Thai economy slows in May on weaker tourism, production, central bank says
BANGKOK, June 30 (Reuters) - Thailand's economy in May softened from the previous month following a slowdown in the tourism sector and a decline in manufacturing production, which offset the surge in exports, the central bank said on Monday.
The tourism sector in May saw a decline in both revenue and the number of foreign tourists, particularly long-haul travellers, the Bank of Thailand said in a statement, opens new tab.
Manufacturing production declined in May from April, attributed to a prior inventory replenishment and the temporary closure of an oil refinery for maintenance, it said.
Exports, a key driver of the economy, rose sharply, led by electronics exports and driven by increasing global demand as well as an acceleration of shipments during the tariff grace period, it said.
Thailand posted a current account (THCURA=ECI), opens new tab deficit of $0.3 billion in May, the BOT said.
Private investment in May dropped 0.6% from the previous month but private consumption rose 0.2%, supported by a continued surge in consumption of durables, it said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Top Gear
an hour ago
- Top Gear
Lotus isn't closing its UK base, but is 'exploring options' to stay competitive
Business Rumours of the brand's Norfolk plant closing have been dismissed Skip 1 photos in the image carousel and continue reading Headlines over the weekend suggested Lotus Cars' UK HQ could be facing closures. We can confirm the carmaker has denied the rumours, saying "it's business as usual". Lotus told the Financial Times "it had paused production from mid-May to manage inventories amid supply chain issues related to US tariffs", but this doesn't mean the Hethel factory – responsible for 1,300 jobs – is shutting down. Advertisement - Page continues below In a statement, Lotus Cars said: 'The UK is the heart of the Lotus brand - home to our sports car manufacturing, global design centre, motorsport operations, and Lotus Engineering. It is also our largest commercial market in Europe. "Lotus Cars is continuing normal operations, and there are no plans to close the factory. We are actively exploring strategic options to enhance efficiency and ensure global competitiveness in the evolving market.' So fear not, more Lotusness is happening. You might like In fairness, it kinda has to. Strong sales haven't yet paid off the development costs for the Lotus Emira, or the fully electric Eletre and Emeya models. Lotus Cars is owned by Geely – Volvo's parent company – and it's been doing well, particularly in the US. In 2020, it sold just 94 cars in the States, but in the first nine months of 2024, Lotus Technology – its EV subsidiary – reported sales of 1,665. In a bid to mitigate the potential impact of its customers facing import duties, it's looking into how best to continue selling its motors. Advertisement - Page continues below The statement continued: "We have invested significantly in R&D and operations in the UK over the past six years. Lotus remains committed to the UK, and its customers, employees, dealers, suppliers, as well as its proud British heritage." More as we get it. Thank you for subscribing to our newsletter. Look out for your regular round-up of news, reviews and offers in your inbox. Get all the latest news, reviews and exclusives, direct to your inbox.
Telegraph
3 hours ago
- Telegraph
Nissan to axe hundreds of UK jobs
Nissan plans to cut hundreds of jobs at its Sunderland factory as the carmaker scrambles to boost profits amid slow demand for electric vehicles (EV). On Monday, the Japanese manufacturer announced plans to cut around 250 jobs – roughly 4pc of its 6,000-strong workforce at the plant in the North of England – through a voluntary redundancy scheme. Office staff and shop floor supervisors at the Sunderland facility will be affected by the cull, while manufacturing workers will be unaffected, the group said. Nissan's Sunderland facility was first opened in 1986 to supply cars including the iconic Nissan Bluebird to markets in the UK and Europe. The factory is currently the largest car factory in Britain and Nissan's only factory in Europe. The car factory in Sunderland is also the city's largest employer. The cuts come as Nissan seeks to cut ¥400bn (£2bn) of costs after its profits slumped amid slower-than-expected uptake of EVs in Europe. Nissan has invested heavily in its push to become a leading manufacturer of EVs in a bid to ditch petrol and diesel car production by 2030. The plans saw it commit £2bn worth of investments for upgrades to its Sunderland facility in 2023 to prepare for the switch to EVs. 25-year low The lay-offs come as slow uptake of EVs hits Nissan's profitability. Slumping sales in China and pricing pressures in the US have also hurt Nissan's income, while soaring energy prices and labour costs have further eroded profits. The slowdown saw Nissan report an 88pc drop in its profits for the full year 2025, in what marked its worst set of financial results in 25 years. In response, the company outlined a far-reaching turnaround plan that is expected to see it lay off 20,000 of its 133,500 global employees. A Nissan spokesman said: 'This week we are beginning discussions with some of our team in Sunderland about the opportunity to voluntarily leave Nissan, with support from the company.' 'This will support the plant's efficiency as we aim to become a leaner, more resilient business,' the spokesman said. Nissan is now expected to start producing its fully electric Leaf model out of its Sunderland facility this year, with a view to launching an electric version of its Juke car in 2026. The spokesman said: 'Our Sunderland plant remains at the forefront of our electrification strategy.'
Telegraph
4 hours ago
- Telegraph
British manufacturing could disappear for good under Labour
Sir Keir Starmer is gaslighting the great British public. The news that net zero taxes will be slashed for thousands of manufacturers in the long-overdue industrial strategy is of course to be wholeheartedly welcomed. Yet, the idea that this means 'Britain is back and open for business,' as the Prime Minister declared last week, really is preposterous nonsense. Perhaps, if Starmer extricated himself from the Westminster bubble even just for a few seconds, he may be able to spot something deeply troubling unfolding across the country on his watch: far from being open, Britain's industrial base is in grave danger of shutting down for good. It's not as if it's happening gradually. The pace at which UK heavy industry is collapsing under the dead hand of Labour is truly extraordinary. Barely a day goes by without another major factory waving the white flag. The latest casualty is Lindsey Oil Refinery in north-east Lincolnshire – one of the country's last remaining refineries and a vital regional employer, as my own father will attest to. The plant provided him with much-needed work in the late 1980s after he left the RAF. With its parent company forced to call in the administrators on Monday morning, a facility that churns out nearly 5.5m tonnes of oil a year – equivalent to roughly about one tenth of the country's capacity – is now in the hands of a government-appointed special receiver. At this rate, the Humber estuary and Teesside may soon be competing to become the country's biggest industrial graveyard as one-by-one, the big plants that dominate the east coast threaten to crumble into the North Sea. In Hull, the owners of Vivergo, the UK's largest bioethanol plant, are threatening to pull the plug. Further north in Redcar, the axe hangs over another big bioethanol producer, while barely a stone's throw away, the Olefins chemicals complex is scheduled for permanent closure. Among the largest of its kind, the site has been a feature of the Teesside skyline since it began operating in the late 1970s. With Labour asleep at the wheel, it is no exaggeration to say that this Government could conceivably preside over the total disappearance of this country's manufacturing capabilities. The North Sea oil and gas industry is surely past the point of no return. The future of other so-called foundational industries such as chemicals, cement, glass, paper, ceramics are all similarly bleak with catastrophic consequences for regional growth, national output, and our self-reliance. Every factory closure threatens to make us even more reliant on foreign imports. It's not as if the Government has any answers, other than the usual hurried handouts. With Jonathan Reynolds reportedly willing to offer support to Lotus to persuade the struggling Chinese-owned carmaker not to shift production to the US, subsidies are at risk of becoming the default solution for ministers bereft of proper ideas any time a fire needs putting out. But history tells us that's never a real solution. Lotus may yet stage a miraculous recovery, but this is a company that has survived for years on handouts amid a tortuous battle to make money. Most of this has come in the form of generous loans from its owners running into the hundreds of millions of pounds, but it has also been the recipient of government funding on several occasions. Taxpayers are entitled to ask why they should have to keep picking up the bill whenever a company is in trouble. In the case of Lindsey Oil Refinery, its owners are facing calls for an official inquiry after they were 'unable' to answer questions about its finances, energy minister Michael Shanks said. Lotus's latest issues, meanwhile, are largely the result of US tariffs, and the bioethanol sector says it will be unable to withstand the onslaught of 1.4bn litres of duty-free ethanol allowed under the UK-US trade deal. Ultimately, the responsibility for a crisis as serious as this has to lie with those in power. It is the consequence of a lethal cocktail of long-term neglect, complacency, short-termism and muddled decision-making. Labour's long-awaited Industrial Strategy will provide some relief – but only some. A reduction in green levies will be meaningful for many manufacturers, but for a great number it is a case of too little, too late. If Sir Keir really wanted to protect British industry and commerce, he would temper the green crusade of his fanatical Energy Secretary, which almost seems deliberately designed to put swathes of perfectly viable companies out of business just to satisfy the militant activists at Greenpeace and Just Stop Oil. The plight of Lindsey is a stark reminder of the folly of over-burdening companies with environmental costs. In corporate filings, the company talks glowingly about its embrace of eco-friendly initiatives such as LED lighting, electric cars, and renewable energy. It even felt compelled to swap face-to-face meetings for zoom calls in the name of saving the planet. One wonders whether the plant may have fared better if management had been less distracted by box-ticking green initiatives. But the Prime Minister is weak, as proven by the horribly one-sided trade agreement he returned from Washington with. Starmer's deal with Trump sold Britain's ethanol makers down the river. One thing that's for certain is that repeated handouts are unsustainable. Somebody needs to get a grip on the tsunami of issues – not just green taxes but other energy costs, along with reams of red tape, and National Insurance rises – that threaten to drown businesses. Starmer faces a choice: find a way to allow more businesses to survive without taxpayer money or allow a slew of failing companies to shut down and accept that the foundations of the economy must change. The current approach is neither one nor the other. It harks back to the days of British Leyland – but in some ways it's worse. At least then the policy of nationalising everything was deliberate. In the absence of anything remotely coherent under the bumbling duo of Starmer and Reeves, the flurry of interventionism seems almost entirely accidental.
