logo
'I was in a little anxious void waiting'

'I was in a little anxious void waiting'

Yahoo3 days ago
A Worcestershire woman said she felt as though she was living in a "little anxious void" as she waited for the government to vote on welfare cuts.
On Tuesday evening, the welfare reform bill passed by 75 votes after offering last-minute concessions to appease Labour rebels.
Elspeth Edwards, 21, from Pershore, claims £600 per month in welfare and said: "It has been an absolute emotional rollercoaster because the entire time I've not known what I can do with my life."
But the prime minister said the welfare bill ends mandatory reassessment for those with severe disabilities, calling it the "right thing to do".
Ms Edwards is unable to work due to her conditions, as she faints multiple times a day, is in "immense pain constantly" and suffers from severe fatigue.
Speaking at the House of Commons on Wednesday, Sir Keir Starmer said it also rebalanced universal credit, which he says is "long overdue" and sets out a pathway to reform Pip.
The original welfare reform bill, which would have affected Ms Edwards, included proposals to restrict eligibility for the personal independence payment (Pip) and cut the health-related element of universal credit.
The changes made by the passed bill will now not include Pip, which will see no changes until a review has been completed.
However, under the plans, under-22s will also no longer qualify for the health element of universal credit.
The government initially announced its plans for a shake-up of the benefits system in March.
Discussing her life since March, Ms Edwards said it had been "incredibly stressful".
"I've not known what I can do with my life," she said.
"It's like I've had to put my life on pause in like anxious little bubble because I couldn't plan for university.
"I couldn't even apply for university because I didn't know if I had the financial stability to be able to go.
"I was basically sat in this little anxious void waiting for an answer."
Follow BBC Hereford & Worcester on BBC Sounds, Facebook, X and Instagram.
Starmer backs Chancellor Rachel Reeves after tearful appearance at PMQs
Government wins vote on watered-down welfare bill after concessions
Starmer's approach to welfare reform 'appalling' - Swinney
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Met Police issue warning after Palestine Action ban comes into force
Met Police issue warning after Palestine Action ban comes into force

Yahoo

time41 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Met Police issue warning after Palestine Action ban comes into force

The Metropolitan Police have warned that officers will act if criminal offences related to the support of proscribed groups are committed, after a ban on Palestine Action came into force on Saturday. The force said there are a number of events taking place in London this weekend and 'anyone attending should be aware that officers policing these will act where criminal offences, including those related to support of proscribed groups or organisations, are committed'. Palestine Action lost a late-night Court of Appeal challenge on Friday, which sought to stop the protest group being banned, less than two hours before the new legislation came into force at midnight. The designation as a terror group means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison. Proscription makes it a criminal offence under the Terrorism Act 2000 (TACT) to invite or express support for an organisation through chanting, wearing clothing or displaying articles such as flags, signs or logos, the Met said. The Met also said it is a criminal offence to: – belong, or profess to belong, to a proscribed organisation in the UK or overseas (Section 11 TACT); – invite support for a proscribed organisation (Section 12(1A) TACT); – express an opinion or belief that is supportive of a proscribed organisation (Section 12(1A) TACT); – arrange, manage or assist in arranging or managing a meeting in the knowledge that the meeting is to support or further the activities of a proscribed organisation, or is to be addressed by a person who belongs or professes to (Section 12(2) TACT); – wear clothing or carry or display articles in public in such a way or in such circumstances as to arouse reasonable suspicion that the individual is a member or supporter of a proscribed organisation (Section 13 TACT); – publish an image of an item of clothing or other article, such as a flag or logo, in the same circumstances (Section 13(1A) TACT)

Rachel Reeves to announce review of workplace pensions contributions — here's what it could mean
Rachel Reeves to announce review of workplace pensions contributions — here's what it could mean

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Rachel Reeves to announce review of workplace pensions contributions — here's what it could mean

Rachel Reeves is set to announce an overhaul of the pensions regime when she delivers a major speech at Mansion House this month. The chancellor is due to appoint a commission looking at the adequacy of the pensions system, including the amount of savings among the self-employed, the state pension and auto-enrolment rates. It was announced last July after Labour won the general election, but put on hold after the chancellor's brutal tax-hiking Budget amid anger at the pressure piled on businesses. But two executives familiar with the plans told the Financial Times she plans to appoint the commission in the 15 July speech, with the chancellor believing the UK pensions industry has long been ripe for reform. The chancellor's overhaul is reportedly planning to shake-up auto-enrolment rules, which mandate that staff pay at least 8 per cent of their earnings above £6,240 into the pot each year, with at least 3 per cent coming from their employer. Experts, including the influential Institute for Fiscal Studies (IFS), have warned that the current rate of contribution will leave many pensioners without enough money in retirement. Almost four in 10 pensioners who have worked in the private sector face a cliff-edge in retirement with the current contribution level, the think tank warned. It called last week for 'decisive action' to create a pension system 'fit for the next generation'. It called for an end to the system of employer pension contributions only having to be made if the employee also contributes, recommending that all employees should receive at least 3 per cent of their total pay as contributions. And the IFS called for targeted support for those hardest hit by increases in the state pension age, as well as solutions to help people manage their pension wealth through retirement. Former work and pensions secretary David Gauke said the IFS report was timed perfectly to coincide with the imminent conclusion of the chancellor's pensions review. 'The government should provide a secure pension income, further increases in the state pension age should be accompanied by more support for those hardest hit, and both employees and employers should gradually contribute more to help achieve greater financial security in retirement,' the ex-Tory minister, who has advised the Labour government, said. And IFS director Paul Johnson said: 'There is a risk that policymakers have become complacent when it comes to pensions. Without decisive action, too many of today's working-age population face lower living standards and greater financial insecurity through their retirement.' Mr Johnson said the think tank's recommendations would 'shore up the state pension, help workers save more – but only in periods when they are better placed to do so – and help individuals to make the most of their pension pots through retirement'. The government's review will also look at the level of the state pension, currently £230.25 per week, or £11,973 per year for those who have contributed through national insurance for 35 years. Labour has repeatedly committed to the triple lock, which increases the state pension amount by the highest of inflation, average earnings growth or 2.5 per cent. The Department for Work and Pensions (DWP) was asked to comment.

More than 500 people crossed Channel on Friday
More than 500 people crossed Channel on Friday

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

More than 500 people crossed Channel on Friday

More than 500 people arrived in the UK after crossing the Channel on Friday, as small boat crossings reached record levels. Overall, 517 people arrived in eight boats on Friday, taking the annual total to 21,117, an increase of 56% on the same point last year, according to analysis by the PA news agency. On Tuesday, the tally passed 20,000, the earliest point in the calendar year the figure has been reached since data was first collected in 2018, as ministers struggle with their pledge to 'smash the gangs' of people-smugglers who facilitate the journeys. It comes after reports on Friday that French police officers had used knives to puncture a boat off the French coast. The Government has repeatedly pushed for French authorities to do more to prevent boats leaving the shore, including changing existing rules to allow police officers to intervene when dinghies are in the water. Those changes have not yet come into effect, but reports on Friday suggested tougher action was already being taken. Meanwhile, the Home Secretary Yvette Cooper has announced a 'crackdown' on immigration enforcement targeting illegal working in the gig economy. Officers will carry out checks in hotspots across the country where they suspect asylum seekers are working as delivery riders without permission. It comes after Deliveroo, Uber Eats and Just Eat said they would ramp up facial verification and fraud checks over the coming months after conversations with ministers. Ms Cooper said: 'Illegal working undermines honest business and undercuts local wages. The British public will not stand for it, and neither will this Government. 'Often those travelling to the UK illegally are sold a lie by the people-smuggling gangs that they will be able to live and work freely in this country, when in reality they end up facing squalid living conditions, minimal pay and inhumane working hours. 'We are surging enforcement action against this pull factor, on top of returning 30,000 people with no right to be here and tightening the law through our plan for change.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store