Education Departments and the Office of Personnel Management. In a concurring opinion, seven judges who ruled against DOGE wrote that the case involving Social Security data was "substantially stronger" with "vastly greater stakes," citing "detailed and profoundly sensitive Social Security records," such as family court and school records of children, mental health treatment records and credit card information.

ZBIO Deadline: ZBIO Investors with Losses in Excess of $100K Have Opportunity to Lead Zenas BioPharma, Inc. Securities Lawsuit Filed by The Rosen Law Firm
ZBIO Deadline: ZBIO Investors with Losses in Excess of $100K Have Opportunity to Lead Zenas BioPharma, Inc. Securities Lawsuit Filed by The Rosen Law Firm

Malaysian Reserve

time4 hours ago

  • Malaysian Reserve

ZBIO Deadline: ZBIO Investors with Losses in Excess of $100K Have Opportunity to Lead Zenas BioPharma, Inc. Securities Lawsuit Filed by The Rosen Law Firm

NEW YORK, June 6, 2025 /PRNewswire/ — Why: Rosen Law Firm, a global investor rights law firm, reminds purchasers of the securities of Zenas BioPharma, Inc. (NASDAQ: ZBIO) pursuant and/or traceable to the registration statement and prospectus (collectively, the 'Registration Statement') issued in connection with Zenas BioPharma's September 2024 initial public offering ('IPO' or the 'Offering'), of the important June 16, 2025 lead plaintiff deadline in the securities class action first filed by the Firm. So What: If you purchased Zenas BioPharma securities you may be entitled to compensation without payment of any out of pocket fees or costs through a contingency fee arrangement. What to do next: To join the Zenas BioPharma class action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email case@ for information on the class action. A class action lawsuit has already been filed. If you wish to serve as lead plaintiff, you must move the Court no later than June 16, 2025. A lead plaintiff is a representative party acting on behalf of other class members in directing the litigation. Why Rosen Law: We encourage investors to select qualified counsel with a track record of success in leadership roles. Often, firms issuing notices do not have comparable experience, resources or any meaningful peer recognition. Many of these firms do not actually litigate securities class actions, but are merely middlemen that refer clients or partner with law firms that actually litigate the cases. Be wise in selecting counsel. The Rosen Law Firm represents investors throughout the globe, concentrating its practice in securities class actions and shareholder derivative litigation. Rosen Law Firm achieved the largest ever securities class action settlement against a Chinese Company at the time. Rosen Law Firm was Ranked No. 1 by ISS Securities Class Action Services for number of securities class action settlements in 2017. The firm has been ranked in the top 4 each year since 2013 and has recovered hundreds of millions of dollars for investors. In 2019 alone the firm secured over $438 million for investors. In 2020, founding partner Laurence Rosen was named by law360 as a Titan of Plaintiffs' Bar. Many of the firm's attorneys have been recognized by Lawdragon and Super Lawyers. Details of the case: According to the lawsuit, the Registration Statement contained false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) Zenas BioPharma materially overstated the amount of time it would be able to fund its operations using existing cash and expected net proceeds from the IPO; and (2) as a result, defendants' public statements were materially false and misleading at all relevant times and negligently prepared. When the true details entered the market, the lawsuit claims that investors suffered damages. To join the Zenas BioPharma action, go to or call Phillip Kim, Esq. toll-free at 866-767-3653 or email case@ for information on the class action. No Class Has Been Certified. Until a class is certified, you are not represented by counsel unless you retain one. You may select counsel of your choice. You may also remain an absent class member and do nothing at this point. An investor's ability to share in any potential future recovery is not dependent upon serving as lead plaintiff. Follow us for updates on LinkedIn: on Twitter: or on Facebook: Attorney Advertising. Prior results do not guarantee a similar outcome. Contact Information: Laurence Rosen, Esq. Phillip Kim, Esq. The Rosen Law Firm, P.A. 275 Madison Avenue, 40th Floor New York, NY 10016 Tel: (212) 686-1060 Toll Free: (866) 767-3653 Fax: (212) 202-3827 case@

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store