Strengthening Trespass Laws For Businesses
The Government is strengthening trespass laws to make them more effective and practical for businesses, Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith and Associate Justice Minister Nicole McKee say.
'We know our trespass laws are no longer fit for purpose. They're difficult to enforce and often criminals take no notice. They return with impunity and just continue to rob businesses of their livelihoods,' Mr Goldsmith says.
'Our plan to restore law and order is working, but there's still more work to be done. Trespass laws are an area we know will make a world of difference to the community.
'Businesses need extra tools to better protect their properties, keep offenders away, and stop them from coming back.'
The proposed changes to the Trespass Act are:
Increasing the maximum trespass period from two years to three years.
Allow businesses, such as franchises, to trespass individuals from multiple locations.
Increase the maximum fine for anyone refusing to leave when asked, or returning when trespassed from $1,000 to $2,000.
Increase the maximum fine for anyone refusing to give their name and address when requested, or giving false information, from $500 to $1,000.
'For too long, offenders have treated trespass notices like a joke. These changes send a clear message: enough is enough. If you threaten retail workers or steal from businesses, don't expect to walk back in like nothing happened,' Mrs McKee says.
'Every New Zealander deserves to feel safe at work, especially our frontline retailers. These reforms aren't just about fines and paperwork; they are about making retail spaces safer and giving businesses the respect they deserve.'
'I want to thank Sunny Kaushal and the Retail MAG for engaging with retailers across the country and for their recommendations on how to modernise the Trespass Act, so it better upholds retailers' business and property rights, while keeping customers and staff safe,' Mr Goldsmith says.
'Our goal before the Bill is introduced is to explore how best to support retailers when distributing notices to those who refuse to engage.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
an hour ago
- RNZ News
Auckland Airport's net income lifts strongly after last year's results hit by tax bill
Auckland Airport showed a net profit of $420.7 million compared to $5.5m last year. Photo: 123RF Auckland Airport's bottom line has lifted strongly after last year's results were affected by a tax bill, while underlying profit also rose, as rental income improved, it increased aeronautical charges and had lower interest and tax expenses. Key numbers for the 12 months ended June compared with a year ago: Airfield income rose by $20.4 million, passenger services income increased by $36.6m and rental income was also up, by $22.6m. The previous year's bottom line was affected by a significant tax bill due to a change in government policy on depreciation of building structures. Passenger numbers were only slightly higher due to the soft recovery in travel volumes, with the airport saying international seat capacity stabilised at 92 percent of 2019 levels. Auckland Airport chair Julia Hoare said recovering and growing airline seat capacity was a top priority for the airport. "International airlines continue to have to prioritise their available fleet in the short term, but the future outlook remains positive with New Zealand well-positioned for growth - boosted by several airline partners announcing new routes and expanded capacity for the coming summer." Overall domestic capacity was steady despite Jetstar growing its capacity by 14 percent, largely due to Air New Zealand's ongoing engine and fleet issues. Chief executive Carrie Hurihanganui said it was a solid performance despite seat capacity constraints. "As we navigate through these challenges, we continue to be focused on prudent cost management and delivering the resilient and fit-for-purpose gateway New Zealand needs to maintain our competitiveness as a nation." Looking ahead, Hurihanganui said airline seat capacity constraints, a weaker domestic economy, global geopolitics and ongoing construction due to the terminal rebuild would contribute to uncertainty around the outlook. Auckland Airport projected domestic and international passenger numbers of 19.2m in the year ending June 2026, and an underlying earnings guidance of between $280m and $320m. Sign up for Ngā Pitopito Kōrero , a daily newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
NZ Herald
2 hours ago
- NZ Herald
The importance of clear laws shown in impressive evidence from Italy
If New Zealand's laws were as ambiguous, we would be worse off by $20 billion – or about $10,000 per household – every year. What family would not welcome avoiding that? What is 'poorly drafted' law? The researchers used 10 indicators of writing that likely lacks clarity. It assesses each of over 75,000 Italian laws. One measure is sentence length. According to experts, sentences with more than 25 words are likely to be unclear. The authors found that 85% of the millions of sentences in all of this law exceeded 25 words. That might seem staggering for those who do not read law books. Authors of children's books might think it was absurd. Lawyers are likely less surprised, but still disturbed. Greater clarity in drafting should be easy to fix. So why isn't it? The paper's answer lies in law-making imperatives. These include haste, compromise, personal career aspirations and short-term expediency. Ambiguity conceals likely outcomes. It shields blame and defuses critics' attempts to pinpoint a proposed law's problems. Even lawyers cannot be sure how courts will interpret unclear laws. Nor can judges in a lower court be sure about how a higher court will interpret them. This uncertainty creates a cascade of problems throughout the legal system. The authors examined 620,000 Italian Supreme Court judgments between 2004 and 2017. They found 32% of them reversed a decision of a lower court solely on legal grounds The rule of law is a precondition for national prosperity. The law should be clear and accessible. When it is not clear to judges, it cannot be clear to those who must obey it. The paper next assessed the effects on over 700,000 Italian firms of reversed court decisions. It looked, for example, at changes in their investment spending and output growth. This aspect was another exhaustive, path-breaking achievement. It found the adverse effects were significant. The estimated permanent 5% drop in Italian national income encapsulates that. The paper's approach is ingenious, but too complex to explain here. Are New Zealand's laws better drafted in these respects? It would be good to know, because low productivity is holding New Zealanders back. It should be easy to improve drafting quality. The bigger the gains, the more it should be a priority. To better inform this article, I used AI to count the word lengths of sentences in two of New Zealand's acts. From an Italian perspective, the results were encouraging. The proportion of sentences in the Health and Safety at Work Act 2015 that exceeded 25 words was 'only' 70%. For the Resource Management Act 1991, it was 53%. Even so, the implication is that most New Zealanders would not find the Resource Management Act (RMA) law clear and accessible. Parliament could be more insistent about improving clarity. The Government's Regulatory Standards Bill would increase this discipline. One part requires the Government to tell Parliament if a bill is unclear and hard to understand – and explain why. Small comfort, but better than nothing. Of course, there is more to good law than just clear drafting. Its content surely matters even more. Prominent symptoms of content problems include unaffordable housing, and infrastructure delays and inadequacies. However, much more is hidden or accepted as 'part of the woodwork'. Content problems have many sources. Public pressure on governments to 'do something' about the latest adverse headline is one source. Appeasing that pressure can be the easiest option. More mundane are the relentless daily calls on ministers to regulate or spend for this or that partisan or public-spirited cause. Such calls often fail to consider the costs to others. The Italian paper acknowledges that content also matters. It cites literature that shows property rights and institutional quality are key determinants of economic prosperity. The RMA is deficient in both respects. It offends almost everyone. The Regulatory Standards Bill also recognises the importance of protecting private property. Ministers must tell Parliament of any grounds for concern but Parliament can ignore this information at will and continues to be supreme lawmaker. (Most public opposition to this bill ignores this limiting aspect.) Greater transparency about these matters could help inform voters. Governments would spend and regulate more judiciously if more voters rewarded them for doing so. This exhaustive Italian research helps make the potential gains more concrete.
RNZ News
4 hours ago
- RNZ News
Jeffrey Epstein grand jury records to remain sealed, judge rules
By Luc Cohen , Reuters Financier Jeffrey Epstein was indicted on sex trafficking charges. Photo: AFP PHOTO / NEW YORK STATE SEX OFFENDER REGISTRY/HANDOUT A United States judge has denied the Justice Department's bid to unseal records from the grand jury that indicted the late financier Jeffrey Epstein on sex trafficking charges. Manhattan-based US District Judge Richard Berman's decision came as President Donald Trump tries to quell discontent from his conservative base of supporters over his administration's handling of the case. Trump, a Republican, had promised to make public Epstein-related files if reelected and accused Democrats of covering up the truth. But in July, the Justice Department declined to release any more material from its investigation of the case and said a previously touted Epstein client list did not exist, angering Trump's supporters. Evidence seen and heard by grand juries, which operate behind closed doors to prevent interference in criminal investigations, cannot be released without a judge's approval. Trump in July instructed Attorney General Pam Bondi to seek court approval for the release of grand jury material from Epstein's case. The grand jury that indicted Epstein heard from just one witness, an agent with the Federal Bureau of Investigations, the Justice Department said in a court filing in July. Epstein died by suicide in 2019 while awaiting trial on sex-trafficking charges. He had pleaded not guilty. His death in jail and his friendships with the wealthy and powerful sparked conspiracy theories that other prominent people were involved in his alleged crimes and that he was murdered. The New York City chief medical examiner determined that Epstein's death was a suicide by hanging. On 11 August, a different Manhattan-based judge, Paul Engelmayer, denied a similar request by the Justice Department to unseal grand jury testimony and exhibits from the case of Ghislaine Maxwell, Epstein's longtime girlfriend. Maxwell is serving a 20-year prison sentence following her 2021 conviction for recruiting underage girls for Epstein to abuse. Engelmayer wrote that the public would not learn anything new from the release of materials from Maxwell's grand jury because much of the evidence was made public at her monthlong trial four years ago. The grand jury testimony contained no evidence of others besides Epstein and Maxwell who had sexual contact with minors, Engelmayer wrote. Maxwell had pleaded not guilty. After losing an appeal, she has asked the US Supreme Court to review her case. In July, a Florida judge rejected the administration's request to unseal grand jury records from federal investigations there into Epstein in 2005 and 2007. Epstein served a 13-month sentence after pleading guilty in 2008 to a state-level prostitution charge as part of a deal now widely regarded as too lenient. - Reuters
