Who are Freedom Convoy protest leaders Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, found guilty on mischief charges?
On Wednesday a sentencing hearing began for Freedom Convoy protest leaders Tamara Lich and Chris Barber, after the two were found guilty of mischief. Here's what to know about them, and what happens next.
Article content
Who are Tamara Lich and Chris Barber?
Article content
Article content
Lich and Barber were key figures behind the convoy protest, sometimes referred to as the Freedom Convoy, that occupied downtown Ottawa for three weeks beginning in late January 2022. The protests followed the end of vaccine mandate exemptions for cross-border truckers. Protesters called for the repeal of all COVID-19 mandates and restrictions.
Both are from Saskatchewan. Lich had previously been involved with Canada's Yellow Vest protests in Medicine Hat, Alta., and elsewhere, and the United We Roll truckers convoy and protest in Ottawa in 2019, which was in favour of pipelines and against carbon taxes.
Barber is a trucker and owns his own company, CB Trucking Limited, based in Swift Current, Sask.
Article content
When were they arrested?
Article content
Article content
Lich and Barber were arrested in Ottawa on Feb. 17, 2022, shortly after the government of Justin Trudeau invoked the Emergencies Act for the first time ever, bringing an end to the protest. (Last year, a Federal Court judge ruled that the response was unconstitutional and unjustifiable.) The convoy was cleared out of Ottawa's downtown core in a three-day police operation that began on Feb. 18.
Article content
At first, Lich was charged with counselling to commit mischief, and Barber with counselling to commit mischief, counselling to disobey a court order, counselling to obstruct police, and mischief that interferes with the use and enjoyment of property.
Article content
However, a month after their arrest the Crown submitted a relaid information sheet from Ottawa police, and the two were jointly accused of mischief, counselling mischief, obstructing police, counselling to obstruct police, counselling intimidation, and intimidation by blocking and obstructing one or more highways.
Article content
Article content
Were they found guilty?
Article content
Article content
On April 3, 2025, Ontario Court Justice Heather Perkins-McVey found both Lich and Barber guilty of mischief because the court ruled they routinely encouraged people to join or remain at the protest, despite knowing the negative effects it was having on downtown residents and businesses.
Article content
Barber also was found guilty of counselling others to disobey a court order for telling people to ignore a judge's injunction directing convoy participants to stop honking their truck horns. (Lich was not charged with that offence.)
Article content
They were both acquitted of intimidation and counselling intimidation, with the judge noting that their repeated calls to remain peaceful meant there was no menace or violence intended. They were also acquitted of obstructing police and counselling to obstruct police.
Article content
The Crown is seeking a prison sentence of seven years for Lich and eight years for Barber. Two days have been set aside for the parties to present their sentencing submissions.
Article content
What did Pierre Poilievre say about this?
Article content
Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre has posted and shared several posts on social media criticizing the Crown's sentencing proposals. In one post on X on Monday he said: 'Let's get this straight: while rampant violent offenders are released hours after their most recent charges & antisemitic rioters vandalize businesses, terrorize daycares & block traffic without consequences, the Crown wants 7 years prison time for the charge of mischief for Lich & Barber. How is this justice?'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Winnipeg Free Press
5 hours ago
- Winnipeg Free Press
Past and present traumas
Although this short, potent novel draws on a real-life double murder that occurred in the mountains of Italy's Abruzzo region in the 1990s, The Brittle Age does not read like a typical crime thriller. Donatella Di Pietrantonio's fifth novel — which won the 2024 Strega Prize, Italy's most important literary award — moves fluidly back and forth through time, intense but elliptical, subtly unravelling the effects of violence on individual lives, on a community, even on the land itself. Narrator Lucia, a physiotherapist recently separated from her husband, lives in Pescara. Her college-age daughter, Amanda, had been studying in Milan. Once eager to move away and start her own life, Amanda has returned home during the COVID-19 pandemic after being robbed and beaten outside her apartment. The Brittle Age Amanda now stays in her room, barely eating, rarely washing. Lucia finds her daughter unreachable. They hardly speak. 'Even a look from me can annoy her,' she says. Eventually, though, the reader starts to suspect that Lucia struggles to deal with Amanda's trauma because she has never dealt with her own. Over 20 years ago, when Lucia was the same age as Amanda is now — 'the brittle age' of the title — two young women were murdered and another wounded near a campground in the impoverished rural area where Lucia lived with her parents. Though it's hard at first for Lucia to look directly at this event, the terrors of that night gradually come out. At the foot of the mountains ominously called Il Dente del Lupo ('the wolf's teeth'), law enforcement officers and men from the nearby village look for three missing women, including Doralice, Lucia's childhood friend. The teenaged Lucia waits, overwhelmed with guilt and fear. Doralice might have been with Lucia that evening instead of at the campground, except that Lucia went to the beach with her new city friends, ashamed of Doralice's country dialect and not wanting to bring her along. The account of the crime and its aftermath — the search-and-rescue operation, the arrest, the trial — is interspersed with Lucia's current mid-life concerns. Gradually, we learn of Lucia's difficult relationship with her taciturn elderly father, who now lives alone in the hills, the tensions with her estranged husband, the feelings of helplessness as she watches her daughter, unable to connect. Through Lucia's somewhat cool first-person narrative, Di Pietrantonio suggests these present-day problems might actually be related to Lucia's past, that the murders marked Lucia in ways she is only now starting to realize. There are universal issues here. The novel is about the tensions between mothers and daughters, about the way children's lives move beyond their parents. 'Children — there are so many ways of losing them,' Lucia thinks at one point. Lucia feels that through education, a profession and life in the city, she has escaped the hardscrabble existence of her own mother. Now she is baffled that Amanda seems to be deliberately turning her back on the middle-class privileges for which Lucia worked so hard. Leonardo Cendamo photo Di Pietrantonio's short, shifting chapters and plain words, often abrupt and tense, hide a dark and complicated poetry in her novel which, at its core, is about crimes against women. But woven into these dynamics is fear. Lucia comes to see that while Amanda has healed physically from her attack, there is a deeper wound: 'Her trust in the world had been ripped away from her.' She realizes her own trust ended that night all those years ago, when she realized that no place was safe. As the prosecutor of the case says, 'Wherever man goes, he can bring evil.' At its core, The Brittle Age is about crimes against women, but Di Pietrantonio is careful to avoid the problems often seen in the true-crime genre. She refuses to sensationalize, to speculate, to over-explain. She uses short, shifting chapters and plain words, often abrupt and tense, that hide a dark and complicated poetry. (The translator is Ann Goldstein, the English translator for Elena Ferrante.) Looking obliquely at the long shadows cast by violence, The Brittle Age is both harrowing and guardedly hopeful. Alison Gillmor writes on pop culture for the Free Press. Alison GillmorWriter Studying at the University of Winnipeg and later Toronto's York University, Alison Gillmor planned to become an art historian. She ended up catching the journalism bug when she started as visual arts reviewer at the Winnipeg Free Press in 1992. Read full biography Our newsroom depends on a growing audience of readers to power our journalism. If you are not a paid reader, please consider becoming a subscriber. Our newsroom depends on its audience of readers to power our journalism. Thank you for your support.
Canada News.Net
15 hours ago
- Canada News.Net
Trump fires head of statistics bureau after poor jobs report
In an extraordinary outburst, U.S. President Donald Trump, aside from lambasting Federal Reserve Cahir Jay Powell, has now taken aim at the head of the bureau overseeing the tabulation of employment statistics, following Friday's disappointing jobs report. On Friday, the Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the U.S. economy added just 73,000 jobs in July, far less than expected, and revised down the May and June figures, by a combined 258,000 jobs. A furious Donald Trump took to Truth Social, his own social media platform, to blast the bureau chief, and fire her, claiming she was 'faking' the stistics, and noting she was appointed by long time rival, former President Joe Biden. She was nominated by Biden on July 12, 2023, and confirmed by the U.S. Senate on January 11, 2024. "I was just informed that our Country's "Jobs Numbers" are being produced by a Biden Appointee, Dr. Erika McEntarfer, the Commissioner of Labor Statistics, who faked the Jobs Numbers before the Election to try and boost Kamala's chances of Victory," President Trump posted on Truth Social on Friday. Trump alleged that the BLS, under McEntarfer's leadership, had significantly overstated job growth figures in March 2024 by approximately 818,000 jobs, followed by additional overstatements of 112,000 jobs in August and September—just before the election. He called the discrepancies "records" and questioned their validity, stating,"No one can be that wrong?" "We need accurate Jobs Numbers. I have directed my Team to fire this Biden Political Appointee, IMMEDIATELY," Trump said. "She will be replaced with someone much more competent and qualified. Important numbers like this must be fair and accurate, they can't be manipulated for political purposes." "McEntarfer said there were only 73,000 Jobs added (a shock!) but, more importantly, that a major mistake was made by them, 258,000 Jobs downward, in the prior two months. Similar things happened in the first part of the year, always to the negative." "The Economy is BOOMING under "TRUMP" despite a Fed that also plays games, this time with Interest Rates, where they lowered them twice, and substantially, just before the Presidential Election, I assume in the hopes of getting "Kamala" elected – How did that work out? Jerome "Too Late" Powell should also be put "out to pasture." Thank you for your attention to this matter!" the president posted. Background on Dr. Erika McEntarfer Dr. McEntarfer, a labor economist with over two decades of federal government experience, was nominated by President Joe Biden on July 12, 2023, and confirmed by the U.S. Senate on January 11, 2024. Her career includes key roles at the U.S. Census Bureau, where she led research for the Longitudinal Employer-Household Dynamics program, and at the White House Council of Economic Advisers, where she advised on labor market recovery during the COVID-19 pandemic. Her research, published in leading economic journals, has focused on job loss impacts, wage rigidity, and labor market dynamics. She holds a Ph.D. in economics from Virginia Tech and a bachelor's degree from Bard College. The Bureau of Labor Statistics has not yet publicly responded to Trump's allegations.
20 hours ago
Could U.S. tariffs drive up drug prices? Manitoba bioscience group says it's complicated, but possible
Medicine manufacturers across Canada are on edge with the looming threat of catastrophic tariffs on pharmaceutical exports to the U.S., experts say. Earlier this month, U.S. President Donald Trump threatened to impose tariffs as high as 200 per cent on pharmaceuticals exported to the United States. Howard Lutnick, Trump's secretary of commerce, said details about the pharmaceutical tariffs would come at the end of July. The uncertainty this created is starting to reveal itself as stock prices of major pharmaceutical manufacturing companies with operations in Canada — companies like Emergent Biosolutions and Bausch Health — have declined in recent days. If a 200 per cent tariff were to be put into place then I think [pharmaceutical manufacturers] would have to potentially reconsider whether it makes sense to manufacture in Canada, says Shawn Bugden, dean of the school of pharmacy at Memorial University. So what could the impact be in Canada? Given the tariff uncertainty, it's intensely complicated, says Bugden. According to government data, the pharmaceutical industry in Canada represents two per cent (new window) of global market share, and the manufacturing portion of it alone consists of an average of 35,000 jobs since 2019. Enlarge image (new window) Andrea Ladouceur, president and chief executive officer of the Bioscience Association of Manitoba, describes the pharmaceutical industry as the cornerstone of the province's economy. Photo: CBC / Justin Fraser In Manitoba, medicine is one of the leading industries, accounting for between 30-35 per cent of the medicine manufactured in Canada, seven per cent of the province's GDP, and roughly 14,000 jobs, according to Andrea Ladouceur, president of the Bioscience Association of Manitoba. The pharmaceutical industry is the cornerstone of the Manitoba economy, said Ladouceur. If being in Canada becomes unaffordable for them, these companies are connected to the global market and moving out of Canada is not off the table. The danger of these companies leaving is multifaceted. Not only would there be the major economic impact of a shrinking key industry, but we'd also lose the security of having some of the drug supply manufactured here in Canada, according to Bugden. The reliance on international trade for essential goods like medicines has proved risky in the past. During the COVID-19 pandemic, drug shortages (new window) in Canada were not uncommon. If pharmaceutical manufacturers move operations out of the country, it will likely make Canada even more reliant on global markets than they already are: with 70 per cent of drugs imported from foreign countries, 16 per cent of which is imported from the U.S., accounting for nearly $9 billion, according to Bugden. However, Budgen's main concern is that a sizable tariff, like the 200 per cent figure touted by Trump, would undermine Canada's price control mechanisms like the Patented Medicine Prices Review Board and the pan-Canadian Pharmaceutical Alliance — which he views as major assets to Canadians. The Patented Medicine Prices Review Board — established in 1987 but amended in 2019 — is meant to (new window) ensure that the prices of patented medicines sold in Canada are not excessive. The board reviews the price of drugs and medicine and conducts hearings which may result in orders to reduce prices to a non-excessive level, according to guidelines listed on their website. Shawn Bugden, dean of the school of pharmacy at Memorial University, says if Canadian pharmaceutical companies are hurt by tariffs on imports to the U.S., it could have an impact on the supply of some medicines in Canada. Photo: Submitted by Shawn Bugden Bugden says that as an unintended consequence, implementing such a substantial tariff would likely raise the cost of manufacturing drugs and medicine globally, in turn applying pressure on the review board to break their own rules and allow for higher-priced drugs. The Americans have been transparent, they say they have the highest drug prices in the world, we want to lower them, but we're not going to lower them, which is what they should do and they have the ability to do, we're instead going to try and make everybody else pay higher prices so that it allows our prices to go down, said Bugden. As things stand, many pharmaceutical companies are waiting to see what will happen. CBC News has reached out to several pharmaceutical companies in Manitoba, but none have wanted to comment given the uncertainty of the situation they're facing. Ladouceur says they're fearful that tariffs may force them to increase their prices. At the end of the day, any increase in cost will be passed on to the consumer, says Ladouceur. And so for these companies it is a very hard spot because they know it may put them out of reach for the consumer, and having medicines are key to having a healthy life and sometimes save a life, so they are really concerned their products will become unaffordable for those that need them most. Trump has said that there would be a period — a year, or a year and a half after a tariff would be imposed for companies to get their act together. In light of that, Bugden doesn't think the end consumer will be paying the price for at least a year. I don't think consumers need to worry about the prices changing tomorrow, said Bugden. Keep calm and carry on, don't think you need to run to the drug store and fill up your prescriptions. I'm confident in the institutions we have in Canada to do the best job possible to maintain pricing and accessibility for Canadians, said Bugden.
