logo
OPEC+'s crude output hike comes amid tepid Asian oil demand: Russell

OPEC+'s crude output hike comes amid tepid Asian oil demand: Russell

Reuters2 days ago

LAUNCESTON, Australia, June 2 (Reuters) - The crude oil market devotes considerable energy to what OPEC+ says, but perhaps a little less to what it actually does when it comes to the supply of the world's most important commodity.
The eight members of the wider group that had implemented voluntary production cuts met at the weekend and decided to raise output by 411,000 barrels per day (bpd) in July, the third straight month of the same increase.
More than half of the lift in output will be split among the big three of the OPEC+ group, namely Saudi Arabia, Russia and the United Arab Emirates.
However, there are two questions that need answering.
Firstly, will the eight members party to the agreement actually increase output by the agreed volumes, and secondly, if they do will they find buyers for the additional oil?
A point worth noting is that OPEC+, and much of the wider market, talk in terms of production, but the more important metric is export volumes, as it's the amount of crude flowing around the globe that sets the price and the supply-demand balance.
The group's top producer, Saudi Arabia, actually saw weaker exports in April of 5.75 million bpd, down from March's 5.80 million bpd, according to data complied by commodity analysts Kpler.
Saudi Arabia's exports kicked up to 6.0 million bpd in May, the Kpler data showed, and are expected to rise even further in June, suggesting that there is a lag between output agreements and actual exports.
Russia's seaborne exports of crude were 5.07 million bpd in March, remained largely flat at 5.12 million bpd in April and then dipped to 4.82 million in April, showing that the agreed increase in output didn't translate into higher shipments.
The question still remains as to whether any additional oil is actually needed, especially in the top-importing region Asia.
In the statement after the May 31 meeting, OPEC+ reiterated its view that the global oil market has "healthy" fundamentals "as reflected in low inventories."
This is the position they have held since they started easing the 2.2 million bpd of voluntary production cuts in April.
However, the Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries monthly report for May showed crude inventories in the developed world rose in March by 21.4 million barrels to 1.323 billion barrels, which is 139 million barrels less than the average from 2015-2019.
In other words, inventories in the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development are slightly below the pre-COVID average, and are were already rising before OPEC+ started raising output.
Inventories outside the OECD are less visible, and especially in China, the world's largest crude oil importer.
Even though China doesn't disclose commercial and strategic stockpiles, the amount of surplus crude can be estimated by subtracting the volumes processed by refiners from the total available from domestic output and inventories.
On this basis, China's surplus oil has surged in recent months, hitting 1.98 million bpd in April, the most since June 2023, and up from 1.74 million bpd in March.
China increased oil imports in March and April as it secured discounted cargoes from Iran and Russia.
But it appears that China's appetite for crude eased in May, despite the lower global prices.
China's seaborne imports are estimated at 9.43 million bpd in May by Kpler, down from 10.46 million bpd in April and 10.45 million bpd in March.
China's weaker appetite in May contributed to a drop in arrivals in Asia, the world's top-importing region, with Kpler estimating 24.2 million bpd, down from 24.85 million bpd in April.
For the first five months of the year, Asia's seaborne crude imports are estimated at 24.45 million bpd, down 320,000 bpd from the same period in 2024.
This means that despite the near 30% drop in global crude benchmark Brent futures between mid-January and the low so far this year of $58.50 a barrel on May 5, Asia's demand for oil hasn't increased.
So far the impact of lower prices has been muted, and while demand may yet rise in coming months in response to cheaper oil, it's also possible that the economic uncertainty unleashed by U.S. President Donald Trump's trade war is crimping fuel consumption.
Brent futures gained on Monday by more than $1 to $63.84 a barrel.
The gain in prices suggests that the market had been expecting a larger output increase from the OPEC+ group of eight for July.
There remains a high degree of uncertainty for the demand outlook, given the distortions being created by the Trump trade war.
But there is also uncertainty over the supply outlook and questions as to whether OPEC+'s top producers will increase export volumes and seek market share over prices.
The views expressed here are those of the author, a columnist for Reuters.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

EXCLUSIVE A bright yellow minibus, a force 9 gale in the Baltic and a gang of heavies with Kalashnikovs: how MI6 extracted a KGB colonel and double agent from under the Russians' noses - with his wife, son and senile mother-in-law in tow
EXCLUSIVE A bright yellow minibus, a force 9 gale in the Baltic and a gang of heavies with Kalashnikovs: how MI6 extracted a KGB colonel and double agent from under the Russians' noses - with his wife, son and senile mother-in-law in tow

Daily Mail​

time11 minutes ago

  • Daily Mail​

EXCLUSIVE A bright yellow minibus, a force 9 gale in the Baltic and a gang of heavies with Kalashnikovs: how MI6 extracted a KGB colonel and double agent from under the Russians' noses - with his wife, son and senile mother-in-law in tow

Even with decades of experience between them, the two middle-aged spies were on edge. They were about to attempt something that had never been done before in the history of MI6. Instead of smuggling out one Russian spy to a new life in Britain – the more usual scenario – they were going to extract an entire family.

Biotech king Evans lands $50m injection for Ellipses cancer drugs
Biotech king Evans lands $50m injection for Ellipses cancer drugs

Sky News

time21 minutes ago

  • Sky News

Biotech king Evans lands $50m injection for Ellipses cancer drugs

Sir Christopher Evans, the renowned British biotech entrepreneur, is close to landing $50m (£37m) in funding for a developer of a new portfolio of cancer treatments. Sky News has learnt Sir Christopher, whose previous companies have included Biovex and Chiroscience, is in the advanced stages of securing the capital for Ellipses Pharma. City sources said Middle Eastern and Asian investors had provisionally agreed to provide the bulk of the new funding, which is expected to be committed at a valuation of about $800m (£592m). The capital injection is expected to be the last such fundraising before Sir Christopher seeks an initial public offering for Ellipses Pharma, with Hong Kong the likeliest listing venue. Ellipses' focus on oncology has previously drawn investment from prominent backers including Sir Tom Hunter's investment vehicle, West Coast Capital. The London-based company's board members include an executive from Mubadala, the Abu Dhabi sovereign wealth fund. In December, it announced the launch of a clinical trial programme in the UAE. "This tremendous commitment has led us to the point where our achievements can be brought to bear for the potential benefit of patients in UAE," Sir Christopher said at the time. "In many ways, we can now bring hope and an innovative therapy to people in the UAE and also enable healthcare professionals to collaborate and share research."

‘Five years from now, these readers will be soldiers': The Russian literature encouraging teens to enlist
‘Five years from now, these readers will be soldiers': The Russian literature encouraging teens to enlist

The Guardian

time25 minutes ago

  • The Guardian

‘Five years from now, these readers will be soldiers': The Russian literature encouraging teens to enlist

'Z literature', a subgenre of Russian fantasy fiction characterised by nationalistic, pro-war storylines, has been on the rise since Russia's full-scale invasion of Ukraine began three years ago and may be pushing young readers towards enlisting in combat. Z literature – named after the 'Z' symbol of support for the invasion – often features popadantsy, or 'accidental travel' narratives, involving a protagonist being transported to pivotal moments in Russia's past and using modern knowledge to intervene and alter history in Russia's favour. 'Providing a powerful strain of jingoistic nostalgia, these narratives satisfy readers' yearning for the lost superpower status by rewriting the past,' according to Mediazona, the independent Russian news outlet which reported on the boom in Z literature in May. Z literature is targeted at young men who will soon be the focus of enlistment drives, said Colin Alexander, a senior lecturer in political communications at Nottingham Trent University. 'In times of war, all countries will try to inspire those demographics targeted [for] soldiering through a range of propaganda strategies.' While news broadcasts are often focused on by propaganda researchers, 'the reality is that publics are most inspired to serve the war effort through storytelling entertainment media and that excites and inspires. Russia is certainly using these well-trodden wartime emotional propaganda techniques, but it is important to state that wherever there is war we tend to find them.' These 'Russian hyper-nationalistic genre novels with their outsize heroics are significant because they are made outside the formal propaganda apparatus of the state,' said Nicholas O'Shaughnessy, emeritus professor of communications at Queen Mary, University of London. 'They are pieces of individual entrepreneurship but highly predictable, as if from a common template.' While the books 'connect of course with Hollywood hyper heroics' such as Captain America, and the 'literature imbibed by Victorian British schoolboys' such as the novels of GA Henry, 'the difference lies in their crudeness and the extent of their hypernationalism which takes them into the realms of fantasy. They retain not one shred of credibility.' 'They offer a binary world of hateful foreigners and wonderful Russians – or at least, Russians who become great after learning the lessons of experience,' he said. Books falling in the Z literature subgenre, according to Mediazona, include Crimean Cauldron by Nikolai Marchuk, in which Ukrainians are portrayed as Nazis and the whole world has turned against Russia, and White Z on the Front Armour by Mikhail Mikheev, about a Russian agent who enters Ukraine after the full-scale invasion begins and apprehends a western spy. 'The market is clearly young and male, but what is stunning is the coarseness. It would be funny if it were not really real. [The books] are tapping into a terrible appetite for destruction, deep yearnings for revenge and a strange view of the Russians as a kind of herrenvolk, a unique people. One source of this mythology is the belief that second world war victory was almost entirely of Russian authorship,' said O'Shaughnessy. Sign up to Bookmarks Discover new books and learn more about your favourite authors with our expert reviews, interviews and news stories. Literary delights delivered direct to you after newsletter promotion 'So these are master-race fantasies which to work require the diminution of other peoples, their subjugation – and arousing hatred is the lubricant for this.' Another example of Z literature, reported Mediazona, is PMC Chersonesus by Andrei Belyanin, a popadantsy story which sees a former marine on a mission to return artefacts to Crimea with a team resembling Aphrodite, Heracles and Dionysus. Along the way, they encounter other figures from Greek mythology and zombie Nazis. Their final mission involves stealing Scythian gold from the Netherlands – a plotline nodding to the real-life loaning of gold to an Amsterdam museum pre-annexation, which the Dutch supreme court ultimately decided should go to Ukraine, not Crimea. 'Five years from now, these readers will be soldiers,' Jaroslava Barbieri, a researcher at the University of Birmingham, told The Telegraph. 'The Kremlin isn't trying to appease aggression – it's cultivating it.' All healthy men aged between 18 and 30 must complete one year of service in the Russian military. Though conscripts in theory cannot serve on the frontlines, there have been reports of them signing combat contracts under duress.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store