Police probe Leicestershire patient deaths during Covid pandemic
Police are investigating a Leicestershire NHS trust over three patients who died during the Covid pandemic.Leicestershire Police has said it is looking into Leicestershire Partnership NHS Trust (LPT) for offences relating to corporate manslaughter and gross negligence manslaughter regarding the deaths, which took place between September 2020 and July 2021.The Local Democracy Reporting Service (LDRS) said one of the deaths was believed to relate to a patient absconding from Bradgate mental health unit at Glenfield Hospital.LPT told the LDRS it would be "inappropriate" to comment on "an ongoing police investigation".
A recent employment tribunal heard the patient, named only as Patient One in proceedings, was a new arrival on the Beaumont Ward of the unit in September 2020. He was able to escape from the ward's garden, before taking his own life, the tribunal was told.Safety concerns on the ward during Covid were at the heart of the case, with former consultant, Dr Mariam Benaris, claiming she was forced out of her role after blowing the whistle over her fears around patient safety.The tribunal heard Dr Benaris and others working on Beaumont were concerned about the number of new admissions - who would have been at the start of the recovery and often had more complex needs - being concentrated in one ward, and the increased pressure they said this put on employees.The trust told the tribunal the admissions ward was set up in response to NHS England's guidance in the early stages of the pandemic, adding it had conversations around controls to reduce risks relating to the new structure with mitigations being put in place.It also denies its actions were intended as a detriment for the whistleblowing, saying Dr Benaris moved "voluntarily".None of the three patients who lost their lives have been named by Leicestershire Police.Confirming an investigation into "offences relating to corporate manslaughter and gross negligence manslaughter", a spokesman said: "The investigation remains ongoing. No charges have been brought at this time."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
37 minutes ago
- Telegraph
Assisted dying ‘could be Trojan Horse that breaks NHS'
Assisted dying 'could become the Trojan horse that breaks the NHS,' the Commons has heard. MPs are due to vote on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill on Friday, which could see it either progress to the House of Lords or fall. It will be the first time the Bill has been voted on in its entirety since the historic vote in November when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55. On Tuesday, Wes Streeting, the Health Secretary, was questioned about the availability of money to fund such moves. Last year, Mr Streeting voted against the Bill and has since indicated he remains opposed, reiterating that the Government is taking a neutral stance on it. Dame Siobhain McDonagh, a Labour MP opposed to the Bill, said an assisted dying service could 'rob our stretched NHS of much-needed resources'. She said: 'When asked in the House of Commons, the Secretary of State for Health made clear to MPs that there is no money allocated to the NHS to fund the assisted dying Bill. 'It's now clear that the assisted dying Bill will rob our stretched NHS of much-needed resources and could become the Trojan horse that breaks the NHS, the proudest institution and the proudest measure in our Labour Party's history. 'We already know from the impact assessment that this new system could cost tens, if not hundreds of millions of pounds, making our mission to cut waiting times and rebuild our NHS harder. I urge Labour MPs not to vote for the assisted dying Bill to protect the vulnerable and our NHS.' Mr Streeting was asked by the Labour MP Katrina Murray, who opposed the Bill, whether the NHS had the money to fund assisted dying on top of its other priorities. She said: 'If passed, the assisted dying Bill would make thousands of terminally ill people every year eligible to end their lives on the NHS. Does our health service have the money to fund this service as well as its priority of bringing down waiting lists?' Mr Streeting responded: 'Of course, the Government is neutral [on assisted dying]. It's for the House to decide. 'There isn't money allocated to set up the service in the Bill at present, but it's for members of this House and the Lords, should the Bill proceed, to decide whether or not to proceed and that's a decision that this Government will respect either way.' Mr Streeting said last year that there were 'choices and trade-offs', adding that 'any new service comes at the expense of other competing pressures and priorities'. Last week, Mr Streeting said the NHS was 'in a fight for its life' as he described his mission to turn the health service around. 'Not about pounds or pence, but the human cost' An impact assessment published by the Government last month estimated that the operational costs of setting up an assisted dying service could be up to £13.6 million a year. The assessment suggested there could be up to 4,500 assisted deaths in a decade, saving the taxpayer up to £90 million in healthcare and benefits and pensions payments. Kim Leadbeater, the Bill sponsor, has said the proposed legislation is about giving dying people choice at the end of their lives, saying it is 'about the human cost' and 'not about pounds and pence'. She has described her Bill as the 'most robust piece of legislation in this area in the world'. Dozens of Labour MPs called for Friday's overall vote to be delayed, asking Lucy Powell, the Commons Leader, for more time to scrutinise a Bill they say is 'perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations'. But a Government spokesman pointed out that it is a private members' Bill and 'the amount of time for debate is therefore a matter for the House'. Supporters of the Bill say it is coming back to the Commons with better safeguards after more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent on it to date. But opponents claim the process has been rushed and that the Bill is weaker than it was when first introduced last year. A key change was the replacement of a High Court judge requirement for sign-off of applications from terminally ill people, with a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and the three-member panel. While the Bill has the backing of some MPs from medical backgrounds, concerns have been raised by the Royal Colleges of Physicians and Psychiatrists.
Daily Mail
an hour ago
- Daily Mail
Health secretary Neil Gray accused of 'arrogance and entitlement' after he was chauffeur-driven to a pub
Scotland's Health Secretary has been accused of 'arrogance and entitlement' after defending his decision to take a taxpayer-funded limousine to the pub. Neil Gray has refused to apologise and insisted he would not resign for taking a chauffeur-driven ride in the ministerial car to the Brig O'Don watering hole in Aberdeen before being taken on to watch his favourite team play a league match at Pittodrie. It follows calls for him to quit for the latest controversy, after previously coming under fire for using the ministerial car to travel to a series of Aberdeen fixtures. Scottish Government rules state limos cannot be used when the 'principal purpose' of a trip' is not connected to the performance of ministerial duties'. But when challenged on the issue yesterday, Mr Gray told the broadcaster LBC: 'I was on my way between ministerial engagements, I went from a dinner at a restaurant. 'It is all within the rules. I've said quite a bit on this in the past and I've got nothing further to add.' He said he would not be resigning and that he 'absolutely' has the backing of the First Minister and is focused on 'reform and renewal' of the NHS. Scottish Conservative deputy leader Rachael Hamilton said: 'This response smacks of arrogance and entitlement from Neil Gray. 'His refusal to apologise sums up why many Scots are disillusioned with politics and their trust in SNP politicians is broken. He is acting like there is nothing to see here when he has disgracefully misled Parliament. 'Neil Gray's position is health secretary is untenable. How can patients and staff ever trust him again on the NHS after his fabricated account of his use of the ministerial limo?' The journeys were initially logged in the official ministerial register as trips to and from a 'personal address, Aberdeen', and were only amended after an investigation showed no evidence of an address could be found. The Scottish Government insisted there had been an 'administration error' and officials admitted that Mr Gray has no home address in Aberdeen. But the revelation led to claims he had misled parliament for a second time over his ministerial car journeys. Mr Gray previously issued a humiliating apology in the Scottish Parliament last November following revelations that he was chauffuered to and from nine football matches involving Aberdeen FC or Scotland in the period between 2022 and 2024. He apologised to MSPs for giving 'the impression of acting more as a fan and less as a minister' but reassured them that officials had made a record of business meetings at the games. In January, he was forced to apologise again - and admit he had misled parliament - after it was revealed there was no such written record of discussions he was involved in when he attended the 2023 Scottish League Cup Final between Aberdeen and Rangers. On May 15, 2024, Mr Gray was invited by Aberdeen FC Community Trust to take part in a number of Mental Health Awareness Week events and after his meetings, the official Government record showed he was taken to a 'personal address' in Aberdeen. Yet when this claim was investigated, there was no evidence of Mr Gray having a second home in the region. When questioned over the irregularity, SNP spin doctors admitted to The Mail that the Health Secretary was not in fact returning to a home address in Aberdeen, as he did not have one - but was instead attending what they said was a 'personal engagement' at a 'restaurant'. A source confirmed that Mr Gray went to the Brig O'Don, which describes itself as a 'pub restaurant', and is located less than two miles from Pittodrie stadium. The insider confirmed Mr Gray picked up his own bill at the pub.
North Wales Chronicle
an hour ago
- North Wales Chronicle
MP claims assisted dying could be ‘trojan horse that breaks the NHS'
It is expected MPs will have a vote on the Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill on Friday, which could see it either progress to the House of Lords or fall. It will be the first time the Bill has been voted on in its entirety since November's historic yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55. While supporters of the Bill say it is coming back to the Commons with better safeguards after more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent on it to date, opponents claim the process has been rushed and that the Bill is now weaker than it was when first introduced last year. A key change was the replacing of a High Court judge requirement for sign-off of applications from terminally ill people, with a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist. As it stands, the proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and the three-member panel. While the Bill has the backing of some MPs from medical backgrounds, concerns have also been raised by the Royal Colleges of Physicians and Psychiatrists. Disability campaigners have voiced worries about coercion and how vulnerable people could be caught up in any new law, although the proposed legislation is supported by MP and disability rights advocate Marie Tidball as well as former director of public prosecutions Sir Max Hill. On Tuesday, Mr Streeting confirmed no money has yet been allocated for the setting up of an assisted dying service and reiterated the Government is neutral on the Bill. Mr Streeting voted no last year and has since indicated he remains opposed to the Bill. MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill and any amendments, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines. He was asked by Labour MP Katrina Murray, who also voted no in November, whether the NHS has the money to fund assisted dying on top of its other priorities. She said: 'If passed, the assisted dying Bill would make thousands of terminally ill people every year eligible to end their lives on the NHS. 'Does our health service have the money to fund this service as well as its priority of bringing down waiting lists?' Mr Streeting responded: 'Of course, the Government is neutral (on assisted dying). It's for the House to decide. 'There isn't money allocated to set up the service in the Bill at present, but it's for members of this House and the Lords, should the Bill proceed, to decide whether or not to proceed and that's a decision that this Government will respect either way.' Mr Streeting said last year that there were 'choices and trade-offs', adding 'any new service comes at the expense of other competing pressures and priorities'. Dame Siobhain McDonagh, fellow Labour MP who is also opposed to the Bill, claimed an assisted dying service could 'rob our stretched NHS of much needed resources'. She said: 'When asked today in the House of Commons the Secretary of State for Health made clear to MPs that there is no money allocated to the NHS to fund the assisted dying Bill. 'It's now clear that the assisted dying Bill will rob our stretched NHS of much needed resources and could become the trojan horse that breaks the NHS, the proudest institution and the proudest measure in our Labour Party's history. 'We already know from the impact assessment that this new system could cost tens if not hundreds of millions of pounds making our mission to cut waiting times and rebuild our NHS harder. 'I urge Labour MPs not to vote for the assisted dying Bill to protect the vulnerable and our NHS.' An impact assessment published by the Government last month estimated that the establishment of a Voluntary Assisted Dying Commissioner and the three-member expert panels would cost an average of between £10.9 million and £13.6 million per year, although overall implementation costs of a service were not possible to work out yet. While noting that cutting end-of-life care costs 'is not stated as an objective of the policy', the assessment estimated that such costs could be reduced by as much as an estimated £10 million in the first year and almost £60 million after 10 years. Bill sponsor Kim Leadbeater has said the proposed legislation is about giving dying people choice at the end of their lives, saying it is 'about the human cost' and 'not about pounds and pence'. She has described her Bill as the 'most robust piece of legislation in this area in the world'. Dozens of Labour MPs called for Friday's overall vote to be delayed, asking Commons Leader Lucy Powell for more time to scrutinise a Bill they say is 'perhaps the most consequential piece of legislation that has appeared before the House in generations'. But a Government spokesperson pointed out that it is a Private Members' Bill and 'the amount of time for debate is therefore a matter for the House'.
