logo
Consultant believed dispute over female changing rooms ‘was hate incident'

Consultant believed dispute over female changing rooms ‘was hate incident'

Sandie Peggie was suspended after she complained about having to share a changing room with transgender medic Dr Beth Upton at Victoria Hospital, Kircaldy, Fife, on Christmas Eve 2023.
She was placed on special leave after Dr Upton made an allegation of bullying and harassment and cited concerns about 'patient care'.
Ms Peggie has lodged a claim against NHS Fife and Dr Upton, citing the Equality Act 2010, including sexual harassment; harassment related to a protected belief; indirect discrimination; and victimisation.
The tribunal resumed in Dundee on July 16 after an initial set of hearings in February.
On Tuesday, Dr Kate Searle, a consultant in emergency medicine, said that Dr Upton was 'very open' about their trans status during a job interview, and had been out for around a year in August 2023, the tribunal heard.
Dr Searle said that she had known Ms Peggie during her 11-year career at NHS Fife but was unaware of her gender critical views, and had asked Dr Upton 'if she was happy using female changing rooms' in August 2023 during an induction and 'didn't make any other suggestions'.
She said she emailed equality lead Isla Bumba on December 8 2023 to ask if NHS Fife had a transgender policy but was told it did not.
Dr Searle said: 'I asked her if she was happy using female changing rooms, she said yes, I had nothing else to add.'
She said she emailed Ms Bumba as 'we've got our first transgender doctor working, there's very little information available', hoping there would be an NHS Fife policy on 'supporting transgender staff in their workplace', the tribunal heard.
On her return to work after Christmas, on December 29 2023, Dr Searle read an email from Dr Elspeth Pitt regarding an 'upsetting interaction with another member of staff' and an email from Dr Upton from Christmas Day, alleging Ms Peggie had told her 'she can't be in the female changing room, it's wrong and lots of others feel this way' and 'she continued to tell me she is intimidated, she told me women have a right to feel safe', and made a comment about 'prisons', the tribunal heard.
Dr Searle said: 'To me that was likening the situation to the Isla Bryson case that was very well publicised. Isla Bryson was a convicted rapist who was housed temporally in a female prison.'
She said she was 'very concerned' and 'knew there wasn't an NHS Fife policy', adding that 'according to the hate incident policy it is verbal harassment', the tribunal heard.
Dr Beth Upton arriving at the employment tribunal in Dundee for an earlier hearing (Andrew Milligan/PA)
She said she had a meeting with Dr Upton at 5pm who was 'shaken and distressed', and they completed a Datix internal report together.
Dr Searle said: 'We looked at NHS Fife's hate incident policy and recognised this required a Datix to be completed, so we completed that together, we discussed reporting the incident to the police as that's again what is recommended in NHS Fife policy.
'Beth said she would think about it, we looked at her shift patterns to see when she was next due to be in and if she felt safe to do that.'
She added that Dr Upton 'mentioned two other incidents she had had with Sandie where she had felt the interaction was affected by Ms Peggie's feelings towards her as a transgender woman', and alleged that in one incident in a resuscitation unit 'Ms Peggie was doing nursing obs (observations) on a patient; when Beth walked in Ms Peggie left. Beth said 'do you want me to finish doing obs?', Ms Peggie said 'you can finish doing them yourself', and left the room', the tribunal heard.
She alleged that another incident involved a patient in a suspected mental health crisis leaving, and said that when Dr Upton went to look for Ms Peggie, the nurse 'would only speak to her through another member of nursing staff', the tribunal heard.
Dr Searle said: 'That would make me somewhat concerned for patient safety; in our team we need to communicate very well between ourselves to ensure patient safety.'
She said she had spoken to the healthcare worker, and added: 'I asked if she recalled the situation and she was concerned about getting involved in any discussions about the incident because she said 'I am mixed race and I am worried about getting involved in this for my own safety'.'
Counsel for both respondents, Jane Russell KC, said: 'What do you think she meant?'
Dr Searle said: 'This legal case where there is a lot of press attention and any staff being involved in the case have felt under scrutiny and concerned that their views will be widely publicised when they wouldn't otherwise.'
She said she completed the Datix as 'NHS staff must record all hate incidents' and added: 'We talked about reporting to the police, that's mentioned for hate incidents.'
The tribunal continues.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

NHS Fife wanted to 'punish' veteran nurse Sandie Peggie over trans medic row, tribunal is told
NHS Fife wanted to 'punish' veteran nurse Sandie Peggie over trans medic row, tribunal is told

Daily Mail​

time5 hours ago

  • Daily Mail​

NHS Fife wanted to 'punish' veteran nurse Sandie Peggie over trans medic row, tribunal is told

The pursuit of a nurse who challenged a trans doctor for being in the woman's changing room was 'controlled from the very top' to punish her for objecting, a tribunal has heard. Sandie Peggie has sued NHS Fife and male-born medic Dr Beth Upton after being suspended from work for challenging the doctor's use of the room. The embattled health board was accused of punishing the 51-year-old nurse for the 'heresy' of the 'refusal to accept or pretend that Dr Upton is a woman'. During another extraordinary day of evidence it emerged the investigator looking into Ms Peggie had a private meeting with Dr Upton, 30, to adjust notes from an interview. And the lawyers involved became embroiled in a row about pronouns, with the NHS Fife KC Jane Russell demanding the nurse's lawyer stop referring to Dr Upton as a man. It led to barrister Naomi Cunningham firing back, telling the tribunal Ms Russell had been 'indulged in repeated futile objections to my use of correct sex pronouns for Dr Upton'. Ms Peggie has taken NHS Fife and Dr Upton to an employment tribunal and has claimed her treatment has broken the Equality Act. It follows an incident on Christmas Eve 2023 when she challenged Dr Upton in the women-only changing room at Victoria Hospital, Kirkcaldy, for which she was subsequently suspended and investigated for. Ms Peggie, a nurse of 30 year's experience, last week was cleared of gross misconduct with NHS Fife finding 'insufficient evidence'. Angela Glancy, a clinical nurse manager, led an investigation into allegations against the nurse and became involved in the case in late February 2024. Ms Cunningham heighted a note from early January 2024 which was forwarded to Norma Beveridge, the director of nursing, which the senior boss said it was a 'very serious allegation with the potential for significant reputational damage'. In her cross-examination, Ms Cunningham said: 'The truth is this process was controlled from the very top, isn't it. 'Sandie always had to be put through this process and punished for her offence of standing up to a man who wanted to use the women's changing room?' The witness, who has worked for NHS Fife for 27 years, rejected the claim, and told the lawyer: 'I don't agree with that.' The hearing, in Dundee, was told that Dr Upton was offered a meeting after querying the notes made during an investigation interview. Ms Cunningham asked if it was 'normal practice' to 'meet up privately with the witness in order to agree adjustments to the notes', and was told by Ms Glancy that it had been 'the first time it has been asked of me'. Ms Glancy said most of the changes were grammar changes, and there was not 'anything in the body of the notes that were changed that I disagreed with'. During in the hearing Ms Glancy referred to Dr Upton as 'he', before changing it to 'she', prompting the intervention of the NHS Fife KC who said she had a concern at Ms Cunningham's 'persistent misgendering' which was 'discombobulating' the witness. Ms Russell, who said NHS Fife were 'not used to Dr Upton being referred to with the pronouns he/him' asked the judge to note her concerns and asked Ms Cunningham to 'reflect on her language'. Ms Cunningham promptly declined the invitation, and continued to refer to Dr Upton with the 'he/him' pronouns. The witness disagreed with Ms Cunningham when she asked: 'The reason Sandie had to be punished, through this whole process, was she was guilty of the exact same heresy in the eyes of the board to which Ms Russell, no doubt on the instructions of the board, has taken repeated exception in the course of this hearing, namely the refusal to accept or pretend that Dr Upton is a woman.' Also during the hearing the two sides butted heads, with Ms Cunningham telling the tribunal judge that at no point had she 'impugned Ms Russell's character or professionalism, but unfortunately the converse is not true'. Ms Russell said the concerns she had raised were about the fairness of proceedings, and added: 'My concerns have been raised appropriately and professionally in public and in private at all times.' The tribunal continues.

Row erupts over trans medic's pronouns at Peggie tribunal
Row erupts over trans medic's pronouns at Peggie tribunal

The Herald Scotland

time8 hours ago

  • The Herald Scotland

Row erupts over trans medic's pronouns at Peggie tribunal

The row started after NHS Fife's lawyer, Jane Russell KC, interjected after a witness used the pronoun "he" to refer to the medic before correcting themselves to say, "sorry, she". Ms Peggie's lawyer, Naomi Cunningham, has consistently referred to Dr Upton using male pronouns — specifically "he/him" — throughout the proceedings. Read more: Ms Russell — who has consistently used she/her pronouns when referring to Dr Upton — told the tribunal that best practice was to use an individual's preferred pronouns. She said: "You should use the pronouns that are preferred — there is an exception if it is a biological male attack, but that is not the case here. No one has physically attacked anyone, especially Dr Upton attacking Ms Peggie. "I am concerned about the fairness of the proceedings. Ms Cunningham's misgendering is creating a hostile environment for the witnesses and is confusing them. "They are not used to hearing Dr Upton referred to with the pronouns he/him, and it is clearly discombobulating this witness and affecting her ability to give her best evidence." Ms Russell urged the tribunal to note her concerns and asked Ms Cunningham to reflect on her language. Judge Kemp then turned to Ms Cunningham, asking if she had anything to say in response, or if she needed time to reflect. Ms Cunningham declined both, continuing her cross-examination using the pronouns "he/him" for Dr Upton. Margaret Gribbon and Sandie Peggie (Image: Iain Masterton) Later she put it to the witness, Angela Glancey, a senior charge nurse involved in the investigation, that Ms Peggie "was guilty of essentially the same heresy that has so exorcised Ms Russell in being prepared to say that Dr Upton was a man." Ms Russell objected. She said Dr Upton was not a man and that she was "very concerned about the latitude being given to Ms Cunningham to be so offensive in this tribunal." She suggested Ms Cunningham had called her a heretic. Ms Cunningham disputed this, but the judge said his inference from the comment was that the lawyer had implied that Ms Russell was a heretic. Ms Cunningham said: "In my submission, there is no sensible understanding of the words I used — in the order in which I said them — that could be taken as an accusation of heresy against Ms Russell. "The proposition that I put was that Ms Russell, in putting forward the board's case and raising the objections she has, is objecting to what the board regards as a heresy." Ms Cunningham said the "heretics" in this case was Ms Peggie. EJ Kemp then asked Ms Cunningham what she meant by heresy. She described it as an offence against, or a departure from, a required or compulsory creed. The judge then asked for a definition of the word creed? He said it was not in the Equality Act. "I don't think I can be expected to cross-examine witnesses only using terms lifted directly from the Equality Act," Ms Cunningham said. The tribunal then broke for lunch, but when they returned Ms Peggie's legal team said she was 'concerned about what we perceive as asymmetry in the tribunal's treatment of both sides." Read more: Ms Cunningham defended her remarks, arguing they were not pejorative and did not attack Ms Russell's professionalism. 'It is beyond doubt Ms Russell is exorcised on behalf of her client on their instruction and there is nothing pejorative about the word exorcised and I did not accuse her of heresy. 'One aspect of my claimant's case is she has been treated as a heretic deserving of punishment — heresy here is shorthand for someone who doesn't believe in and won't play lip service to the gender identity belief system. 'That is not a novel or fanciful idea.' Ms Cunningham added she had not attacked the professionalism of Ms Russell but argued the 'converse is true', particularly in private sessions to a 'considerably greater degree'. Ms Russell replied: "It is unfortunate what I have just heard did not contain an apology. I do not accept the characterisation of my intervention as being exorcised as that indicates a level of emotion that was plainly not there." She said her concerns centred on fairness and the rights of Dr Upton to be treated with dignity and respect. Jane Russell KC arrives at the tribunal (Image: Iain Masterton) Dr Upton began transitioning in January 2022 and said they had been "fully out in all aspects of my life" since August 2022. They do not hold a gender recognition certificate. During evidence, Dr Upton said: "I'm not male," and argued a certificate should not be required for a trans person's gender identity to be respected. Ms Cunningham had previously told the tribunal she intended to "use real language in court", arguing it was appropriate to say "he's a man" when discussing single-sex spaces. One complaint being investigated by NHS Fife was that Ms Peggie had misgendered Dr Upton. Last week, the board cleared her, citing insufficient evidence to support Dr Upton's allegations. Last year, a tribunal found that Roz Adams had been constructively dismissed from Edinburgh Rape Crisis Centre for believing that those using the service should be able to know the sex of staff It also found that the management had conducted a 'heresy hunt' against her. The ruling said the decision to launch a disciplinary process against Ms Adams was because the centre's management wanted to make an example of her because of her gender critical beliefs. Meanwhile, the tribunal heard that Ms Peggie had raised concerns about Dr Upton's previous conduct, particularly that, as the Herald on Sunday revealed last weekend, that the medic had kept logs of incidents with other colleagues. It was put to Ms Glancey, who was tasked with investigating the complaints internally, that there was "evidence that Dr Upton was a known troublemaker and a bully". Ms Cunningham asked whether these allegations should have been investigated further. Ms Glancey rejected that she was "unfair" to Ms Peggie by not doing so and she argued that her specific role was to investigate the incident that occurred with Dr Upton on Christmas Eve. The barrister said Ms Peggie's "troublemaker" claim against Dr Upton "flatly contradicts" the junior doctor when they said they had no previous incidents in the workplace. Ms Glancey said she could not comment on this. Meanwhile, JK Rowling has described Ms Peggie as a "heroine" and framed the tribunal as a class-based struggle against a "smug management" enforcing gender identity policies. She claimed the nurse had "already won" and that women everywhere owed her a debt of thanks. The Harry Potter author criticised NHS Fife staff who gave evidence, calling them "idiotic and cruel" and singling out diversity officer Isla Bumba and consultant Dr Kate Searle. Ms Rowling accused them of supporting gender identity over biological sex, saying: "Genuinely kind people don't find themselves compelled to explain in court why they helped whip up a witch-hunt against a woman whose only crime was wanting to change her clothes without a man watching." She claimed the case exposed the role of class in enforcing gender ideology like no previous legal proceedings.

'We had to beg to get safe education for our autistic daughter'
'We had to beg to get safe education for our autistic daughter'

Daily Mirror

time16 hours ago

  • Daily Mirror

'We had to beg to get safe education for our autistic daughter'

Four-year-old Eloise has complex needs and a rare safeguarding condition, but was refused specialist education for over a year Singer Emma King and videographer Ritch Spence have emerged victorious after nearly two years of battling with the local authority in Hull over their daughter's educational needs. Their daughter, Eloise, will be starting specialist education in the new school year but the family has chosen to share their experience out of concern for those who may not be as familiar with the legal system. ‌ Emma told PA: "We were forced to beg – not for special treatment, just for safety. It felt like they were trying to wear us down." ‌ Ritch added: "We had some family members we could chat to, we both know how to write a letter, we both have experience with legal processes from various bits of life and we thought, if this is overwhelming for us, imagine how a young person, a single parent, or someone whose first language isn't English would feel." ‌ Eloise didn't walk until she was 18 months, didn't make eye contact and is "entirely non-speaking", which led the parents to seek an autism assessment after ruling out hearing issues. The couple first applied for an education, health and care plan (EHCP) shortly after Eloise was diagnosed with autism just after her second birthday in 2023. The four year old's complex needs include sensory processing difficulties, non-verbal communication and a condition called pica. Pica prompts the young girl to attempt eating non-food items such as scissors or stones, or even her own excrement if left unattended while using the toilet. ‌ Emma stated: "She needs to have a one-to-one for her safety, I thought pica alone would be enough to warrant it. You have to be so fast with Eloise, anything that is in her hands she could try to eat." The couple claim the council missed the legal deadline to respond to the EHCP paperwork they submitted. After following up, they were informed Eloise wouldn't be assessed and were advised to arrange independent mediation. This decision was ultimately reversed just before the mediation date. The council agreed to assess Eloise but in the meantime, she had to be placed in a mainstream nursery for just five hours a week as she was only entitled to emergency early years support. ‌ However, the nursery couldn't provide one-to-one support without an EHCP in place and the lack of assistance was "overwhelming" for the toddler. Ritch said: "At pick-up, we would often find that she'd be spinning in a corner." Even after agreeing to assess Eloise, the process didn't pick up speed as Emma recalled: "I had to have a phone call and literally beg (the council) to please see Eloise." Finally, in February 2025 the EHCP was issued stating that Eloise would attend mainstream school. Ritch said: "We couldn't believe that it said she would attend the mainstream setting – we were, like, head exploding, really." The pair launched a tribunal appeal and spent hours compiling the evidence bundle themselves. ‌ By May, the duo hadn't heard anything but discovered the council had responded to the tribunal "but didn't include us". When Emma and Ritch were brought into the loop, the council confirmed it had reversed its decision and Eloise was offered a place at a local specialist school which supports pupils through primary and secondary education. She will start in September, two years after her parents began the EHCP process. Emma added: "This is what Eloise should have had from the beginning, it shouldn't be something that we are celebrating. ‌ "She can't thrive under conditions that are not right for her, but by placing her somewhere where the conditions are correct, I feel she will thrive and come on in her own way. To feel like she belongs somewhere, I think she finally will sense that." The turbulent experience inspired the duo to create Emma's latest album, Pocket Full of Sun. One track was penned about the EHCP application process specifically while some lyrics reflect the impact of sensory processing difficulties that Eloise and many others like her experience. The album will be launched in August, and the duo are hopeful it will strike a chord with fellow parent carers. Emma said: "We just want people to listen to the music and not feel alone."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store