ND Legislature allocates $150,000 for passenger rail service project
Dave Strohmaier, chair of the Big Sky Passenger Rail Authority, said the $150,000 will be part of a new $11 million grant agreement with the U.S. Department of Transportation's Federal Railroad Administration. As part of the agreement, $1.1 million is needed to match the federal dollars.
Strohmaier said on Wednesday, May 14, that North Dakota is the only state that has allocated funding for the $11 million grant agreement. He said a few states' legislatures are still in session and working on their budgets.
"The Rail Authority is kicking off a capital campaign to close the gap on the balance of the dollars we need to move forward," he said.
Strohmaier said about another $1 million is needed for the match of the federal dollars. He said the route for passenger rail service would go through eight states.
The Federal Railroad Administration awarded a $500,000 grant from its Corridor Identification and Development Program to the Big Sky Passenger Rail Authority to restore passenger rail service on the former North Coast Hiawatha Chicago to Seattle route, which is known as the Big Sky North Coast Corridor. Passenger rail projects in Amtrak's North Coast Hiawatha are overseen by the Big Sky Passenger Rail Authority.
The Big Sky North Coast Corridor would go through eight states from Chicago to Seattle, including southern Montana and North Dakota. The route would go through Fargo, Jamestown, Bismarck, Dickinson and Medora.
The concept of high-performance rail includes both freight and passenger operations, The Jamestown Sun reported in March. The Big Sky Passenger Rail Authority is developing a route that would include two trains in each direction daily, ensuring that every community with a stop has at least one daylight train.
Sen. Terry Wanzek, R-Jamestown, said allocating the $150,000 to the Big Sky Passenger Rail Authority gives the state the ability to participate in the planning of the passenger rail route.
"If we didn't participate, a plan could be developed and we might not have a say in whether they stop in Jamestown, Medora, Bismarck and Fargo or anywhere else," he said.
Rep. Craig Headland, R-Montpelier, said the passenger rail route going through North Dakota will help with tourism. He said tourism is the third-leading industry in the state.
"I think it would enhance what we are trying to create here in North Dakota," he said.
Headland said the passenger rail route could help get out-of-state visitors to stop in Jamestown, Bismarck or Medora.
"I think it would be used," he said. "I just think it would be a big boost."
Jamestown City Councilman David Steele said he hasn't heard any negative comments about the passenger rail route going through Jamestown.
"Everybody has been positive wishing it was done tomorrow or yesterday," he said.
Steele said the passenger trains would be great for tourism for all communities along the route.
"We just need to make the connections with the public and what the advantages would be to having passenger rail," he said.
Strohmaier said the Big Sky Passenger Rail Authority is in the process of completing the first step of the Corridor Identification and Development Program.
"We're coming up with a scope schedule and budget for creation of a service development plan for the route," he said.
The service development plan results in a corridor project inventory that identifies the capital projects necessary to achieve the proposed service, according to the Federal Railroad Administration's document on providing a scope of work framework for creating a service development plan.
Strohmaier said the goal is to have the passenger rail service starting in the early to mid-2030s. He said it will take about two to three years to finish the service development plan.
"That gets us up to the point of step three, which is the final step in this program, and that's when we begin preliminary engineering and environmental analysis," he said. "That's going to be another probably couple-year-long exercise to do all of that engineering and so that that gets you five or six years into this."
Strohmaier said the Big Sky Passenger Rail Authority also will need to think about the fabrication of the trains.
"We're going to have to start relatively soon thinking about how to get an order lined up so that when we finish all of the planning, all the infrastructure investment, we'll actually have the trains ready," he said.
After the planning work is done, he said the groundwork can begin.
"That could be double tracking," Strohmaier said. "It could be the reestablishment of stations themselves, which can run the gamut from pretty simple to much more elaborate based on what a community wants."
The Federal Railroad Administration will make the final decision on the locations when approving the service development plan for the route.
For more information about the Corridor Identification and Development Program and the Big Sky Rail Authority, visit
www.bigskyrail.org
.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
16 hours ago
- Newsweek
California High-Speed Rail Protects $4B in Federal Funding Amid Lawsuit
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California officials have reached an agreement with the Federal Railroad Administration that places $4 billion in federal grants for the state's high-speed rail project into a legal trust while a lawsuit challenging the funding cancellation moves through court. The agreement, which the California High-Speed Rail Authority confirmed to Newsweek, would set aside the funding while state authorities worked to prevent President Donald Trump's funding revocation. Why It Matters Years of delays and an inflated budget have damaged public and political faith in California's high-speed rail project, but the past few years have seen progress, with construction happening throughout the state and tracklaying set to begin later this year. Proponents of the project say that to call if off now, as many of its detractors in the White House desire, would waste years of advancement. That has not stopped Trump, a long-standing critic of the project, from regularly threatening to take away the federal funding that has been vital to the project's progress, a threat he and Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy carried out in July. An Amtrak Pacific Surfliner train headed north arrives at the Moorpark Train Station in Moorpark, California, on June 15, 2024. An Amtrak Pacific Surfliner train headed north arrives at the Moorpark Train Station in Moorpark, California, on June 15, 2024. Getty Images What To Know The agreement with the Federal Railroad Administration places the contested $4 billion into a legal trust, which state officials said would prevent the funds from being redirected while the legal challenge proceeded. The California High-Speed Rail Authority, which does not comment on pending litigation, confirmed to Newsweek that the agreement had been reached. The authority has previously called the Trump administration's funding decision an "unwarranted and unjustified" move that was "based on an inaccurate, often outright-misleading, presentation of the evidence." The project has faced long-running delays and cost increases since voters approved it in 2008, with early estimates near $33 billion and more recent estimates ranging broadly in reporting between roughly $128 billion and $135 billion. The authority and state officials have pointed to continuing construction milestones. Officials said the project had entered or neared a tracklaying phase, with 171 miles under active construction and more than 50 major structures completed. What People Are Saying California Senator Dave Cortese, the chair of the Senate Transportation Committee, said in a statement on the agreement: "I'm encouraged that the California High-Speed Rail Authority has reached an agreement with the Federal Railroad Administration to prevent $4 billion in federal high-speed rail funding from being lost while litigation is pending. "These funds were terminated under the Trump Administration following a compliance review, despite no findings of fraud, waste, or abuse. The Authority promptly challenged that decision in court, and this agreement ensures that the funding will remain available until the legal process is resolved. "As Chair of the California Senate Transportation Committee, I will continue to defend our progress on high-speed rail, and efforts like my bill SB 545 will help secure opportunities for major residential and commercial development along the high-speed rail corridor, creating the kind of public-private synergy that can help fund the infrastructure of the project itself and deliver long-overdue economic benefits to communities across the state." What Happens Next The state's lawsuit challenging the federal withdrawal was filed in U.S. District Court. Initial litigation is expected to proceed in the coming months, with the trust arrangement intended to keep the grants intact until the court resolves the dispute.
Business Journals
a day ago
- Business Journals
'Important' but controversial DFW project in limbo as feds revoke funding
McKinney's ambitious downtown revitalization project faces a major setback as federal funding evaporates, leaving city leaders to navigate uncharted financial waters. The $15 million federal grant toward the $40 million project has been withdrawn from the U.S. Department of Transportation's Neighborhood Access and Equity Grant program as part of the Big Beautiful Bill Act signed in July.
Miami Herald
3 days ago
- Miami Herald
Trump administration pledges to keep, streamline much-maligned EV charger program
WASHINGTON - The Trump administration, months after signaling it might gut the effort completely, unveiled plans on Monday to expedite a Biden-era program focused on building public electric vehicle chargers nationwide. The U.S. Department of Transportation said it would alter requirements in the $5 billion National Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Formula Program, or NEVI, to provide more flexibility to states and 'slash red tape' left by the previous administration. 'The Biden-Buttigieg Administration failed to deliver EV chargers despite their promises. Our revised NEVI guidance slashes red tape and makes it easier for states to efficiently build out this infrastructure,' said Transportation Sec. Sean Duffy, referring to his predecessor, Pete Buttigieg. 'While I don't agree with subsidizing green energy, we will respect Congress' will and make sure this program uses federal resources efficiently.' The move is a surprising reversal following months of work by President Donald Trump and his allies to roll back pro-EV initiatives in the federal government. Now, instead of nixing NEVI, the Trump administration has pledged to improve a program that became a bipartisan symbol of sluggish bureaucracy under the Biden administration. 'If Congress is requiring the federal government to support charging stations, let's cut the waste and do it right,' Duffy added. NEVI was part of the Bipartisan Infrastructure Law signed by Democratic President Joe Biden in November 2021. It offered an infusion of $5 billion to states to build out their charger networks as electric vehicles become more common, with Michigan getting $110 million through fiscal year 2026. The law also included a separate $2.5 billion grant program issued on a discretionary basis to cities, rural areas and major transportation corridors. Republican and Democratic lawmakers alike criticized the program after it produced only a handful of completed, functional charger stations within the first three years of the program. 'That's pathetic,' U.S. Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Ore., said in a May 2024 hearing. 'That is a vast administrative failure.' A recent update showed progress. The federal programs yielded 384 charging ports by April 2025, according to a recent Government Accountability Office report. But even as projects and investments started to yield more results, the Trump administration fought for months to put - and keep - the program on hold. Trump, in an executive order signed the day he returned to office, called out NEVI in a section on 'Terminating the Green New Deal.' His Department of Transportation then suspended the program in February, though the agency noted a goal of providing updated guidance later in the year. NEVI had about $2.7 billion remaining in unobligated funds at the time, according to the Federal Highway Administration. The GAO, a nonpartisan agency within Congress, issued an opinion in May finding that the Trump administration was breaking the law by withholding charger funds. The opinion was not binding, but it served as an important signal that federal courts might reach a similar conclusion and force the DOT to resume the program, according to the nonpartisan Eno Center for Transportation. The White House's Office of Management and Budget then instructed the DOT to disregard the opinion and continue its suspension of the NEVI program. But the Trump administration now appears to be ending its NEVI fight, instead vowing to make it easier for states to address a lag in public charging infrastructure that has slowed EV adoption in the United States. The Transportation Department said Monday it would minimize onerous requirements and simplify the federal approval process for state plans. For example, the new guidance removes an order for states to ensure 'the deployment, installation, operation, and use of EV charging infrastructure achieves equitable and fair distribution of benefits and services.' The new guidance also removes a requirement for states to explain how their NEVI implementation would encourage participation from small businesses, including minority-owned and women-owned small businesses. The guidance also minimizes requirements for states to consider 'electric grid integration and renewable energy.' States will be required to submit new plans to the Department of Transportation within 30 days. Copyright (C) 2025, Tribune Content Agency, LLC. Portions copyrighted by the respective providers.
