Bruce Rauner: Don't lower the bar for Illinois students
If you've ever watched the high jump event in track and field, you know they raise the bar a little at a time to determine who can clear the greatest height without knocking the bar to the ground.
It's exhilarating to watch each athlete rise to the challenge.
Now imagine if they did it in reverse, lowering the bar in each round so everyone feels good about their performance and gets awarded a medal. It would spare some frustration and disappointment, but it also would defeat the entire purpose of the event — and no one would ever improve.
The same principle applies in education. If we keep lowering expectations to create the illusion of success, we fail the very students we claim to be helping.
According to state education officials, Illinois currently has 'some of the highest proficiency benchmarks in the nation.' Yet instead of keeping that bar high or even raising it, they're proposing reworking the state's benchmarking system because it 'unfairly mislabels students.'
State Superintendent of Education Tony Sanders recently proposed that Illinois lower its state assessment standards to 'provide us with more accurate data.'
Lowering the standards doesn't make the scores more accurate. It sends the wrong signal to students and creates misinformation for parents and educators that results in more students falling through the cracks.
This is part of a troubling trend picking up steam across the country. In 2024, Oklahoma and Wisconsin revised their academic standards by lowering the passing scores on their state tests. As a result, students this year were not required to demonstrate the same level of mastery as those in previous years. This change means that some students who would have previously been identified as needing additional support are now considered to be meeting expectations. Oklahoma realized the folly in lowering the bar and recently reversed course to reinstate higher expectations.
According to the Nation's Report Card, a biannual assessment of math and reading administered to students in every state, Illinois needs to commit to more rigorous standards, not weaken them. This year's scores showed stagnant or declining results in the number of fourth grade students able to score at or above proficient for math and reading. By lowering expectations on state assessments, the number of students listed as below, at or above proficient could look wildly different than the scores reported by National Assessment of Educational Progress.
This is what is known as an 'honesty gap.' It's an active choice to fudge proficiency scores because state leaders believe they're unfair.
Lowering expectations for students in Illinois will only widen the honesty gap between state-reported performance and how students actually compare to their peers nationwide, leaving them unprepared for the realities they'll face after graduation. That's the most unfair thing we can do to our students.
Numerous studies have shown a strong connection between reading achievement and long-term outcomes, such as college enrollment and lifetime earnings.
Similarly, a recent Urban Institute study found that raising math scores by just 0.5 standard deviations for students up to age 12 led to greater increases in earnings by age 30 than any other factor examined.
We don't want our students to be unprepared for the academic or professional challenges they will face after K-12 education. This is why Illinois should instead look to bolster current standards with more comprehensive policy solutions that will support students where they are: promoting and challenging those who are testing above proficiency and providing rapid evidence-based interventions and support to those who are testing below proficiency in an effort to bring them up to speed.
Illinois policymakers just voted to give more than $300 million in additional funding to public schools. Billions of dollars in new spending has been allocated since we passed historic school funding reform in 2017, yet accountability continues to be eroded. Taxpayers deserve to know whether that additional funding leads to students improving in meaningful, measurable ways. Consistently high standards are the only way to ensure that.
It might feel good in the short term to see more students clear the bar, but those same students are likely to wind up more disadvantaged in the long run because they won't get the support they need to make real improvement. Bruce Rauner was the 42nd governor of Illinois.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Chicago Tribune
8 hours ago
- Chicago Tribune
Bruce Rauner: Don't lower the bar for Illinois students
If you've ever watched the high jump event in track and field, you know they raise the bar a little at a time to determine who can clear the greatest height without knocking the bar to the ground. It's exhilarating to watch each athlete rise to the challenge. Now imagine if they did it in reverse, lowering the bar in each round so everyone feels good about their performance and gets awarded a medal. It would spare some frustration and disappointment, but it also would defeat the entire purpose of the event — and no one would ever improve. The same principle applies in education. If we keep lowering expectations to create the illusion of success, we fail the very students we claim to be helping. According to state education officials, Illinois currently has 'some of the highest proficiency benchmarks in the nation.' Yet instead of keeping that bar high or even raising it, they're proposing reworking the state's benchmarking system because it 'unfairly mislabels students.' State Superintendent of Education Tony Sanders recently proposed that Illinois lower its state assessment standards to 'provide us with more accurate data.' Lowering the standards doesn't make the scores more accurate. It sends the wrong signal to students and creates misinformation for parents and educators that results in more students falling through the cracks. This is part of a troubling trend picking up steam across the country. In 2024, Oklahoma and Wisconsin revised their academic standards by lowering the passing scores on their state tests. As a result, students this year were not required to demonstrate the same level of mastery as those in previous years. This change means that some students who would have previously been identified as needing additional support are now considered to be meeting expectations. Oklahoma realized the folly in lowering the bar and recently reversed course to reinstate higher expectations. According to the Nation's Report Card, a biannual assessment of math and reading administered to students in every state, Illinois needs to commit to more rigorous standards, not weaken them. This year's scores showed stagnant or declining results in the number of fourth grade students able to score at or above proficient for math and reading. By lowering expectations on state assessments, the number of students listed as below, at or above proficient could look wildly different than the scores reported by National Assessment of Educational Progress. This is what is known as an 'honesty gap.' It's an active choice to fudge proficiency scores because state leaders believe they're unfair. Lowering expectations for students in Illinois will only widen the honesty gap between state-reported performance and how students actually compare to their peers nationwide, leaving them unprepared for the realities they'll face after graduation. That's the most unfair thing we can do to our students. Numerous studies have shown a strong connection between reading achievement and long-term outcomes, such as college enrollment and lifetime earnings. Similarly, a recent Urban Institute study found that raising math scores by just 0.5 standard deviations for students up to age 12 led to greater increases in earnings by age 30 than any other factor examined. We don't want our students to be unprepared for the academic or professional challenges they will face after K-12 education. This is why Illinois should instead look to bolster current standards with more comprehensive policy solutions that will support students where they are: promoting and challenging those who are testing above proficiency and providing rapid evidence-based interventions and support to those who are testing below proficiency in an effort to bring them up to speed. Illinois policymakers just voted to give more than $300 million in additional funding to public schools. Billions of dollars in new spending has been allocated since we passed historic school funding reform in 2017, yet accountability continues to be eroded. Taxpayers deserve to know whether that additional funding leads to students improving in meaningful, measurable ways. Consistently high standards are the only way to ensure that. It might feel good in the short term to see more students clear the bar, but those same students are likely to wind up more disadvantaged in the long run because they won't get the support they need to make real improvement. Bruce Rauner was the 42nd governor of Illinois.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Trump Fires 13 Members of Education Research Board
President Donald Trump holds up a signed executive order about dismantling the Education Department alongside Education Secretary Linda McMahon at the White House in Washington, DC, on March 20, 2025. Credit - Chen Mengtong—China News Service/VCG via Getty Images The Trump Administration fired all 13 Biden-appointed members of a key federal education research board last month, a move that drew sharp rebuke from former members amid the Administration's ongoing campaign to dismantle the Department of Education. The firings, carried out on May 23, targeted the National Board for Education Sciences (NBES), which Congress established in 2002 to advise the Department of Education's research arm, the Institute of Education Sciences (IES). The board—whose members include researchers, educators, and civic leaders—had been tasked with shaping the Department's $900 million research agenda, including approving priorities, overseeing peer-reviewed grants, and advising on efforts to close achievement gaps across race, income, and disability status. The future of that work is now unclear, as the new Administration has slashed much of that spending. The dismissals are the latest blow to a board that has struggled for more than a decade to maintain its statutory role. For much of President Donald Trump's first term, he did not appoint enough members to NBES to fill the 15-member board. They didn't hold any meetings over those four years, according to the board's web page. 'We can confirm that the Department fired thirteen Biden appointees to the National Board for Education Sciences on May 23,' said Madi Biedermann, Deputy Assistant Secretary for Communications under Education Secretary Linda McMahon, in a statement to TIME. 'One of the core duties of a board member is to ensure that activities are objective, nonideological, and free of partisan influence—they failed.' Biedermann cited poor student outcomes, excessive spending on research contracts, and the alleged politicization of federal research as justification for the purge. She said new appointees will be announced to 'drive forward President Trump and Secretary McMahon's vision' for education reform, which emphasizes decentralization and a sharp reduction in the federal government's role. 'As reflected in the dismal results of the recent Nation's Report Card, these board members stood by as student outcomes declined nationwide, oversaw research contracts that took gross advantage of the American taxpayer without delivering improvements in teaching and learning, and allowed partisan ideologies to seep into taxpayer-funded research and development,' Biedermann said. But former board members and education advocates say the firings are part of a broader and deeply political effort to discredit scientific research and roll back protections for vulnerable student populations. Shaun Harper, a University of Southern California professor who was among those dismissed, said he wasn't surprised by the Trump Administration's decision but disagreed with how they have characterized the board's work. 'We committed to spending four years in the unpaid role because we all want the best for our democracy,' he wrote in an op-ed for TIME published Wednesday. 'We approached our work as experts, not as politically-polarizing activists who somehow sought to advance anti-American agendas.' 'Without knowing or even asking what this entailed, it is possible that the Trump Administration presumed this to be a hotbed of DEI activities that privileged wokeness over merit,' he added. 'I never participated in nor witnessed this. There is no evidence of such wrongdoing.' The Trump Administration has made no secret of its disdain for the Department of Education itself. Trump has vowed repeatedly to abolish the agency, though a recent federal court ruling temporarily blocked his executive order aimed at doing just that. Judge Myong J. Joun of the U.S. District Court in Massachusetts issued a preliminary injunction ordering the reinstatement of thousands of department employees fired as part of the Administration's downsizing campaign. In testimony before Congress, Education Secretary McMahon acknowledged that as many as three-fourths of the roughly 2,000 staff members who had been fired at the agency had been dismissed under restructuring efforts led by Elon Musk, who formerly led the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. The NBES firings come amid mounting concern over the future of the Institute of Education Sciences itself. According to department employees and internal emails reviewed by NPR, many IES contracts were canceled within the first two months of Trump's second term. These include long-term studies on math interventions, data collection on homeschooling, and surveys related to private education and career training. One canceled program had already been deployed in classrooms across multiple states. Founded under President George W. Bush as part of the Education Sciences Reform Act of 2002, the IES and its advisory board were created to bring scientific rigor to the education field. The NBES in particular was tasked with ensuring that federal education research is objective, equitable, and informed by practitioners and scientists alike. Harper warned of the long-term implications of terminating members of the board without replacements: 'Consequently, students with disabilities will be even more underserved. Inequities between rich and poor, as well as white and racially diverse learners, will widen. Congress and educational leaders will have even less access to trustworthy, high-quality research on what works.' Write to Nik Popli at
New York Post
5 days ago
- New York Post
Fresh proof school choice can save Catholic schools — and help more generations of kids thrive
Over the past decade, no state in the country has been a bigger poster child for the decline of America's Catholic schools than New York. And no state has offered more hope about the reversibility of that tragic trend line than Florida. From 2015 to 2025, enrollment in the nation's Catholic schools fell another 13%, per a report to be released Wednesday by Florida nonprofit Step Up For Students. New York led the way, with a 31% drop. In Florida, though, enrollment grew — by 12%. In fact, Florida is the only US state in the top 10 of Catholic-school enrollment to see any growth in that span. The big reason: school choice. Florida has long had the most robust private-school choice programs in America. In 2023, it made every student eligible for choice scholarships, each worth roughly $8,000. This year, 500,000 students in Florida are using scholarships, including 89% of the students in its Catholic schools. New York families still have no private-school choice. Which is why, as The Post recently described it, Catholic schools are falling like dominoes. This isn't just tragic for Catholics. This is tragic for New York. For generations, Catholic schools have delivered top-notch education at low cost to masses of low-income families, many of them not Catholic. The 'Catholic school effect' is well documented: Catholic schools lifted millions of working-class families into America's middle class. They strengthened fragile communities. They saved taxpayers billions. Today, if America's Catholic schools collectively counted as a state, they'd rank first in reading and math, per the most recent results on the National Assessment of Educational Progress. Despite that success, thousands of Catholic schools have closed, not because families no longer want them, but because families can no longer afford them. For those of us who believe low-income families deserve access to more high-quality learning options, this is heartbreaking. But it's not inevitable. One potential solution is the Educational Choice for Children Act, a congressional proposal for a national school-choice program. ECCA would essentially bring the Florida choice model to every state. Under the plan, nonprofit scholarship groups would oversee funds raised through tax-credited contributions from individuals. Even if a state didn't have a choice program, families could apply for a federally supported scholarship. Florida shows the upside of expanding choice. In the 1990s, its education system was a joke. It ranked near the bottom on the NAEP tests; barely half its students graduated. Today, Florida's graduation rate is approaching 90%, it ranks No. 7 in Advanced Placement performance, and its demographically adjusted NAEP performance is among the nation's best. This progress comes even though Florida's per-pupil spending is among the lowest in the country. Federal data that allows for state-to-state comparisons show that New York spent $29,873 per pupil in 2022, the most in America. Florida spent $11,076. (New York's per-pupil spending has since climbed to more than $36,000 a year.) Private-school choice in Florida has been especially good for low-income students. A 2019 Urban Institute study found low-income students using choice scholarships were up to 43% more likely than their public-school peers to attend four-year colleges, and up to 20% more likely to earn bachelor's degrees. Another research team found that as private-school choice in Florida expanded, high-poverty public schools most impacted by the competition saw higher test scores, lower absenteeism and fewer suspensions. Florida's Catholic schools have been in the thick of this change. They've become increasingly diverse, in terms of students served, and increasingly diversified, in terms of programs offered — all while holding true to the core values that have made them so vital for so long. All education sectors in Florida know families now have the power to choose them, or not, and all have responded accordingly. New York could use more of that choice and competition — and the expanded options and opportunities that brings to low-income families. The result would be not only a comeback for Catholic schools, but systemic improvements in education that are long overdue. Danyela Souza Egorov is the founder of Families for NY. Lauren May is senior director of advocacy at Step Up For Students, which administers Florida's school-choice scholarship programs, and a former Catholic-school teacher and principal.
