logo
Heriot-Watt University agreed to monitor students for arms firm

Heriot-Watt University agreed to monitor students for arms firm

The National13-07-2025
Emails obtained under freedom of information laws and reported by The Herald and Liberty Investigates reveal how Heriot-Watt University staff agreed to implement a range of security measures requested by defence firm Raytheon UK ahead of a campus careers fair.
These included monitoring student chat groups and discussion forums for talk of any planned protest, monitoring CCTV for signs of groups gathering, and having an "enhanced" physical presence on the day to "help safeguard the Raytheon employees attending".
The requests were being made of the university's safeguarding team, first aid and mental health first aid trained campus officers.
READ MORE: How arms firms are buying exclusive access to MPs for as little as £1499
In response, a HWU staff member said they would implement the additional security measures.
Katie Wood, a HWU student and president of the Society for Progressive Students, said that she was 'disappointed and ashamed' by the university's response to Raytheon UK's requests.
"My immediate reaction is that the safeguarding team are in place at the university to protect the students and not the profits of arms companies.
"This kind of move damages the trust that students have in safeguarding about their ability to make decisions that will protect students and put them first.
"As a student, I would have respected them more if they had just said, 'That's not within our capabilities, that's not something we're going to actively do, but if something happens on campus, we'll be there to deal with any situation that arises.'"
Heriot-Watt University is under pressure after the reports (Image: Garrett Baylor Stell) Despite not challenging Raytheon's requests at the time, a university spokesperson told The Herald that the safeguarding team "does not have access to or monitor any student chat groups or online discussion forums".
They said: 'Our safeguarding team routinely checks physical notice boards on campus. This is part of their regular responsibilities to ensure that all displayed materials align with our university's values.
'In the event of a protest or demonstration, the role of our safeguarding team is to observe and support the safety and wellbeing of all participants.'
On February 20, the university hosted two defence companies at its student careers fair, Raytheon UK and Leonardo, both of which make parts for the type of F-35 fighter jets used by the Israeli military, according to research by the Campaign Against the Arms Trade.
Neither company replied to questions about their connection to jets used for bombings in Gaza, but both have been the subject of demonstrations against their involvement in weapons manufacturing and, more recently, connections to technology used in the war in Gaza.
On January 31, Raytheon UK's security manager asked the HWU safeguarding team to monitor CCTV for signs of students gathering to protest and to conduct enhanced patrols to 'show a presence and act as a deterrent.'
READ MORE: 'Why must Palestinians pay?': Holocaust survivor speaks out on Gaza genocide
The Raytheon UK employee wrote that the company's presence on campuses has previously drawn "unwanted attention from protest groups, including university students' and requested help ahead of the February careers event.
Raytheon UK's attendance was not advertised prior to the event, according to the email.
The Raytheon UK employee asked HWU to implement additional measures, including three specific requests of the safeguarding team:
"Monitor the university chat groups and notice boards in the lead up to the event in case any groups are planning to disrupt the event, as we have had this occasionally at university events in the past."
"Monitor the campus CCTV prior to and during the event in case any groups are seen gathering that may be intent on a protest or simply disrupting the event."
"Prior to and during the event carry out enhanced patrols around the venue entrance and perhaps enter the venue occasionally to show a presence and act as a deterrent."
The Raytheon UK employee added that they had no information to suggest any protest or disruption was planned, nor did they provide examples of their employees being subjected to unlawful protest on other campuses.
On February 5, in response to Raytheon UK's requests, a HWU employee said: "Not a problem, we will support this event in the same way as last year and to [sic] implement the measures you have suggested.
'If there is anything else we can assist with this, then please do not hesitate to let me know."
​There was no demonstration during the career event in question.
When asked if university staff followed through on Raytheon UK's requests, a HWU spokesperson told The Herald that the university is "proud of its safeguarding service, and it is good practice to assess safety measures for campus events, with our safeguarding and estates teams playing a key role in this process".
They added: "We reject any allegation that the university was involved in improper monitoring of any members of our community."
'The safeguarding team provides 24/7 support for students, staff and visitors on campus, including incident response, first aid, mental health support, and overall campus safety. Their role is to protect and support our community, as the wellbeing of our students and staff is of paramount importance to us.
"Heriot-Watt University fully supports the right to freedom of expression and peaceful protest, provided these activities are conducted lawfully and within the framework of University policies.
'Like all universities, we must balance this right with our responsibility to ensure the safety, wellbeing, and uninterrupted academic experience of the wider community.
'In the event of a protest or demonstration, the role of our safeguarding team is to observe and support the safety and wellbeing of all participants.'
The university did not provide further comment when asked why it did not explicitly refuse to monitor student chats, given it has since said that staff do not have access to such groups.
In the email exchange between the Raytheon UK employee and HWU, safety concerns are only referenced in relation to Raytheon employees. All references to HWU students or potential protestors are in the context of possible 'disruption' or 'unwanted attention".
The university's spokesperson did not reply when asked whether supporting the safety and wellbeing of demonstrators included discouraging demonstrations from taking place.
A Raytheon UK spokesperson said that it works with hosts to conduct thorough security assessments on behalf of all participants ahead of any career event.
They added: 'Raytheon UK, like other large employers, regularly meets with university students interested in exploring aerospace careers.
"Raytheon UK is proud to be a longstanding employer in the United Kingdom with pathways to robust careers in advanced technology.'
Raytheon UK's website describes the company as 'focused on Defence, Aerospace, Cyber and Intelligence with sites across the UK".
In the email to HWU, the Raytheon UK employee indicated that the company's status as 'one of the biggest defence industry companies in the world' is the reason it sometimes draws protests from student groups.
Raytheon UK did not reply when asked if it only discussed careers in its aerospace with attendees, and not any careers connected to weapons systems or defence more broadly.
Jo Grady, general secretary of the University and College Union (UCU), which represents a wide range of university staff in the UK, expressed concern over the university's relationship with Raytheon UK.
'It is bad enough that Heriot-Watt, while touting its positive role on the global stage, is inviting an arms company like Raytheon onto campus.
'That the university's bosses are also spying on their own students on the company's behalf is a scandal and plumbs new depths.
'Heriot-Watt must stop colluding with arms companies and protect democratic space for students to protest against genocide and crimes against humanity.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Lindsay Hoyle blocks release of emails sent to Israeli politicians
Lindsay Hoyle blocks release of emails sent to Israeli politicians

The National

time43 minutes ago

  • The National

Lindsay Hoyle blocks release of emails sent to Israeli politicians

Responding to an Freedom of Information (FoI) request lodged by Declassified UK, the UK Government said Hoyle was the individual who had chosen not to release written correspondence since October 2023 between himself and the Israeli Embassy, Labour Friends of Israel and members or officials of the Knesset, the Israeli legislature. The response said that Hoyle "has formed the reasonable opinion that disclosure of the information would be likely to prejudice the effective conduct of public affairs". READ MORE: What reparations should Palestine receive? The Fringe show where you decide Hoyle previously visited Israel in November 2023 for a 'solidarity visit'. Israel's ambassador to the UK Tzipi Hotovely shared a video clip of his visit online. He said: "Unless you witness and come here to see what's happened, you cannot imagine the atrocity took place." In 2024, Hoyle was heavily criticised for allowing rules to be changed for the first time over a vote led by the SNP on a ceasefire in Palestine - ultimately saving Labour from a rebellion threat. The House of Commons erupted into chaos as Hoyle selected both UK Government and Labour amendments, making it the first time in at least 25 years that the move had occurred on an Opposition Day, the clerk of the House confirmed - calling it a "departure from long-established convention". Nearly 100 MPs signed a no-confidence motion in the Speaker – but a bid to have the issue referred to the Privileges Committee failed. Hoyle caused further outrage when he told the SNP that they would have another opportunity to put forward a ceasefire motion, but this was not followed up on. The full FoI response stated: You asked to be provided with written correspondence since 1 October 2023 between the Speaker of the House of Commons Sir Lindsay Hoyle and the Israeli Embassy, Labour Friends of Israel and members and/or officials of the Knesset, the Israeli legislature. The House of Commons holds information within the scope of your request. While we hold this information however, it is withheld from release in accordance with section 36(2)(c) of the Freedom of Information Act 2000 (FOIA). This is because the Speaker of the House of Commons, on advice from House officials, including Speaker's Counsel and Clerk of the Journals, has formed the reasonable opinion that disclosure of the information would be likely to prejudice the effective conduct of public affairs. Section 36 FOIA provides an absolute exemption in the case of the House of Commons and the public interest test does not apply. You may, if dissatisfied with the handling of your request, complain to the House of Commons. Alternatively, if you are dissatisfied with the outcome of your request, you may ask the House of Commons to conduct an internal review of any decision regarding your request.

Kemi Badenoch's position on Israel is discrediting the Conservative Party
Kemi Badenoch's position on Israel is discrediting the Conservative Party

New Statesman​

time3 hours ago

  • New Statesman​

Kemi Badenoch's position on Israel is discrediting the Conservative Party

Photo byandWhen Kemi Badenoch became leader of the Conservative Party, she very sensibly aimed not to rush into early statements of detailed policy. Unfortunately, her appointment of Priti Patel as shadow foreign secretary was its own statement. Following her unauthorised 2017 trip to Israel while secretary for international development, Patel has been a disgraced figure. While there, accompanied by the peer Stuart Polak of the Conservative Friends of Israel, she met the Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu without UK government officials or the British ambassador. Afterwards, she advocated a change in UK policy which, in breach of long-established humanitarian practice, would have included the Israel Defence Forces (IDF) in its aid delivery. This episode could not have been a starker example of impropriety. It merited her dismissal but Theresa May was too weak to wield the axe. Instead, Patel was allowed to resign. And yet, Badenoch saw fit to appoint her to the shadow cabinet. Patel is now in a position to perpetuate her views at a critical moment in world events. Badenoch has shown no indication of knowing anything about Israel and Palestine, and has not made any profound statements on this, the one foreign issue, other than Ukraine, that has dominated global news since she was elected. All she utters is uncritical support for Israel. The Conservative Party used to have a world-view. It supported enlightened international cooperation, and institutions such as the UN along with its accompanying treaties, rules and conventions. More broadly, it was the UK that pledged to support a homeland for the Jewish people, and a future for the Palestinians next door. To their shame, while successive governments have forever delayed implementing that commitment, the Israelis each and every day have violently stolen ever more Palestinian land. Palestine is the only populous legally undisputed land in the world not allowed to call itself a state. It does not belong to Israel, and Israel's determination to annex it does not mean it is disputed. The illegality of Israeli encroachment is cast-iron in international law, a belief that has been the policy of Conservative and Labour governments for decades. Badenoch, however, seems to share the view of those like Patel who do not believe in their own policy. They can never bring themselves to say explicitly that settlements are illegal. The charge sheet against Israel is growing every day: disproportionate force, indiscriminate bombing, mass displacement, food deprivation, the replacement of the Palestinian relief agency UNRWA with mercenaries, the killing of tens of Palestinians each day as they desperately scramble for food, state-backed support for settler terrorists, and the banning of journalists from Gaza. Badenoch and her front bench have done nothing to condemn any of it. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe [See also: Jonathan Sumption on Israel and Gaza: A question of intent] Amid all this, Priti Patel has refused in the Commons to condemn settler violence – all she would say was that settlers are a barrier to a two-state solution. And when extremist Israeli ministers Bezalel Smotrich and Itamar Ben-Gvir were sanctioned in June, she declined in her response even to mention their names. The likes of Suella Braverman, meanwhile, have branded pro-Palestine demonstrations 'hate marches'. Contemptibly, any pro-Palestinian voice within the Conservative Party is almost systematically accused of anti-Semitism and put into its complaints procedure, which silences and bullies. And as Michael Gove increases his hold on appointments to the leader's office, what could be more warped than his recent recommendation that the IDF be awarded the Nobel Peace Prize? It has now reached the point where Conservative comment has become so extreme it has discredited their entire foreign policy and is making them despised more widely. The party is increasingly becoming defined by its lack of humanity. The world is watching the extermination of an entire country. Palestine is being annihilated. Meanwhile the Conservative Party is covering itself in shame, and will stand no chance of re-election unless it states a clear policy based on international law, and promotes the UK's historic understanding of the region. This issue is and always has been about land. Israel's extremist government has only one objective, and that is to make all of Palestine theirs. All other talk, horrendous though the facts may be, is second to that. As leader, Kemi Badenoch could redeem herself speedily by stating loudly what all should be saying to Israel: 'Get out of Palestine, it isn't your country.' [See also: Keir Starmer alienates left and right on Gaza] Related

Aerial footage filmed by ITV News shows scale of Gaza's destruction
Aerial footage filmed by ITV News shows scale of Gaza's destruction

ITV News

time13 hours ago

  • ITV News

Aerial footage filmed by ITV News shows scale of Gaza's destruction

Last week, ITV News International Editor Emma Murphy filmed from on board a Jordanian flight dropping aid into Gaza. The first aerials of Gaza for months document the territory's continued destruction. Filmed by ITV News International Editor Emma Murphy, on board a plane dropping aid into Gaza, the images show huge swathes of land in ruins. Journalists are prevented from entering Gaza by Israel. Looking out the plane windows from 15,000 feet is the closest any foreign media has been to seeing the aftermath of 22 months of war, apart from trips arranged by the Israeli military. Those on the flights were told they were only allowed to film the aid being dropped, not Gaza below. Entire areas have been levelled after months of Israeli bombardment; the land, once pebbled with spots of green, has largely turned to dust. The Al Wafa Centre for Elderly Care, located in Al-Zahraa City, stands out in a landscape primarily made of rubble. The centre said it provides care for elderly people over 60 with no one to care for them, free of charge. While the building still stands, it has not escaped aerial attacks, according to Palestinian sources. In November 2023, there are multiple reports of Israeli shells hitting the elderly care centre and killing its director, Dr. Medhat Muheisen. Videos from the centre's social media, before the war began ,show elderly patients being fed, provided with activities and partaking in exercise. They also show the surrounding area of the hospital and what stood there before it was turned to rubble. This screenshot from a video posted in 2021 shows a number of tall buildings that once stood near the centre. Their fate is highlighted in yellow below; once tall frames razed to the ground or crumpled in on themselves. Pressure is being levelled on Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu to reach a ceasefire with Hamas, after images of emaciated hostages held in Gaza were released. Talks previously broke down in July, after President Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff said Hamas' response showed "a lack of desire" to reach a truce. The videos of the hostages emerged as experts warn that Gaza faces "a worst-case scenario of famine" because of Israel's blockade, which will lead to widespread death. Gaza's Health Ministry said Monday that five more Palestinian adults died of malnutrition-related causes in the past 24 hours. It claimed that 87 adults have died from malnutrition-related issues since late June, and that 93 children have died since the war began from a lack of food. Israel's government has denied that people are starving to death in Gaza.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store