Judge orders charges dismissed for migrants accused of trespassing on military property
U.S. Magistrate Judge Gregory B. Wormuth found no probable cause to believe that the migrants knew they were entering a military zone and thus 'willfully' trespassed. Wormuth dismissed trespassing charges against 22 migrants who made their initial court appearances on Thursday, but they still face illegal entry charges. The judge has dismissed charges related to trespassing against more than 100 migrants so far.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
25 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Have Trump's Tariffs Slowed the Stock Market?
President Donald Trump signed Executive Order 14257 on April 2, a move that he called 'Liberation Day.' Why? Because that executive order, along with Trump using the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), implemented a series of tariffs upon nearly all of America's trading partners, an act Trump defended as liberating the United States from what he called unfair trade deals of the past. Be Aware: Read Next: The signing of that executive order has created a summer of economic uncertainty both for America as well as its many trade partners. Trump instituted a baseline 10% on those trade partners, followed by a series of additional tariffs for some countries, while decreasing tariffs for others, or even pausing tariffs for certain countries to allow for further negotiation. In America, the looming threat of tariffs has created a fair amount of buyer concern — tariffs mean higher consumer prices here at home, and both shoppers and businesses alike have spent the summer waiting for the near-inevitable price-hikes. So it comes as no surprise that Trump's somewhat shocking Liberation Day announcement immediately caused global markets to crash in response to such a bold move. The markets eventually absorbed the news and righted themselves. That said, has the continued yo-yoing of tariff threats slowed the stock market? The Impact of Tariffs on the Stock Market The answer is yes. First, there was the initial market crashes in response to the news. Trump's announced tariffs were far more extreme than what experts and analysts predicted, and the April announcement was seen was a 'worse than the worst case scenario' by economists — the Dow Jones fell 3.98%, the Nasdaq Composite dropped 5.97% and the broad market index collapsed by 4.84%, the worst showing for each since the summer of 2020 when COVID ravaged the country and its economy. That isn't the only time Trump's tariffs have torpedoed the stock market, though. With almost every newly-announced increase in tariffs against a certain country, the markets tend to dive in response. Check Out: For example, August 2025 began with markets across the planet dropping in response to Trump's newest tariffs against America's partners, with S&P falling 1.6%, the Dow dropping by 1.23% and the Nasdaq Composite slipping by 2.24%, per CNN. This was Nasdaq's biggest single-day dip since April, and the S&P 500's biggest fall since May. All markets had been on a two-week rise prior to this most recent announcement. That April to August rollercoaster has been the pattern of the stock market for the summer — markets will be on the climb, Trump will announce a new flurry of tariffs, and stocks will drop in panic regarding the news, slowing whatever progress the market had accumulated. Trump's tariffs may ultimately lead to more equitable trade deals for America, but they've definitely come at a cost, frequently slowing the stock market with each new tariff. Editor's note on political coverage: GOBankingRates is nonpartisan and strives to cover all aspects of the economy objectively and present balanced reports on politically focused finance stories. You can find more coverage of this topic on More From GOBankingRates 5 Old Navy Items Retirees Need To Buy Ahead of Fall 7 Tax Loopholes the Rich Use To Pay Less and Build More Wealth This article originally appeared on Have Trump's Tariffs Slowed the Stock Market? Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Associated Press
25 minutes ago
- Associated Press
What to know about how Trump's judicial picks could reshape abortion rights for decades
CHICAGO (AP) — A review by The Associated Press shows that several of President Donald Trump's nominees to the federal courts have revealed anti-abortion views, been associated with anti-abortion groups or defended abortion restrictions. Several have helped defend their state's abortion restrictions in court and some have been involved in cases with national impact, including on access to medication abortion. While Trump has said issues related to abortion should be left to the states, the nominees, with lifetime appointments, would be in position to roll back abortion rights long after Trump leaves the White House. Trump has been inconsistent on abortion Trump has repeatedly shifted his messaging on abortion, often giving contradictory or vague answers. In the years before his most recent presidential campaign, Trump had voiced support for a federal ban on abortion on or after 20 weeks in pregnancy and said he might support a national ban around 15 weeks. He later settled on messaging that decisions about abortion access should be left to the states. Throughout his campaign, Trump has alternated between taking credit for appointing the Supreme Court justices who helped overturn Roe v. Wade and striking a more neutral tone. That's been an effort to navigate the political divide between his base of anti-abortion supporters and the broader public, which largely supports access to abortion. Many nominees have anti-abortion backgrounds One Trump nominee called abortion a 'barbaric practice' while another referred to himself as a 'zealot' for the anti-abortion movement. A nominee from Tennessee said abortion deserves special scrutiny because 'this is the only medical procedure that terminates a life.' One from Missouri spread misinformation about medication abortion, including that it 'starves the baby to death in the womb' in a lawsuit aiming to challenge the Food and Drug Administration's approval of the abortion pill mifepristone. Legal experts and abortion rights advocates warn of a methodical remaking of the federal courts in a way that could pose enduring threats to abortion access nationwide. Bernadette Meyler, a professor of constitutional law at Stanford University, said judicial appointments 'are a way of federally shaping the abortion question without going through Congress or making a big, explicit statement.' 'It's a way to cover up a little bit what is happening in the abortion sphere compared to legislation or executive orders that may be more visible, dramatic and spark more backlash,' she said. The nominees represent Trump's 'promises' to Americans, White House says Harrison Fields, a White House spokesperson, said 'every nominee of the President represents his promises to the American people and aligns with the U.S. Supreme Court's landmark ruling.' 'The Democrats' extreme position on abortion was rejected in November in favor of President Trump's commonsense approach, which allows states to decide, supports the sanctity of human life, and prevents taxpayer funding of abortion,' Fields said in a statement to the AP. Trump focused primarily on the economy and immigration during his 2024 campaign, the issues that surveys showed were the most important topics for voters. Anti-abortion groups, abortion rights advocates respond Anti-abortion advocates say it's premature to determine whether the nominees will support their objectives but that they're hopeful based on the names put forth so far. 'We look forward to four more years of nominees cut from that mold,' said Katie Glenn Daniel, director of legal affairs for the national anti-abortion organization SBA Pro-Life America. Abortion rights advocates said Trump is embedding abortion opponents into the judiciary one judge at a time 'This just feeds into this larger strategy where Trump has gotten away with distancing himself from abortion, saying he's going to leave it to the states, while simultaneously appointing anti-abortion extremists at all levels of government,' said Mini Timmaraju, president of the national abortion rights organization Reproductive Freedom for All.
Washington Post
25 minutes ago
- Washington Post
Trump has said abortion is a state issue. His judicial picks could shape it nationally for decades
CHICAGO — One called abortion a 'barbaric practice.' Another referred to himself as a 'zealot' for the anti-abortion movement. Several have played prominent roles in defending their state's abortion restrictions in court and in cases that have had national impact, including on access to medication abortion . As President Donald Trump pushes the Senate to confirm his federal judicial nominees, a review by The Associated Press shows that roughly half of them have revealed anti-abortion views, been associated with anti-abortion groups or defended abortion restrictions.
