There is an 'imminent' threat to Taiwan, America warns
UNTIL RECENTLY America reassured nervous Asian friends that a Chinese invasion of Taiwan was 'neither imminent nor inevitable'. But in a dramatic shift on May 31st Pete Hegseth, the defence secretary, said the Chinese threat 'could be imminent'; and he implied any assault would lead to war with America. China sought 'hegemonic power' in Asia but America 'will not be pushed out of this critical region, and we will not let our allies and partners be subordinated and intimidated'. Mr Hegseth's tough talk appears designed to deter China and reassure allies worried about President Donald Trump's 'America First' foreign policy. Yet it raises two questions. The first is whether his assessment of Chinese intentions is correct. The second is whether his tough talk and effort to rally America's friends in Asia is credible, given the Trump administration's record of erratic behaviour and contempt for its allies.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NBC News
38 minutes ago
- NBC News
China hits back at Trump, saying U.S. actions 'severely undermine' trade truce
HONG KONG — China on Monday accused the United States of breaching the 90-day trade truce agreed by the world's two largest economies, after President Donald Trump said it was Beijing that had 'totally violated' the agreement. Last month, the U.S. and China announced a 90-day pause on most of their tit-for-tat tariffs, which had reached higher than 100%. Trump initially hailed the truce as a 'total reset' but said Friday in a post on his Truth Social platform that China had 'TOTALLY VIOLATED' the deal. The Chinese Ministry of Commerce struck back at Trump's remarks Monday, saying that while China had implemented and actively upheld the deal, the U.S. had introduced a series of 'discriminatory and restrictive measures against China' that 'severely undermine' the agreement. The ministry said those measures included AI chip export controls, a reported pause on the sale of chip design software to China, and the announcement of U.S. plans to revoke the visas of Chinese students. 'Instead of reflecting on its own actions, it has falsely accused China of violating the consensus, which is a serious distortion of the facts,' the ministry said in a statement. 'China firmly rejects these groundless accusations.' The ministry urged the U.S. to 'immediately correct its erroneous practices' and vowed to take 'strong and resolute' measures if Washington 'insists on acting unilaterally and continues to harm China's interests,' without providing details. U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said Sunday that China was 'holding back' exports of rare earths that it had agreed to release as part of the truce. 'That is not what a reliable partner does,' he said on the CBS news program 'Face the Nation.' Rare earth minerals are a crucial component of products that cut across the U.S. economy, including the tech sector, the energy industry and automobile manufacturing. China supplies 60% of the world's rare earth elements and is responsible for the refining of 90% of them, according to the International Energy Agency. Bessent, who said last week that U.S.-China trade talks were 'a bit stalled,' said he was 'confident' that rare earths exports and other details could be 'ironed out' in a call between Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping. 'Maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system, maybe it's intentional. We'll see after the president speaks with the party chairman,' Bessent said, referring to Xi. Kevin Hassett, director of the National Economic Council, also suggested Sunday that the two leaders could speak as early as this week. 'President Trump, we expect, is going to have a wonderful conversation about the trade negotiations this week with President Xi,' he said on the ABC news program 'This Week.' Hassett said he was unsure whether a specific date for that conversation had been set. The last publicly known conversation between the U.S. and Chinese presidents was on Jan. 17, days before Trump's inauguration.
The Herald Scotland
42 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump tariffs are not going away amid legal battles: White House
Lutnick predicted Trump would win on appeal. But he also referenced other tariff authorities if the higher courts agree with the trade court that Trump can't invoke the International Emergency Economic Powers Act of 1977 to bypass Congress to issue the tariffs. Trade whiplash: Appeals Court allows Trump to keep tariffs while appeal plays out "Rest assured, tariffs are not going away," Lutnick said. "He has so many other authorities that even in the weird and unusual circumstance where this was taken away, we just bring on another or another or another." In addition to the trade court's ruling, a federal district judge in Washington, D.C. blocked the Trump administration from collecting tariffs from a pair of Illinois toy importers, also ruling that the same 1977 law didn't grant Trump the powers to impose tariffs as he claimed. Trump addressed the legal battles in a Sunday post on Truth Social: "If the Courts somehow rule against us on Tariffs, which is not expected, that would allow other Countries to hold our Nation hostage with their anti-American Tariffs that they would use against us. This would mean the Economic ruination of the United States of America!" Amid the tariff whiplash from the court rulings, Trump announced on May 30 that he's doubling his tariffs on steel and aluminum imports from a 25% rate to 50%. 'Nobody's going to get around that': Donald Trump to double tariffs on foreign steel to 50% "I think it cost us a week - maybe cost us a week," Lutnick said of the court decisions, arguing that other countries still want to make trade deals with the United States. "Everybody came right back to the table. Everybody is talking to us. You're going to see over the next couple of weeks really first-class deals for the American worker." For two months, Trump and White House officials have boasted about their prospects of using tariffs to secure trade agreements with other nations. So far, the administration has only secured a deal with the United Kingdom, in addition to a pact with China to slash massive tariffs on each other for 90 days. Trump later accused China of violating the tariff agreement on May 30, White House officials: Trump and China's Xi Jinping to speak soon, iron out trade fight Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said on CBS' "Face the Nation" that he expects Trump to soon talk with Chinese President Xi Jinping, expressing confidence trade issues will be "ironed out," including over critical minerals he said Beijing is refusing to open to trade. "They are withholding some of the products that they agreed to release during our agreement," Bessent said. "Maybe it's a glitch in the Chinese system. Maybe it's intentional. We'll see after the president speaks with the party chairman." The Chinese government said Xi has not spoken to Trump since his Jan. 20 inauguration. "I believe we'll see something very soon," Bessent said when asked whether a meeting is scheduled for Trump to talk to Xi. Reach Joey Garrison on X @joeygarrison.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Albanese again pushes back on US demand for Australia to increase defence spending to 3.5% of GDP
Anthony Albanese has again sidestepped US calls for Australia to drastically increase its defence budget, now by about $40bn more each year, amid warnings from the Trump administration over China's plans. The US secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, met with Australia's defence minister, Richard Marles over the weekend in Singapore as part of the Shangri-la Dialogue. In a readout of the meeting released Monday morning Australian time, Hegseth conveyed that Australia should increase its defence spending to 3.5% of its GDP 'as soon as possible'. Sign up for Guardian Australia's breaking news email Australia is on track to lift defence spending from about $53bn a year, or around 2% of GDP – to an estimated $100bn, or 2.4% of GDP, by 2033-34. An additional annual spend of around $40bn would be required by 2033-34 to reach 3.5% of GDP. Hegseth on Saturday urged countries in Asia to 'share the burden' and lift defence spending to 5% of GDP, warning 'Beijing is credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power in the Indo-Pacific' in a speech at the conference. It followed months after Pentagon undersecretary Elbridge Colby told a US Senate hearing that the US wanted Australia to reach a 3% defence spending threshold. Albanese was asked on Monday to respond to the US's calls for Australia to pour billions more into its defence budget, to meet a higher spending target. The prime minister asked: 'Which one?' 'There's been a range of [spending targets] going forward. What you should do in defence is decide what you need, your capability, and then provide for it. That's what my government is doing,' he said. 'What we need is things that defend us in real terms, and that's what we'll provide.' The prime minister had stood firm on Sunday, saying in response to a similar question about Hegseth's Saturday comments: 'We'll determine our defence policy.' Also speaking on Sunday, Marles said the issue of defence spending was a conversation he was 'totally up for'. 'The Americans have been very clear about wanting to see more from their friends and allies around the world. It's a sentiment that we understand,' Marles said at a press conference in Singapore. 'We have already engaged in the last couple of years in the single biggest peacetime increase in defence expenditure in Australia's history. So we are beginning this journey. We've got runs on the board. 'And indeed, if we look at Aukus, I mean, Aukus is something which is seeing our defence expenditure increase – as it should – and so we actually are taking steps down this path.' In February, Australia paid $US500m ($AUD790m) to the US as part of the first instalment in a total of $US3bn pledged in order to support America's shipbuilding industry. At the time, Marles said Aukus was 'a powerful symbol of our two countries working together in the Indo-Pacific'. Albanese is expected to meet Trump in person for the first time since both leaders were re-elected, on the sidelines of the G7 leaders' summit in Canada this month. The two leaders are expected to discuss defence cooperation in the Indo-Pacific, as well as the US's doubling of tariffs to 50% on steel and aluminium imports, including from Australia, beginning this week.
