MP CM Yadav to attend 25th Central Zonal Council meeting chaired by Union Minister Amit Shah in Varanasi today
During the meeting, key issues including regional security, development, health, administrative coordination, and state-specific concerns will be discussed.
The Central Zonal Council aims to strengthen cooperation among states, resolve inter-state disputes through dialogue, deliberate on matters of common interest, ensure equitable utilisation of natural resources, and promote developmental activities in sensitive regions.
The Central Zonal Council comprises the states of Chhattisgarh, Madhya Pradesh, Uttarakhand, and Uttar Pradesh. The meeting is being organised by the Inter-State Council Secretariat under the Ministry of Home Affairs in collaboration with the Uttar Pradesh government.
Under Sections 15 to 22 of the States Reorganisation Act, 1956, five Zonal Councils were established. The Union Home Minister is the chairperson of these five Zonal Councils, and the Chief Ministers, Lieutenant Governors and Administrators of the member states and Union Territories are their members.
Among these members, the Chief Minister of one member state (rotating every year) acts as the vice-chairperson. From each member state, the governor nominates two ministers as council members. Each Zonal Council has also formed a permanent committee at the level of the Chief Secretaries.
Issues proposed by the states are initially presented to the permanent committee of the concerned Zonal Council for discussion. After consideration by the permanent committee, the remaining issues are then presented to the Zonal Council meeting for further deliberation.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has emphasised the need to leverage cooperative and competitive federalism for the country's all-around development.
With the belief that strong states make a strong nation, the Zonal Councils provide a structured mechanism for dialogue and discussion on issues affecting two or more states or the Centre and states, and through this, serve as an important platform to enhance cooperation.
The role of the Zonal Councils is advisory; however, over the past few years, these councils have proven to be an important factor in promoting healthy bonds of mutual understanding and cooperation in various fields. With the cooperation of all state governments, central ministries, and departments, a total of 61 meetings of the various Zonal Councils and their permanent committees have been held in the last eleven years.
The Zonal Councils also discuss broad issues of national importance, including the speedy investigation of cases of sexual offenses against women and children and the implementation of Fast Track Special Courts (FTSC) for their swift disposal; providing brick-and-mortar banking facilities within the designated area of every village; implementation of the Emergency Response Support System (ERSS-112); and various regional-level common interest issues such as strengthening nutrition, education, health, electricity, urban planning, and the cooperative system. (ANI)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
Business Standard
7 minutes ago
- Business Standard
AI171 crash: US attorney seeks probe data, eyes lawsuit against Boeing
Mike Andrews, the lead US attorney representing more than 65 families impacted by the Air India AI171 crash, has called for full transparency in the investigation. "We want to know the truth, we want transparency and exactly what happened," Andrews told news agency ANI. "These families want to know, and they deserve the respect to know what happened to their loved ones." A report by The Economic Times quoted Andrews as saying that if the flight data recorder (FDR) and cockpit voice recorder (CVR) findings point to technical faults as the cause of the crash, he would move US courts to pursue a product liability case against Boeing. 'We are placing formal requests with the Air India and AAIB (Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau) to release the details of the FDR, which will reveal a great deal about the accident,' he told The Economic Times. Andrews also met the lone survivor and his family, describing them as "humble and hardworking" people who are enduring unimaginable pain. He added that investigators are exploring multiple possible causes, including a malfunction in the throttle control system. "One question is whether or not moisture can affect the systems and cause a problem," he said. Anger over compensation delays The US attorney criticised the slow pace of compensation, calling it a 'bureaucratic process' that would not have existed under the leadership of the late Ratan Tata. "Even in the US, we know who Ratan Tata was," Andrews said. "We know about his work ethic and his humility. If he were here today, we don't believe victims and their families would be subjected to delayed payments." On July 26, Air India released an interim compensation of ₹25 lakh each to the families of 147 passengers and 19 victims on the ground. This amount will be adjusted against the final settlement later. Tata Group's memorial and support The Tata Group has also set up the "AI-171 Memorial and Welfare Trust" in memory of the victims. The Trust has pledged an ex gratia of ₹1 crore per deceased individual, while also funding the rebuilding of the damaged BJ Medical College Hostel and extending support to first responders and medical teams. On June 12, Air India flight AI171, a Boeing 787-8, crashed shortly after takeoff from Ahmedabad's Sardar Vallabhbhai Patel International Airport. The accident killed 260 people — 229 passengers, 12 crew members, and 19 people on the ground. Air India CEO on flight safety Following the tragedy, Air India CEO Campbell Wilson addressed frequent flyers through an email, saying their concerns about safety were 'understandable". He assured that the airline is strengthening checks, inspections, and training to ensure safer operations. India's aviation regulator, the DGCA, recently issued four show cause notices to Air India over repeated safety lapses, including issues with crew deployment, pilot rest rules, and training. DGCA records show 19 top-level safety findings in the past year across Air India Group airlines — 10 in Vistara, seven in Air India, and two in Air India Express. Other Indian carriers recorded none in this category. The regulator clarified that higher observations are 'normal' for larger airlines but stressed that immediate corrective action is required. Air India crash: What the preliminary report found The Aircraft Accident Investigation Bureau's (AAIB) initial findings revealed that both fuel control switches had been moved to the 'cutoff' position, cutting supply to the engines shortly after take-off. The report found one pilot questioning the move, while the other denying making it. Wilson, in his note to customers, added, 'All our processes are backed by a comprehensive Safety Management System aligned with global standards and fully compliant with DGCA and ICAO guidelines.'
Hindustan Times
7 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
Himachal CM urges Centre to relax land, forest Act for disaster victims
Himachal Pradesh chief minister Sukhwinder Singh Sukhu on Saturday urged the Union government to provide at least one bigha of land to families whose homes and farmlands have been washed away in the ongoing monsoon disaster, and to relax provisions of the Forest Conservation Act, 1980, to make forest land available for rehabilitation. Chief minister Sukhvinder Singh Sukhu during the Independence-Day celebrations at Sarkaghat in Mandi district on Friday. (ANI Photo) 'In Himachal, 68% of land falls under forests, and the Forest Conservation Act applies there. The state government cannot use even one inch of that land for rehabilitation or to provide to the needy. I appeal to the Centre to relax this law so that land can be made available to disaster-hit families,' Sukhu told reporters. The chief minister said that the state government has already announced a special package for Mandi district, the worst-affected by floods and landslides. 'Certainly, the maximum benefit will go to the Seraj assembly constituency, which has suffered the most damage. Even if a relative donates land to a family, the state government will pay the registration fee. Many affected families do not want to return to the damaged areas, and for their resettlement, we need the Union government's support,' he said. Sukhu recalled that in 2023, the assembly had passed a resolution seeking ₹10,000 crore in special relief aid from the Centre, but alleged that the BJP did not support the move at the time. 'Now, a BJP delegation has met central leaders for relief. That is welcome. We too are waiting for a special package release soon,' he said, adding he had met Prime Minister Narendra Modi and home minister Amit Shah, who had also sent a scientific team to study the recurring pattern of disasters. On V-C appointment row, says will meet governor On the row over advertisements for vice-chancellor posts at Dr YS Parmar Horticulture University, Nauni in Solan district, and the agricultural university at Palampur, Sukhu said the matter was misrepresented to the governor by officials. 'Whatever has been done is with cabinet approval and state legislation. I will meet the governor to resolve the issue. I respect the governor and have always worked in line with his advice,' he said, but added that 'constitutional powers rest with the state legislature, and those directives must be respected'. Governor Shiv Pratap Shukla, while refraining from commenting on the high court stay on the V-C appointment matter, defended his stand. 'For the universities, whatever I did was in their interest. The court has stayed it, and I respect that. Whatever has to be done, I will do. I will leave it to the people of Himachal to decide why such steps were taken with Nauni and Palampur universities,' he said. Shukla also recalled his recent visit to a disaster-hit region, praising the resilience of local residents. 'I appreciate the courage of Himachal residents. I was afraid on that road, but they were driving fearlessly. When I went to distribute relief material, I saw respect in their hearts for one another. That is a big thing about Himachal, something rare in other places,' he added. Monsoon inflicted heavy loss: Agnihotri Deputy chief minister Mukesh Agnihotri underlined the scale of losses suffered in the monsoon in the state in the past two years. 'For the last two years, Himachal has faced heavy damage. Last year, losses exceeded ₹10,000 crore, yet we did not get adequate help from the Centre. This year again, huge losses have been incurred, especially in the Jal Shakti department, where many water schemes have been washed away,' he said. Agnihotri said the government has revised the relief package announced after last year's disaster. 'Earlier we had given ₹7 lakh for fully damaged houses. Now we have increased support, including compensation for animals lost and land damaged. We have authorised deputy commissioners to notify new areas as disaster-affected so they can also be covered under relief,' he said. On the delayed unveiling of the statue of former CM Virbhadra Singh at the Ridge Maidan in Shimla, Agnihotri clarified that it was postponed due to adverse weather. 'Virbhadra Singh ji was a towering leader who ruled the hearts of people for 50 years. Just as Dr YS Parmar created Himachal, Virbhadra Singh shaped modern Himachal. His statue will be dedicated to the public as soon as the weather improves, with participation of our central leadership,' he said.
The Hindu
37 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Governors are not aliens, but checks on States' ‘hasty legislation': Centre to Supreme Court
The Union government has said the Supreme Court cannot treat Governors as 'aliens' or 'foreigners' on whom timelines can be imposed and whose discretion do not count. The submission by the Centre, made in a note authored by Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, is part of the record in a Presidential Reference hearing scheduled before a Constitution Bench headed by Chief Justice of India B.R. Gavai from August 19. The Presidential Reference stems from an April 8 judgment pronounced by a Supreme Court Bench of Justices J.B. Pardiwala and R. Mahadevan in a petition filed by the Tamil Nadu government, which had challenged Governor R.N. Ravi's delay in clearing 10 re-passed Bills and his subsequent action to reserve them for consideration by the President. The two-judge Bench had thrust a three-month deadline on State Governors and the President to deal with State Bills sent to them for approval or consideration, respectively. It had concluded that Governors enjoyed no discretion while dealing with these Bills, and were totally bound by the 'aid and advice' of the State Legislature concerned. The Division Bench had even invoked Article 142 of the Constitution to grant 'deemed assent' to 'delayed' State Bills. The April 8 judgment had further directed that the President must seek advice from the Supreme Court under Article 143 (advisory jurisdiction) in case of any vexing State Bills. The written submissions of Tamil Nadu, represented by senior advocate P. Wilson, countered that the Presidential Reference mechanism cannot be used to reopen or nullify binding judgments of the apex court itself. Questions on the powers of the President and the Governors as regards State Bills have already been settled by the April 8 judgment. Entertaining the Reference now would erode the finality attached to Supreme Court judgments under Article 141 of the Constitution. Tamil Nadu submitted the court was not bound to answer every Presidential Reference made to it But Mr. Mehta maintained the April judgment of the court had clearly trenched upon a zone exclusive to the President and the Governors. 'Governors are not to be treated as alien/foreigner in the federating units of the Union. Governors are not just emissaries of the Centre. The Governors possess democratic legitimacy through indirect democratic representation. Governors are appointed by the President on the aid and advice of the Council of Ministers… Governors are constitutional actors,' Mr. Mehta submitted. The law officer argued the nature of gubernatorial assent has a unique duality of character. Though the assent is given by an apex Executive authority, the act itself is legislative in nature. The Supreme Court's approach ought to have been more calibrated. The Centre's law officer submitted that neither Article 200 (Governor's power to assent to State Bills) nor Article 201 (President's power to consider State Bills referred to her by the Governor for consideration) provided any specific time limit. 'The absence of any express time limit in Articles 200 and 201 is a deliberate and conscious constitutional choice. The judicial direction of imposition of any timeline would amount to an amendment to the Constitution,' Mr. Mehta emphasised. The note asked if the court could invoke Article 142 and assume powers under Article 200 and 201 to grant deemed assent to 'delayed' State Bills. 'The alleged failure, inaction, or error of one organ does not and cannot authorise another organ to assume powers that the Constitution has not vested in it. Article 142 does not empower the court to create a concept of 'deemed assent', turning the constitutional and legislative process on its head,' Mr. Mehta put forth. The Centre said a Governor was not a mere post office, but a check on 'hasty legislation' by the States. A Governor was not precluded from exercising discretion under Article 200 to grant assent, withhold assent, reserve a Bill for the President's consideration or return the same to the Legislative Assembly, even in the absence of aid and advice to that effect. 'The Governor's assent cannot be a mechanical process… Situations may arise where the Governor may need to take a view independently of the Council of Ministers,' Mr. Mehta argued. Moreover, the Union government said directing the President to consult the Supreme Court under Article 143 in case of any doubts about State Bills would effectively turn a constitutional prerogative into a judicial mandate. 'An absolute discretion lies with the President to seek advice. The term 'consult' means the President is not bound to do so,' Mr. Mehta submitted.
