
America has a health care affordability gap. Congress is working toward change.
A resounding majority of voters — nearly 80 percent, according to a recent poll by Fabrizio Ward — say it's time the middle class has a dedicated tool to help them offset runaway health care costs. Yet the complexities and sheer size of our health care system make finding solutions seem insurmountable to many and divisive among the policymakers working toward change.
Even as leaders in Congress are focusing on the myriad of issues driving up the cost of care, such as prescription price hikes, lack of price transparency, and bureaucratic red tape, costs continue to climb. Americans can't afford to wait any longer.
That is why we are reaching across the aisle and supporting the Health Out-of-Pocket Expense Act, or HOPE Act, to give over 100 million eligible Americans the chance to manage their health care expenses. By advancing bipartisan legislation, we can bridge the health care affordability gap, help hardworking Americans receive the care they need, promote better health care outcomes, and work toward becoming a healthier nation.
The HOPE Act, with its broad eligibility and tax advantages, offers a structured and personal way to save for future health needs. The legislation introduces HOPE Accounts, an innovative savings tool designed to help individuals and families plan for medical costs. Individuals and their employers can contribute to a personal account that stays with them forever, untethered to their job, giving people a new way to save for future health expenses, from a routine visit to preventative care to an unforeseen emergency.
Most appealing to Americans is the portability of HOPE Accounts, meaning the funds can never be lost, even when they change jobs. It's security for the long run.
The HOPE Act offers a lifeline for families and individuals who find themselves battling these ever-rising costs, the consequences of which are illustrated both by data and constituent stories. A staggering 45 percent of adults in the U.S. can't afford care when they need it — a 6-point increase since 2022. Families are delaying or altogether skipping out on medical treatment simply out of fear of health care costs, threatening their physical health and adding to anxieties and stress.
Nearly one in three American adults avoided seeking needed care in three months alone, while others, often living paycheck to paycheck, are forced to choose between their health and affording other basic, essential needs from paying off bills and credit cards to buying food for their families.
Worse yet, when care can no longer be avoided, Americans find themselves dipping into their life savings. In the most severe yet all too common cases, patients attempt to buy time by using credit cards or otherwise face medical debt and even bankruptcy.
Americans coming from middle- or lower-income backgrounds are hit hardest, disproportionately affected by out-of-pocket expenses and the consequences of an inability to pay. For these individuals, balancing basic living expenses with unforeseen health care needs can be devastating no matter how hard they work to make ends meet.
The HOPE Act is not a complicated overhaul of the health care system, nor is it a narrow program with eligibility restrictions. It's a straightforward, common-sense solution that empowers families to take control of their health care expenses in a financially responsible way.
As health care costs rise, it is essential for Congress to work toward solutions that not only address the immediate need for affordable care but also equip people from all walks of life with tools that prepare them for future challenges. The HOPE Act does just that, empowering over 100 million people to manage and protect their health. We already have momentum with an endorsement from the Problem Solvers Caucus, a 62-member group evenly split between Republicans and Democrats and committed to advancing solutions by finding common ground. It's time for our other House colleagues to follow suit.
While this solution alone may not completely solve the health care affordability crisis, it is certainly a step in the right direction. Times have seemingly never been more unpredictable. But the HOPE Act is an opportunity for Congress to come together, show bipartisanship, and provide the critical lifeline working families need to take their health, security and futures back into their own hands.
Rep. Blake Moore (R) represents Utah's 1st Congressional District and is a member of the Ways and Means Committee. Jimmy Panetta (D) represents California's 19th Congressional District and is a member of the Ways and Means Committee.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
"They Should Send The Epstein List To Everyone's Phones Like That U2 Album": 49 Political Tweets From The Last Month That Are Too Good Not To Share
Editor's Note: While we can't endorse what X has become, we can bring you the worthwhile moments that still exist there, curated and free of the surrounding chaos. American politics — well, frankly, global politics — is chaos right now, but I find it comforting to know I'm not alone in thinking the world has gone bananas. So, here are 49 of the best, most relatable, and sometimes funny political tweets from the last month: 1. 2. 3. Twitter: @caitcamelia 4. 5. Related: 6. 7. @AJA_Cortes / Twitter: @AJA_Cortes 8. Note: A different image of Omar was used here due to photo rights. 9. 10. 11. Note: The image of Trump in the original tweet was replaced here due to photo rights. 12. 13. 14. 15. 16. Related: 17. 18. 19. 20. 21. 22. RSBN / Twitter: @FPWellman 23. 24. 25. Related: 26. 27. 28. 29. Elevation Pictures / Twitter: @evermoresivy 30. Fox News / @hasanthehun / Twitter: @hasanthehun 31. 32. 33. 34. 35. Note: The images in the original tweet were replaced with the meme due to photo rights. 36. C-SPAN / Twitter: @hemantmehta 37. 38. Related: 39. 40. 41. 42. 43. 44. 45. 46. 47. 48. 49. And finally: Twitter: @carlyincontro See you next time! For more political tweets, check out our most recent roundup: "Straight-up Orwellian": 25 Of The Very, Very, Very Best Political Tweets Of The Week Also in In the News: Also in In the News: Also in In the News:


Time Magazine
22 minutes ago
- Time Magazine
Marjorie Taylor Greene Signals Potential Split From GOP
Georgia Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene, who has historically been closely aligned with President Donald Trump's MAGA movement, is proclaiming her discontent with the current trajectory of the Republican Party. 'I don't know what the hell happened with the Republican Party,' Greene told the Daily Mail in an interview published over the weekend. 'But I'll tell you one thing, the course that it's on, I don't want to have anything to do with it, and I, I just don't care anymore.' While Greene said that she is still loyal to Trump, she told the outlet that she thinks the party 'has turned its back on America First and the workers and just regular Americans.' On Monday, the Georgia lawmaker appeared to criticize the Trump Administration's handling of various issues on social media. In one post, she included an image that said 'number of arrests' and listed several incidents or events—including an apparent reference to the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the U.S. Capitol, 'pedophile arrests' related to convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, and the '2020 election'—with the number zero next to each one. Greene captioned the post, 'Don't talk about it if you aren't going to do it.' In another post the same day, she noted that 'our Republican controlled Congress is no where near completing our appropriations bills' ahead of a Sept. 30 deadline, and that lawmakers are on recess until Sept. 2. 'The American people pay ALL the taxes and deserve their representatives to do our jobs and put Americans needs and interests FIRST,' she wrote. Greene has made a handful of other critical comments toward her fellow Republican lawmakers or the Trump Administration in recent weeks. On July 28, Greene became the first Republican in Congress to call the situation in Gaza a 'genocide,' taking the step in a post denouncing what she called an 'awful statement' from her Republican colleague Rep. Randy Fine of Florida regarding the conflict. Earlier that month, she criticized the Trump Administration's handling of files related to Epstein's case, calling it 'a red line that it crosses for many people.' Both issues have been the subject of broader tensions within the Republican Party, as deepening divides have emerged between lawmakers over the conflict in Gaza and as the Trump Administration has faced fierce backlash from the President's MAGA base over Epstein. Polling has also suggested other trouble for Trump and congressional Republicans. The President hit the lowest approval rating of his second term late last month as he lost support from Independents. And the massive tax and spending bill the GOP passed earlier in July—a signature piece of Trump's agenda—appears to be the most unpopular piece of major legislation in decades. In her interview with the Daily Mail, Greene said she wants to stop foreign aid, cut down on government spending via the Department of Government Efficiency, and reign in the national debt. The Georgia lawmaker also told the outlet that she thinks Republican women 'are really sick and tired of the way men treat' them. She said that Republican Rep. Elise Stefanik of New York, whose nomination to serve as the U.S. representative at the United Nations was pulled by the Trump Administration earlier this year, 'got shafted.' Greene didn't blame the President specifically for the move, but rather 'the people in the White House.' She called it 'weird' that Mike Waltz was then tapped for the role, being reassigned from his position as National Security Adviser, even after The Atlantic revealed that he had apparently added its editor in chief to a private Signal group chat that was being used to discuss sensitive military operations. 'How does he get awarded after 'Signalgate'?' Greene told the Daily Mail. 'I don't know if the Republican Party is leaving me, or if I'm kind of not relating to Republican Party as much anymore,' she said. 'I don't know which one it is.'


San Francisco Chronicle
23 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
Modi and Trump once called each other good friends. Now the US-India relationship is getting bumpy
NEW DELHI (AP) — The men shared bear hugs, showered praise on each other and made appearances side by side at stadium rallies — a big optics boost for two populist leaders with ideological similarities. Each called the other a good friend. In India, the bonhomie between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and U.S. President Donald Trump was seen as a relationship like no other. That is, until a series of events gummed up the works. From Trump's tariffs and India's purchase of oil from Russia to a U.S. tilt towards Pakistan, friction between New Delhi and Washington has been hard to miss. And much of it has happened far from the corridors of power and, unsurprisingly, through Trump's posts on social media. It has left policy experts wondering whether the camaraderie the two leaders shared may be a thing of the past, even though Trump has stopped short of referring to Modi directly on social media. The dip in rapport, some say, puts a strategic bilateral relationship built over decades at risk. 'This is a testing time for the relationship,' said Ashok Malik, a former policy adviser in India's Foreign Ministry. Simmering tensions over trade and tariffs The latest hiccup between India and the U.S. emerged last week when Trump announced that he was slapping 25% tariffs on India as well as an unspecified penalty because of India's purchasing of Russian oil. For New Delhi, such a move from its largest trading partner is expected to be felt across sectors, but it also led to a sense of unease in India — even more so when Trump, on social media, called India's economy 'dead.' Trump's recent statements reflect his frustration with the pace of trade talks with India, according to a White House official who was not authorized to speak publicly and spoke on condition of anonymity to describe internal administration thinking. The Republican president has not been pursuing any strategic realignment with Pakistan, according to the official, but is instead trying to play hardball in negotiations. Trump doubled down on the pressure Monday with a fresh post on Truth Social, in which he accused India of buying 'massive amounts' of oil from Russia and then 'selling it on the Open Market for big profits.' 'They don't care how many people in Ukraine are being killed by the Russian War Machine. Because of this, I will be substantially raising the Tariff paid by India to the USA,' he said. The messaging appears to have stung Modi's administration, which has been hard-selling negotiations with Trump's team over a trade deal by balancing between India's protectionist system while also opening up the country's market to more American goods. Many expected India to react strongly considering Modi's carefully crafted reputation of strength. Instead, the announcement prompted a rather careful response from India's commerce minister, Piyush Goyal, who said the two countries are working towards a 'fair, balanced and mutually beneficial bilateral trade agreement.' India's Foreign Ministry also played down suggestions of any strain. However, experts in New Delhi wonder. 'Strenuous, uninterrupted and bipartisan efforts in both capitals over the past 25 years are being put at risk by not just the tariffs but by fast and loose statements and social media posts,' said Malik, who now heads the India chapter of The Asia Group, a U.S. advisory firm . Malik also said the trade deal the Indian side has offered to the U.S. is the 'most expansive in this country's history,' referring to reports that India was willing to open up to some American agricultural products. That is a politically sensitive issue for Modi, who faced a yearlong farmers' protest a few years ago. Trump appears to be tilting towards Pakistan The unraveling may have gained momentum over tariffs, but the tensions have been palpable for a while. Much of it has to do with Trump growing closer to Pakistan, India's nuclear rival in the neighborhood. In May, India and Pakistan traded a series of military strikes over a gun massacre in disputed Kashmir that New Delhi blamed Islamabad for. Pakistan denied the accusations. The four-day conflict made the possibility of a nuclear conflagration between the two sides seem real and the fighting only stopped when global powers intervened. But it was Trump's claims of mediation and an offer to work to provide a 'solution' regarding the dispute over Kashmir that made Modi's administration uneasy. Since then, Trump has repeated nearly two dozen times that he brokered peace between India and Pakistan. For Modi, that is a risky — even nervy — territory. Domestically, he has positioned himself as a leader who is tough on Pakistan. Internationally, he has made huge diplomatic efforts to isolate the country. So Trump's claims cut a deep wound, prompting a sense in India that the U.S. may no longer be its strategic partner. India insists that Kashmir is India's internal issue and had opposed any third-party intervention. Last week Modi appeared to dismiss Trump's claims after India's Opposition began demanding answers from him. Modi said that 'no country in the world stopped' the fighting between India and Pakistan, but he did not name Trump. Trump has also appeared to be warming up to Pakistan, even praising its counterterrorism efforts. Hours after levying tariffs on India, Trump announced a 'massive' oil exploration deal with Pakistan, saying that some day, India might have to buy oil from Islamabad. Earlier, he also hosted one of Pakistan's top military officials at a private lunch. Sreeram Sundar Chaulia, an expert at New Delhi's Jindal School of International Affairs, said Trump's sudden admiration for Pakistan as a great partner in counterterrorism has 'definitely soured' the mood in India. Chaulia said 'the best-case scenario is that this is just a passing Trump whim,' but he also warned that 'if financial and energy deals are indeed being struck between the U.S. and Pakistan, it will dent the U.S.-India strategic partnership and lead to loss of confidence in the U.S. in Indian eyes.' India's oil purchases from Russia are an irritant The strain in relations has also to do with oil. India had faced strong pressure from the Biden administration to cut back its oil purchases from Moscow during the early months of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Instead, India bought more, making it the second-biggest buyer of Russian oil after China. That pressure sputtered over time and the U.S. focused more on building strategic ties with India, which is seen as a bulwark against a rising China. Trump's threat to penalize India over oil, however, brought back those issues. On Sunday, the Trump administration made its frustrations over ties between India and Russia ever more public. Stephen Miller, deputy chief of staff at the White House, accused India of financing Russia's war in Ukraine by purchasing oil from Moscow, saying it was 'not acceptable.'