logo
Children's voices missing from Pakistan's child rights policy: experts

Children's voices missing from Pakistan's child rights policy: experts

Express Tribune29-05-2025

Listen to article
In Pakistan, children's voices are often absent from the policymaking process on child rights, with decisions typically shaped by experts, policymakers, and activists.
This adult-centric approach, experts warn, fails to reflect the lived experiences and needs of children, undermining both the relevance and effectiveness of policies intended to protect them.
'When policies are designed solely from an adult perspective, they often don't align with children's age, interests, and needs,' said a child rights expert. 'This results in low engagement and weak implementation.'
However, promising signs of change are emerging. A notable example is 16-year-old Abihah Batool, a student from Lahore and an active member of a child forum.
She recently represented Pakistan at the United Nations' Annual Child Rights Convention in Geneva, where she advocated for a comprehensive social protection programme for children.
She has also met with the Punjab Minister for Human Rights, the Chairperson of the Child Protection and Welfare Bureau, and a member of the National Commission for Human Rights (NCHR) to present a charter of demands developed by children.
'From schools to national consultations and even global platforms, children in Pakistan have shown they can speak with insight, sincerity, and moral courage—if only they are given the chance,' said Abihah. She emphasized that social stigma, institutional weaknesses, and tokenistic inclusion continue to obstruct meaningful child participation.
Ayesha Raza Khan, Chairperson of the National Commission on the Rights of the Child (NCRC), shared that Pakistan is leading the way in the South Asian region by including two children as members of the commission.
'We've also established a Child Advisory Panel with representation from across the country,' she noted. 'It is crucial that when we talk about child protection and rights, we start by listening to children themselves.
Their perspectives must be taken seriously.' She pointed to a recent Supreme Court case on child custody as a landmark, where, for the first time, the court sought the children's preferences about which parent they wished to live with after separation.
Iftikhar Mubarak, Executive Director of Search for Justice, highlighted Article 12 of the UN Convention on the Rights of the Child, which guarantees every child the right to express their views on matters affecting them and to have those views taken seriously.
'This means creating safe, inclusive, and effective platforms where children can speak on critical issues such as education, violence, environmental change, gender equality, and mental health.'
Despite these developments, child protection institutions across Pakistan— including in Punjab—remain dominated by adult professionals, with little or no representation of children themselves.
Experts argue that this exclusion not only hinders children's development in confidence, leadership, and civic responsibility but also conceals serious issues like sexual abuse and domestic violence.
"When children are excluded from shaping the policies that impact them, they feel alienated from society, which can lead to long-term inequality," experts warn.
They urge policymakers to ensure meaningful inclusion of children as a foundational principle for building effective, inclusive, and sustainable child protection frameworks.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

India's hegemonic designs
India's hegemonic designs

Business Recorder

time16 hours ago

  • Business Recorder

India's hegemonic designs

One reality which emerged out of the recent India-Pakistan conflict is that India is one among equal in the fraternity of South Asian nations. India has long positioned itself as the dominant regional power in South Asia, leveraging its demographic, economic, and military superiority. However, the recent conflict between India and Pakistan has exposed critical vulnerabilities in this hegemonic posture. This article examines the implications of the conflict on India's regional dominance, highlighting the growing parity between India and Pakistan in diplomatic and military affairs and the increasing strategic autonomy of smaller South Asian nations. It argues that the traditional notion of Indian hegemony is being challenged by an emerging more multipolar and assertive regional order India's involvement in regional organizations like the South Asian Association for Regional Cooperation (SAARC) and the Bay of Bengal Initiative for Multi-Sectoral Technical and Economic Cooperation (BIMSTEC) also illustrates its ambitions to play a leadership role in South Asia. Yet, this perceived hegemony has often been met with resistance from neighboring countries. Indian leadership's role in South Asia has been underpinned by a combination of soft power, economic leverage and strategic dominance. New Delhi has frequently acted as a security guarantor, development partner, and political influencer in countries like Bangladesh, Bhutan, Nepal, Sri Lanka, and the Maldives. However, these relationships have often been marked by tensions, with smaller states resisting perceived Indian overreach. Pakistan, influenced by historic parity between the two carved out countries, remained out of the orbit of India's hegemony. Countries like Bangladesh, Nepal, and Sri Lanka have increasingly asserted their sovereignty and economic independence. Bangladesh has pursued extensive economic partnerships with China and Japan and lately with Pakistan, while Nepal has defied Indian pressure on constitutional and territorial matters. Sri Lanka, Bhutan and the Maldives have oscillated between pro-India and pro-China alignments, reflecting a desire for strategic balance rather than dependence. Nevertheless, this hegemonic stance has increasingly come under scrutiny, particularly in the wake of the recent India-Pakistan conflict, which has revealed significant constraints on India's ability to unilaterally influence regional and global outcomes. India's relative military and economic superiority did not translate into strategic dominance in this conflict. The parity in tactical outcomes has dented the myth of India's invincibility in conventional military terms. Pakistan's nuclear deterrence, improved air defence, and effective diplomacy neutralized India's attempts to impose strategic costs, creating a deterrent equilibrium. The conflict illustrated that conventional superiority does not guarantee dominance in modern asymmetric and nuclear-influenced warfare. The rapid military responses on both sides underscored the limits of escalation without mutual destruction. The conflict has affirmed Pakistan's continued relevance in global diplomacy. Despite India's growing alignment with the West, especially the US, , France and Russia, these powers refrained from taking a partisan stance. Instead, international diplomacy focused on de-escalation and parity-based dialogue. This reinforces the notion that, in matters of regional security and peace, India is not the sole interlocutor, and Pakistan remains a necessary counterpart. Diplomatically, both countries engaged with major global powers to narrate their versions of the conflict. Crucially, the international community treated both states as equally responsible actors, calling for restraint and dialogue. The ceasefire agreement, reportedly influenced by external mediation from actors like the US and the United Arab Emirates, further undermined India's insistence on bilateralism and highlighted its vulnerability to international pressure. Moreover, internationally, both India and Pakistan engaged in parallel diplomatic offensives, apprising the world capitals of their narratives. Significantly, none of these powers outrightly condemned either side. Instead, global calls for restraint and dialogue placed both nations on an equal diplomatic footing. India's inability to dictate the terms of the conflict's resolution represents a broader erosion of its regional and global influence. This shift is not only due to Pakistan's strategic resilience but also because of the changing dynamics among other South Asian nations, many of whom are actively diversifying their diplomatic and economic engagements. The cumulative effect of these developments is a region that is moving away from a unipolar Indian-led order toward a more multi-polar framework. South Asian states are no longer content with passive roles in a hierarchy led by India; instead, they are engaging in multilateral diplomacy, leveraging international partnerships, and resisting hegemonic pressures. The recent India-Pakistan conflict serves as a critical inflection point in South Asia's geopolitical trajectory. It challenges the long-standing assumption of Indian hegemony and underscores the emergence of a more balanced regional order. India's strategic and diplomatic parity with Pakistan in the conflict, coupled with the assertiveness of smaller neighboring states, signals the decline of unilateral Indian dominance. Moving forward, India's future role in South Asia will depend not on its ability to dominate, but on its willingness to engage as a partner among equals. In a region characterized by rising nationalism, economic competition, and strategic realignments, hegemonic posturing may prove not only unsustainable but counter-productive. The way forward lies in fostering regional integration, resolving bilateral issues through dialogue, and embracing a pluralistic vision of South Asian solidarity. India can play a significant role in making this happen. Copyright Business Recorder, 2025

'Isolating' Pakistan not in US interest: think tank
'Isolating' Pakistan not in US interest: think tank

Express Tribune

time17 hours ago

  • Express Tribune

'Isolating' Pakistan not in US interest: think tank

A US think tank has advised the Trump administration to pursue a pragmatic and interest-driven relationship with Pakistan, emphasising that isolating the South Asian nation is counterproductive to American national security interests. "Isolating Pakistan is not in the United States' national security interests. Pakistan's cooperation, even if selective and limited, is better than its intransigence," reads a report of Hudson Institute, a research organization promoting American leadership for a secure, free, and prosperous future. Titled "Engaging Pakistan in a New Era of US Foreign Policy", the report is the product of the US-Pakistan Study Group, comprising seasoned diplomats and analysts. Contributors include Former Ambassador Husain Haqqani, Sahar Khan, Michael Kugelman, Ambassador Cameron Munter, Ambassador Anne Patterson, Ambassador Robin Raphel, Harlan Ullman, Dr Marvin Weinbaum, and Uzair Younus. The report says the United States and Pakistan have a long history of working together. Moving forward, both countries could benefit from identifying common interests and cooperating accordingly. Even selective or limited cooperation from Pakistan is seen as more valuable than disengagement. The report says the recent India-Pakistan crisis reportedly brought the two nuclear-armed South Asian countries to the brink of war before the United States intervened and pulled them back. "This crisis highlights the need for continued US engagement with Pakistan, a critical country in a geostrategic location with which Washington has historically had a complex relationship," it adds. The relationship between Pakistan and the United States has weathered many ups and downs. In the opening months of his second term, President Donald Trump has indicated that he intends to adopt a more pragmatic foreign policy, one that maintains relations even with countries that hold beliefs or values different from his own, according to the report. As a result, the relationship between the United States and Pakistan has a better chance of improvement than it has enjoyed in recent years—if both countries' leaders are able to focus on shared interests rather than ideological differences. In the aftermath of the 2025 crisis, US policymakers are emphasising the importance of engaging with both India and Pakistan to prevent and manage crises between the two nuclear-armed neighbors. Given the serious threat posed by any future conflict or nuclear escalation in South Asia, the United States is encouraged to take an active role in mediation efforts during such crises. The experience of past administrations has shown that Pakistan's strategic calculus about India is unlikely to change through either incentives or pressure. Instead, a more realistic approach is advised—one that accepts Pakistan's self-perception and works within that framework rather than attempting to reshape it. Another area of mutual interest is counterterrorism. While the United States continues to monitor terrorist groups, Pakistan also faces internal threats from militant extremist organizations.

Bilawal urges Trump to mediate talks between Pakistan, India over Kashmir
Bilawal urges Trump to mediate talks between Pakistan, India over Kashmir

Express Tribune

timea day ago

  • Express Tribune

Bilawal urges Trump to mediate talks between Pakistan, India over Kashmir

Bilawal Bhutto Zardari, former Foreign Minister of Pakistan and current head of the Pakistan People's Party, leads a delegation to Washington, which played a key mediatory role in a ceasefire after Pakistan's conflict with India in May. Photo: AFP Listen to article Heading the Parliamentary Diplomatic Committee, Pakistan Peoples Party (PPP) Chairman and former foreign minister Bilawal Bhutto Zardari has called on US President Donald Trump to play a role in defusing tensions between Pakistan and India. In an interview with AFP, Bilawal urged US President Donald Trump to play an active role in bringing India to the negotiating table for comprehensive talks with Pakistan. He stated that while Pakistan is open to discussions on terrorism, the central issue of any meaningful dialogue must be the Kashmir conflict. He highlighted the growing dangers posed by India, which used terrorism as a justification for military action, potentially destabilising the entire South Asian region. "The destiny of 1.7 billion people cannot be left to faceless non-state actors or India's so-called new normal," he warned. In a separate interview with Chinese media, Bilawal called out India for deliberately undermining regional peace through unilateral aggression on Pakistani soil. He stressed that the Pakistani community in the US must unite and contribute to shared goals of peace and prosperity. He reaffirmed Pakistan's commitment to peace and dialogue, emphasising the country's role as a responsible actor amid rising tensions. The former FM appealed to the international community to support efforts for peace, noting that lasting stability in South Asia hinges on inclusive dialogue. A peaceful South Asia, with normalised trade relations between India and Pakistan, would bring widespread benefits to the region and beyond, he added. Bilawal further acknowledged the sacrifices made by Pakistan's military leadership in the ongoing fight against terrorism. "We have consistently taken steps toward peace, while India continues its aggression," he said. "If India escalates the situation, Pakistan retains the right to respond accordingly." He also addressed the issue of Indian-sponsored terrorism in Balochistan, supporting terrorist groups like the Balochistan Liberation Army (BLA) and th Tehreek-e-Taliban Pakistan (TTP). He questioned whether this would lead to an ongoing cycle of conflict after every terrorist attack, given India's approach. Read more: India laying ground for 'first nuclear water war', says Bilawal Meanwhile, Bilawal held meetings with key figures, including Senator Tom Cotton, Congress members Liu Correa and Brian Mast, and senior officials from the US Department of Homeland Security. These discussions focused on regional cooperation, the Kashmir dispute, and the broader implications for US-Pakistan relations. During a talk at the Middle East Institute in Washington, he underscored the urgent need for the resolution of long-standing conflicts in the region. He reiterated Pakistan's willingness to engage in discussions on Kashmir, terrorism, and water issues, but emphasized the need for the US to act as a mediator to advance the dialogue. He pointed out that India's actions in Kashmir have violated international agreements and UN resolutions. He commended the recent US efforts in offering to mediate, which has re-internationalised the Kashmir issue, disproving India's narrative that Kashmir is a bilateral matter. He further stressed that Pakistan condemns terrorism and firmly rejects any involvement in recent incidents in Kashmir, calling for impartial international investigations, which India has so far rejected. Bilawal also raised concerns over India's threat to disrupt Pakistan's water supply under the Indus Water Treaty, describing this as a potential trigger for war. He urged the US and the international community to intervene and prevent this dangerous trend, warning of its catastrophic consequences for the entire region. Also read: South Asia at brink over Kashmir and Indus Water Treaty, Bilawal warns US lawmakers Reflecting on the recent conflict with India, he highlighted Pakistan's military victories, including the shooting down of Indian aircraft. He noted that, at the diplomatic level, the world has once again recognised the importance of Pakistan-India relations. He expressed hope for future cooperation between India and Pakistan, particularly in the areas of trade, water security, and environmental challenges like flooding and drought. He also proposed the possibility of an India-Pakistan Economic Corridor, which could enhance bilateral prosperity while benefiting regional and global stakeholders, particularly the US. Bilawal concluded the mission with a strong call for international support in ensuring lasting peace and stability in South Asia, stressing that both Pakistan and India must prioritise dialogue and cooperation to address shared challenges and secure a prosperous future for the region. Other members of the parliamentary delegation thanked the US for its positive response and reaffirmed Pakistan's commitment to peaceful resolutions of all unresolved issues. They also urged global leaders to support this critical diplomatic mission.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store