logo
We're saving almost enough in our 401(k) retirement plans. Here's the magic number.

We're saving almost enough in our 401(k) retirement plans. Here's the magic number.

USA Todaya day ago

We're saving almost enough in our 401(k) retirement plans. Here's the magic number.
Show Caption
Hide Caption
How are tariffs and your 401(k) retirement savings intertwined?
Experts say a rise in tariffs can lead to several factors that impact your retirement savings.
After years of fitful progress, Americans with 401(k) accounts are finally saving enough for retirement – almost.
That's the takeaway from the latest retirement savings report from Fidelity, a leading plan manager.
In the first three months of 2025, the total 401(k) savings rate on Fidelity plans reached 14.3%. That's an all-time high, and it approaches the 15% benchmark that many financial advisers set for optimal retirement savings.
A decade ago, in the first quarter of 2015, employees contributed 8.1% of their pre-tax pay to 401(k) plans, according to Fidelity data. Employers kicked in 4.4% in matching contributions, for a total savings rate of 12.5%.
In the first quarter of 2025, by contrast, employees saved 9.5% of their salaries, and employers matched 4.8%, for a total savings rate of 14.3%.
How much should you contribute to a 401(k)?
Retirement planners recommend a 15% contribution rate to 401(k) plans on this theory: If you save at least that much throughout your working years, you'll have enough to live comfortably in retirement.
'It's basically the rate that we recommend that will allow you to live the same lifestyle in retirement that you did before you retired,' said Mike Shamrell, vice president of thought leadership at Fidelity Investments.
The gradual ramp-up in 401(k) contribution rates reflects several positive trends in the retirement savings industry, Shamrell said.
The 4.8% employer match is an all-time high. Employers increasingly offer to match at least 5% of a worker's pay in 401(k) contributions, as a way to attract and retain good employees. A common formula matches the first 3% of salary dollar for dollar, and 50 cents on the dollar for the next 2%.
'That's basically free money for saving for retirement, and that is something that employees value,' said Mindy Yu, senior director of investing at Betterment, the online investment manager.
Big 401(k) trends: Auto-enrollment, auto-escalation
Another big trend to influence 401(k) contribution rates is auto-enrollment. Starting in 2025, most new 401(k) plans must automatically enroll employees, rather than leave the decision to workers.
Many older 401(k) plans are voluntary, meaning that employees must sign up to participate. Under auto-enrollment, an employee who does nothing opts in.
More than one-third of Fidelity plans now auto-enroll employees in 401(k)s at a contribution rate of 5% or higher.
'Unless a new hire takes action, they're going to be saving for the plan,' said Rob Austin, head of thought leadership at Alight Solutions, a human capital technology and services provider. 'That's much different than how 401(k)s first started, and you had to enroll on your own.'
Another evolving feature allows employees to automatically increase 401(k) contributions from year to year. Nearly three-quarters of Fidelity plans now have an auto-escalation feature.
Is retirement savings finally catching on?
Retirement plan contributions are rising at a moment when tax-advantaged retirement savings seems to be catching on in the American workplace.
Half of all private-sector workers now participate in 401(k)-type plans, up from about two-fifths of employees in 2010, federal data shows. Some retirement experts see 50% participation as a retirement-savings tipping point.
More private-sector Americans are participating in 401(k) plans, at least in part, because more employers are offering them. Between 2014 and 2024, employee access to 401(k)-style plans rose from 60% to 70%, according to the Bureau of Labor Statistics.
Those positive signs are important, retirement experts say, because many Americans fail to save for retirement.
Wealthy workers amass more retirement savings
The wealthiest Americans are the most likely to amass retirement savings. For households in the top 10% by income, the median retirement account held $559,000 in 2022, according to the federal Survey of Consumer Finances. An overwhelming 93% of those households held retirement accounts.
For middle-income Americans, those in the 40th to 60th percentile by income, the median retirement plan held just $39,000, and nearly half of that group had no retirement accounts.
Many smaller employers don't offer 401(k) plans. Nearly half of workers have no access to any retirement plan at work, according to an AARP analysis.
Americans achieved a record rate of 401(k) savings at a time when their account balances were slipping.
Average 401(k) balances fell by 3% from late 2024 through early 2025, to an average value of $127,100, Fidelity reports. The decline came during a span of market volatility as President Trump took office and launched a trade war.
Gen Z has good retirement savings habits
If 401(k) contribution rates continue to rise, investment experts say, one reason will be good savings habits among younger workers.
The total 401(k) savings rate for Generation Z workers is 11.2%, Fidelity reports, not far behind the savings rates for Millennials (13.5%) and Generation X (15.4%). The savings rate for young adults is significant, because Gen Z is decades away from retirement.
'I think most of the newer, younger cohorts are in this environment where they learn that they need to be saving a lot,' Austin said.
Younger workers know about the decline of pensions as a source of retirement income, and the possibility that Social Security will face a shortfall when they retire.
'Shortfall risk is very real,' Yu said.
Younger workers are more likely than older workers to contribute to a Roth 401(k), Fidelity data shows. Those workers are effectively contributing at a higher rate, Austin said, because Roth contributions have already been taxed.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Trump's ‘big beautiful bill' to make wealthy even richer and punish poor
Trump's ‘big beautiful bill' to make wealthy even richer and punish poor

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Trump's ‘big beautiful bill' to make wealthy even richer and punish poor

Donald Trump's 'big, beautiful bill' will hand thousands of dollars to the rich and leave poorer Americans worse off, a US spending watchdog has warned. The top 10pc of households will get a windfall of $12,000 (£8,800) per year from the Bill's tax cuts, while the bottom 10pc will see a net loss of $1,600 per year because of benefits cuts, according to analysis by the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). This means the richest people in America will get a cash boost worth 2.3pc of income while the poorest households will see losses worth 3.9pc. Mr Trump's 'One Big, Beautiful Bill Act', as the legislation is known, was narrowly passed by House Republicans last month and is currently under scrutiny by the Senate. The president has set a July 4 deadline for a final version of the Bill. The Bill has come under heavy fire for driving up America's debt burden just as economists are sounding alarm bells over the sustainability of the US debt pile. Earlier this month, Mr Trump's former 'first buddy' Elon Musk slammed the Bill as a 'disgusting abomination' that he said would saddle America with 'crushing' debt. The US lost its last triple-A credit rating in May after a downgrade from influential credit agency Moody's. According to the CBO, the measures outlined in the Bill will add $2.4 trillion to the US deficit over the next decade. The Bill includes tax cuts worth $3.7 trillion over the next 10 years – primarily through extending the income tax cuts Mr Trump introduced in 2017 which are due to expire at the end of this year – alongside $1.3 trillion in spending cuts. The bulk of the spending cuts will come through reductions in Medicaid, which funds health insurance for low-income families, and the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (Snap), which provides food stamps for the poorest in America. This means that although households will technically benefit from the tax cuts, the benefits for the lowest earners will be far-outweighed by the cost of their lost benefits. Around 16m Americans are expected to lose their health insurance as a result of the Bill. In a letter to Democrat lawmakers, who had requested the analysis, Phillip Swagel, the CBO director, said: 'The changes would not be evenly distributed among households. 'The agency estimates that in general, resources would decrease for households toward the bottom of the income distribution, whereas resources would increase for households in the middle and top of the income distribution.' Households in the middle of the income distribution would gain just $500 per year, or 0.5pc of their annual income. Speaking on Thursday, Mr Trump said the Bill was 'one of the most important pieces of legislation ever signed, ever approved, so it's going to be something very special.' Broaden your horizons with award-winning British journalism. Try The Telegraph free for 1 month with unlimited access to our award-winning website, exclusive app, money-saving offers and more.

With Baumgartner in audience, Trump signs bill blocking Washington's electric vehicle mandate; state sues in response
With Baumgartner in audience, Trump signs bill blocking Washington's electric vehicle mandate; state sues in response

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

With Baumgartner in audience, Trump signs bill blocking Washington's electric vehicle mandate; state sues in response

Jun. 12—WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump on Thursday signed legislation into law that blocks Washington and other states from following California's lead in phasing out gas-powered vehicles. Rep. Michael Baumgartner of Spokane was among dozens of Republican lawmakers invited to the White House for the occasion, which the president used to riff on a variety of topics in addition to the bill. Between calling Federal Reserve Chairman Jerome Powell "a numbskull" and highlighting his own popularity on TikTok, Trump celebrated the revocation of Biden-era waivers from the Environmental Protection Agency that let California impose stricter vehicle emissions standards than the federal government. After the Biden administration allowed California to ban the sale of gas-powered cars starting in 2035, Washington followed suit in 2022, requiring that all new cars sold in the state be either fully electric or plug-in hybrids. A total of 17 states has adopted similar rules that the newly signed law revokes. "The automakers didn't know what to do, because they're really building cars for two countries," Trump said. "When you have 17 states, you're building cars for two countries." In an interview before the bill-signing ceremony, Baumgartner said the California regulation and its progeny would have been devastating to the U.S. economy. "There does not exist the ability to magically create electric semi-trucks that move nearly 70% of the goods that Americans consume, so it would have been crippling to our economy if this rule was left in place," he said. "You can't run semi-trucks across America on unicorn laughter and aspirational dreams of environmental extremists." To revoke the waivers, the EPA issued under a previous administration, lawmakers invoked the Congressional Review Act, which allowed them to skirt the 60-vote supermajority required to pass most bills in the Senate. They did so despite the nonpartisan Government Accountability Office and the Senate parliamentarian, the chamber's neutral adviser on rules, both informing senators that the EPA waivers didn't count as the executive-branch rules for which the act applies. Despite near-unanimous opposition from Democratic senators, the bill revoking California's waivers received significant bipartisan support in the House, plus a single Democratic senator, Michigan's Elissa Slotkin. Trump was surprised on Thursday when a GOP lawmaker in the room told him 35 House Democrats had voted in favor. One of them was Rep. Marie Gluesenkamp Perez of southwest Washington, who runs an auto repair shop with her husband and has been a frequent critic of her party's push to speed a transition to electric vehicles. Shortly after Thursday's ceremony concluded, Washington state Attorney General Nick Brown and California Attorney General Rob Bonta announced a joint lawsuit with nine other states challenging the elimination of California's waiver. The suit alleges that the resolution violates the separation of powers, the Take Care Clause and multiple federal statutes, including the Congressional Review Act and Administrative Procedure Act. In the lawsuit, the plaintiff states allege that the Congressional Review Act has "never before been used in any context that resembles this one. It has certainly never been used, as it was here, to negate particular state laws." The lawsuit seeks to have the resolution declared unlawful and to require the federal government to implement the Clean Air Act consistent with the granted waivers. "Transportation is the single greatest contributor to greenhouse gas pollution in Washington, and our residents understand the transition to zero-emission vehicles is critical in the fight against climate change," Brown said in a statement Thursday. "This is the Trump administration's latest unlawful attempt to derail Washington's and the nation's transition to a clean future." At the White House, Trump railed against Democrats' efforts to use state and federal laws to phase out gas-powered vehicles — the country's biggest single source of greenhouse gas emissions — and speed the adoption of wind, solar and other low-carbon energy sources. "They're making you buy stuff that doesn't work," the president said. "You should be given the option to buy the electric car, by a gasoline-powered car, buy a hybrid. Probably not hydrogen, because hydrogen has the tendency that when it blows up, you're gonzo. It's over." After the room broke out in laughter at that line, Trump turned to Rep. Steve Scalise and said, "It'll make your accident look like peanuts," apparently referring to the 2017 shooting that left the Louisiana Republican in critical condition. Washington state officials have taken steps in recent days to prepare for the new federal law. In a June 6 memo, the Washington State Department of Ecology notified vehicle manufacturers that it would temporarily pause compliance requirements for some vehicle categories. "This recent federal action introduces new uncertainty for states, manufacturers, and consumers at a time when both businesses and consumers are making real progress in reducing the transportation sector's greenhouse gas emissions," Ecology Director Casey Sixkiller said in a statement June 6. "It undermines states' rights, negatively impacts public health, and puts U.S. automakers at a competitive disadvantage in a global market that is rapidly transitioning to zero-emission vehicle technology." Sixkiller added that the agency would work with legislators, industry partners, local governments and other states to "stay on track and ensure continued progress toward our climate and public health goals." After the federal bill cleared the Senate in late May, Gov. Bob Ferguson said in a statement that the action was "brazenly out of step with the law, science, and public will." "For more than 50 years, states have possessed the ability to adopt stronger vehicle emissions standards to protect public health. Washington has exercised that right, along with 17 other states, resulting in cleaner air and healthier communities," Ferguson said. "Despite this retreat from public health by the federal government, I'm committed to ensuring Washington moves forward on building a healthier, cleaner future." Thursday's bill signing drew praise of the Washington Trucking Association, which said it remains committed to working with Washington lawmakers and the Department of Ecology on a "workable path to electrification." "California's EV trucking mandates have been a disaster for states like Washington, and have caused real harm to the trucking industry, a key link in our trade-dependent state's supply chain network," the association's president and CEO, Sheri Call, said in a statement. "Washington state does not have the infrastructure in place to properly institute such a sweeping mandate like this, and the technology has not advanced enough yet to support the trucking industry's rapid transition to clean energy. Our neighbors in Oregon recently opted out of these mandates for these same reasons." Vicki Giles Fabré, vice president of the Washington State Auto Dealers Association, said that Washington's franchised new car and truck dealers have "made substantial investments in electrification and remain committed to selling electric and hybrid vehicles." "The Washington State Auto Dealers Association intends to work with state policymakers to find solutions that incentivize increased adoption of these vehicles, while also supporting the needs of franchised dealers, their employees, and the customers they serve," Fabré said in a statement Wednesday. According to Sixkiller, one in five new vehicles sold today runs on zero-emission technology. "We're not going to slow down that progress. Washingtonians already experience the impacts of climate change every year, from drought and wildfire to flooding and sea-level rise," Sixkiller said in a statement following the Attorney General's lawsuit. "As our Attorney General's Office fights to protect our state's rights, we'll continue working with the Legislature, industry partners, local governments, and other states to continue our progress on clean transportation. At a time of great uncertainty, that's a promise we can keep." Orion Donovan Smith's work is funded in part by members of the Spokane community via the Community Journalism and Civic Engagement Fund. This story can be republished by other organizations for free under a Creative Commons license. For more information on this, please contact our newspaper's managing editor.

‘High price': Grim warning after AUKUS move
‘High price': Grim warning after AUKUS move

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

‘High price': Grim warning after AUKUS move

Australia will have 'a very high price to pay if AUKUS fails', opposition defence spokesman Angus Taylor says. The warning came after the US Department of Defence launched a review of the trilateral pact with Australia and the UK to ensure it aligned with Donald Trump's 'America First' agenda. The Albanese government has brushed off concerns the move signals waning US support for the alliance with Canberra, with Deputy Prime Minister Richard Marles saying it was 'natural that the (Trump) administration would want to examine this major undertaking'. But with AUKUS the centrepiece of Australia's defence strategy over the first half of this century, it has offered little reassurance. 'This is an incredibly important alliance,' Mr Taylor said on Friday. 'It's an incredibly important capability, both in terms of the submarine capability and the technology capability … and this must be a top priority of the government.' He said the Albanese government had 'many questions to answer'. 'What discussions has Richard Marles already had? To what extent is our lack of defence spending a driver of this review? When will the Prime Minister meet with the President to actually discuss this face-to-face?' he queried. 'These are questions we need answers to, and they're questions that go to the heart of making sure that AUKUS is a success and that we ensure that we have peace through deterrence in our region.' NewsWire understands Anthony Albanese was set to meet the US President on the sidelines of the upcoming G7. But US State Department sources said a time had not been set and the situation was 'fluid'. 'No submarines' Canberra has already spent billions laying the groundwork to acquire and build nuclear-powered submarines and train personnel to crew them under AUKUS. Washington has committed to supply up to five Virginia-class submarines starting in 2032. But sluggish submarine production has put the US on track to face a shortage early next decade. To help bolster production, Australia has agreed to inject $4.6bn into the US defence industrial base. Mr Marles said on Thursday he was 'confident' the production rate was on track. 'And we are seeing real progress – increases in both production and sustainment – associated with what we're doing with AUKUS and what the Americans themselves are doing,' Mr Marles told the ABC. 'That's what is set out in the agreement that we already have with the United States, which forms part of the treaty that we now have between the US and the UK. 'I think it's completely appropriate for this administration to have a look at all of the facts and figures around that.' Malcolm Turnbull, who was prime minister during Mr Trump's first term, took a different view. Also speaking to the ABC, he said it was 'very likely' Australia would end up 'having no submarines'. 'The latest numbers given to the congress by the navy on 11 March this year was that the rate of production is 1.1 per annum,' Mr Turnbull said. 'They need to get to two by 2028 to be able to meet their own requirements, and to 2.33 to meet their own plus Australia's. 'And they have not been able to lift production rates despite the expenditure of over $10bn over the last six or seven years.'So they've got a real problem there.' Mr Trump can renege on Washington's AUKUS commitments if they put US national security at risk.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store