Japan becomes Boeing's newest customer of latest Chinook helo variant
The CH-47 Block II Chinook is an extended-range version of the aircraft that is used by the U.S. Army and U.S. Special Operations Command. Japan is the fourth customer for the new variant.
Germany purchased 60 of the helicopters in a $4 billion deal in 2022, and the U.K. finalized its deal for 14 Chinooks in early 2024.
The CH-47s will be co-produced by Boeing and Kawasaki Heavy Industries. The Japanese company similarly provided elements for the CH-47 JA helicopters.
The helicopters purchased for the Japan Self-Defense Forces will replace some of its CH-47 JA aircraft, which were purchased in the 1980s and delivered by the early 2000s. The helicopters have been used, for example, to respond to the Fukushima nuclear power plant disaster in 2011, with special lead plates attached to the floor to protect the crew from radiation exposure. The aircraft collected ocean water and dropped it over hot spots.
'This award strengthens our decades-long relationship with [Kawasaki Heavy Industries] and provides critical capability improvements that will keep the Japan Self-Defense Forces operating heavy-lift aircraft for decades to come,' Heather McBryan, vice president and program manager for Boeing cargo programs, said in a statement. 'The Block II configuration and digital flight controls will modernize and significantly improve Japan's helicopter transport capabilities by improving aircraft stability, safety, and efficiency.'
The U.S. Army decided in 2019 that it would not procure the CH-47F Block II for the active fleet so it could begin making heavier investments in its Future Long Range Assault Aircraft, or FLRAA, and the Future Attack Reconnaissance Aircraft, or FARA, that it wanted to field in the early 2030s. The service decided it would build 69 of the latest Chinook variant for special operations in the form of the MH-47 'G' model and stop there.
But the Block II had a comeback after several years of uncertainty when the Army decided to return funding to build the variant for the active force following pressure from Congress. And as the result of the service's decision to cancel its FARA program in 2024, $465.2 million in fiscal 2025 funding became available to enable a Block II production start for the regular Army.
The version incorporates a new fuel system, electrical system and stronger airframe to increase lift capability. The Block II version of the Chinook featured new rotor blades, but the Army abandoned the effort in 2022 due to excessive rotor blade vibrations that, according to the Pentagon's chief weapons tester, posed a flight risk.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
5 hours ago
- Yahoo
Boeing Defense Union Asks Lawmakers to Intervene in Strike
(Bloomberg) -- A union representing workers at Boeing Co.'s St. Louis-area defense factories urged US lawmakers from Missouri to intervene and nudge the planemaker to reach a deal. Sunseeking Germans Face Swiss Backlash Over Alpine Holiday Congestion The US-Canadian Road Safety Gap Is Getting Wider To Head Off Severe Storm Surges, Nova Scotia Invests in 'Living Shorelines' Five Years After Black Lives Matter, Brussels' Colonial Statues Remain For Homeless Cyclists, Bikes Bring an Escape From the Streets The IAM Union, which represents 3,200 workers currently on strike, said it had written letters to senators and representatives to press Boeing to return to the bargaining table, the group said in a statement on Wednesday. 'We remain ready and willing to listen to any constructive proposals from the union,' Dan Gillian, a Boeing vice president and senior St. Louis site executive, said in an email. About 3,200 machinists walked off the job earlier this month after members voted down a deal that would have raised wages by 20% and boosted retirement contributions. The union last went on strike in 1996, with the stoppage lasting 99 days. The action adds pressure to Boeing's turnaround efforts with the defense and space division contributing about a third of the company's revenue. Union members build fighter aircraft such as the F-15, the T-7 training jet, missiles and munitions. They also manufacture components for Boeing's 777X commercial jets. In March, Boeing won a contract to design and build the US's next-generation stealth fighter jet, beating out rival Lockheed Martin Corp. for the multi-billion-dollar program dubbed the F-47. Still, the operation that's now gone on strike is far smaller than the civil aircraft business that was severely affected late last year by a walkout, which brought manufacturing in the Seattle area to a standstill for weeks and contributed to Boeing selling equity worth almost $24 billion. (Updates with comment from Boeing in third paragraph.) Bessent on Tariffs, Deficits and Embracing Trump's Economic Plan Why It's Actually a Good Time to Buy a House, According to a Zillow Economist Dubai's Housing Boom Is Stoking Fears of Another Crash Americans Are Getting Priced Out of Homeownership at Record Rates The Social Media Trend Machine Is Spitting Out Weirder and Weirder Results ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
6 hours ago
- Yahoo
Aviation Capital Group Announces Delivery of One Boeing 737-8 MAX to Virgin Australia
NEWPORT BEACH, Calif., August 13, 2025--(BUSINESS WIRE)--Aviation Capital Group LLC (ACG), a premier global full-service aircraft asset manager, announced the delivery of one Boeing 737-8 MAX aircraft to Virgin Australia. This is the third and final aircraft to deliver to the carrier from ACG's order book with Boeing. About Aviation Capital Group Aviation Capital Group is one of the world's premier full-service aircraft asset managers with approximately 500 owned, managed and committed aircraft as of June 30, 2025, leased to roughly 90 airlines in approximately 50 countries. It specializes in commercial aircraft leasing and provides certain aircraft asset management services and aircraft financing solutions for third parties. It was founded in 1989 and is a wholly owned subsidiary of Tokyo Century Corporation. Follow ACG on LinkedIn, and for more information, visit View source version on Contacts Media RelationsMediaRelations@ Investor RelationsInvestorRelations@ Sign in to access your portfolio
Yahoo
9 hours ago
- Yahoo
Why the US military refuses to adopt bullpup rifles
For decades, the U.S. military has flirted with bullpup rifles — compact, futuristic-looking designs that put the action and magazine behind the trigger instead of in front of it. From the Austrian Steyr AUG to the Israeli Tavor, the sci-fi-looking FN F2000, and most recently the RM277 from the Army's Next Generation Squad Weapon program, the Pentagon has tested them all. And every time, the verdict has been the same: No thanks. So why does the military keep rejecting a rifle style that's seen service from Australia to Israel? What is a bullpup rifle? In a bullpup, the working parts, the chamber, bolt, and magazine, are located in the buttstock, behind the trigger group. This means you can run a full-length barrel in a much shorter overall package. For example, the M4 carbine is just under 30 inches long with a 14.5-inch barrel. The Israeli Tavor X95 is 26 inches with a 16.5-inch barrel. The French FAMAS is roughly the same size as the M4, but has a 19.2-inch barrel. That extra barrel length matters. Longer barrels usually mean higher muzzle velocity, better energy retention, and more reliable terminal effects from rounds like 5.56mm or 6.8mm. And in tight spaces like vehicles, helicopters, and urban combat, shaving a few inches off the gun's overall length makes a real difference. The advantages of a bullpup On paper, bullpups tick a lot of boxes for modern combat. Compactness without losing barrel length: Ideal for close quarters and vehicle crews. Better weight distribution: With the bulk of the rifle close to the shoulder, they can feel lighter and easier to hold at the ready. Suppressed use: Starting with a shorter rifle means a suppressor won't make it unwieldy. So if they look good on a spec sheet, why won't the U.S. use them? The dealbreakers The first problem is ergonomics. Bullpups require a different manual of arms. The magazine sits behind the pistol grip, often under the shooter's armpit or mixed up in body armor. Speed reloads and malfunction drills are harder, especially for troops who've spent years training on the M4/M16 family. Next is trigger feel. With the trigger up front and the firing mechanism in the rear, bullpups rely on a long mechanical linkage to connect the two. That linkage adds friction and flex, resulting in heavier, spongier pulls that aren't ideal for precision shooting. Left-handed shooting is another hurdle. Many bullpups eject to the right by default, which means lefties risk brass in the face unless the rifle is reconfigured, something you can't do mid-fight. Then there's modularity. The M4 has plenty of rail space for optics, lasers, lights, and grips. Bullpups have a shorter fore-end, which means less real estate for accessories without crowding the muzzle or ejection port. Top Stories This Week News Airman arrested for death that prompted Air Force-wide safety review of Sig M18 Airman arrested for death that prompted Air Force-wide safety review of Sig M18 By Jeff Schogol News Soldiers who stopped Fort Stewart gunman recognized as 'the best among us in the Army' Soldiers who stopped Fort Stewart gunman recognized as 'the best among us in the Army' By Patty Nieberg Culture Laura Loomer unites vets from both sides of aisle after Medal of Honor rant Laura Loomer unites vets from both sides of aisle after Medal of Honor rant By Matt White Finally, logistics and doctrine. Adopting bullpups would mean rewriting training manuals, changing qualification standards, redesigning load carriage systems, and retraining hundreds of thousands of troops across every service branch. Unless a bullpup offers overwhelming advantages, that level of disruption just isn't likely to be seen as being worth it. The U.S. has tried In 1985, the Pentagon put the Steyr AUG through its paces. What they found were all of the above shortcomings and decided not to purchase them, but that didn't stop U.S. Customs and Border Protection from adopting the rifle from 1988 to 2007 before replacing them with AR-style rifles. The Belgian FN F2000, tested by U.S. special operations, offered fully ambidextrous, forward-ejecting operation in a compact package. But its spongy trigger, bulky profile, and incompatibility with existing accessories killed its chances. Most recently, the General Dynamics RM277 was proposed as part of the Army's Next Generation Squad Weapon program. It is a suppressed, polymer-cased 6.8mm bullpup that, despite impressive ballistics, lost to SIG Sauer's then-XM7, an AR-style rifle that felt more familiar to soldiers and fit better into existing logistics. Other countries made it work… sort of Israel fields the Tavor for infantry and urban ops, but many troops still carry M4s depending on the mission. The country is currently looking to replace the Tavor with a home-built AR-style weapon. France ditched the FAMAS for the HK416. The UK stuck with the SA80 but spent decades and millions fixing its flaws. They're also currently looking for a replacement, and none of the candidates are bullpups. Austria and Australia have stuck with the Steyr AUG, but they operate on a smaller scale and with different mission profiles than the U.S. The bottom line Bullpups aren't bad rifles. In some environments, they're excellent. But they don't offer enough benefit to make the U.S. military scrap its entire small arms ecosystem. They're harder to reload, have less modularity, and often deliver a worse trigger feel. And in a force this large, familiarity and interoperability matter as much as performance. For now, the Army's next standard rifle, the M7, sticks with the AR-style layout. Bullpups will keep showing up in gun shop display cases and in the hands of foreign forces, but for the U.S. military writ large, they remain too weird to issue. We dive into this in more depth in this week's YouTube video, which you can check out here.
