E Tū Union - Mischievous Or Misinformed?
The E tū union is either being deliberately mischievous or is seriously misinformed about how aged residential care works in New Zealand, says Aged Care Association Chief Executive Hon. Tracey Martin.
The Post published a story last week based on a report titled Transparency and Corporate Tax Reforms to Improve the Efficiency of Aged Residential Care Funding, which has not been made public.
"To level public accusations based on an unreleased document, one that neither the targeted provider nor the public can scrutinise, is not only duplicitous but unethical." says Ms Martin.
It is disappointing that E tū has chosen to spend time and money on what appears to be a flawed report, in an attempt to bully a particular provider into ceasing a change consultation process with their staff.
Without access to the full report, the Association can only respond to the comments attributed to the report's authors and the union.
The claim that aged care providers may not be using government money appropriately is either a complete misunderstanding of how aged residential care is funded or a deliberate manipulation of the facts to push an alternative agenda.
Aged care is a complex environment, but at its core, the financial relationship is between Health New Zealand and the individual New Zealander who needs care.
Providers meet rigorous standards to be eligible to deliver aged residential care services to New Zealanders who are funded directly by the Crown.
The Aged Care Association had hoped for a more constructive relationship with E tū for the benefit of their members and ours, based on shared recognition that the funding model for the provision of aged care to senior New Zealanders is fundamentally broken and must be addressed with urgency.
The time and resource spent on this report would have been better directed toward advocating for an independent, cross-party taskforce (including union representation), to design a fit-for-purpose aged care funding model that delivers greater transparency for all, including everyday taxpayers.
Notes:
Funding for aged residential care is allocated as follows:
- Aged care providers are certified by government agency HealthCert as meeting criteria to deliver specific levels of care - e.g. Rest Home, Hospital, Dementia, or Psychogeriatric care.
- Certification does not entitle providers to any guaranteed funding. It simply confirms that they meet the required standards to deliver care, such as the required staff and facilities.
- Providers are subject to regular audits (both scheduled and unannounced) by independent auditors approved by HealthCert.
- Many of the standards audited relate directly to staffing levels, and the sector overwhelmingly respects and adheres to the voluntary safe staffing levels agreed with Government.
When a New Zealand senior is assessed by a NASC (Needs Assessment and Service Coordination) team as needing residential care, the Ministry of Social Development reviews their financial situation. If they qualify for support:
- They must first contribute their own income (e.g. superannuation or assets).
- The Government then tops up the difference between what they can afford and a capped amount that can be charged by any residential care provider for the provision of that care, with the capped amount set by the Director-General of Health.
- The individual and their whānau choose the care provider they wish to deliver that care to them.
- All financial agreements around the provision of care are between the government and the New Zealander needing care. None of our members receive a bulk grant from government or have a direct financial contract with government.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
17 hours ago
- Scoop
Putting Patients First: Government To Refocus Health System On Outcomes
Press Release – New Zealand Government This Government is focused on delivery getting the basics right, fixing what the previous Government broke, and ensuring New Zealanders have access to timely, quality healthcare, Health Minister Simeon Brown says. Minister of Health The Government will introduce legislation to ensure the health system is more accountable, more efficient, and focused on delivering better outcomes for patients, Health Minister Simeon Brown says. 'After years of bureaucracy and confusion, the health system lost its focus. The previous government scrapped health targets, centralised decision-making with no accountability, while every single health target went backwards meaning patients waiting longer for the care they need,' Mr Brown says. 'This Government is focused on delivery – getting the basics right, fixing what the previous Government broke, and ensuring New Zealanders have access to timely, quality healthcare.' Cabinet has approved a suite of amendments to the Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) Act 2022, designed to strengthen the performance of Health New Zealand and ensure a clearer, more accountable system. 'These changes are about improving health outcomes by making sure the system is focused on delivery, not bogged down in doing the same thing twice. That means better care for patients through a more connected, transparent, and effective health system,' Mr Brown says. 'The previous Government's reforms created a bloated system where no one was truly accountable for delivery. We're changing that,' Mr Brown says. 'We're putting health targets into law so every part of the system is focused on delivering faster care, shorter wait times, higher immunisation rates, and real results.' The current legislation is too focused on bureaucracy rather than patients, with multiple charters and plans creating confusion and fragmentation. These reforms repeal the health sector principles and health charter – cutting needless bureaucracy – while requiring each population strategy to give effect to the Government's health targets. Mr Brown says infrastructure delivery was one of the most serious failings under the previous Government. 'Too many builds were delayed, blown out, or never even started. We're addressing this by establishing a dedicated infrastructure committee and embedding infrastructure as a core function of Health New Zealand. This means the board can focus on lifting system performance where it matters most: for patients.' The Minister is also confirming changes to strengthen the Hauora Māori Advisory Committee (HMAC) and clarify the role of iwi-Māori Partnership Boards (IMPBs). 'Local IMPBs will continue to engage with their communities but will now provide advice directly to HMAC. That advice will then support decisions made by the Minister and the Health NZ board. 'These changes are about one thing – putting patients back at the centre. We're rebuilding a health system that delivers real outcomes, not just organisational charts.' The Amendment Bill will be introduced to Parliament in the coming weeks. Notes: Key changes include: Establishing a new statutory purpose to ensure all patients have access to timely, quality healthcare. Legislated health targets to lock in accountability and ensure New Zealand's health system is measured and managed. Requiring all health strategies give effect to these targets. Stronger governance and financial oversight within Health New Zealand. Making the delivery of health infrastructure a core legislated function of Health New Zealand. Establishing a permanent infrastructure committee to carry out functions related delivery of physical health infrastructure by Health New Zealand. The Director-General of Health (or delegate) able to attend Health New Zealand board meetings to support monitoring. Ensuring simplified board appointment rules that select the best person for the job, based on skills and delivery. Clarifying public service integrity rules apply to the Health New Zealand board, CEO, and staff so patients know they're held to the highest standards. Removing audit requirements for the NZ Health Plan, aligning with other Crown entity requirements. Repealing the Health Charter and Sector Principles to reduce red tape and make things clearer for everyone. Enhancing the role of the Hauora Māori Advisory Committee (HMAC) to provide advice to the Minister and the board of Health New Zealand, that will be taken into account at the national level. Clarifying and streamlining iwi-Māori Partnership Boards (IMPBs). IMPBs focus will shift away from local service design and delivery, to engaging with communities on local perspectives and Māori health outcomes. This legislation supports the Government's wider Health Delivery Plan – including reinstated health targets, a record $16.68 billion in funding, faster access to primary care, improved infrastructure delivery, and the recruitment and training of more frontline doctors and nurses.
Scoop
21 hours ago
- Scoop
Putting Patients First: Government To Refocus Health System On Outcomes
Minister of Health The Government will introduce legislation to ensure the health system is more accountable, more efficient, and focused on delivering better outcomes for patients, Health Minister Simeon Brown says. 'After years of bureaucracy and confusion, the health system lost its focus. The previous government scrapped health targets, centralised decision-making with no accountability, while every single health target went backwards meaning patients waiting longer for the care they need,' Mr Brown says. 'This Government is focused on delivery – getting the basics right, fixing what the previous Government broke, and ensuring New Zealanders have access to timely, quality healthcare.' Cabinet has approved a suite of amendments to the Pae Ora (Healthy Futures) Act 2022, designed to strengthen the performance of Health New Zealand and ensure a clearer, more accountable system. 'These changes are about improving health outcomes by making sure the system is focused on delivery, not bogged down in doing the same thing twice. That means better care for patients through a more connected, transparent, and effective health system,' Mr Brown says. 'The previous Government's reforms created a bloated system where no one was truly accountable for delivery. We're changing that,' Mr Brown says. 'We're putting health targets into law so every part of the system is focused on delivering faster care, shorter wait times, higher immunisation rates, and real results.' The current legislation is too focused on bureaucracy rather than patients, with multiple charters and plans creating confusion and fragmentation. These reforms repeal the health sector principles and health charter – cutting needless bureaucracy – while requiring each population strategy to give effect to the Government's health targets. Mr Brown says infrastructure delivery was one of the most serious failings under the previous Government. 'Too many builds were delayed, blown out, or never even started. We're addressing this by establishing a dedicated infrastructure committee and embedding infrastructure as a core function of Health New Zealand. This means the board can focus on lifting system performance where it matters most: for patients.' The Minister is also confirming changes to strengthen the Hauora Māori Advisory Committee (HMAC) and clarify the role of iwi-Māori Partnership Boards (IMPBs). 'Local IMPBs will continue to engage with their communities but will now provide advice directly to HMAC. That advice will then support decisions made by the Minister and the Health NZ board. 'These changes are about one thing – putting patients back at the centre. We're rebuilding a health system that delivers real outcomes, not just organisational charts.' The Amendment Bill will be introduced to Parliament in the coming weeks. Notes: Key changes include: Establishing a new statutory purpose to ensure all patients have access to timely, quality healthcare. Legislated health targets to lock in accountability and ensure New Zealand's health system is measured and managed. Requiring all health strategies give effect to these targets. Stronger governance and financial oversight within Health New Zealand. Making the delivery of health infrastructure a core legislated function of Health New Zealand. Establishing a permanent infrastructure committee to carry out functions related delivery of physical health infrastructure by Health New Zealand. The Director-General of Health (or delegate) able to attend Health New Zealand board meetings to support monitoring. Ensuring simplified board appointment rules that select the best person for the job, based on skills and delivery. Clarifying public service integrity rules apply to the Health New Zealand board, CEO, and staff so patients know they're held to the highest standards. Removing audit requirements for the NZ Health Plan, aligning with other Crown entity requirements. Repealing the Health Charter and Sector Principles to reduce red tape and make things clearer for everyone. Enhancing the role of the Hauora Māori Advisory Committee (HMAC) to provide advice to the Minister and the board of Health New Zealand, that will be taken into account at the national level. Clarifying and streamlining iwi-Māori Partnership Boards (IMPBs). IMPBs focus will shift away from local service design and delivery, to engaging with communities on local perspectives and Māori health outcomes. This legislation supports the Government's wider Health Delivery Plan – including reinstated health targets, a record $16.68 billion in funding, faster access to primary care, improved infrastructure delivery, and the recruitment and training of more frontline doctors and nurses.
The Spinoff
a day ago
- The Spinoff
The Weekend: Dignity in death shouldn't be so hard
Madeleine Chapman reflects on the week that was. I was going to write a short, silly thing about how everyone should get back into wearing singlets as undergarments in the winter. But then I read an article published by our national broadcaster that made me feel like I'd travelled back in time to a colder, darker society. ' Teenager starves to death alone in emergency accommodation ' is the headline. On the surface, a sad headline that you'd expect to accompany a short report on the tragic death of a young New Zealander. Instead, what follows is a 4,000 word feature article told largely through the testimony of V's parents who still seem to be struggling to accept his gender identity, even after his death. Ever since I read it I have wondered: what responsibility do we as journalists have to respect the wishes of the dead? In reading the full article, it can be ascertained that V was a young trans man who also happened to be autistic and suffered from disordered eating. They went by he/they pronouns and had adopted the gender neutral name 'V' at 15. V's parents 'did not accept the teen was transgender' and were kept 'at a distance' up until V's death in emergency accommodation in 2023. The article is harrowing reading simply for the myriad struggles V faced in their short life. The topline suggestion that 'multiple agencies failed' in their care may well prove true in the coroner's report. But woven throughout the article is a recurring theme, posited by V's parents: that V's gender identity being acknowledged and supported by care providers was a direct factor in their death as it distracted from their eating disorder. That mindset, and some of the framing in the article, have been responded to here. I suspect there is a lot more to come on this story. There are questions around how our health agencies care for young people in acute mental distress. There's a conversation to be had around disordered eating and its treatment in New Zealand. And there's plenty to be interrogated into how our gender diverse population is at such a higher risk of harm and what contributes to this risk. But in this short reflection I can only think about the disservice done to V in having their life and death be reduced to an argument about gender identity. RNZ placed its 'Rainbow Communities Reporting and Content Guidelines' at the bottom of the article which state that 'we use the name and pronouns that people tell us they use'. In the article, those who interacted with V regularly (the Family Works team leader who saw them a week before their death, the motel manager where they were staying), referred to them as 'V' and used either he or they pronouns. Even the police attending to the scene, who had presumably never met V as a living person, 'insisted on using a male name and pronouns'. Clearly this was the name they wished to be known by and the pronouns they used. This was their identity. And yet the article includes their birth name throughout 'at the parents' request' and uses she/her pronouns. Why? 'As this story deals with a deceased person, they are not able to communicate their wishes.' V spent their short life communicating their wishes around their identity to their closest relatives, to no avail. Allowing them to have it in death is a small dignity that shouldn't be so hard to give. The stories Spinoff readers spent the most time with this week Feedback of the week 'Thank you Liam. Beautifully written. I grew up in a state house next to the Ford Block in Rotorua, later immortalised by Alan Duff in Once Were Warriors. We thought it was the way life was. (And life was certainly a lot better before the Labor Govt corporatised the Forest Service and put 5000 people out of work, with devastating consequences.) I couldn't wait to escape because everything I was reading was about New York and London. Much later, looking back, I realised what rich cultural material it was – how interesting it was. There's no doubt Mangere will be gentrified in time. The great pity is that the people who live here now will be priced out. As you write, it's complicated! My only solution: ensure working people are paid a living wage. And all the best to you and your son.' 'On the Western line this morning I am happy to report that Neil's still got it. Big ups to the one person who clapped after his performance.'
