No, sunscreen will not give you skin cancer
"It is an indisputable fact that the countries that use the most sunscreen, have the highest incidence of skin cancer," said this X user in a post with close to 60,000 followers. "And the more sunscreen they use, the greater the prevalence." There are also TikTok videos warning about sunscreen.
"There is no scientific evidence that supports the association of sunscreen use with a higher risk of cancer," Brittany Schaefer, Public Information Officer with the Connecticut State Department of Public Health told DW.
The X post attributed the chart to the Connecticut Tumor Registry (CTR), but Schaefer says that was inaccurate.
"The original cancer incidence data likely came from the CT Tumor Registry decades ago, but not the added text boxes regarding sunscreens. We do not know the source of the actual graphic, but it was not from CTR or the Connecticut Department of Public Health," she said.
But why is the number of global skin cancer cases on the rise, even though more and more people are using sunscreen? A study across several countries from December 2023involving scientists from the US, Switzerland, Germany and Hungary looked at five hypotheses to get to the bottom of this.
According to the study, possible reasons for misunderstandings and myths around linking skin cancer risk and sun protection include access to better diagnostics and treatment methods, outdated scientific studies, erratic use of sunscreen and climate change.
Global incidence rates
Rising awareness about skin cancer risks among both patients and doctors has led to an increase in reporting and documenting cases. In contrast to higher skin cancer incidence worldwide, the mortality rate has dropped due to better treatment options, says the World Health Organisation's International Agency for Research on Cancer.
According to the World Cancer Research Fund, Australia had the highest age-standardised incidence rate of new cases in 2022: 37 new skin cancer cases per 100,000 people per year, followed by Denmark (31.1), Norway (30.6), New Zealand (29.8) and Sweden (27.4).
The US ranked first with 101,388 cases in terms of the total number of skin cancer cases in 2022, while Germany ranked second with 21,976 skin cancer cases, with an identical incidence rate of 16.5.
In terms of the number of skin cancer deaths in 2022, the US again took the lead with 7,368 deaths, while Germany ranked fourth with 3,303 cases, behind China and Russia. The following graph also shows that a high incidence rate of skin cancer does not necessarily correspond to a higher mortality rate.
Another reason for rising skin cancer rates could also be the fact that people spend more time outside in the sun. Even if they applied sunscreen, that was no guarantee that they used it as intended to protect their skin.
The lack of current scientific studies further adds to the problem of reinforcing outdated narratives. The US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) only began regulating sunscreen in 2011. All prior studies examining sunscreen use and the development of melanoma were likely conducted with products that did not offer the same level of protection as those currently on the market.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
3 days ago
- Express Tribune
Arresting doctors
The writer is an Adjunct Professor of Epidemiology at the University of Nebraska and has worked for the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. He can be reached at jasghar@ Listen to article Two doctors were having a leisurely lunch on the banks of a river. While eating they noticed a body floating in the water. Both jumped in the water and dragged the person out of water and started resuscitating him. While busy saving the person, they noticed two more bodies floating in the river. They jumped again and dragged both out and started providing first aid. Again they noticed that many more bodies were coming their way. One of these doctors jumped into the water again to save them while the other, instead of jumping into water, started running upstream. The doctor in the water shouted to his friend: "John, you don't want to save them?" "First I need to find out why they are falling into the river," answered the second doctor. The moral of the story is that instead of focusing on symptoms, you need to find out the actual cause and treat it. Providing clinical care after certain numbers becomes impossible for any health system unless you figure out why people are getting sick in the first place and by providing preventive strategies at the basic level. Even though this story is narrated in an epidemiology textbook (Gordis), it's true across all subjects and fields. Recently there is an onslaught of Facebook reels and TikTok videos, where senior decision-makers (both politicians and bureaucrats) are visiting hospitals and dressing down medical superintendents and senior medical staff working there. Without trying to understand the root causes of failure of the health system, they are focusing on peripheral issues like: instead of token number 90, why is token number 91 seeing a doctor? An immediate investigation was ordered right there. Why was the flowerbed not cleaned and had dead leaves lying there? I am not making up both these incidents, as I have seen uploaded videos of these officials. And yes, there are some serious issues like prescribing outside medicines, especially if they have a stock in the store. But how a prescribing doctor knows about availability of certain medicines without having a working logistics management information system (LMIS). Question needs to be asked first that if hospital after hospital is not up to the mark, then the problem may not lie inside the hospital but in the health system. If no MS is performing then the first question we all need to ask is: how are they being appointed, what is the criterion for appointments and who is appointing them? The second question we need to ask is: what professional training is being provided to them once we select them for administrative positions? Readers will be surprised to know that in most instances there is absolutely no training before an appointment. Most government departments, including civil services, where starting grade is 17, like health department, gets extensive preboarding training while health system does not offer any type of preboarding training. Other departments of government normally have required administrative trainings for promotions to the next grade, but health system does not offer until very late in the career and that too is not given much importance. Many are given ad hoc positions instead of permanent positions just to keep them under the thumb. Tenure security is just a fancy word, and you could be moved on the whims of someone. This automatically translates into suboptimal performance. I am also dismayed at our public hospitals and want them to be improved. To make this happen first we need to: decrease the sick people needing hospitals by population management; provide clean drinking water to reduce 70% of disease burden on hospitals; transparently and fairly hire medical superintendents; provide them needed professional training; empower them administratively and financially to run public hospitals. Only then could we make them accountable. The current practice will only demotivate the whole department and result in the remaining good officers exiting from the public health system. Arresting doctors will not help but understanding their problems and working with them will improve the health services.
Express Tribune
31-07-2025
- Express Tribune
Justin Timberlake reveals Lyme disease diagnosis following tour struggles
Justin Timberlake has opened up about his recent health struggles, revealing in an emotional Instagram post that he has been diagnosed with Lyme disease. The announcement came shortly after the conclusion of his Forget Tomorrow World Tour, which spanned two years and ended in late July. In a heartfelt message shared on July 31, Timberlake reflected on the highs and lows of the tour, describing it as 'the most fun, emotional, gratifying, physically demanding, and, at times, grueling experience.' The 44-year-old singer acknowledged that his performances may have appeared lackluster at times, which led some fans to speculate about his energy levels onstage. Timberlake explained that behind the scenes, he had been quietly dealing with serious health issues. 'Among other things, I've been battling some health issues and was diagnosed with Lyme disease — which I don't say so you feel bad for me — but to shed some light on what I've been up against,' he wrote. 'If you've experienced this disease or know someone who has, then you're aware: living with this can be relentlessly debilitating, both mentally and physically.' Lyme disease, caused by bacteria transmitted through tick bites, can lead to severe fatigue, nerve pain, joint problems, and neurological issues if untreated. Timberlake said he initially considered canceling his tour but ultimately chose to push through because of his passion for performing. His admission followed online criticism from concertgoers who noticed Timberlake holding the microphone out to the crowd and minimizing his usual dance routines. One TikTok user jokingly captioned their video, 'Go girl, give us nothing.' In the same post, Timberlake also addressed his hesitance to speak publicly about his diagnosis. 'I was raised to keep something like this to yourself,' he wrote. 'But I'm trying to be more transparent so that my struggles aren't misinterpreted.' Timberlake's revelation has also raised questions about the future of a rumored *NSYNC 30th anniversary reunion tour, which now appears uncertain.
Express Tribune
30-07-2025
- Express Tribune
When forever chemicals enter period products
The name sounds almost poetic: forever chemicals. But these are perfluoroalkyl or polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS), which get their name from the fact that they practically never decompose — and stay in our environment forever. As per DW, they also have serious consequences for humans. Some PFAS are carcinogenic, while others have an effect on the immune system or reduce the effectiveness of vaccinations. "PFAS can affect fertility, sperm quality or even the development of the child in the womb," toxicologist Marike Kolossa-Gehring told the German TV show Tagesschau. Forever chemicals have also been linked to thyroid disorders and high blood pressure. Now, a research team in the US has found that these chemicals can be found in reusable period products. Almost a third of the period underwear, menstrual cups and reusable pads tested by the scientists were made using these toxic chemicals. The team, led by Alyssa Wicks and Graham Peaslee at the University of Notre Dame in Indiana, tested 59 reusable period products from North America, South America and Europe. The researchers found low levels in some products, which were most likely packaging residues. But in some products, the levels were so high that PFAS must have been used in the manufacturing process - even though they would work just as well without the toxic chemicals. "We found PFAS in some, but not all of the products," Peaslee, a physicist and professor emeritus at Notre Dame University, told DW. "So it's not necessary. Some don't have PFAS, and they sell fine." Chemicals everywhere The chemicals can harm humans in two ways. The direct route is absorption through the skin of the wearer. "The skin absorbs between 1 per cent and 50 per cent of PFAS in the product," said Peaslee. "Even if only 1 per cent or 2 per cent are absorbed, that's still bad." The indirect route endangers not only the individual using the item, but everyone else, too. When the products are disposed of, the chemicals end up in our water cycle, where, as their name suggests, they do not decompose. People then wind up absorbing PFAS via their drinking water or food that has been irrigated with contaminated groundwater. "These products are sold as eco-friendly, because they produce less waste than single-use products," said Peaslee. "But this chemical class is particularly terrifying, because they're everywhere and don't go away." Growing awareness PFAS are widespread. They are water – and dirt-repellent, as well as resistant to pressure and heat. This makes them attractive for companies like clothing and packaging manufacturers. Forever chemicals can be found in water-repellent jackets or shoes, in tents and in food packaging. PFAS are even used in cosmetics to alter the consistency of the product, or as a colourant, for example. With the study, Wicks, Peaslee and their team want to raise awareness of the dangers of PFAS in menstrual products, both among companies and consumers. They do not mention brand names in their published report. "We didn't want to be sued," said Peaslee, adding that could easily happen in the US. The researcher said it would be more cost-effective for producers to omit PFAS from their products, as these materials are expensive. However, at the end of the day, he expects any industry move away from PFAS will primarily be driven by consumers. "Consumers have a lot of market power," said Peaslee. "Consumers should ask [whether products are manufactured without PFAS] and be vocal about their choices. If there's demand, companies will start to test for [the chemicals] and say when their products don't contain PFAS. And companies won't lie, because they don't want to get sued, either."
