The easiest way to prevent the next antisemitic attack
Sunday's Molotov cocktail attack in Boulder on a Jewish gathering in support of hostages held by Hamas in Gaza is the latest horrific episode in a record-breaking spike of antisemitism not seen in a generation. The attack — reportedly planned by a lone wolf actor for more than a year — was predictable and preventable in ways that reflect an ongoing failure to stem the spread of antisemitic propaganda and its mobilization to violence.
One of the top antisemitic narratives that circulate online is the false idea that ordinary Jews are responsible for the actions of Israel. That is the exact idea that mobilized violence in Sunday's attack, along with the killings of a young couple outside the Jewish Museum in Washington, D.C., last week and the arson attack against Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro's home on the first night of Passover. The Colorado, Pennsylvania and D.C. attackers all justified their violence against Jewish Americans as a response to the state of Israel's actions in Gaza.
My research lab at American University, the Polarization and Extremism Research and Innovation Lab (PERIL), maps the most emergent, salient and fastest-spreading propaganda and conspiracy theory narratives across a wide range of harmful ideologies as part of our work to create digital literacy tools to educate Americans about manipulative propaganda and bad actors online. The targeting of Jews because of political disagreement about the state of Israel is one of the most dangerous, and fastest-spreading, such narratives.
Since the Hamas attacks on Oct. 7, 2023, we have seen global acts of violence and vandalism against Jewish houses of worship and Holocaust memorial sites. Protesters shouted 'baby killers' at drivers near a synagogue in New Jersey, etched or spray-painted antisemitic graffiti at Jewish houses of worship and cemeteries, and made bomb threats against synagogues.
Make no mistake: Nonviolent political protest is a hallmark of American freedoms. It is understandable that people want to protest the atrocities in Gaza, which are heartbreaking and nauseating, including the deaths of 27 mostly children gunned down by Israeli soldiers this week for 'straying' from the designated path of a food aid line. But violence is an unacceptable tactic that must be prevented and countered. Blaming Jews for the actions of the Israeli government is both wrong and antisemitic and has led to anxiety among Jewish Americans that 'simply existing in public as a Jewish person is increasingly dangerous.'
Our failure to meaningfully address antisemitism as a country has many layers. The Biden administration launched a landmark national strategy to counter antisemitism in 2023, but made little progress on the more than 100 specific actions named. The Trump administration's actions to combat antisemitism have been accused by a coalition of Jewish organizations as eroding democratic norms, and by a group of senators as weaponizing antisemitism in ways that undermine 'legitimate, nonpartisan efforts to combat rising antisemitism.'
The biggest failure, though, is also the easiest one to address: the spread of disinformation and propaganda that so clearly motivates and mobilizes violence. Both administrations utterly failed to meaningfully address the spread of disinformation and propaganda online, which makes targeted mass violence more likely. The Biden administration's effort to counter disinformation as part of national security efforts collapsed after just three weeks, following massive circulation of misinformation about its purpose and aims. The Trump administration has decimated federal funding for primary prevention of targeted violence as well as efforts to bolster the kinds of digital and media literacy that help fight online propaganda.
These failures fly in the face of what we know about prevention of mass violence: It is preventable if we invest early enough in recognizing warning signs and help people be savvier about the content they consume online. There is strong evidence that people can be dissuaded from believing in harmful online propaganda and conspiracy theories in as little as 30 seconds, just by learning about the manipulative tactics of persuasive bad actors and becoming more skeptical.
We also know that communities can be equipped to prevent violence. There is time to prevent harm in almost every case of radicalization — if we intervene early enough. And by now, the signs are more often than not there for anyone who will pay attention. There are simple steps that communities can take, for example, educate people about red flags and warning signs that make it more likely for family members, friends, colleagues, or others to notice behavioral changes or statements that might need to be escalated to authorities for further assessment. The Boulder attacker plotted his attack for more than a year. He learned how to shoot a gun and took a concealed carry class, but after discovering he was ineligible to purchase a gun as a noncitizen, he did online research on how to make Molotov cocktails.
Safeguarding Jewish communities will only happen when we invest in the kinds of upstream prevention that would make every one of us safer — including digital and media literacy programming for everyone. Imagine a world where the Boulder attacker, and others like him, are dissuaded from believing propaganda that says ordinary Jews are accountable for the political actions of a state halfway across the world, or that violence is an acceptable response to political disagreement.
No one deserves to be targeted for their identity, their religion or the false claim that they are somehow responsible for the actions of a state. Until we address the roots of the propaganda and the spread of disinformation that enables those beliefs, we will continue to see violence and harm like last weekend's horrific attack.
This article was originally published on MSNBC.com
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
IDF announces four soldiers killed in Gaza explosion
The names of two soldiers have not yet been cleared for publication and will be published later. Their families have been notified. The IDF announced on Friday that four Israeli soldiers were killed and another wounded in Khan Yunis, Gaza Strip, when a bomb detonated, causing a building to collapse on the troops clearing the area. Five additional soldiers were wounded, one seriously and the rest moderately. Warrant Officer, (Warr. Ofc.) Chen Gross, and Staff Sergeant (St.-Sgt.) Yoav Raver were named as two of the four wounded. The names of the two additional soldiers have not yet been cleared for publication and will be published later. Their families have been notified. Warr. Ofc. Gross, 33, from Gan Yoshiya, served as a reserve soldier in the Maglan Unit, Commando Brigade. St.-Sgt. Raver, 19, from Sde Warburg, served in the IDF's elite Yahalom unit. The Drom Hasharon Regional Council expressed deep sorrow and extended condolences to Raver's family. A reserve officer in the Maglan Unit, Commando Brigade, was severely wounded in the incident, has been evacuated to a hospital to receive medical treatment, and his family has been notified. The operation took place as part of the IDF's efforts to destroy terror infrastructure in the area, aiming to establish continuous control. The building that the force entered is situated above a tunnel system, so it was necessary to enter and investigate it, Walla reported. Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said, "This is a sad and difficult day. On behalf of all the citizens of Israel, my wife and I send our deepest condolences to the families of our four heroic fighters who fell in Gaza in the campaign to defeat Hamas and return our hostages."

21 minutes ago
FBI, DHS warn of 'elevated threat' to Jewish community in new PSA
The FBI and Department of Homeland Security are warning of an "elevated threat" facing the Jewish community in the wake of two attacks: Sunday's Molotov cocktail assault in Boulder, Colorado, and last month's killing of two Israeli Embassy staff members in Washington, D.C. The Israel-Hamas conflict "may motivate other violent extremists and hate crime perpetrators with similar grievances to conduct violence against Jewish and Israeli communities and their supporters," the FBI and DHS said in a public service announcement issued Thursday night. "Foreign terrorist organizations also may try to exploit narratives related to the conflict to inspire attacks in the United States." The public should "remain vigilant" and "report any threats of violence or suspicious activity to law enforcement," the agencies said. The PSA references Sunday's attack in Boulder when Mohamed Soliman allegedly threw Molotov cocktails at a group of marchers advocating for the release of Israeli hostages, according to prosecutors. Fifteen people, including a Holocaust survivor, were injured, officials said. Soliman, who was arrested at the scene, allegedly yelled "Free Palestine" during the attack, the FBI said. Soliman later told police "he wanted to kill all Zionist people," court documents said. He "said this had nothing to do with the Jewish community and was specific in the Zionist group supporting the killings of people on his land (Palestine)," documents said. Soliman has been charged with a federal hate crime as well as 118 state charges, including attempted murder, assault and explosives charges. He has not entered a plea in either case. The PSA also mentions the May 21 killings of two Israeli Embassy staff members. Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Lynn Milgrim were fatally shot as they left an event at the Capital Jewish Museum in D.C. When the suspect was arrested, he began to chant, "free, free Palestine," according to police. The Anti-Defamation League has documented a dramatic rise in acts of hate targeting Jewish people in the U.S. since the Oct. 7, 2023, terror attack in Israel. In 2024, the ADL said it recorded a record high of 9,354 antisemitic incidents in the U.S., marking a 344% increase over the past five years and a 893% increase over the past 10 years. "I am angry," ADL CEO Jonathan Greenblatt said a news conference in Boulder on Wednesday. 'It's way past time for our political leaders, community groups, media outlets, tech platforms, faith leaders to take action before more Jewish blood is spilled. And it's way past time to stop excusing antisemitic rhetoric," he said. Greenblatt urged the public to speak out against hate and shared small, specific actions people can take.
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump says he has no evidence to justify his unprecedented Biden investigation
Late Wednesday, Donald Trump broke new ground, directing the Justice Department to launch a wide-ranging investigation into Joe Biden and officials in the Democrat's administration, based on Republican conspiracy theories about the former president's mental health. It was an unprecedented move: An incumbent American president had never before publicly ordered a federal probe of his predecessor. There was a degree of irony to the circumstances. After his defeat in the 2020 election, Trump spent years insisting that Biden had ordered an investigation into him — an odd conspiracy theory for which there is literally no evidence. As of this week, it's Trump who's doing exactly what he falsely accused his predecessor of doing. The day after the incumbent president delivered his directive to Attorney General Pam Bondi, as NBC News reported, a reporter asked Trump a good question. Trump said he does not have evidence to support his claims of illegal autopen use during the Biden administration. Asked by NBC News whether he has uncovered any evidence that anything specific was signed without Biden's knowledge or that someone in the former president's administration acting illegally, Trump said, 'No.' The Republican specifically said, 'No, but I've uncovered, you know, the human mind. I was in a debate with the human mind.' He went on to say, 'So, you know, it's just one of those things.' In other words, as far as Trump is concerned, he debated Biden last year; the Democrat struggled; so the Justice Department should investigate the former president and his team to see if White House aides secretly signed laws, orders, directives and pardons without Biden's knowledge. In this country, federal law enforcement is supposed to launch investigations when presented with evidence of wrongdoing. As of now, however, the Trump administration is less concerned with the existence of evidence and more concerned with a president who believes he's 'uncovered, you know, the human mind.' I can appreciate why this might seem like the latest in a series of head-shaking 'Trump being Trump' stories, but it has a broader significance. A sitting American president, effectively by his own admission, just ordered the attorney general to launch an unprecedented fishing expedition against a former American president because on the basis of a flubbed debate performance. What's more, this week's White House offensive marked the third time in three months that Trump has ordered baseless investigations into Americans he perceives as political foes. The story was soon eclipsed by dozens of other administration controversies, but in April, Trump signed two first-of-their-kind executive orders targeting a pair of officials from his first term who defied him. There was barely a pretense in the orders that the targeted former officials — Christopher Krebs, who led the Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency, and Miles Taylor, a former high-ranking Department of Homeland Security official — had done anything wrong. Indeed, the closer one looked at the stated rationales in support of the directives, the more ridiculous they appeared. Nevertheless, the president directed Pam Bondi and the Department of Homeland Security to launch a 'review' into Krebs, while simultaneously ordering DHS to investigate Taylor. A week later, The New York Times' Jonathan Swan reminded White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt, 'The president has long said that it would be an abuse of power for a president to direct prosecutors to investigate him. Last week, President Trump explicitly directed the Justice Department to scrutinize Chris Krebs to see if it can find any evidence of criminal wrongdoing. How is that not an abuse of power, to direct the Justice Department to look into an individual, a named individual?' Leavitt struggled badly to defend Trump's move, and for good reason: The directives were indefensible. That did not, however, stop the Republican president from pushing the problem to a new level by going after his immediate predecessor. I can appreciate why the media landscape is crowded, but I continue to believe this should be more than a one-day story. Trump — who ran on an authoritarian platform, who's trying to concentrate power while expressing indifference to the rule of law — has now ordered three investigations into Americans he doesn't like. He has an enemies list, and he's using the power of the presidency to target people on that list, despite the inconvenient fact that there's no evidence whatsoever of actual wrongdoing. If the pushback is muted, Trump will do what he's always done: assume that he can get away with such an abuse, while preparing to go even further down the same radical and dangerous path. Not to put too fine a point on this, but if the president can sic the Justice Department on his critics and perceived enemies and this isn't seen as a dramatic scandal, who'll be next? How far down his enemies list will he go? I'm reminded anew of J. Michael Luttig, a prominent conservative legal scholar put on the federal bench by President George H.W. Bush who published a Bluesky thread on the orders against Krebs and Taylor, calling them 'shameful' and 'constitutionally corrupt' and accused Trump of 'palpably unconstitutional conduct.' The more routine this becomes, the greater the severity of the offense. This post updates our related earlier coverage. This article was originally published on