UnitedHealth Plunge Stunned Wall Street. One Analyst Saw It Coming
(Bloomberg) -- When CFRA's Paige Meyer slapped a 'sell' rating on UnitedHealth Group Inc. in February, she was the lone analyst out of 30 tracked by Bloomberg with a negative view of the company.
Can Frank Gehry's 'Grand LA' Make Downtown Feel Like a Neighborhood?
Chicago's O'Hare Airport Seeks Up to $4.3 Billion of Muni Debt
NJ Transit Makes Deal With Engineers, Ending Three-Day Strike
Meyer's price target implying a 22% fall for the shares glared in a sea of optimistic forecasts, while her warnings on regulatory uncertainty and high medical expenses seemed almost alarmist. The health insurance giant was, after all, an industry bellwether that was widely considered a safe bet by Wall Street, even as it faced rising costs and was recovering from the murder of a top executive last year.
Today, Meyer's outlook has proved more prescient than she could have imagined. UnitedHealth's stock has plunged about 36% since her downgrade to Tuesday's close, losing more than $170 billion in market value and notching a spot as the worst performer in the S&P 500 Index during that period. The tumble came as the company cut — then suspended — its annual forecast, replaced its chief executive officer and is now reportedly facing a criminal investigation for possible Medicare fraud.
'I feel fortunate that I had the courage to make that call,' Meyer said in an interview. 'It's hard to go against the grain.'
More bad news continues to pile up for UnitedHealth. The Guardian reported Wednesday that the insurer secretly paid nursing homes bonuses to cut hospital transfers for sick residents, as part of a series of cost-cutting tactics. Prior to that, HSBC cut the stock to a sell-equivalent rating, becoming the second analyst tracked by Bloomberg to do so. UnitedHealth shares fell as much as 8.5% in premarket trading.
The crisis at UnitedHealth is resurfacing an issue that has long plagued Wall Street: The overwhelmingly positive views analysts hold on America's biggest corporations. Data compiled by Bloomberg show that nearly 60% of ratings on S&P 500 companies are 'buys,' and only 5% are 'sells.' UnitedHealth was an extreme example of the trend when Meyer slashed her rating, sporting the highest ratio of 'buys,' at 97%.
Some of the reasons behind those bullish outlooks have little to do with company fundamentals, market participants said. Analysts may hesitate to be overly critical of a company for fear of hurting their relationship with management, which can mean less face time with executives, said Rhys Williams, chief strategist at Wayve Capital Management LLC and a nearly four-decade veteran of Wall Street.
Many also work at firms that make a hefty chunk of their profits from investment banking — an area that is typically firewalled from its research arm. Still, analysts are wary of being negative on companies that might be current or future clients, said David Miller, co-founder and CIO at Catalyst Funds.
'For the most part, they don't want to get fired,' he said. 'Investment banks aren't charities, so they want business from these same companies.'
The collapse of Silicon Valley Bank two years ago is a recent example of analysts being blindsided by weakness in a company's fundamentals.
To what degree such factors played a role in the coverage of UnitedHealth is hard to say. Its proponents, to be sure, often cited the firm's dominant industry position and its history of stellar performance: The insurer regularly reported quarterly profit that beat estimates, and its stock surged more than 1,800% from its 2008 plunge through the end of 2024.
'The view has been 'it's the best-run company, it has the best management and it's huge in the benchmark, so I'm just gonna set it and forget it',' said Mike Taylor, lead portfolio manager of Simplify Health Care ETF, which has maintained an underweight position in UnitedHealth shares.
A UnitedHealth spokesperson said the company 'strives to be accessible to a wide range of analysts and investors, including those with varying perspectives and ratings.'
'A complete shock'
UnitedHealth's issues with rising medical costs began two years ago, as patients who had put off elective procedures during the Covid-19 pandemic started seeking care. The company reassured investors in January, saying it had adequately prepared to cover medical costs trends for 2025.
CFRA's Meyer wasn't convinced. Besides the threat posed by rising costs, she was alarmed by reports of a US Justice Department civil investigation into UnitedHealth's Medicare billing practices, as well as concerns over plans by the Trump administration to cut costs in federal insurance programs. She downgraded the company to 'sell' on February 21.
Other analysts were sanguine. A bevy of Wall Street banks, from JPMorgan Chase & Co. to Wells Fargo & Co., maintained positive ratings on the health insurer going into its April 17 earnings report. The stock rose 25% in the nearly two-month span between Meyer's downgrade and the company's first-quarter earnings. JPMorgan analyst did not respond to a request for comment on this story. Wells Fargo analyst declined to comment.
What happened next stunned analysts and investors. Medical costs were rising faster than it had anticipated, the company said. UnitedHealth reported its first profit shortfall since 2008 and cut its annual forecast as a result.
'We did speak to the company and all signs were pointing to 1Q being a solid setup,' said Michael Ha, an analyst at Baird. 'It's a complete shock and I just don't see how anyone could have foreseen all of this happening.'
More surprises followed. CEO Andrew Witty stepped down earlier this month, to be replaced by former CEO and long-time board chair Stephen Hemsley. The company also suspended its 2025 guidance, further shaking investor confidence.
The next day, the Wall Street journal reported the company faced a criminal investigation by the Justice Department into its Medicare business. UnitedHealth has refuted the report and said it hadn't been notified about the investigation.
Nevertheless, 23 of the 29 analysts Bloomberg tracks maintained buy-equivalent recommendations as of Tuesday's close.
KeyBanc Capital Markets analyst Matthew Gillmor, like many others, said investors should continue buying the stock because 'the issues that are negatively impacting 2025 should be fixable for 2026' as a result of the annual cycle of policy pricings for health insurers. His firm has kept its 'overweight' rating.
Baird's Ha said UnitedHealth's stock is currently too cheap to downgrade. However, any sign of structural weakness in the company's health-care services business could spur a ratings change, he said.
A rare bit of good news has bolstered the case for holding UnitedHealth: At least four insiders, including the newly appointed CEO, together bought some $31 million worth of its stock last week. Bargain-hunting investors appear to have joined in, sending shares up 17% from their recent lows.
Don't count CFRA's Meyer among the buyers, however. She sees the Justice Department investigations continuing to weigh on UnitedHealth shares and says there's little clarity on when medical costs might peak.
'Cheap stocks,' she said, 'can always get cheaper.'
(Updates with Guardian report, HSBC downgrade and premarket trading.)
Why Apple Still Hasn't Cracked AI
Anthropic Is Trying to Win the AI Race Without Losing Its Soul
Inside the First Stargate AI Data Center
Microsoft's CEO on How AI Will Remake Every Company, Including His
Cartoon Network's Last Gasp
©2025 Bloomberg L.P.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Upturn
30 minutes ago
- Business Upturn
India's manufacturing PMI slips to 3-month low in May, employment hits record high
India's manufacturing sector remained in expansion mode in May 2025, although momentum softened compared to April, according to the HSBC India Manufacturing Purchasing Managers' Index (PMI) released by S&P Global. The PMI dipped to 57.6 in May from 58.2 in April — a three-month low — signaling a slower pace of growth in output and new orders. Despite the decline, the reading remained well above the neutral 50-mark and its long-run average of 54.1. According to the HSBC report, while domestic and international demand continued to support business activity, cost inflation, intense market competition, and concerns surrounding the India-Pakistan conflict acted as drags on growth. Manufacturers reported notable increases in selling prices, driven by higher input costs — the steepest seen in nearly a year. One standout in the data was employment. May witnessed the highest rate of job creation since the survey began, with permanent roles rising significantly. Firms also ramped up their input purchases to meet future demand, even as inventory of finished goods fell for the sixth consecutive month. New export orders rose strongly, with firms citing better demand from the US, Europe, Asia, and the Middle East. Despite the challenges, sentiment for future output remained robust, driven by marketing efforts and fresh customer enquiries. Disclaimer: The information provided is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial or investment advice. Economic indicators like PMI are subject to revisions and contextual interpretation. Please consult official sources or financial experts before making business decisions. Aditya Bhagchandani serves as the Senior Editor and Writer at Business Upturn, where he leads coverage across the Business, Finance, Corporate, and Stock Market segments. With a keen eye for detail and a commitment to journalistic integrity, he not only contributes insightful articles but also oversees editorial direction for the reporting team.
Yahoo
35 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Oil Rises as OPEC+ Boosts Supply Less Than Expected
Oil advanced off the back of geopolitical tensions and as OPEC+ hiked production less than some had feared. OPEC+ agreed to surge oil output for the third month in a row, doubling down on a policy shift that has sent crude prices sinking. The nations agreed to add 411,000 barrels a day to the market in July. Bloomberg's Anthony di Paola reports.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Hegseth Talked Big Game to Indo-Pacific Allies—but Trump Mistrust Runs Deep
U.S. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth speaks during the IISS Shangri-La Dialogue in Singapore on May 31, 2025. Credit - Ore Huiying—Bloomberg/Getty Images Against the backdrop of U.S. Vice-President J.D. Vance's jaw-dropping polemic against European democracies at February's Munich Security Conference, this was a welcome return to sense, if not Secretary Pete Hegseth delivered a powerful though measured speech at Singapore's IISS Shangri-La Dialogue on Saturday, pointedly calling out 'Communist China' for its 'massive military build-up, … grey zone tactics, and hybrid warfare,' while also hailing the strength and importance of America's regional alliances and using the word 'peace' 27 times. 'President Trump is a leader of peace, a man of peace, a force for peace,' Hegseth told the scores of Asia-Pacific defense and military chiefs crammed into the ballroom at Singapore's Shangri-La Hotel. 'And together, we will achieve that peace through strength.' Hegseth repeatedly called the Indo-Pacific 'our priority theater' and, in a marked departure from Vance, actually praised European nations for hiking defense spending as an example that their Asian counterparts should emulate. 'It was quite surprising that he used Europe as a reference in terms of GDP [defense] spending,' Micael Johansson, president and CEO of the Swedish arms manufacturer Saab, told TIME. 'But it was a good speech and more collaborative than I had expected.' As Hegseth described it, American defense policy was now that Europe's security would be left to Europeans, while the U.S. was focusing its rebuilt military might—augmented by a $1 trillion defense spend next year, a 13% year-on-year rise—on the Indo-Pacific. This would focus on boosting America's forward force deployment, helping allies and partners strengthen their security capabilities, and rebuilding defense industrial bases including within friendly nations. 'A strong, resolute, and capable network of allies and partners is our key strategic advantage,' said Hegseth. Hegseth also unleashed several broadsides against China, accusing strongman President Xi Jinping of having 'ordered his military to be capable of invading Taiwan by 2027,' with the former Fox News anchor warning that an assault on the self-ruling island—which politically split from the mainland following China's 1945–49 civil war—'could be imminent.' These remarks drew the inevitable rebuke from Beijing, which issued a statement saying Hegseth 'vilified China with defamatory allegations' that were 'filled with provocations and intended to sow discord.' Beijing also warned that Washington 'must never play with fire on [the Taiwan] question,' which is 'entirely China's internal affair.' Notably, China's defense minister stayed away from the annual security summit for the first time since 2019. Admiral Dong Jun was rumored to have been under a corruption investigation amid a sweeping purge of high-ranking PLA officers, though latest reports suggest that he's been cleared. The Chinese delegation that did attend treated Hegseth's accusations with scorn. 'He used a very strong, harsh tone, which surprised me a little, and it's unconstructive and hypocritical,' says Prof. Da Wei, director of the Center for International Security and Strategy (CISS) at Beijing's Tsinghua University. 'Because the U.S. is imposing high tariffs on regional countries, so how can you expect them to partner with you against another economic power?' Indeed, Trump's internecine global trade war was the glaring elephant in the room. Asked about the 'reciprocal tariffs' imposed in April, Hegseth joked: 'I am happily in the business of tanks, not trade, and I will leave that discussion to the man who knows how to do it best.' Which was the ultimate takeaway for the brass hats present. Hegseth's statement of commitment to the region and working with allies was broadly welcomed but hedged by the chaotic approach of the guy he reports to. Indeed, Hegseth showed his hand when he admitted: 'My job is to create and maintain decision space for President Trump, not to purport to make decisions on his behalf.' Delegates in Singapore were only too aware that today, more than during any other U.S. administration, power rests with just one man, whose constant policy flip-flops—embarrassing Zelensky before lambasting Putin; ripping up one Iranian nuclear deal before seeking another; hiking and pausing tariffs—have conjured a bevy of TACO, 'or Trump always chickens out,' memes as well as the impression that American words have never been cheaper. 'I'm quite sure it's just talk,' one European delegate said of Hegseth's speech. A Bangladeshi military officer agreed: 'It still feels like Trump is a more inward-looking than global President.' Write to Charlie Campbell at