
More than 2.8m people in US identify as trans, including 724,000 youth, data shows
Researchers from the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) Williams Institute used federal surveys and data from state health agencies to identify the size and demographics of the trans population in each state.
The analysis, shared with the Guardian and released on Wednesday, documented thousands of trans youth living in all 50 states and the District of Columbia. The findings counter Donald Trump's aggressive efforts to deny the existence of trans minors, as his administration removes references to trans people across federal agencies and widely erodes protections and programs for LGBTQ+ communities.
The report builds on federal data collection efforts that the White House is now eliminating. The authors warn their study could be the last comprehensive portrait of the nation's trans population for a decade or more as trans people are erased from vital US surveys, including health reports and crime data analyses.
The Williams Institute primarily relied on 2021 to 2023 data from Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) surveys and records disclosed by state health agencies. Some of the key findings include:
1% of the total US population aged 13 and older identifies as trans, including 0.8% of adults (more than 2.1 million people) and 3.3% of youth ages 13 to 17 (roughly 724,000 people).
Young adults ages 18 to 24 are significantly more likely to identify as trans (2.72%) than those 35 to 64 (0.42%) and those aged 65 and older (0.26%).
Of the 2.1 million trans adults, 32.7% (698,500) are trans women, 34.2% (730,500) are trans men and 33.1% (707,100) are trans non-binary people.
The trans populations are fairly consistent across regions, with 0.9% of adults in the west, midwest and north-east identifying as trans, compared with 0.7% of adults in the south.
Minnesota had the highest rate of adults who identify as trans (1.2%), and Hawaii had the highest rate of trans youth (3.6%), though the ranges were similar across states.
'Trans people live everywhere and are represented in every state,' said Dr Jody Herman, senior scholar of public policy at the Williams Institute and co-author of the report, noting the total US trans population was larger than the individual size of more than a dozen states. 'This is a substantial population that has unique concerns and barriers to getting their needs met, and lawmakers need to keep that in mind.'
The Williams Institute, a leading LGBTQ+ policy research center, has published national trans population counts since its 2011 report, which was the first of its kind as state-level data on gender identity became available. The estimates are considered the best available data and were cited by the US supreme court in its recent majority opinion upholding Tennessee's ban on trans youth healthcare.
The quality and sources of the researchers' data have improved from one report to the next, the researchers said, making it difficult to assess changes over time. But the researchers noted that its overall estimates of trans adults have remained relatively steady, while the latest data shows how younger people are now significantly more likely to identify as trans than older groups.
There are many factors contributing to youth identifying as trans at higher rates, including that younger people are more likely to answer these kinds of survey questions, said Dr Andrew Flores, Williams Institute distinguished visiting scholar and associate professor of government at American University.
'Younger people are growing up among other younger people who already hold more accepting attitudes toward LGBT and transgender people more broadly,' said Flores, a report co-author, citing increasingly visible signs of support, such as student walkouts in Florida in protest of anti-trans policies. 'In this generation, they might be more willing and safe to identify that they are transgender, because they don't see as much of a harm or threat as older generations.'
While some conservatives and anti-trans advocates have presented a reported rise in trans youth as a 'social contagion', suggesting youth are copying their peers, 'The growth comes as people are now in an environment that allows them to fully express who they are,' Flores said.
Shifting language also affected generational differences, he said, noting how older groups were more likely to identify as lesbian or gay while younger people are more likely to identify as bisexual or pansexual. And while older trans people are more likely to identify as men or women, younger trans people more frequently identify as non-binary.
The report also found that the race and ethnicity of trans people was largely similar to broader US demographics, with Indigenous, Latino and multiracial adults slightly more likely to identify as trans than other groups.
The Trump administration, which has widely attacked data collection efforts across government, has moved to remove trans identity questions from two critical CDC behavioral health surveys and from Department of Justice surveys on crime victimization and sexual violence. The US Census Bureau has also taken steps to exclude gender identity from multiple surveys, according to the former director who resigned in February.
Those efforts followed Trump's day-one executive order 'restoring biological truth' to the government, which suggested that trans identity was 'false' and directed the state department to deny trans people accurate passports.
The data loss will make it impossible for the Williams Institute to continue its analyses in their current form, and even if the next administration restored the surveys, the public would still be losing up to 10 years of data, which would be a devastating erosion of knowledge, the researchers said.
'We didn't really have decent national data until around 10 years ago, so we just very recently got a grasp on how many people identify as trans in the US and what their characteristics are,' said Herman. 'For these data sources to just suddenly disappear, it is a major setback. The population is not going to go away, we're just not going to know more about them than what we have from our current sources.'
The data has frequently been cited by journalists, school boards, public health experts, civil rights lawyers, advocates fighting discriminatory legislation and lawmakers expanding trans rights. The researchers had hoped federal data could help illuminate how trans people were moving within the US as some have fled red states due to anti-trans laws, but that will be hard to track without national surveys, they said.
'In some policy circles, they say if you can't be counted, you don't count,' Flores added. 'And for members of the LGBTQ+ community, to be able to see numbers that reflect their lived experiences is quite important.'
Imara Jones, founder of news organization TransLash Media, said there was no easy fix for the loss of national data backed by federal resources.
'It is meant to erase, and that erasure is meant to have real-world impacts, making it harder for people to be who they are.'
Flores said the institute and others were discussing ways to fill the gaps and continue data collection without the federal government: 'We're not just going to close up shop. We're going to try to find a way to keep telling these stories and be persistent.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
13 minutes ago
- The Independent
Voting machine company linked to Trump conspiracy used LA funds to create slush fund for bribing officials: prosecutors
Employees of Smartmatic, the U.K.-headquartered election technology company, face accusations from federal prosecutors of systematically overbilling Los Angeles County for voting machines used in the 2020 election. The company allegedly used the surplus funds to create a 'slush fund' for bribing government officials, according to a criminal case against three company executives. Smartmatic is involved in a multibillion-dollar defamation lawsuit against Fox News after the network claimed it was involved in conspiracy theories to steal the 2020 election from Donald Trump. Joe Biden defeated the incumbent president in both the popular vote and the Electoral College. Prosecutors in a Florida federal corruption case against Smartmatic co-founder Roger Alejandro Piñate Martinez and two other company officials allege that bribery was part of the company's business model. While the recipients of the alleged misuse of county taxpayer money have not been identified, Dean Logan, the county's top voting official, has reported having regular meetings with Piñate, The Los Angeles Times reports. The allegations also extend internationally with prosecutors claiming similar schemes occurred in the Philippines and Venezuela. Last year, Piñate was charged with bribery and money laundering in the Philippines, where executives are accused of inflating voting machine prices to secure $182 million (£135 million) in contracts for its 2016 election to bribe a top election official. In Venezuela, Smartmatic employees are said to have used a similar fund to buy a home with a pool for a long-time elections official in 2019. This detail surfaced in an August 1 court filing in the Philippines corruption case. In Los Angeles County, where Smartmatic won a $209 million contract for the 2020 election — considered the largest election technology deal in U.S. history — the company allegedly used county money to create a similar type of slush fund. Prosecutors plan to present financial and business records, witness testimony, and electronic communications to strengthen their case, which they claim reveals a broader pattern of bribery. According to the August 1 filing, the company is accused of regularly adding a surplus fee of $10 to $50 per machine sent to the three jurisdictions, with these funds designated for bribes. Federal prosecutors declined to comment on the ongoing criminal case when contacted by the LA Times. Logan, the county's registrar-recorder, stated: 'The county has no knowledge or visibility into how Smartmatic USA used proceeds from that contract. The contract between Los Angeles County and Smartmatic USA was competitively bid, evaluated, and awarded in compliance with the county's open competitive public procurement processes.' A spokesperson for the registrar-recorder's office added that no evidence was found of the surplus charges alleged by federal prosecutors and that the price of machines always remained the same. No federal prosecutors have contacted the department. Smartmatic spokesperson Samira Saba accused the Department of Justice of filing the motion with misrepresentations that were 'untethered from reality.' In a statement, the company asserted: 'Let us be clear: Smartmatic wins business because we're the best at what we do. We operate ethically and abide by all laws always, both in Los Angeles County and every jurisdiction where we operate.' As the federal corruption case against the Smartmatic employees gets underway, L.A. County's Logan faces separate civil allegations that he benefited from a close relationship with company management. This included upscale dinners, a trip to Taiwan and the Maldives, as well as other outings, according to reported county emails and text messages. Logan later stated in a civil case deposition that these were exempt from disclosure because he attended in a 'personal capacity.' The emails and depositions emerged in an unusual 1,000-page public records lawsuit filed this month by Fox News, whose representatives say they need county records to defend themselves against the multibillion-dollar defamation lawsuit brought by Smartmatic. Smartmatic gained widespread recognition in 2020 after Fox News falsely reported that the company, along with Dominion Voting Systems, helped rig the 2020 election against President Trump. This conspiracy was widely pushed by Trump surrogates both on-air and in legal filings that ultimately failed. At the time, Dominion voting machines were used in about two dozen states, while Smartmatic was only used in L.A. County — it's first business in North America. Dominion filed a defamation suit against Fox which was settled for $787.5 million. Smartmatic filed a similar lawsuit in 2021 seeking $2.7 billion. Smartmatic also launched defamation lawsuits against some of its accusers. In addition to Fox News, the company sued Mike Lindell, Newsmax, One America News Network, Sidney Powell, and Rudy Giuliani. As part of its defense, Fox News lawyers have focused on the relationship between Logan and Smartmatic, arguing that the county is withholding crucial records. The network declined to elaborate on the allegations made in the lawsuit when contacted by the LA Times. Logan said in a statement that the county is being used as a pawn in both the civil lawsuit and federal corruption case and said the 'voluminous records' the county released 'refute the salacious allegations.' The federal criminal case against Smartmatic executives started during the Biden administration with charges filed in August 2024. The Trump administration paused most foreign bribery cases after he took office for a second term, but allowed the charges against Smartmatic executives to proceed. Records released to Fox News by L.A. County, which the media company included as exhibits in the civil public records lawsuit, show no evidence of the voter fraud espoused on air by the network's guests in 2020 that led to the whirlwind of conspiracy theories and the subsequent defamation case.


The Guardian
14 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Trump has bought more than $100m in bonds while president, disclosure shows
Donald Trump has bought more than $100m in company, state and municipal bonds since taking office in January, according to new disclosures which shed further light on the vast holdings of the US's billionaire president. The forms, posted online on Tuesday, show the Republican former real estate mogul made more than 600 financial purchases since 21 January, the day after he was inaugurated for his second term in the White House. The 12 August filing from the US Office of Government Ethics does not list exact amounts for each purchase, only giving a broad range. They include corporate bonds from Citigroup, Morgan Stanley and Wells Fargo, as well as Meta, Qualcomm, the Home Depot, T-Mobile USA and UnitedHealth Group. Other debt purchases include various bonds issued by cities, states, counties and school districts as well as gas districts, and other issuers. The holdings cover sectors that could benefit from US policy shifts under his administration, such as financial deregulation. A senior White House official said Trump continued to file mandatory disclosures about his investment portfolio but that neither he nor his family had a role in managing or selecting the bonds, which are managed by a third-party financial institution. Federal ethics officials certified the reports, which are in compliance with applicable laws, according to the official, who declined to be named. Trump, a businessperson turned politician, has said he has put his companies into a trust managed by his children. 'President Trump's net worth has increased substantially, with much of that concentrated in crypto holdings and Trump Media. Given that, there is no evidence currently that his bond purchases are anything other than a prudent diversification within his billions of dollars in assets,' said John Canavan, lead US analyst at Oxford Economics. 'It seems like he was primarily purchasing corporate and municipal bonds and others that are high quality and highly rated, so it's just a way to take a little bit of risk off the table,' he said. Trump's annual disclosure form filed in June showed his income from various sources still ultimately accrues to the president – something that has opened him up to accusations of conflicts of interest. In that disclosure, which appeared to cover the 2024 calendar year, Trump reported more than $600m in income from cryptocurrencies, golf properties, licensing and other ventures. It also showed his push into crypto had added substantially to his wealth. Overall, Trump reported assets worth at least $1.6bn, according to a Reuters calculation at the time.


Reuters
14 minutes ago
- Reuters
Trump administration to vet immigration applications for 'anti-Americanism'
WASHINGTON, Aug 20 (Reuters) - President Donald Trump's administration has said it will assess applicants for U.S. work, study and immigration visas for "anti-Americanism" and count any such finding against them, sparking concern about implications for free speech. The U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services said in a "policy alert, opens new tab" dated Tuesday that it gave immigration officers new guidance on how to exercise discretion in cases where foreign applicants "support or promote anti-American ideologies or activities" as well as "antisemitic terrorism." Trump has labeled a range of voices as anti-American, including historians and museums documenting U.S. slavery and pro-Palestinian protesters opposing U.S. ally Israel's military assault on Gaza. "Anti-American activity will be an overwhelmingly negative factor in any discretionary analysis," USCIS said. "America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies." The announcement did not define anti-Americanism. But the policy manual refers to a section of federal law about prohibiting naturalization of people "opposed to government or law, or who favor totalitarian forms of government." The full text mentions supporters of communism or totalitarian regimes and people who advocate overthrow of the U.S. government and violence against government officers, among other factors. USCIS said it expanded the types of applications that have social media vetting, and reviews for "anti-American activity" will be added to that vetting. Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, said the step hearkened to the 1950s when Senator Joseph McCarthy hunted alleged communists in a campaign that became synonymous with political persecution. "McCarthyism returns to immigration law," he said. Anti-Americanism "has no prior precedent in immigration law and its definition is entirely up to the Trump admin." In April, the U.S. government said it would begin screening the social media of immigrants and visa applicants for what it called antisemitic activity. Rights advocates raised free speech and surveillance concerns. (This story has been refiled to fix a typo in the headline)