UBS faces tough new Swiss banking sector rules
BERN, June 6 (Reuters) - The Swiss government on Friday proposed stricter rules for UBS (UBSG.S), opens new tab following its takeover of Credit Suisse, which could make it hold $26 billion more in core capital, confirming some of the bank's worst fears about incoming new regulations.
The key proposal, which the bank would have six to eight years to prepare for after it became law, is that UBS must fully capitalise its foreign units, confirming what many analysts, lawmakers and executives had been expecting.
The government said its capital requirement proposal would allow UBS to reduce its holding of Additional Tier 1 (AT1) bonds by $8 billion. Today, UBS must only 60% capitalise its foreign units and can cover some of the capital with AT1 debt.
UBS executives say the additional capital burden will put the Zurich-based bank at a disadvantage to rivals and undermine the competitiveness of Switzerland as a financial centre.
Shares in the bank rose after the government unveiled the proposals on Friday afternoon, climbing by more than 6%.
Such was the shock in Switzerland over the 2023 collapse of Credit Suisse that top politicians led by Finance Minister Karin Keller-Sutter vowed to introduce more robust rules that would protect taxpayers and prevent another meltdown in future.
Keller-Sutter now holds Switzerland's rotating one-year presidency and Friday's announcement will start a long period of political wrangling over the measures, which the governing federal council called "targeted and proportionate."
"They strengthen trust in the financial centre, which, in the view of the federal council, is central to its stability and competitiveness," the council said in a statement.
A parliamentary inquiry last year noted that since UBS bought Credit Suisse for 3 billion Swiss francs ($3.65 billion) in March 2023, it has had a balance sheet bigger than the Swiss economy, and urged the government to take the foreign units into account.
The federal council said it would present drafts on the proposals for consultations with stakeholders in the second half of 2025. Finance Ministry officials say laws requiring parliamentary approval will not enter force before 2028.
Separate measures known as ordinances that can be issued directly by the government could apply from the start of 2027.
A six to eight-year transition period looked appropriate for UBS to meet new rules on capitalising foreign units from when they come into force, the government said.
That could give the bank until the mid-2030s to comply.
UBS's shares have lagged European peers in anticipation of the tougher rules and sources inside the bank have warned the new regulations could make it an appealing takeover target.
Under the Swiss proposals, UBS's Common Equity Tier 1 (CET1) capital ratio could end up somewhat higher than those of global rivals, the government said. UBS's CET1 ratio of 14.3% could rise up to 17%, above rivals like JPMorgan (JPM.N), opens new tab at 15.8%, Morgan Stanley (MS.N), opens new tab at 15.7%, and 15.3% at Goldman Sachs, it said.
Shares in UBS rose more than 60% in the 12 months following its acquisition of Credit Suisse. But the stock has since sharply underperformed; UBS shares have lost about 5% in the past year, while a top European banking index (.SX7P), opens new tab climbed 37%.
Analysts say the new regulations could trigger a rejig of UBS's business model, which now focuses on growth in the United States and Asia. To take the edge off the rules, the bank may be tempted to sell some assets, banking experts say.
The Swiss government also set out piecemeal reforms to bolster the market regulator FINMA, which was heavily criticised for its response to the Credit Suisse collapse.
These include measures aimed at holding bankers to account, giving the regulator the power to impose fines and making it easier to restrain pay and claw back bonuses. Still, the proposals come years after the European Union introduced similar measures in the wake of the 2007-2009 financial crisis.
The government also proposed making it easier for banks to access liquidity from the Swiss National Bank. Barriers to transferring collateral to the SNB will also be removed.
($1 = 0.8222 Swiss francs)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Reuters
a day ago
- Reuters
Shaken by crises, Switzerland fetters UBS's global dream
BERN, June 6 (Reuters) - Switzerland announced reforms on Friday to make its biggest bank UBS (UBSG.S), opens new tab safer and avoid another crisis, hampering the global ambitions of a lender whose financial weight eclipses the country's economy. UBS emerged as Switzerland's sole global bank more than two years ago after the government hastily arranged its rescue of scandal-hit Credit Suisse to prevent a disorderly collapse. The demise of Credit Suisse, one of the world's biggest banks, rattled global markets and blindsided officials and regulators, whose struggle to steer the lender as it lurched from one scandal to the next underscored their weakness. On Friday, speaking from the same podium where she had announced the Credit Suisse rescue in 2023 as finance minister, Switzerland's president Karin Keller-Sutter delivered a firm message. The country would not be wrongfooted again. "I don't believe that the competitiveness will be impaired, but it is true that growth abroad will become more expensive," Keller-Sutter said of UBS. "We've had two crises. 2008 and 2023," she said. "If you see something that is broken, you have to fix it." During the global financial crisis of 2008, UBS was hit by a losses in subprime debt, as a disastrous expansion into riskier investment banking forced it to write down tens of billions of dollars and ultimately turn to the state for help. Memories of that crisis also linger, reinforcing the government's resolve after the collapse of Credit Suisse. For UBS, which has a financial balance sheet of around $1.7 trillion, far bigger than the Swiss economy, the implications of the reforms proposed on Friday are clear. Switzerland no longer wants to back its international growth. "Bottom line: who is carrying the risk for growth abroad?" said Keller-Sutter. "The bank, its owners or the state?" The rules the government proposed demand that UBS in Switzerland holds more capital to cover risks in its foreign operations. That move, one of the most important steps taken by the Swiss in a series of otherwise piecemeal measures, will make UBS's businesses abroad more expensive to run for one of the globe's largest banks for millionaires and billionaires. Following publication of the reform plans, UBS Chairman Colm Kelleher and CEO Sergio Ermotti said in an internal memo that if fully implemented, they would undermine the bank's "global competitive footprint" and hurt the Swiss economy. The reform would require UBS to hold as much as $26 billion in extra capital. Some believe the demands may alter the bank's course. "It could be that UBS has to change its strategy of growth in the United States and Asia," said Andreas Venditti, an analyst at Vontobel. "It's not just growing. It makes the existing business more expensive. It is an incentive to get smaller and this will most likely happen." Credit Suisse's demise exploded the myth of invincibility of one of the wealthiest countries in the world, home to a global reserve currency, and proved as unworkable a central reform of the financial crisis to prevent state bailouts. For many in Switzerland, the government's reforms are long overdue. "The bank is bigger than the entire Swiss economy. It makes sense that it should not grow even bigger," said Andreas Missbach of Alliance Sud, a group that campaigns for transparency. "It is good that the government did not give in to lobbying by UBS. The question is whether it is enough. We have a banking crisis roughly every 12 years. So I'm not really put at ease." UBS CEO Ermotti had lobbied against the reforms, arguing that a heavy capital burden would put the bank on the back foot with rivals. The world's second-largest wealth manager after Morgan Stanley is dwarfed by its U.S. peer. Morgan Stanley shares value the firm at twice its book value, compared with UBS's 20% premium to book. On Friday, the bank reiterated this message, saying that it strongly disagreed with the "extreme" increase in capital. But others are sceptical that the government has done enough. Hans Gersbach, a professor at ETH Zurich, said there was still no proper plan to cope should UBS run into trouble. "The credibility of the too big to fail regime remains in question."
Reuters
a day ago
- Reuters
India's fuel demand in May hit highest in over a year
June 6 (Reuters) - India's fuel demand rose to 21.32 million metric tons in May, its highest in more than a year, Oil Ministry data showed on Friday. India is the world's third-largest consumer and importer of oil. The data is a proxy for the country's oil demand. On a yearly basis, fuel demand in May was up 5.7% from the previous month and 1.1% from 21.08 million tons in the same month last year, the Petroleum Planning and Analysis Cell's website showed. Sales of gasoline, or petrol, rose 9.6% to 3.78 million tons, compared with 3.45 million tons last month, and were up 9.2% from levels a year ago. Diesel consumption in May climbed 4% month-on-month to 8.59 million tons, and up 2.1% from year-ago levels. Cooking gas, or liquefied petroleum gas, sales increased 10.4% on an annual basis to 2.66 million tons, while naphtha sales fell 8.3% compared with last year to 1.0 million tons. On a monthly basis, LPG and naphtha sales rose 5.6% and 7.5%, respectively. Sales of bitumen, used for making roads, remained largely unchanged in May, compared with April. "Looking at product details, Indian demand saw strong growth for gasoline and aviation fuel, which speaks for mobility as the key factor supporting demand growth. Diesel demand expanded at a solid pace as well, but less than the first two," UBS analyst Giovanni Staunovo said. "Assume weakness in the petrochemical sector is the main factor weighing on naphtha demand." India's private sector activity accelerated at its fastest pace in over a year in May, driven by expansion in services even as price pressures intensified, a survey showed. Several petrochemical producers in Asia plan to reconfigure their crackers to process more ethane to reduce costs and capitalise on rising U.S. supplies as they face thin margins and global oversupply, company executives said in May.
Reuters
a day ago
- Reuters
New UBS rules: what are they and when will they come into force?
ZURICH, June 6 (Reuters) - The Swiss government on Friday published its proposals for stricter regulation of UBS (UBSG.S), opens new tab, setting varying timelines for the introduction of rules that will have far-reaching consequences for the lender and its business model. UBS will need to find up to $26 billion in additional core capital, while there are also new proposals to make it easier for banks to access central bank liquidity, to give the regulator more powers and to introduce bonus "clawbacks". Some of the proposed rules, which are designed to make the banking system safer, will need to go through parliament in a process set to take years; other changes can be introduced directly by the governing Federal Council. Following is an overview of the proposals and when the finalised rules could come into force: * UBS must hold 100% of the capital in its foreign units at the parent bank, up from 60% currently, with parliament given the final word on the rule. * UBS to get at least 6-8 years' transition period for new capital rules, the government proposes. * The government will send a draft bill for formal consultation with political parties, business associations and other interested groups by autumn 2025. * In 2026, the Federal Council plans to adopt the bill and submit it to parliament, which could modify the legislation. * Final legislation will be passed in 2027 at the earliest and not come into force before 2028, the Swiss finance ministry said. OTHER RULES EXPECTED IN 2027 * Stricter provisions to apply to the valuation of assets not sufficiently recoverable in a crisis, like software or deferred tax assets. * These proposals are on the ordinance track, meaning the Federal Council can enact them directly after a feedback period. * Final rules are expected to come into force in 2027. * The government proposes to make it easier for banks to access liquidity from the Swiss National Bank. * Lenders will need to have collateral prepared in advance, with a minimum amount set for systemically important banks. * Barriers to the transfer of collateral to the SNB will also be removed. * Announcements that banks have accessed central bank liquidity may be deferred to minimise damage to lenders. * The Public Liquidity Backstop proposals remain unchanged. * Government to consider covered bonds as collateral for access to liquidity at a later date. * These liquidity measures to be addressed at both legislative and ordinance levels. * FINMA to get new powers to fine legal entities. * The regulator should be able to intervene more easily and to issue fines to non-compliant institutions. * Requirements for recovery and resolution plans to be increased and FINMA should be able to order measures to address deficiencies in recovery planning. * These measures are on the longer legislative track, meaning final rules will not come into force before 2028. * The government proposes to introduce a senior managers regime. Banks will need to assign clear responsibility to individuals, making them more accountable for breaches of duty. * This should make it possible to claw back variable remuneration, cancel bonuses or withdraw recognitions from financial regulator FINMA, the government said. * The government favours "effective clawbacks" for systemically important banks. * Introducing a cap on bonuses is not seen as appropriate.
