'To gain financial autonomy, Europe must create a large-scale debt market'
"Sell America." The turmoil caused by Donald Trump's back-and-forth on tariffs has led to an unusual mantra spreading through the world of finance: Sell (some of) your American assets to avoid being too exposed to the whims of the US president. As a result, many investors have shed both their American stocks, their US bonds and their dollars. While the stock market has rebounded – at least temporarily – the greenback has still fallen nearly 10% against the euro since February.
Selling America is one thing, but what should one buy instead? The answer is far from obvious. Japan's economy is stagnant, China is not considered a reliable partner and emerging markets are extremely volatile. In theory, Europe could seize this opportunity. It may not be dynamic, but it is wealthy and the rule of law is respected. In that context, could the euro – the world's second-most traded currency, though still three times less important than the dollar – take on a greater role? The stakes are high; this is about European sovereignty, and with it, Europe's ability to fund itself more easily. Ultimately, it comes down to shifting the "exorbitant privilege of the dollar" toward an "exorbitant privilege of the euro."
"There is an opportunity that is opening now (...) but my conclusion is that it is not going to be granted to us; it should not be taken as a given," warned Christine Lagarde, president of the European Central Bank, on June 5. To take advantage of the chaos caused by Trump, she explained, Europe needs to reform. Above all, it must address its main weakness, namely fragmentation among the 27 countries (20 in the eurozone).
Creating a large-scale debt market
This is especially clear when it comes to funding the economy. While the US has $29 trillion in sovereign bonds – until recently considered the world's safest assets – the European Union (EU) has 27 separate sovereign debt markets. Germany's − seen as the safest − is worth $2.5 trillion, which is nearly 12 times smaller. For an American or Japanese investor looking to put their money in Europe, this makes things complicated. To gain financial autonomy, Europe must create a large-scale debt market capable of competing with that of the US.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Euronews
39 minutes ago
- Euronews
Israel starts flying home citizens stuck abroad during Iran conflict
Israel has started flying home citizens stranded overseas during the conflict with Iran, with two flights from Cyprus landing in Tel Aviv on Wednesday morning. Israel's airspace has been closed since the country launched a surprise airstrike campaign against Iran on Friday. Iran has retaliated with hundreds of drones and missiles. A total of 13 repatriation flights were scheduled on Wednesday from Larnaca to Israel, with nine to Haifa and four to Tel Aviv, according to an airport operator in Cyprus. Israel's transport ministry says that up to 150,000 Israelis are currently outside the country, about a third of whom are trying to return home. Many Israelis stranded abroad have ended up in Cyprus, which is the closest EU country to Israel. The jets of Israel's three airlines have been moved to Larnaca since the conflict with Iran began last week. The conflict has forced most countries in the Middle East to close their airspace. Dozens of airports have halted all flights or significantly reduced operations, leaving tens of thousands of passengers stranded and others unable to flee the conflict or return home. At least 400 Israeli citizens are reported to be stranded along Bulgaria's Black Sea coast. One of those tourists, Galid, told Euronews that she did not know when she and her family would be able to return home to Israel. "We can't go back now. We can't. We'll have to stay here with the children and wait. Nothing can be done right now. That's it. It's war," Galid said. Two other tourists, Eden and Itai, stated that they had ruled out the possibility of flying to Jordan or Egypt and then entering Israel through the land border because they had a young child. The hotels where the stranded Israelis are staying in Bulgaria have been placed under increased police presence and security measures in recent days. Israel's national carrier El Al has said it intends to operate dozens of flights to repatriate Israelis from various European capitals such as Athens, Rome and Paris. Smaller carrier Arkia will fly back Israeli citizens from Greece, Cyprus and Montenegro, while Israir is operating flights for the country's stranded tourists from Cyprus, Greece and Bulgaria. However, passenger flights are still not departing from Israel, which means that tens of thousands of tourists are currently stranded in the country. Israeli airstrikes hit Iran's capital Tehran overnight and into Wednesday morning, as Iran launched a small barrage of missiles at Israel with no reports of casualties. The attacks between the bitter rivals have opened a new chapter in their turbulent recent history. Many in the region fear a wider conflict as they watch waves of missiles fly across their skies every night. A Washington-based Iranian human rights group, Human Rights Activists, says at least 585 people, including 239 civilians, have been killed and more than 1,300 wounded by Israel's strikes on Iran. Since Friday, Iran has fired about 400 missiles and hundreds of drones in retaliatory strikes that have killed at least 24 people in Israel, all civilians, and wounded hundreds, according to Israeli authorities. An EU law aiming to establish minimum common standards for breeding and keeping cats and dogs in the bloc leaves loopholes in online trading and risks continued use of so-called "puppy mills" in which babies are chained up, MEPs and NGOs have warned. In December 2023 the European Commission proposed the law to regulate a market it estimates generates €1.3 billion each year, in order to improve traceability of cats and dogs across Europe, as well as banning controversial practices such as ear cropping. EU ministers adopted their position on the proposal last year, and the European Parliament is now expected to vote on the matter on Thursday in Strasbourg, paving the way for final negotiations between the institutions before agreement can be reached on a final text. Under the new rules all pets would need to be identified using electronic microchip transponders before entering the market to reduce fraud and enable better enforcement of animal welfare standards. The legislation does not require online platforms to verify pet listings before they are published, however, despite the fact that most illegal pet trade happens online. Only nine EU countries currently require sellers to meet basic standards to sell pets online. This gap allows illegal sellers to post listings anonymously, bypass licensing, and avoid identification checks. A set of amendments has been filed by MEPs to address this specific issue. Advocacy groups would like lawmakers to implement a simple but effective verification system similar to a credit card check to ensure online sellers are traceable and accountable. A related problem is the common practice of sellers posing as 'private individuals' to sidestep regulations. This avoids mandatory health checks, registration, and taxes, enabling a large underground market to flourish. Another contentious issue is a proposed exemption for breeders with three litters or fewer. Animal welfare groups warn this could exclude roughly 80% of all breeders from oversight, many of whom operate without proper regulation. Just one unregulated breeder can produce up to 100 puppies or kittens over an animal's lifetime, according to Eurogroup for Animals. France alone has an estimated 20,000 to 30,000 amateur breeders, many producing at least one litter per year. Without regulation, these animals risk being raised in unsanitary or unethical conditions, including so-called 'puppy mills', where animals are sometimes kept in chains, according to the NGO. Some MEPs are calling for these exemptions to be removed. Animal welfare organisation Four Paws urged lawmakers to ensure all breeders, regardless of size, comply with identification, registration, and basic welfare rules. 'No exceptions, and full traceability in online sales. In short, this regulation must live up to its own objectives,' said Georgia Diamantopoulou from Four Paws. A final blind spot in the legislation is its limited scope: microchipping and registration only apply to animals placed on the market. This excludes stray and free-roaming animals, leaving shelters to deal with the fallout. Animal shelters across Europe are facing overcrowding situations and are under-resourced, meaning they will receive even greater strain due to unregistered pets and the continued consequences of unregulated breeding and trade. 'To effectively combat the illegal pet trade and protect animal welfare, EU rules must apply to all cat and dog breeders, including small and amateur ones,' said Iza Arriet from Eurogroup for Animals, who added that illegal trade often comes from breeders who cut corners and ignore welfare standards.
Euronews
an hour ago
- Euronews
Why was the US TikTok ban extended again?
The pending ban on the popular social media app TikTok will likely be extended on Thursday. US President Donald Trump told reporters on Tuesday that he would 'probably' extend the TikTok ban for a third time but he would need approval from China's President Xi Jinping to do so. The Supreme Court uphelda decision in January that forces ByteDance, the Chinese company behind TikTok, to either sell the app to an American buyer or face a nationwide ban. June 19th was the new date that the ban was supposed to take effect. Euronews Next takes a look at what could be next for the app and evaluates whether the extension is a sign that the national security concerns around TikTok have changed AND if it is a geopolitical move by Trump It's not a surprise that Trump is likely to extend the TikTok ban because he believes it's being used in further negotiations with China, said Darío García de Viedma, fellow of technical and digital policy at the think tank the Elcano Royal Institute in Spain. 'I don't see a scenario in which both [Xi and Trump's] interests are met with a purchase or a ban,' García de Viedma told Euronews Next. 'It would have to be part of a broader negotiation, where one concedes TikTok and the other concedes something else, like tariffs or export control'. Last week, Trump claimed the US and China agreed to a new trade relationship where the US would receive magnets and rare earth minerals in exchange for allowing Chinese students to enrol in American colleges and universities. The deal also brought their respective tariffs down to 55 per cent imposed by the US on Chinese products and 10 per cent imposed by China on American products. Despite their relationship appearing to have calmed, it still isn't the right time to force a TikTok sale, said García de Viedma. It also wouldn't be the first time that a TikTok ban is be used to gain political leverage over China, he added. Indian President Narendra Modi banned TikTok along with 58 Chinese apps in 2020 after border skirmishes with China. The app was gone overnight but accounts and old videos are still online, the BBC reported. García de Viedma said Indian policy experts he has spoken to, the move is 'populist' to show that '[Modi] is taking care of the conflict with China and that this is a very big move towards Indian sovereignty'. 'President Trump is doing the opposite,' García de Viedma said.. 'His discourse right now is, I'm going to save TikTok. [Trump] is saying the opposite to Modi, but it's actually the same trend, using it as a sovereignty discourse.' Jan Penfrat, senior policy advisor with European Digital Rights, said he wouldn't be surprised if a movement to ban all Chinese apps like Modi comes up later. 'I wouldn't be surprised if later in the administration, [there is] an idea to basically just say 'hey let's just ban all Chinese things that are kind of in competition with [what] America offers,' Penfrat said. The main argument from the Republican Party that passed the bill to divest TikTok is that ByteDance could be compelled to send US data to the Chinese government if they requested it. This is largely a 'theoretical concern' because there are opposing views from officials about whether there have been TikTok data transfers to the Chinese government, García de Viedma said. But data privacy concerns haven't resonated with TikTok creators, who have stayed on the platform despite conflicting stories from officials, he added. The US also has a similar data transfer law to China called the Clarifying Lawful Overseas Use of Data Act (CLOUD). Passed during Trump's first mandate, the US government can subpoena American technology companies for data stored on any server in the world to help them investigate serious crimes. Penfrat and García de Viedma argue that TikTok has just as many security risks as other social media apps due to how they share and store data. 'All of these social media apps are a security risk if you work in a sensitive area because they all do massive data collection through the device that they're installed on,' Penfrat said. 'And this has nothing to do with the fact that TikTok comes from China and everything to do with the business model that the company has'. This business model involves collecting personal data and selling it to advertisers to feed it into recommender systems, Penfrat said, referring to algorithms. If a US or Chinese government body wants data, they don't have to compel the social media companies to hand it over - they can just participate in real-time bidding for personal data on the targeted advertising market and bypass the social media companies entirely, he added. 'It's an incredibly messy industry which leads to hundreds of parties eventually having access to personal data and it's totally out of control in a way,' Penfrat said. 'Eventually, government agencies like ICE (Immigration and Customs Enforcement)in the US have started buying personal data on the commercial market because they can get all the information they want without needing a warrant'. It's also not clear if and when the sale goes through, whether ByteDance would be forced to sell the TikTok algorithm or just its US-based operations, according to García de Viedma. If the US only buys the operations and not the algorithms, it could change what content is seen or recommended for users in Europe, said García de Viedma. This could then lead to the possible 'implosion' of the so-called 'TikTok economy' that is moving money mostly from the United States. 'In a matter of days, the big TikTok community could move to another platform and this would have a big impact on all the intellectual movements and culture and politics that is created on TikTok,' he said. But that could be what Trump wants by creating this uncertainty about the ban, García de Viedma said, by forcing creators to move to other platforms like Instagram to keep their income streams alive. By doing this, Trump could be using a 'midterm strategy to just kill TikTok from its user base and to reduce its impact and the price,' he said. The European Commission has notified Chinese online marketplace AliExpress that it is in breach of the bloc's online platform rules for not taking enough measures to counter illegal products. Preliminary results of its investigation into the platform's alleged breaches the Digital Services Act (DSA) – EU rules that oblige online platforms to counter illegal content and products online – were sent to AliExpress on Tuesday. The Commission's began an investigation in March 2024 focussing on several areas including risk mitigation, content moderation and the internal complaint handling mechanism, as well as transparency of advertising and recommender systems. The Commission's preliminary findings suggest that AliExpress devotes limited resources to moderation systems designed to avoid the dissemination of illegal products, underplaying risks. 'The company also fails to appropriately enforce its penalty policy concerning traders that repeatedly post illegal content, and its content moderation systems show systemic failures, making the systems less effective and allowing manipulation by malicious traders,' the Commission's statement said. The platform now has time to react to the findings before the Commission decides on next steps. If the EU executive confirms the breach in a final decision, it could impose a fine of up to 6% of the company's global turnover. At the same time, the Commission accepted voluntary commitments made by the platform on some of the other grievances of the probe and made them binding. The commitments related to the notice and action mechanism, transparency of advertising and data access for researchers as well as the platform's systems to monitor and detect illegal products, such as medicines, food supplements and others which could affect users' health and minors' well-being. By making the commitments binding, the Commission closed these parts of the investigation. The AliExpress case is the second most advanced DSA probe since the platform rules entered into force late 2023. The Commission also sent preliminary findings to X related to risk management, content moderation and dark patterns. It has further investigations pending into platforms including Facebook and Instagram. Under the DSA, companies with more than 45 million users are considered Very Large Online Platforms (VLOP) meaning that they face stricter rules to fight illegal and harmful content and counterfeit products on their platforms.
France 24
an hour ago
- France 24
China's AliExpress risks fine for breaching EU illegal product rules
While noting some progress, "the Commission preliminarily found AliExpress in breach of its obligation to assess and mitigate risks related to the dissemination of illegal products" under the EU's Digital Services Act (DSA), a statement said. The EU opened a formal investigation in March 2024 into AliExpress, which is owned by Alibaba, for multiple suspected breaches of DSA rules on countering the spread of illegal goods and content online. The commission's preliminary findings concluded that "AliExpress fails to appropriately enforce its penalty policy concerning traders that repeatedly post illegal content". It also highlighted "systemic failures" in AliExpress's moderation systems that expose it to "manipulation by malicious traders", and said the firm's own risk assessments underestimated the dangers linked to illegal products. Those findings were "in breach of the obligations" that the DSA imposes on very large platforms -- such as AliExpress, Facebook and Instagram -- with more than 45 million monthly European users, the commission said. AliExpress now has the right to examine the commission's findings and reply in writing. If AliExpress is confirmed to be in non-compliance with the DSA, the commission could impose a fine of up to six percent of the firm's global turnover. The EU has developed a powerful armoury to regulate Big Tech with the milestone DSA and a sister law, the Digital Markets Act, that hits web giants with strict curbs, obligations and oversight on how they do business. It took action against AliExpress after identifying likely failings to prevent the sale of fake medicines, prevent minors seeing pornography, stop affiliated influencers pushing illegal products, and other issues including data access for researchers. In its statement Wednesday, the commission said AliExpress had taken a series of legally binding measures to remedy those concerns. Steps included improvements to its systems for detecting illegal products such as medicines and pornographic material, notably goods spread through hidden links and affiliate programmes. The commission also said AliExpress had addressed concerns regarding the flagging of illegal products, the handling of internal complaints, ad transparency, the traceability of traders and research access to data.
