NC's Aga Ruhullah walked out of working committee meet after clash with Omar. Here's what happened
Sources said that during the meeting, attended by all the senior leaders, Ruhullah criticised the overall functioning of the party under Omar and the 'direction' it has taken over the past few months. 'He expressed his disappointment in the way things have been progressing and publicly confronted the core working committee. He explained the situation and ultimately chose to walk out of the meeting as a mark of protest,' said a source familiar with the matter.
According to sources in the NC, this was the first working committee meeting of the party after the assembly elections in Jammu and Kashmir, and a number of items were to be taken up, including political agenda and functioning of the NC. The meeting took place on Wednesday.
New Delhi: Lok Sabha MP and National Conference (NC) leader Aga Ruhullah Mehdi walked out of a party working committee meeting after a clash with J&K Chief Minister Omar Abdullah earlier this week, ThePrint has learnt.
Some who attended the meeting told ThePrint that a number of leaders expressed satisfaction with the functioning of the government under Omar's leadership, while Ruhullah offered a sharp critique of the government as well as the party. 'He tried to address the issue of the party's ideological failure and the way the government is cosying up to the reality being presented by Delhi,' said one of the attendees, not wanting to be named.
Another attendee told ThePrint Ruhullah said that the way things are progressing, 'it means that the party does not believe in the trust and mandate that has been bestowed upon them by the people of Kashmir'.
'We should stop treating the working committee meeting as a public milan. If we are not delivering on the promises we made in the manifesto, we are letting our own people down. Whether it is Article 370, or other issues, we have not moved an inch. Statehood will come but let's focus on Article 370,' Ruhullah was quoted as having said.
This is not the first time Ruhullah has openly defied his party. Last December, the Srinagar MP had led a protest by Kashmiri students outside Omar's residence, demanding a revamp of the reservation policy in Jammu & Kashmir.
Ruhullah had then faced criticism from his party colleague Salman Sagar for joining the protest.
A close aide of Ruhullah said the MP had asked his government to focus on 'bigger' concerns rather than addressing issues related to 'bijli, paani and sadak'.
'As things unfolded, Omar Abdullah got irritated and even suggested to Ruhullah that he contest the by-election and be part of the government to make a change. He said Ruhullah was being two-faced as he had earlier said he would not contest the elections after Article 370,' the aide told ThePrint.
Sources said it was at this juncture that Ruhullah decided to walk out of the meeting while maintaining that he had never expressed a desire to contest the Lok Sabha elections.
Abdullah had in April said he would not use the Pahalgam terror attack to press for his government demand of statehood for the Union territory.
An NC leader told ThePrint that Ruhullah has been finding it difficult to adjust to the J&K government's relations with the Centre.
(Edited by Gitanjali Das)
Also Read: What's the Tulbul project Omar, Mehbooba are sparring over & why has it been in limbo for decades
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indian Express
3 hours ago
- Indian Express
Rahul Gandhi's attack on EC doesn't match poll data, officials say bid to ‘defame'
LEADER of Opposition Rahul Gandhi's attack on the Election Commission, in a piece in The Indian Express Saturday, reiterates allegations he has made in the past and contradicts Maharashtra Assembly election data the poll panel has released. A scrutiny by The Indian Express of his allegations and data around each shows that Gandhi's criticism selectively cites records, ignores crucial context and, in one case, even draws a connection where none exists. Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar was unavailable for comment. However, a senior EC official said: 'After losing the match, blaming the referee has become standard practice. These allegations are absurd and a bid to defame the poll body. ECI has responded to INC on 24 December 2024 on the same issues. It seems like the party has not shared the reply with him (Gandhi).' Consider: 🔴 Appointment of Election Commissioners: Gandhi questioned the government's decision to replace the Chief Justice of India (CJI) with a Cabinet Minister on the panel responsible for appointing Election Commissioners—over-riding a 2023 Supreme Court ruling and raising concerns about the neutrality of the selection process. The fact is that successive governments across party lines—including the UPA—had opportunities to institutionalise a more transparent appointment mechanism but failed to do so. For instance, in 2007, the Administrative Reforms Commission, chaired by Congress leader M. Veerappa Moily, recommended a collegium system for appointing Election Commissioners, citing the 'far-reaching importance' of the EC. The ARC proposed a selection panel comprising the Prime Minister, Lok Sabha Speaker, Leader of the Opposition, Law Minister, and Rajya Sabha Deputy Chairman. However, this recommendation was never implemented. Nor was a similar proposal made by the 20th Law Commission, headed by Justice A.P. Shah, which submitted its report to the NDA government in 2015. 'Now for the first time, a law made by Parliament under Article 325 is in place since 2023 for the appointment of CEC and ECs. Which is better—the earlier system or the new one? Now, there is consultation, there is transparency and there is a concept of majority,' a senior EC official said. 🔴 Increase in new voters: Gandhi flagged what he called an 'incredible leap' of 41 lakh new voters added in Maharashtra within five months between the 2024 Lok Sabha and Assembly elections—almost equal to the number added over the previous five years—suggesting possible manipulation of the voter rolls. However, under election laws, political parties are involved at every stage of preparing the final electoral roll. Election authorities regularly hold meetings with political parties, provide them free copies of draft and final rolls, and publish these on official websites. During the summary revision period, weekly lists of additions and deletions are shared to allow objections. Ahead of the 2024 Maharashtra Assembly election, 1,03,727 booth-level agents (BLAs) were appointed by political parties, including 27,099 from the Congress. These agents are responsible for interacting with election officials to flag any discrepancies at the polling station level. Yet, during this revision, fewer than 100 appeals pertaining to additions or deletions were filed by party agents across all parties. 🔴 Voter turnout: Gandhi questioned the reported voter turnout jump from 58.22% at 5 pm on November 20, 2024, to 66.05% the following morning—an increase of 7.83 percentage points, or about 76 lakh voters. He called the rise unprecedented, noting that in the 2019 Maharashtra polls, the difference between provisional and final turnout was only 0.64 percentage points. The fact is that the poll watchdog has always treated turnout figures released on polling day as provisional—and for good reason. Polling officers prioritise the integrity of the voting process over real-time reporting, and delays in updates are common. Before the Voter Turnout app, the EC would brief media around 6 pm on polling day, with officials consistently stating that the 5 pm figures were tentative, as voting often extended beyond the official deadline. In this context, the gap between the provisional turnout reported at 5 pm and the final figure released the next morning is not unusual—especially when compared to previous elections. On Saturday, the Maharashtra Chief Electoral Officer's office clarified that the difference between provisional and final voter turnout figures in 2024 was not unusual when compared to 2019. In 2019, turnout rose from approximately 54.43% at 5 pm to 61.10% final; in 2024, it rose from 58.22% to 66.05%. The CEO's office said final figures are based on official records (Form 17C), provided to polling agents for verification. It also pointed out that Gandhi's data comparison was flawed: for 2019, he used provisional turnout figures recorded at the actual end of polling—which may have extended beyond 6 pm—alongside the final figures. But for 2024, he compared the 5 pm provisional turnout (before polling had ended) with the final numbers. Further, EC officials said that in 2024, an average of 58 lakh voters cast their votes every hour in Maharashtra. Based on this, 116 lakh voters could have voted in the last two hours alone—making the increase of 76 lakh voters completely plausible. 🔴 'Bogus' Voting: Gandhi further alleged that the surge in voter turnout was concentrated in 12,000 booths across 85 constituencies where the BJP had fared poorly in the 2024 Lok Sabha polls and connected this to gains made by the BJP in the Assembly polls. He cited Kamthi Assembly seat as an example, claiming BJP's votes rose from 1.19 lakh in the Lok Sabha election to 1.75 lakh in the Assembly poll, while Congress figures remained mostly stable. However, the EC allows candidates and their polling agents full access to all polling booths to raise objections in real time. Even after results are declared, candidates may challenge the outcome by filing election petitions in High Court. Congress candidate Suresh Yadavrao Bhoyar, who contested from Kamthi Assembly seat, has not filed such a petition. Of the 112 election petitions filed across Maharashtra, only 28 are from Congress—and Kamthi is not among them. When asked about Gandhi's claim, a Maharashtra CEO official said it was factually incorrect. Kamthi falls under the Ramtek Lok Sabha seat, which was contested by Shiv Sena in the general election—not the BJP. 'Therefore, the question of the BJP receiving 1.19 lakh votes in Kamthi during the Lok Sabha polls does not arise,' the official said. The officer also pointed out that Bhoyar received 1,07,064 votes in 2019 and 1,34,033 in 2024, an increase in support. 🔴 'Concealing' evidence: Accusing the Election Commission of responding with 'silence and even aggression,' Rahul Gandhi said requests to access voter rolls from the Lok Sabha and Assembly elections were denied, and that the poll watchdog has also refused to provide videography and CCTV footage of the polling process in Maharashtra. Electoral rolls—lists of registered voters—are already available to political parties. What cannot be shared is the list of those who actually voted, as this would violate the 'secrecy of voting,' a foundational principle in ensuring free and fair elections, a top official said. It's for this reason the EC provides private voting compartments for each voter. Disclosing post-poll attendance could expose voters to intimidation or pressure. On CCTV footage, it is a fact that in December 2024, the EC—after consultations with the Centre—amended the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961, to restrict access to electronic records. This followed a Punjab and Haryana High Court directive ordering the EC to share footage with advocate Mehmood Pracha. The Commission has argued that providing CCTV footage would amount to violation of secrecy of vote and open it up to potential misuse using artificial intelligence. Asked about this, an official in the State CEO office said, 'In case of any grievance or objection related to the election process, the Representation of the People Act, 1951, under Section 80, provides a legal option in the form of an Election Petition, which may be filed before the Hon'ble High Court. If the Court deems it necessary during the proceedings of such a petition, the relevant electronic or documentary evidence related to the election process is produced before the Court as per its directives.'
India Gazette
5 hours ago
- India Gazette
Rahul Gandhi demands EC publish voter rolls, release all post-5 pm CCTV footage from Maharashtra polling booths
New Delhi [India], June 7 (ANI): Congress leader Rahul Gandhi has called upon the Election Commission to publish consolidated, digital, machine-readable voter rolls for the most recent elections to the Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabhas of all states, including Maharashtra, saying that 'telling the truth' will protect poll panel's credibility. In a post on X, Rahul Gandhi, who is Leader of Opposition in Lok Sabha, referred to the ECI's response to his allegations concerning Maharashtra polls and said 'releasing unsigned, evasive notes to intermediaries is not the way to respond to serious questions'. 'Dear EC, You are a Constitutional body. Releasing unsigned, evasive notes to intermediaries is not the way to respond to serious questions. If you have nothing to hide, answer the questions in my article and prove it by: * Publishing consolidated, digital, machine-readable voter rolls for the most recent elections to the Lok Sabha and Vidhan Sabhas of all states, including Maharashtra * Releasing all post-5 pm CCTV footage from Maharashtra polling booths. Evasion won't protect your credibility. Telling the truth will,' he said in a post on X. In response, ECI described Rahul Gandhi's Maharashtra election poll rigging as 'unsubstantiated allegations.' 'Unsubstantiated allegations raised against the Electoral Rolls of Maharashtra are affront to the rule of law. The Election Commission had brought out all these facts in its reply to the INC on 24th December 2024 itself, which is available on ECI's website. It appears that all these facts are completely being ignored while raising such issues again and again,' it said. 'Any misinformation being spread, by anyone, is not only a sign of disrespect towards the Law, but also brings disrepute to the thousands of representatives appointed by their own political party and demotivates lakhs of election staff who work untiringly and transparently during elections. After any unfavourable verdict by the voters, trying to defame the Election Commission by saying that it is compromised, is completely absurd,' it added. (ANI)
India Gazette
5 hours ago
- India Gazette
"Trying to spread a fake narrative": Maharashtra Dy CM Shinde hits back at Rahul Gandhi over 'rigging' claim
Thane (Maharashtra) [India], June 7 (ANI): Amid political uproar following Congress MP Rahul Gandhi's recent allegation claiming the November 2024 Maharashtra assembly election was 'rigged', Maharashtra Deputy Chief Minister Eknath Shinde on Saturday hit back at the Leader of the Opposition in Lok Sabha, accusing him of trying to spread a 'fake narrative' about the polls. Speaking to reporters in Thane, Shinde dismissed Rahul Gandhi's claims of electoral rigging and EVM tampering as baseless, pointing out that Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) alliance, of which the Congress is a part, was silent during their Lok Sabha 2024 election wins, where they bagged 30 out of the 48 seats in the state. Shinde asserted that the people of Maharashtra were intelligent and would reject such tactics in any upcoming election. 'In the Lok Sabha elections, when Maha Vikas Aghadi won the elections in Maharashtra, they did not say anything. At that time, the EVMs and ECI were right... They are now trying to spread a fake narrative that the voting percentage has been increased, EVMs are rigged, or the EC is wrong,' the Maharashtra Deputy CM said. He added, 'But the people of Maharashtra are intelligent; they understand which government works for them and which government sits at home... The public of Maharashtra will teach them a lesson in the upcoming elections.' Earlier on Saturday, Rahul Gandhi shared an article he authored, alleging the Maharashtra Assembly elections held last year were 'rigged', and claimed that similar tactics could be repeated in the Bihar elections due later this year. 'Maharashtra assembly elections in 2024 were a blueprint for rigging democracy. My article shows how this happened, step by step,' Rahul Gandhi wrote in a post on X. In his article, he outlined a five-point process, claiming: Step 1: Rig the panel for appointing the Election Commission; Step 2: Add fake voters to the roll; Step 3: Inflate voter turnout; Step 4: Target the bogus voting exactly where the BJP needs to win; Step 5: Hide the evidence. Calling it 'match-fixing', Gandhi said that the side cheats might win the game but damage institutions and destroy public faith in the result. 'It's not hard to see why the BJP was so desperate in Maharashtra. But rigging is like match-fixing; the side that cheats might win the game, but will damage institutions and destroy public faith in the result. All concerned Indians must see the evidence. Judge for themselves. Demand answers,' he said. He warned that the 'match-fixing' of Maharashtra would come to Bihar next, where the polls are due later this year, and then 'anywhere' the BJP was losing elections. 'Match-fixed elections are a poison for any democracy,' he added. (ANI)
