
Pete Hegseth urges Asia to boost defence against China's 'imminent' threat to Taiwan
US Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth has warned of China posing an "imminent" threat to Taiwan, while urging Asian countries to boost defence spending and work with the US to deter war.Hegseth also said that while the US does not "seek to dominate or strangle China", the US would not be pushed out of Asia and would not allow intimidation of allies.He was addressing top Asian military officials at the Shangri-la Dialogue, a high-level defence summit held annually in Singapore. Many in Asia fear potential instability if China invades Taiwan, a self-governing island claimed by Beijing. China has not ruled out the use of force.Beijing has yet to respond to Hegseth's Taiwan remarks.
In his speech, Hegseth characterised China as seeking to become a "hegemonic power" that "hopes to dominate and control too many parts" of Asia. China has clashed with several neighbours over competing territorial claims in the South China Sea.He said that Beijing was "credibly preparing to potentially use military force to alter the balance of power" in Asia, and referred to a 2027 deadline that President Xi Jinping has allegedly given for China's military to be capable to invade Taiwan. This is a date put forth by US officials and generals for years, but has never been confirmed by Beijing.China "is building the military needed to do it, training for it, every day and rehearsing for the real deal", Hegseth said."Let me be clear: any attempt by Communist China to conquer Taiwan by force would result in devastating consequences for the Indo-Pacific and the world. There's no reason to sugarcoat it. The threat China poses is real. And it could be imminent. We hope not but certainly could be."The Shangri-la Dialogue has traditionally served as a platform for the US and China to make their pitches to Asian countries as they jostle for influence in the region.But while this year the US has sent one of its largest delegations ever, China instead has sent a notably low-level delegation and has scrapped its planned speech on Sunday.No explanation has been given for this.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Football Australia get right coach in Joe Montemurro, but why did it take so long?
The appointment of Joe Montemurro as Tony Gustavsson's full-time successor on Monday ended a protracted, near year-long search that began when the Swede's contract expired following the Paris Olympics. Eventually, Football Australia got their man. And given the contradictory task that awaits the incoming coach, they probably couldn't have done better. As inevitable as it is to be forgotten in the hullabaloo as next year's Asian Cup approaches, Montemurro's tenure will be defined by significantly different expectations and circumstances than those faced by his predecessor. While Gustavsson was, in the words of outgoing chief executive James Johnson, a 'tournament coach' recruited to guide a golden generation to tournament success, the landscape greeting Montemurro has shifted. He inherits a team that has simultaneously had base expectations elevated by gilded heroes, many of whom are still in place but with the soil of generational change needing to be tilled. It's a role in which judgment will be immediate, but a true picture of his tenure won't emerge for years. Results reflective of the Matildas' status as an Asian power with designs on catching Japan will be demanded. That is not unfair. For all their success as changemakers and as the buttress of FA's balance sheets, winning was always this side's raison d'être. Japan will enter next year's Asian Cup as heavy favourites, , but it is not unreasonable to expect a talented team that finished fourth at the World Cup to go far in a tournament on home soil. Yet this needs to be balanced with a vision for what comes after a core playing group that has been in place for over a decade departs. A new generation won't just need to be exposed to the senior setup. They will, with the 2027 World Cup and 2028 Olympics approaching, begin to provide more starting players. Close cooperation with junior national teams and the A-League Women will be needed, tough calls will need to be made over ageing players, and greater jeopardy must be injected into squad selection. Steph Catley, Caitlin Foord, Katrina Gorry and Sam Kerr cannot play forever. Given this high-wire act – maintaining results while also embracing the grind of becoming 'head coach of the Matildas programme' – attracting top-drawer international talent was always going to be difficult. That is only compounded by the challenges associated with coaching a nation located a day's journey from football's epicentre, and one that does not possess the same level of prestige as major European or North American countries. Indeed, if Montemurro weren't Australian, it would be difficult to envisage him prematurely leaving a contract with superpower Lyon. But he is Australian, which has helped FA land a coach who has a trophy cabinet laden with silverware earned across Australia, England, Italy and France. The former Brunswick Juventus midfielder has a vision of the style he wants his teams to play, and combines established relationships with members of the existing squad with a deep connection to Australian football and its pathways. Scrutiny will be important as there are questions; his record in major knockout fixtures is one, but others, such as the attrition that befell his small squads at Arsenal, will potentially be masked by a shift from club to international football. FA seems to have hit on the right outcome by appointing Montemurro. But unfortunately, the process that landed them here was anything but well executed – with potential flow-on effects for his tenure. By the time their new coach takes up his position, the Matildas will have logged five camps under Sermanni and played 13 games – crucial contact hours Montemurro won't get. The interim coach has done his best to blood new talent and prepare for the Asian Cup during this time, but the nature of his stop-gap role placed limitations on what he could do. This was obvious at SheBelieves Cup in January, when the extent to which their rivals were accelerating away while the Matildas sat in coaching purgatory was laid bare. Sign up to Moving the Goalposts No topic is too small or too big for us to cover as we deliver a twice-weekly roundup of the wonderful world of women's football after newsletter promotion Having allowed Gustavsson's contract to expire, his exit should have been well forecast by FA, something Johnson hinted at when he described himself as being 'comfortable' soon after. Meanwhile, it was May last year that Montemurro was a free agent – he signed with Lyon in June – and had a big come and get me banner effectively floating over the top of his head when back in Australia. And yet, somehow, it has taken nearly a year for the two to come together. Given his broader remit and that the Asian Cup takes place in less than a year, a fair assessment of Montemurro should, short of disaster, look beyond that tournament and towards his effort to oversee generational renewal during the 2027 and 2028 campaigns. But a home tournament, after the magic of 2023, likely doesn't afford that luxury, and the limited preparation he will get is a rod FA has built for the Matildas' back.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
Asia's factory activity shrinks in May as US tariffs bite
TOKYO, June 2 (Reuters) - Asia's factory activity shrank in May as soft demand in China and the impact of U.S. tariffs took a heavy toll on companies, private surveys showed on Monday, highlighting the darkening outlook for the once fast-growing region. Trade-reliant Japan and South Korea continued to see manufacturing activity contract in May as U.S. President Donald Trump's automobile tariffs cloud the outlook for exports. Adding to the gloom, an official survey on Saturday showed China's manufacturing activity shrank in May for a second month in a sign of weakness in the world's second-largest economy. With many Asian economies making little progress in trade negotiations with the U.S., uncertainty will likely keep companies from boosting production or spending, analysts said. "It's hard to expect a pick-up in Asia's manufacturing activity any time soon with countries in the region slapped with quite high 'reciprocal' tariffs," said Toru Nishihama, chief emerging market economist at Dai-ichi Life Research Institute. "With domestic demand weak, China is flooding Asia with cheap exports, which is also putting deflationary pressure on the region's economies," he said. Japan's final au Jibun Bank Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) stood at 49.4 in May, up from April but staying below the 50.0 line that indicates contraction for the 11th successive month, a private survey showed on Monday. The PMI for South Korea, opens new tab, Asia's fourth-largest economy, stood at 47.7 in May, also staying below the 50 mark for a fourth month due to frail demand and the hit from U.S. tariffs, a survey by S&P Global showed. Both Japan and South Korea saw their economies contract in the first quarter, as Trump's tariffs and uncertainty over U.S. trade policy weighed on exports and corporate activity. There is little sign conditions will improve. On Friday, Trump said China had violated a two-way deal to scale back tariffs, whereas China contended it had maintained communication on trade with the United States. Trump also announced a doubling of worldwide steel and aluminium tariffs to 50%, once again rattling international trade. Japan and the U.S. on Friday agreed to hold another round of trade talks ahead of the G7 summit in June, but Japan's top tariff negotiator said no deal would be reached without concessions on all U.S. tariffs, including on automobiles. Vietnam, Indonesia and Taiwan also saw factory activity contract in May, private surveys showed.


Reuters
an hour ago
- Reuters
OPEC+'s crude output hike comes amid tepid Asian oil demand: Russell
LAUNCESTON, Australia, June 2 (Reuters) - The crude oil market devotes considerable energy to what OPEC+ says, but perhaps a little less to what it actually does when it comes to the supply of the world's most important commodity. The eight members of the wider group that had implemented voluntary production cuts met at the weekend and decided to raise output by 411,000 barrels per day (bpd) in July, the third straight month of the same increase. More than half of the lift in output will be split among the big three of the OPEC+ group, namely Saudi Arabia, Russia and the United Arab Emirates. However, there are two questions that need answering. Firstly, will the eight members party to the agreement actually increase output by the agreed volumes, and secondly, if they do will they find buyers for the additional oil? A point worth noting is that OPEC+, and much of the wider market, talk in terms of production, but the more important metric is export volumes, as it's the amount of crude flowing around the globe that sets the price and the supply-demand balance. The group's top producer, Saudi Arabia, actually saw weaker exports in April of 5.75 million bpd, down from March's 5.80 million bpd, according to data complied by commodity analysts Kpler. Saudi Arabia's exports kicked up to 6.0 million bpd in May, the Kpler data showed, and are expected to rise even further in June, suggesting that there is a lag between output agreements and actual exports. Russia's seaborne exports of crude were 5.07 million bpd in March, remained largely flat at 5.12 million bpd in April and then dipped to 4.82 million in April, showing that the agreed increase in output didn't translate into higher shipments. The question still remains as to whether any additional oil is actually needed, especially in the top-importing region Asia. In the statement after the May 31 meeting, OPEC+ reiterated its view that the global oil market has "healthy" fundamentals "as reflected in low inventories." This is the position they have held since they started easing the 2.2 million bpd of voluntary production cuts in April. However, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries monthly report for May showed crude inventories in the developed world rose in March by 21.4 million barrels to 1.323 billion barrels, which is 139 million barrels less than the average from 2015-2019. In other words, inventories in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development are slightly below the pre-COVID average, and are were already rising before OPEC+ started raising output. Inventories outside the OECD are less visible, and especially in China, the world's largest crude oil importer. Even though China doesn't disclose commercial and strategic stockpiles, the amount of surplus crude can be estimated by subtracting the volumes processed by refiners from the total available from domestic output and inventories. On this basis, China's surplus oil has surged in recent months, hitting 1.98 million bpd in April, the most since June 2023, and up from 1.74 million bpd in March. China increased oil imports in March and April as it secured discounted cargoes from Iran and Russia. But it appears that China's appetite for crude eased in May, despite the lower global prices. China's seaborne imports are estimated at 9.43 million bpd in May by Kpler, down from 10.46 million bpd in April and 10.45 million bpd in March. China's weaker appetite in May contributed to a drop in arrivals in Asia, the world's top-importing region, with Kpler estimating 24.2 million bpd, down from 24.85 million bpd in April. For the first five months of the year, Asia's seaborne crude imports are estimated at 24.45 million bpd, down 320,000 bpd from the same period in 2024. This means that despite the near 30% drop in global crude benchmark Brent futures between mid-January and the low so far this year of $58.50 a barrel on May 5, Asia's demand for oil hasn't increased. So far the impact of lower prices has been muted, and while demand may yet rise in coming months in response to cheaper oil, it's also possible that the economic uncertainty unleashed by U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war is crimping fuel consumption. Brent futures gained on Monday by more than $1 to $63.84 a barrel. The gain in prices suggests that the market had been expecting a larger output increase from the OPEC+ group of eight for July. There remains a high degree of uncertainty for the demand outlook, given the distortions being created by the Trump trade war. But there is also uncertainty over the supply outlook and questions as to whether OPEC+'s top producers will increase export volumes and seek market share over prices. The views expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.