
Treasury secretary warns U.S. could enter 'detox period'
Treasury secretary warns U.S. could enter 'detox period' | The Excerpt
On Saturday's episode of The Excerpt podcast: USA TODAY White House Reporter Joey Garrison explains what Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent's warning could mean for the U.S. economy. President Donald Trump threatens Russia with sanctions. American liquor, wine and spirits are pulled from Canadian shelves in response to Trump's tariffs. Officials released the cause of death for actor Gene Hackman and his wife Betsy Arakawa. USA TODAY Border and Immigration Correspondent Lauren Villagran talks about the role faith plays in encouraging migrants to head towards the U.S. border.
Have feedback on the show? Please send us an email at podcasts@USATODAY.com.
Hit play on the player below to hear the podcast and follow along with the transcript beneath it. This transcript was automatically generated, and then edited for clarity in its current form. There may be some differences between the audio and the text.
Podcasts: True crime, in-depth interviews and more USA TODAY podcasts right here
Cody Godwin:
Good morning. I'm Cody Godwin for Taylor Wilson. Today is Saturday, March 8th, 2025. This is The Excerpt. Today, Treasury Secretary Bessent warns that the U.S. economy may experience a detox period plus Trump threatens tariffs on Russia after a massive attack in Ukraine and how some immigrants are saying it's God himself who's telling them to come north.
♦
Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent warned Friday that the U.S. economy could enter a "detox period" as the Trump administration shifts from robust government spending to push more private sector spending. For more on what this means, my colleague Dana Taylor, spoke with USA TODAY White House reporter, Joey Garrison.
Dana Taylor:
Joey, thanks for hopping on the podcast.
Joey Garrison:
Thanks for having me on.
Dana Taylor:
So Joey, let's start with this rather ominous warning by Secretary Bessent. What is he trying to say here?
Joey Garrison:
Scott Bessent's appearance on CNBC Squawk Box, which is kind of a go-to show for economic insiders and the stock market watchers was asked about the recent stock market dive, although it did pick up on Friday and some of the other underlying economic metrics. And he said there could be what he called a detox period, a slowdown in the economy. He said, "Could we be seeing that the economy that we inherited is starting to roll a bit? Sure." And so this was an acknowledgement from the Trump administration of what we are seeing in the state of the economy right now in terms of some potential signs of slippage. There was also a new jobs report that the Trump administration touted, but it was 151,000 jobs reported in February, which was down below projections. And Trump ran on improving the economy, lowering consumer prices for Americans. But that latter promise in particular is proven a little bit harder perhaps than the day one lowering prices promised that Trump had suggested.
Dana Taylor:
So is the message from the Trump administration just stick with us and we'll get there?
Joey Garrison:
Yeah, pretty much. I mean, they are still blaming a lot of the current economic situation on the previous Biden administration. So for example, when Bessent was talking about the detox period, he was saying, look, we're moving from a period in which you had aggressive government spending under President Biden to where we're now trying to have less of that. Of course, we've seen that with the rapid cuts that DOGE led by Elon Musk and the firing of federal workers. We're trying to spend less from the government and push that more to the private sector and he's saying there could be this detox period before a "equilibrium" is struck there. But what they're not really acknowledging as part of the economic uncertainty right now brought on by these tariffs that President Trump has imposed on Canada and Mexico this past week.
He started with 25% tariffs across the board, backtracked a little bit by first excluding automobile imports from those tariffs, and then any goods that are protected under the U.S.-Mexico-Canada free trade agreement. So he's kind of backtracked on that. But what tariffs are, of course are taxes on goods that are imported into the U.S. Economists point out that those prices are usually pushed down to consumers with higher price tags on goods people purchase. So when we saw the tumbling stock market over the past week, that was a response to those tariffs, which spooked a lot of companies out there and a lot of investors.
Dana Taylor:
Another campaign promise was lower interest rates. Did he say what the Trump admin was doing on this front?
Joey Garrison:
Yeah, I mean the Trump administration and Bessent, have been actively urging the Fed to lower interest rates. That's a different approach than President Biden who left the Fed to be independent and tried not to direct which way it was going with things. But Bessent was really downplaying it, which is kind of a shift. Of course, Trump in his first term was always quick to tout stock market gains that would occur, but Bessent in his interview said, Hey, look, there were stock market gains during the Biden administration, but that doesn't mean that the American people believed that there was a strong economy and noted that Biden was voted out. So it's definitely a shift in tone on how they're interpreting what they're seeing from the market right now.
Dana Taylor:
Joey, is there any good news that Treasury or the administration did share yesterday
Joey Garrison:
Regarding those jobs numbers, President Trump and Bessent, as well as other top economic advisors really touted the fact that the majority of newly created jobs were in the private sector, whereas often under President Biden, those jobs came from government employees. So they looked at that as evidence that their economic agenda is working and actually one top advisor said, Hey, we're starting to see a glimpse of the golden age to come. Of course, Trump talked about a new golden age in American prosperity when he was sworn into office, but I think they still want to pin some of the current problems that we're looking at on Biden, and I think as we move forward, that's just going to be more problematic to do.
You get sort of a grace period I think after you're initially elected where you can say, look, I inherited this mess, but eventually people are going to look for him to fulfill that campaign promise. So there's a signs up there of a public and electorate that's antsy right now on the state of things. So when you have Treasury Secretary Bessent saying, Hey, look, we might have a detox period. I think that's maybe only going to stoke more anxiety out there.
Dana Taylor:
Joey Garrison covers the White House for USA TODAY. Thanks Joey.
Joey Garrison:
Hey, thanks for having me on.
♦
Cody Godwin:
President Donald Trump said yesterday that he would not immediately resume U.S. weapons and intelligence sharing with Ukraine, adding that he remains unconvinced, Ukraine is ready for peace. Trump also threatened sanctions on Russia after it bombarded Ukraine with missiles Thursday night. The attack damaged energy infrastructure and led to a renewed call for Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelensky for a ceasefire. Trump said he was strongly considering large-scale banking restrictions, sanctions and tariffs on Russia until a peace deal is secured. The U.S. and its allies already have substantial sanctions on Russia that the Trump administration has said it intends to rigorously enforce. The relationship between the U.S. and Ukraine was recently thrown into chaos after a meeting between Trump and Zelensky went south last week. The Trump administration is now preparing to meet with Ukrainian officials in Saudi Arabia next week to discuss a peace deal.
♦
Although tariffs on goods imported from Canada and Mexico have received a temporary reprieve from Trump until April 2nd, American companies are already sweating over Canadian consumer backlash. U.S. liquor, wine and spirit brands have been pulled off the shelves of many Canadian stores as retaliatory response to Trump's tariffs. Lawson Whiting, CEO of Brown‐Forman, the maker of Jack Daniels said the move is, "worse than a tariff". Experts predict this sentiment could affect other industries in the U.S. too. Meat and agriculture products, apparel, autos, hotel and airlines among them. Economics Professor Kris Mitchener says that the share of most American companies exports to Canada is on average small. So most are insulated from the boycott there. He says if it spreads to other countries, that's when American companies would really feel the pressure.
♦
The cause of death for actor Gene Hackman has been released. The Oscar winner was found dead alongside his wife, Betsy Arakawa and their dog in their home in Santa Fe, New Mexico on February 26th. The New Mexico office of the medical investigator announced that Arakawa died from hantavirus pulmonary syndrome, a rare disease, and that Hackman died from natural causes about a week later. He had heart disease and complications caused by Alzheimer's disease. The investigators said that Hackman likely didn't know his wife had died citing his Alzheimer's disease. Hantavirus can be contracted from contact with rodents like rats and mice. It cannot pass from person to person and dogs cannot contract hantavirus. Hackman was 95 and his wife Arakawa was 64. Family members and Hollywood stars poured in with statements online mourning the actor.
♦
What role does faith play in encouraging migrants on the treacherous journey north to the U.S. border? A new study says a big one. My colleague Taylor Wilson spoke with USA TODAY border and immigration correspondent Lauren Villagran to learn more.
Taylor Wilson:
Hey there Lauren.
Lauren Villagran:
Hey Taylor.
Taylor Wilson:
So Lauren, what did this study find about the role of faith in migration and how exactly was this research carried out?
Lauren Villagran:
There's a really interesting report that's new from the University of Texas at El Paso and research partners that really shows in data what many border reporters have heard for years. Often when you interview migrants at the U.S.-Mexico border, especially on the Mexican side, regardless of what's happening with U.S. policy, new obstacles that are being put in migrants way, you'll often hear them end their conversation with "Si Dios quiere" if God wishes, God willing. And researchers at the University of Texas at El Paso set out to understand what migrants really understood about the U.S. asylum system and found out in the course of their research that in fact faith and their own religiosity had as much influence on the decisions they made on Route North as what they understood about the asylum system, which was very little.
Taylor Wilson:
Something that caught my attention here, Lauren, was that in their home countries, migrants were not necessarily more religious than Americans according to survey findings. Can you talk through that and what is it about the migration journey that might lead folks to turn to God or spirituality?
Lauren Villagran:
I mean, we know that the migration journey over land from Latin America through Central America and Mexico can be incredibly dangerous. People face a host of threats, whether it's corrupt authorities, organized crime along the way, poverty struggles. This particular study, which was conducted in Ciudad Juárez across the river from El Paso, Texas during a four-month period in 2023 found, and just listen to this number Taylor, that 73% of migrants interviewed reported receiving a sign from God on their journey that encouraged them to keep going north. 71% reported praying at least once a day. And this again is even among people, maybe fewer than half of whom attended church services back in their home country.
Taylor Wilson:
You mentioned some of the confusion, Lauren, over the asylum process in recent years, even going back to the Biden era, how does that factor into this conversation and this idea of putting faith in religion or God or whatever spiritual foundation they have during all this confusion?
Lauren Villagran:
So we have to remember that this is an academic study, which means that it wasn't conducted yesterday. Things were very different at the border in 2023 when the research was conducted and there was a reigning narrative in the United States at the time that millions of people were trying to game the system, seek asylum when really they weren't going to qualify for it. And researchers set out to find out, well really how much did migrants from places like Guatemala, Honduras, or Venezuela, what did they really know about the U.S. immigration system, the U.S. asylum system, when they set out on their journey and what did they learn on their way?
And what the researchers found was that they understood very little migrants tended to look one step ahead, not 10 steps ahead. There was a general understanding that there was a way to make a claim at the border, but very little understanding of the complexity of the U.S. asylum system. And Taylor, to be fair to the migrants, I mean many Americans don't fully understand the trappings of the U.S. asylum system as they were at the time in 2023. It's an incredibly complex system that really requires a law degree to understand completely.
Taylor Wilson:
So Lauren, you read about the kind of Trump factor in this piece as well, and I'm curious, this is a guy with strong support from Christian bases. He's even directed the federal government to eradicate anti-Christian bias. I'm just curious, how has faith factored into some of what we've seen from Trump on the campaign trail and in office?
Lauren Villagran:
Part of the reason the findings are so interesting, I think Taylor is because you see widespread support for President Donald Trump among the Christian community that includes white evangelicals. 55% of Catholics voted for Trump according to an AP VoteCast study poll following the November election. And we haven't seen a lot about the makeup of the recent migrants that have so many Americans concerned about border security. The findings of this study are in some ways somewhat narrow. There were 300 people interviewed, not hundreds of thousands. That being said, the role that Christianity and that Christian faith plays in their lives might be of interest to some of the Christian voters and supporters of President Trump's now tougher border policies.
Taylor Wilson:
All right, great piece from you as always, Lauren. Lauren Villagran covers the border and immigration for USA TODAY. Thank you Lauren.
Lauren Villagran:
Thanks for having me.
♦
Cody Godwin:
David Leonard Wood is angry. The sixty-seven-year-old is currently on death row awaiting execution in Texas for the murder of six girls and young women in 1987. His execution is scheduled to take place in just four days. Wood has always maintained his innocence and says he was targeted by police.
David Leonard Wood:
How can I not be angry at the corruption that put me here? How can you let people just dump cases on you and not be angry?
Cody Godwin:
In an exclusive interview USA TODAY death row reporter Amanda Lee Myers sat down with Wood in prison to hear his story. You can hear that episode right here on Sunday morning beginning at 5 A.M. Eastern.
♦
And before we go, it's that time of year again, daylight savings. Clocks are jumping ahead an hour tomorrow, so don't forget to adjust any analog clocks when you wake up.
♦
Thanks for listening to The Excerpt. We're produced by Shannon Rae Green and Kaely Monahan. Our executive producer is Laura Beatty. You can get the podcast wherever you get your audio. If you use a smart speaker, just ask for The Excerpt. I'm Cody Godwin. Taylor Wilson will be back on Monday with more of The Excerpt from USA TODAY.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 minutes ago
- Yahoo
7 top crypto ETFs: The best funds for investing in Bitcoin, Ethereum and more
Bitcoin has hit a number of all-time highs in 2025, and the Trump administration is prioritizing rules that open up the crypto world to more investment, including creating the U.S. Strategic Bitcoin Reserve. So it's no surprise that traders have been actively pushing up crypto prices on the positive shift in sentiment. But how do investors without crypto accounts — or those who are wary of dodgy cryptocurrency exchanges — get a piece of the cryptocurrency market? Simple. Crypto ETFs give anyone with a traditional brokerage account the ability to get exposure to the most popular cryptocurrencies — and more ETFs are on the way to the market. If you're looking to trade crypto through ETFs, it's vital to know exactly what's under the hood of the ETF, and that may not always be obvious by the fund's name. Broadly, traders have several types of crypto funds, depending on what they own. Direct ownership of cryptocurrencies: These ETFs — called spot ETFs — own cryptocurrencies, meaning their shares represent real stakes in the cryptocurrency. These funds closely track the price moves of their cryptocurrency. These funds tend to have relatively low management expenses (i.e. low expense ratios). Indirect exposure to cryptocurrencies: These ETFs use financial derivatives such as futures contracts, to mimic the cryptocurrency's performance. These funds may move in the direction of the cryptocurrency but often don't closely track the crypto's moves. These funds tend to have higher fees, because of the costs of trading. Some funds may try to double the performance of Bitcoin using derivatives, though at greater risk and cost. Options strategies with cryptocurrencies: Some newer funds may own spot ETFs and use options to generate income from the highly volatile asset, and then pay out that income as dividends to shareholders. These funds also have higher fees. Direct ownership of crypto- or blockchain-related stocks: Some crypto ETFs may invest in stocks of companies that profit on blockchain or other crypto-related companies. This ETF will track the fund's stocks and not really the performance of a cryptocurrency. These funds may have lower expense ratios, but you'll need to check each fund's fees. While ETFs owning Bitcoin, the most popular cryptocurrency, had existed for a few years before 2024, that year saw a big development as the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) approved trading in spot Bitcoin ETFs in January and then spot Ethereum ETFs later on. These spot ETFs allow investors to earn virtually the same return as the underlying crypto coin, since they own the cryptocurrency directly. So they're a great pick if you want to invest in these top crypto assets without having to open an account at a crypto exchange and deal with the headaches of handling the coins yourself. The fund company safeguards the crypto, and since ETFs are listed on the exchange, you can work with any of the best online brokers to buy them. For now, only Bitcoin and Ethereum are approved for spot ETFs, but that could change soon, as the crypto-friendly administration of President Donald Trump eases regulations on the sector. Already, dozens of applications for other crypto ETFs have been submitted, and funds for two of the most popular cryptocurrencies — Solana and Avalanche — are among the applicants. So investors may soon have a low-cost way to wager on the prices of many more cryptocurrencies. Below are some top cryptocurrency funds, including what the funds own, how much they charge (as a percentage of your investment) and how they may perform. The funds all feature low expense ratios. ETF (ticker) What it owns Expense ratio How it may perform iShares Bitcoin Trust (IBIT) Bitcoin 0.25% Tracks the returns of Bitcoin closely. Franklin Bitcoin ETF (EZBC) Bitcoin 0.19% Tracks the returns of Bitcoin closely. Fidelity Wise Origin Bitcoin Fund (FBTC) Bitcoin 0.25% Tracks the returns of Bitcoin closely. Bitwise Ethereum ETF (ETHW) Ethereum 0.20% Tracks the returns of Ethereum closely. Franklin Ethereum ETF (EZET) Ethereum 0.19% Tracks the returns of Ethereum closely. iShares Ethereum Trust (ETHA) Ethereum 0.25% Tracks the returns of Ethereum closely. VanEck Digital Transformation ETF(DAPP) Blockchain-related stocks 0.51% Tracks a set of blockchain stocks such as crypto exchanges. The expense ratios for the Bitcoin and Ethereum funds are low, particularly given the relatively high costs of trading cryptocurrency directly, even at some of the best crypto apps and exchanges. A $10,000 investment in the iShares Bitcoin Trust, the largest spot Bitcoin fund by assets, costs $25 per year, and you pay a proportional share of that each day you own the fund. As you can see in the table, the first three funds are all spot Bitcoin ETFs, so they own the crypto directly and the fund performs almost exactly like the cryptocurrency itself. Similarly, the Ethereum funds here are all spot funds, so they closely track the price of Ethereum. So they're a good substitute for trading these cryptocurrencies on your own through an exchange. Here are more of the best Bitcoin ETFs and best Ethereum ETFs. The final fund invests in blockchain and related crypto and infrastructure companies such as crypto exchange Coinbase and Strategy, a company that invests in Bitcoin directly through an elaborate process that could significantly magnify the returns, albeit at much greater risk. Returns at this crypto fund will reflect the weighted average performance of the fund's stocks, and it won't track any cryptocurrency directly, though it may rise and fall with the crypto market. Traders looking to buy a crypto ETF should know exactly what the fund owns so they can get the type of exposure and investment that they actually want. Each fund must report exactly how it's investing its money, so a quick search for the fund will tell you its specific strategy and what kinds of assets it owns — actual cryptocurrency, spot ETFs, futures contracts or stocks. Editorial Disclaimer: All investors are advised to conduct their own independent research into investment strategies before making an investment decision. In addition, investors are advised that past investment product performance is no guarantee of future price appreciation. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data


New York Times
10 minutes ago
- New York Times
Three Days of Protest in L.A.
An extraordinary weekend of protest ignited in Los Angeles after federal immigration authorities conducted a series of immigration raids across the region Friday. Over the next two days, the protests were limited in size and occurred only in a few pockets of the area. But in some of the clashes with demonstrators, law enforcement officers responded with crowd-control munitions, tear gas and flash-bang grenades. President Trump activated the California National Guard without the assent of Gov. Gavin Newsom on Saturday, an unusual move the governor described as 'intentionally designed to inflame the situation.' By Sunday, several hundred troops had been dispatched to the city as protesters gathered outside a detention center in downtown Los Angeles, though most troops appeared not to engage with protesters. City and state leaders condemned the deployment, including Mayor Karen Bass, who called it 'a chaotic escalation.' But Ms. Bass also urged protesters to follow the law and said not all demonstrators had been entirely peaceful. Some defaced self-driving Waymo cars and a group ventured onto the 101 freeway, bringing traffic to a halt. Outside of downtown, life went on as normal in most parts of the city. But Mr. Trump painted a darker picture, saying the city had been 'invaded and occupied' and any efforts to impede federal immigration officials would be seen as a 'form of rebellion.' Sunday, June 8 Waymo self driving cars were vandalized and set on fire as protests intensified. Officers from the Department of Homeland Security, Immigration and Customs Enforcement, and the city police department all worked to contain the unrest. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
15 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump's First Words at Kennedy Center Dinner Were a Diss
President Donald Trump kicked off a Monday dinner for the Kennedy Center board with a dig at their own organization. 'What a group of good friends,' Trump said of Kennedy Center's leadership as he took the podium at the White House event. 'We're gonna bring this place back. It's not so good. I thought it was gonna be beautiful.' The president appeared to be recounting his visit to the legendary arts hub in March, when he lamented that it was in 'tremendous disrepair' and went on a litany of everything he wanted to see changed, from the decor to the seats. The Kennedy Center has been one of many tense battlegrounds in Trump's bid to remake the federal government in his image. In February, he fired the institution's board members to name himself chair and install high-profile MAGA figures such as Laura Ingraham and Richard Grenell. 'The Kennedy Center was in dire shape,' Trump told the new board on Monday. 'It's been neglected very badly, and it needs an infusion of different things, including probably funds. But I think we're going to do very well when we get some money from Congress to fix it, because it's so important.' The president accused Kennedy Center's previous leadership of wasting millions of dollars on 'rampant political propaganda, DEI, and inappropriate shows.' 'Who thinks of these ideas?' he asked, drawing laughter from the crowd. 'It's different. We're bringing our country back so fast.' Trump, a longtime Broadway fan, earlier identified his favorites, including Cats and The Phantom of the Opera, as examples of 'non-woke' shows that he wanted to promote. The Kennedy Center's new lineup, unveiled Monday, includes The Outsiders, Spamalot, Back to the Future, and Moulin Rouge. Chicago and Mrs. Doubtfire, shows that feature characters usually played by a man crossdressing as a woman, will also be coming to the arts institution, despite Trump's earlier comments criticizing the Kennedy Center for having 'featured Drag Shows specifically targeting our youth.' Trump touted that the Kennedy Center has so far balanced its budget, 'eliminated DEI initiatives in all cases, brought back family-friendly programming that will attract large audiences once again, and launched a plan to renovate the building and reclaim the grandeur as a landmark really a Washington landmark—which it always was.'