Family of outback killer Bradley John Murdoch hold private funeral service
Murdoch, who was serving a life sentence for the murder of British backpacker Peter Falconio in 2001, died on July 15. He had been diagnosed with terminal throat cancer in 2019.
The 67-year-old never revealed where Mr Falconio had been buried.
In a private ceremony for family and friends, Murdoch was cremated and his ashes scattered at an 'undisclosed location', 7News reported on Thursday.
After his death, his family remembered him as a devoted family man.
'To many, Bradley Murdoch is known only for the events that led to his conviction in 2005 for the murder of British backpacker Peter Falconio, a crime for which he has always denied responsibility from his arrest until his death,' their statement to the media said.
'But to those who truly knew him, he was much more than the headlines.
'Brad was a devoted father, father-in-law, and proud Poppy who never missed a chance to brag about his grandchildren. He was a beloved brother, uncle, and friends.'
Mr Falconio's parents Joan and Luciano said they still held out hope their son's remains would be found.
'Upon hearing that Bradley John Murdoch had died our first feeling was of relief, it's like a weight that's been lifted.
'We are only forced to think about him now that he's died, we don't want to let him ruin our lives more than he already has.
'The awful thing is our family's future with Peter was cruelly taken away.
'Today we instead focus on the three children we have left and our grandchildren.'
Murdoch was convicted of murdering Mr Falconio on July 14, 2001.
Mr Falconio had been travelling with his girlfriend Joanne Lees in a Kombi van along the Sturt Highway, north of Barrow Creek between Darwin and Alice Springs, when another car stopped alongside them and motioned to them to pull over.
When the Kombi van pulled over, Murdoch shot Mr Falconio in the head.
Murdoch then tried to kidnap Ms Lees, pulling her out of the van and binding her wrists with cable ties before forcing her in the back of his vehicle.
While Murdoch went back to his vehicle, Ms Lees managed to escape and hid in the bushes for several hours before she flagged down another driver.
Murdoch was found guilty of murder in December 2005 and was sentenced to life in jail with a non-parole period of 28 years.
He maintained his innocence throughout the trial and twice tried to overturn the convictions, but both attempts were unsuccessful.
Murdoch would have been eligible for parole in 2032, but the NT's introduction of 'no body, no parole' laws in 2016 meant he would only have been released if he revealed the location of Mr Falconio's body.
In a statement released after his death, the NT Police Force said it remained committed to 'resolving this final piece of the investigation'.
'It is deeply regrettable that Murdoch has died without, as far as we are aware, ever disclosing the location of Peter Falconio's remains,' the statement read.
'His silence has denied the Falconio family the closure they have so long deserved.
'We continue to appeal to anyone who may have information that could lead us to Peter Falconio's remains to come forward, no matter how small the detail may seem.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
ABC News
22 minutes ago
- ABC News
Optus sued by privacy regulator in warning to Australian corporates to protect data or face fines
Optus could face another hefty penalty, as the privacy watchdog sues the telco over the 2022 cyber attack that exposed the data of around 9.5 million Australians. The Office of the Australian Information Commissioner (OAIC) has filed civil penalty proceedings in the Federal Court, alleging Optus breached privacy laws by failing to properly protect consumers' data. The OAIC has alleged that for a nearly three-year period until September 2022, when the breach occurred as the result of a cyber attack, Optus "seriously interfered with the privacy of approximately 9.5 million Australians by failing to take reasonable steps to protect their personal information from misuse, interference and loss, and from unauthorised access, modification or disclosure" under the Privacy Act. The regulator has claimed Optus failed to manage cybersecurity and information security adequately for an organisation of its size, for the volume of personal information it held and for the company's "risk profile". "The commencement of these proceedings confirms that the [Office of the Australian Information Commissioner] will take the action necessary to uphold the rights of the Australian community," one of the commissioners, Elizabeth Tydd, said. "Organisations hold personal information within legal requirements and based upon trust. "The Australian community should have confidence that organisations will act accordingly, and if they don't, the OAIC as regulator will act to secure those rights." An Optus spokesperson said the company was reviewing the matters raised in the proceedings and will respond to the claims "in due course". "Optus apologises again to our customers and the broader community that the 2022 cyber-attack occurred," the statement to ABC News read. The telco said it had been "working hard" to minimise the impact of the 2022 incident and "will continue to invest in the security of our customers' information, our systems, and our cyber defence capabilities". The theoretical fine the telco may face could reach into trillions of dollars, as the Federal Court can impose a civil penalty of up to $2.22 million for each contravention under the Privacy Act. The OAIC said it was alleging one contravention for "each of the 9.5 million individuals whose privacy it alleges Optus seriously interfered with", but the regulator noted any penalty was a matter for the court to determine. A body representing communications consumers, ACCAN, welcomed the action by the OAIC and said it sent a "clear message" to the sector, with "trillions at stake for Optus". "We have a long way to go to remedy the sorts of practices and behaviours we have seen from Optus over the past few years," ACCAN chief executive Carol Bennett said. Optus has already faced legal proceedings over the high-profile attack and last year said it intended to defend claims by the Australian Communications and Media Authority (ACMA) that it failed to protect confidential details in its database. In June, Optus agreed to pay a $100 million penalty after it admitted to inappropriate sales practices and misconduct, following legal proceedings brought by the consumer watchdog in an unrelated matter. Jamieson O'Reilly, the founder of a firm that companies pay to find IT vulnerabilities, welcomed the court action over one of Australia's most significant data breaches. "I do believe these civil proceedings are a net positive to the cyber security of Australian companies. "Many times, historically, private companies have effectively gotten away with exposing their customer information," he told ABC News. Privacy and data security have remained in the headlines following the 2022 Optus cyber attack, with Australian and global corporates continuing to face hacks and breaches. In recent months, the information of 5.7 million Qantas customers was compromised in a cyber attack on the airline's systems. Mr O'Reilly, the founder of Dvuln, said civil penalties did act as a deterrent and encouraged companies to take cybersecurity seriously. "Traditionally, security leaders in organisations struggle to get money from the board to invest in cybersecurity, this allows them to have something to go to the board and say if we don't invest in cybersecurity, this is what happens." Mr O'Reilly said consumers could also help hold companies to account by taking their business elsewhere. "After the shock and awe of the event, if customers don't have the time or effort to pursue legal and civil action, or leave the company, that also sends a message to the board that they don't have to take it [cybersecurity] as seriously"
ABC News
22 minutes ago
- ABC News
Coroner recommends prison communication review after Lathan Brown's death
A New South Wales coroner has called for changes to prison communication systems to ensure loved ones are kept informed in life-threatening situations. The recommendation comes after an inquest into the death of a young Aboriginal man who died in custody without the chance for a final goodbye. Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander readers are advised this article contains the name and image of a person who has died. Kamilaroi and Barkindji man Lathan Brown, 28, died at Orange Hospital on January 6, 2024, after he was found unresponsive in his cell at Wellington Correctional Centre earlier that afternoon. An inquest in Dubbo heard he had no known medical conditions and was on remand for minor property offences. A breakdown in communication between Corrective Services and his family meant they were unable to be by his bedside before resuscitation efforts were stopped. "I did not get to see my son Lathan alive one last time," his father, Michael Brown, said. "Lathan passed away without his family being with him, and this is still deeply horrifying and upsetting to me. "There was time wasted where we could have spent with him and we can never get that time back." Deputy State Coroner Stuart Devine found the "tragic and unexpected death" was the result of a cardiac arrhythmia and could not have been avoided. However, he identified serious failures in how the family was kept informed. He recommended Corrective Services NSW review its systems to ensure families were kept informed when a person in custody was critically ill or transferred to hospital. The coroner also called for improvements to the intercom used for distress calls in cells at Wellington Correctional Centre, and recommended reviewing staff handover procedures. The inquest heard that about 3:40pm on the day of Mr Brown's death, his cellmate, who was showering at the time, heard him coughing and found him unresponsive on the floor. Paramedics arrived and took Mr Brown to Wellington Hospital, where his pulse was briefly restored, but he remained unconscious and unable to breathe independently. Mr Brown's grandmother, who was listed as his emergency contact, was phoned by Corrective Services and told his condition was "dire", but no further updates were provided. Michael Brown, who was in Orange at the time, was told by a family member that his son was being transferred to Dubbo Hospital. He drove nearly two hours, only to learn his son was still at Wellington and would be transferred to Orange instead. Mr Brown then drove to Wellington Hospital, but was denied access to see his son for "security reasons". He arrived at Orange Hospital 10 minutes after medical staff decided to take his son off life support. "The heartbreak of lack of communication on that night, not getting updates on his condition and not being told of his whereabouts has resulted in endless pain," Mr Brown said. Lathan Brown, who grew up in Weilmoringle and Bourke, was described as the "life of the party" and proud of his Indigenous heritage. His family and friends remembered him as a respectful young man and a "pleasure to be around". He is one of more than 600 First Nations people who have died in custody since the 1991 Royal Commission into Indigenous Deaths in Custody. The inquest heard his criminal justice contact involved "relatively minor matters" related to drug use after his mother's death. Aboriginal Legal Service solicitor Tia Caldwell urged Corrective Services to act swiftly to prevent the same thing happening to other families. "Aboriginal people are imprisoned at almost 11 times the rate of non-Indigenous people in NSW," Ms Caldwell said. "It has been an extremely long process for Michael Brown and his family. He's devastated he did not get to say goodbye to his son, causing endless pain. "Everyone deserves to have their loved ones beside them in their final hours, but this opportunity was taken from Lathan and his family because of communication deficiencies."
ABC News
an hour ago
- ABC News
Mushroom murderer Erin Patterson to face late August pre-sentence court hearing
Convicted triple-murderer Erin Patterson will face a two-day pre-sentence hearing later this month, with loved ones of those killed by a poisonous beef Wellington dish set to deliver victim impact statements. Patterson, 50, was last month found guilty by a jury of using death cap mushrooms to murder in-laws Don and Gail Patterson, along with Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson. She was also found guilty of attempting to murder Heather's husband Ian Wilkinson, who was the sole survivor. On Friday, Justice Christopher Beale told the Supreme Court the pre-sentence hearing would be set down on August 25 and 26 in Melbourne. The court's preferred location of Morwell, the regional town where Patterson's trial was staged, was not an option due to maintenance works, the judge said. The pre-sentence hearing, also known as a plea hearing, provides an opportunity for loved ones of victims to tell the court about how a crime has affected their lives. Justice Beale asked prosecutor Jane Warren how many people would be making victim impact statements. "All I can say is a lot," Ms Warren replied. Prosecutors will also make legal arguments about the crimes committed and the jail sentence they should attract. Patterson's lawyers will make arguments on behalf of their client and any factors that could be considered by the court when deciding her punishment. In Victoria, the standard sentence for murder is 25 years' jail, but the crime carries a maximum penalty of life in prison without parole. Patterson pleaded not guilty at her trial and insisted the illnesses suffered by guests who ate the beef Wellingtons were a tragic accident. She has until 28 days after being sentenced to formally lodge an appeal. On Friday, the triple-murderer watched proceedings via video link from the Dame Phyllis Frost Centre women's prison, wearing a black t-shirt. Justice Beale also lifted a court order, allowing media outlets to report on previously-suppressed details. They included the details of attempted murder charges police laid against Patterson in relation to her husband, Simon, and other material that was not put before the jury. The judge ruled Patterson's police interview, during which she told lies to homicide detectives, will also be made public.
