Witness: Most tribal nations at Dakota Access Pipeline protest ‘didn't know who Greenpeace was'
Representatives of several tribal nations demonstrate in August 2016 in Bismarck against the Dakota Access Pipeline. (Kyle Martin/For the North Dakota Monitor)
MANDAN, N.D. — A Lakota organizer said in a video deposition played to jurors Monday that the Standing Rock Sioux Tribe led the protests against the Dakota Access Pipeline, not Greenpeace.
Nick Tilsen, an Oglala Sioux Tribe citizen and activist, called the notion that Greenpeace orchestrated the protests 'paternalistic.'
'I think that people underestimate the complexity and the sophistication of tribal nations,' Tilsen said.
Tilsen's deposition was the latest testimony heard by the nine-person jury in the marathon trial between pipeline developer Energy Transfer and Greenpeace.
Energy Transfer claims Greenpeace secretly aided and abetted destructive and violent behavior by protesters during the demonstrations, which took place in south central North Dakota near the Standing Rock Reservation in 2016 and 2017. It also claims that Greenpeace orchestrated a misinformation campaign to defame the company, leading a group of banks to back out of financing the project. Energy Transfer seeks roughly $300 million from the environmental organization.
Greenpeace denies Energy Transfer's allegations. The group says it has never condoned violence, and only played a supporting role during the protests.
Tilsen said he got involved in the protests before Greenpeace. He was invited to join the cause by former Standing Rock Chairman Dave Archambault and his sister, Jodi Archambault, he said.
'They called me and said, 'Hey, we need your help at Standing Rock,'' Tilsen said.
Standing Rock has long opposed the Dakota Access Pipeline, stating the project poses a pollution threat, infringes on tribal sovereignty and has disrupted sacred cultural sites.
It was Standing Rock leadership that laid the groundwork for the protests against the pipeline's construction in 2016, Tilsen said.
He said organizers later invited Greenpeace to support the camps, including by providing supplies and nonviolent direct action training. Tilsen said he only felt comfortable reaching out to Greenpeace because a friend of his, Cy Wagoner, worked there.
He said since Wagoner is from the Navajo nation, he trusted that Greenpeace would respect Standing Rock's leadership of the camps.
Indigenous communities are often reluctant to invite outside nonprofits to help with Native rights issues, Tilsen added. He said they often don't understand Native nations' unique relationship with the U.S. government.
Greenpeace wasn't a big part of the protests, Tilsen said.
'To be honest, most of the tribal nations didn't know who Greenpeace was,' he said.
Countless other groups — including representatives from more than 300 Native nations — came to the protest camps in solidarity with Standing Rock, said Tilsen.
'Quite frankly, our list of allies was hundreds,' he said.
Greenpeace gave intel, supplies, training to Dakota Access Pipeline protests, testimony shows
Tilsen said he was involved in several protest actions against the Dakota Access Pipeline in 2016 and 2017, including those that involved marching on the pipeline easement, jumping in front of equipment and using lockboxes — also known as 'sleeping dragons' — to disable construction machinery.
None of the protest actions were coordinated by Greenpeace, he said.
Tilsen said he never saw or endorsed any destruction of property or acts of violence toward construction workers or law enforcement. He also pushed back on the assertion that any of the protest activities he participated in qualified as trespassing.
The pipeline passes through land recognized as belonging to the Sioux Nation under treaties signed by the U.S. government in 1851 and 1868. The U.S. government later annexed that land in violation of those treaties.
Tilsen asked how Lakota citizens could be trespassing on land that was unlawfully taken from them.
'This is the conundrum we find ourselves in,' he said.
Employees of Greenpeace said during video depositions played last week that the environmental organization brought 20 to 30 lockboxes to the camps.
Tilsen said while he saw many lockboxes during protests, he wasn't sure where any of them came from. He also said he never heard anyone from Greenpeace tell demonstrators to use the devices.
Tilsen said that David Khoury, an employee for Greenpeace, helped identify potential sites for protest actions. Tilsen added that while Wagoner — another Greenpeace employee — didn't plan protest activities, he trained people on how to conduct them.
The trial, which is before Southwest Central Judicial District Judge James Gion, is expected to last roughly four more weeks.
This story was originally published by the North Dakota Monitor. Like South Dakota Searchlight, it's part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. North Dakota Monitor maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Amy Dalrymple for questions: info@northdakotamonitor.com.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
26 minutes ago
- Yahoo
XerpaAI Launches the World's First AI Growth Agent (AGA), Ushering in a New Era Beyond CMOs and CGOs
SINGAPORE, June 10, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Today marks a historic turning point in the evolution of growth leadership: XerpaAI, the world's first-ever AI Growth Agent (AGA), officially launches—redefining how Web3 companies scale, engage, and retain users. As businesses shift from traditional Chief Marketing Officer (CMO) roles to the more holistic Chief Growth Officer (CGO) framework, XerpaAI takes the transformation a step further. Designed to act as a real-time, always-on growth strategist, XerpaAI's AGA combines the power of automation, cross-platform engagement, and AI-driven decision-making to deliver measurable growth at scale. 'XerpaAI isn't just another marketing tool. It's a paradigm shift,' said Sean, CEO of XerpaAI, the ecosystem that pioneered the AGA category. 'We've moved beyond static dashboards and siloed teams. With XerpaAI, growth becomes autonomous, intelligent, and community-driven.' Key Features of XerpaAI: Real-Time Optimization: Automatically adjusts campaigns based on user behavior, analytics, and incentive triggers. Massive Scale: Over 100,000 AGENTs deployed across platforms like X (Twitter), TikTok, Telegram, and Line. Proven Impact: Up to 3x increase in conversion rates and a 70% reduction in operational costs. Web3-Native: Built for the decentralized internet—XerpaAI powers link-to-earn mechanisms, social graph integrations, and gamified growth loops. Why It Matters Now The launch of XerpaAI comes at a crucial time when Web3 startups and enterprises alike are grappling with costly, fragmented marketing efforts. Traditional methods can't keep pace with the speed and complexity of today's digital ecosystem. As the first product in the UXLINK Growth OS, XerpaAI acts as a unified AI engine, automating everything from user acquisition to retention, and integrating seamlessly with SocialFi, DeFi, GameFi, and PayFi projects. A Glimpse into the Future XerpaAI represents a leap toward ethical, scalable, and adaptive growth. It enables organizations to: Replace outdated CMO dashboards with intelligent, self-improving systems. Empower CGOs with real-time data and predictive insights. Launch growth initiatives in 10+ languages across global markets with no added team burden. 'Think of XerpaAI as your growth co-pilot,' said Gingle. 'It's like having a full-stack growth team—automated and optimized in the cloud.' About XerpaAIXerpaAI is the first AI Growth Agent (AGA), designed by UXLINK to automate Web3 growth across social, product, and community channels. It's built for a future where growth is autonomous, ethical, and exponentially scalable. About UXLINK UXLINK is the foundational ecosystem behind AGAs, enabling next-generation growth for the decentralized web. With millions of users and partners across the space, UXLINK is building the infrastructure that powers community-first innovation. Media Contact Information: Website: : partnership@ Twitter : PR Contact:Rachita ChettriMediaX Agencycontact@ Disclaimer: This is a paid post and is provided by XerpaAI. The statements, views, and opinions expressed in this content are solely those of the content provider and do not necessarily reflect the views of this media platform or its publisher. We do not endorse, verify, or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, or reliability of any information presented. This content is for informational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or business advice. All investments carry inherent risks, including the potential loss of capital. Readers are strongly encouraged to conduct their own due diligence and consult with a qualified financial advisor before making any investment decisions. Neither the media platform nor the publisher shall be held responsible for any inaccuracies, misrepresentations, or financial losses resulting from the use or reliance on the information in this press release. Speculate only with funds you can afford to lose. In the event of any legal claims or concerns regarding this article, we accept no liability or responsibility. Legal Disclaimer: This media platform provides the content of this article on an "as-is" basis, without any warranties or representations of any kind, express or implied. We assume no responsibility for any inaccuracies, errors, or omissions. We do not assume any responsibility or liability for the accuracy, content, images, videos, licenses, completeness, legality, or reliability of the information presented herein. Any concerns, complaints, or copyright issues related to this article should be directed to the content provider mentioned above. A photo accompanying this announcement is available at in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Indonesia revokes most mining permits in dive hotspot after outcry
Indonesia revoked permits on Tuesday for four of the five mining companies operating in the eastern archipelago of Raja Ampat after activists shared videos of islands damaged by nickel extraction. The cluster of islands and shoals in Southwest Papua Province sits in the Coral Triangle and is thought to be one of the world's most pristine reefs, with its clear blue waters making it a popular diving spot. Indonesia has the world's largest nickel reserves and is the biggest producer of the metal, which is used in electric vehicle batteries and stainless steel, and a 2020 export ban has spurred a domestic industrial boom. Last week, Greenpeace Indonesia published videos showing environmental damage to three islands because of nickel mining projects, including one clip which racked up more than 15 million Instagram views. President Prabowo Subianto "decided that the government will revoke the mining business licence of four companies in Raja Ampat", state secretariat minister Prasetyo Hadi told reporters. Energy and mineral resources minister Bahlil Lahadalia said "they have violated" regulations. "We believe this region must be protected," he said. Greenpeace said nickel exploitation on the islands of Gag, Kawe and Manuran had led to the destruction of more than 500 hectares (1,200 acres) of forest and vegetation. Environmentalists say coral reefs and marine life are threatened by the operations, but Bahlil denied the surrounding environment had been harmed. "If people say the coral reefs and the ocean have been damaged, you can see for yourself. Please be careful to differentiate which one is real and which one is not," he said. - 'Make sure they stop' - The NGO's campaign led to growing calls by politicians and celebrities for the licences to be withdrawn. The four companies impacted by the immediate ban are PT Anugerah Surya Pratama, PT Nurham, PT Kawei Sejahtera Mining and PT Mulia Raymond Perkasa. PT Nurham received its mining permits this year and has not started production but the other three have had them since 2013, according to the energy ministry. One more company -- PT Gag Nikel -- will continue to operate on Raja Ampat's Gag island but be closely monitored, said Bahlil. It received its operational permit in 2017. The three affected islands are categorised as small islands that under Indonesian law should be off-limits to mining, Greenpeace said. Greenpeace Indonesia said the decision was a good start but the government needed to take further action. "We appreciate this decision but we need to make sure the decision will be implemented. We need to make sure they stop," forest campaign team leader Arie Rompas said. He warned the government could reissue the permits later or the companies could appeal the decision in court. The activist said the government should also revoke the operating permit for the fifth company. A report last week by Climate Rights International alleged the Indonesian government was allowing environmental damage and violations against Indigenous people to go unchecked by nickel mining firms in the eastern Maluku islands. Processing and mining operations have grown there around Weda Bay, the world's largest nickel mine by production, but have led to locals reporting a spike in air pollution from smelters and rivers polluted by nickel tailings in soil carried by rain. An AFP report last month detailed how the home of the nomadic Hongana Manyawa tribe was being eaten away by that mine, with members issuing a call for nickel companies to leave their tribal lands alone. dsa-jfx/mtp


Hamilton Spectator
6 hours ago
- Hamilton Spectator
High Seas Treaty gains momentum as 18 new countries pledge support
NICE, France (AP) — Eighteen countries ratified the High Seas Treaty on Monday, bringing the total to 49 — just 11 short of the 60 needed for the ocean agreement to enter into force. The surge in support, occurring during the U.N. Ocean Conference in Nice, France, adds momentum to what could become a historic shift in how the world governs the open ocean. Here's what the treaty is, why it matters and what happens next. What is the High Seas Treaty Formally known as the Agreement on Biodiversity Beyond National Jurisdiction, the High Seas Treaty is the first legally binding agreement focused on protecting marine biodiversity in international waters. These waters, which are beyond the jurisdiction of any single country, make up nearly two-thirds of the ocean and almost half the surface of the planet. Until now, there has been no comprehensive legal framework to create marine protected areas or enforce conservation on the high seas. Why is it needed Despite their remoteness, the high seas are under growing pressure from overfishing, climate change and the threat of deep-sea mining . Environmental advocates warn that without proper protections, marine ecosystems in international waters face irreversible harm. 'Until now, it has been the wild west on the high seas,' said Megan Randles, global political lead for oceans at Greenpeace. 'Now we have a chance to properly put protections in place.' The treaty is also essential to achieving the global '30x30' target — an international pledge to protect 30% of the planet's land and sea by 2030. How the treaty works The treaty creates a legal process for countries to establish marine protected areas in the high seas, including rules for destructive activities like deep-sea mining and geo-engineering. It also establishes a framework for technology-sharing, funding mechanisms and scientific collaboration among countries. Crucially, decisions under the treaty will be made multilaterally through conferences of parties (COPs) rather than by individual countries acting alone. What happens when it reaches 60 ratifications Once 60 countries ratify the treaty, a 120-day countdown begins before it officially enters into force. That would unlock the ability to begin designating protected areas in the high seas and put oversight mechanisms into motion. As of Monday evening, 49 countries and the EU had ratified, meaning 11 more are needed to trigger that countdown. What comes after ratification The first Conference of the Parties (COP1) must take place within one year of the treaty's entry into force. That meeting will lay the groundwork for implementation, including decisions on governance, financing and the creation of key bodies to evaluate marine protection proposals. Environmental groups are pushing to surpass the required 60 ratifications, and to do so quickly – the more countries that ratify, the stronger and more representative the treaty's implementation will be. There's also a deadline: only countries that ratify by COP1 will be eligible to vote on critical decisions that determine how the treaty will operate. 'To reach 60 ratifications would be an absolutely enormous achievement, but for the treaty to be as effective as possible, we need countries from all over the world to engage in its implementation,' said Rebecca Hubbard, director of the High Seas Alliance. 'So the next step will be to go from 60 to global.' The surge in support on Monday has raised hopes that 2025 could mark a turning point for high seas protection. 'We're on the brink of making high seas history,' Hubbard said. ___ Follow Annika Hammerschlag on Instagram @ahammergram ___ The Associated Press receives support from the Walton Family Foundation for coverage of water and environmental policy. The AP is solely responsible for all content. For all of AP's environmental coverage, visit