Labour welfare rebellion: Who are the key MPs opposing Starmer's benefit cuts?
In a sign of the challenge facing the prime minister, those set to rebel over the welfare reforms come from across the party and include select committee chairmen, MPs from the new intake and even a recent frontbencher.
The Independent looks at who the key rebels are and what they have said about the reforms.
Vicky Foxcroft
The Commons terrace went silent last month when Vicky Foxcroft quit as a government whip in order to vote against Sir Keir's plans.
The Labour MP said she said she could not vote for reforms that 'include cuts to disabled people's finances'.
Her resignation piled fresh pressure on the PM to negotiate with rebels, and she has since said concessions from Sir Keir are not enough.
Ms Foxcroft has not confirmed she will vote against the plans, but said there are still 'areas where I still think there's need for movement'.
Dame Meg Hillier
Dame Meg Hillier has been a leading figure in the rebel camp, having put forward the initial amendment to the welfare bill which forced the government's climbdown.
She is now planning to back the legislation, having said the government came to a 'good and workable compromise'. But her initial organising is a large part of the reason Sir Keir now has a £2.5bn hole in his flagship welfare bill and has served to dent the PM's authority over his party.
The new amendment, put forward by Rachael Maskell, is also very similar to Dame Meg's original wrecking amendment.
Rachael Maskell
Rachael Maskell has been an outspoken critic of the government over several issues, including the winter fuel cuts which also saw Sir Keir U-turn.
Alone, the government would not be too troubled by Ms Maskell opposing one of its bills.
But Ms Maskell insists she has the backing of MPs outside the Labour left. Her new amendment has the backing of 39 Labour backbenchers, but on Tuesday morning she warned that 'so many more' of her colleagues are prepared to vote against the government.
Debbie Abrahams
Debbie Abrahams is another influential Labour MP, serving as chairman of the Commons welfare committee.
She has accused the government of reneging on commitments it made to rebels in negotiations over the U-turn.
She came out on Monday to say the government's concessions do not go far enough implored the government to think again - indicating she will either abstain or rebel on the plans.
Sarah Owen
Another select committee chairman, Sarah Owen, has also warned against the impact of the PM's welfare cuts.
She said changes to disability benefits 'should not take place without listening to disabled voices' as she reprimanded work and pensions secretary Liz Kendall in the Commons.
She is expected to either abstain on or vote against the bill on Tuesday.
Louise Haigh
Louise Haigh is a leading figure in the soft left wing of the Labour Party, and when she signed an amendment against the government's initial welfare plans it set alarm bells ringing in Downing Street.
The former transport secretary is popular among MPs and her opposition to the prime minister provided cover for others to join the rebellion.
But, in a boost for the PM ahead of the vote, Ms Haigh has indicated she will back the bill after Sir Keir's concessions.
But, in a warning against the PM's approach to government so far, she called for a reset of Downing Street's engagement with the public and for a 'different approach to our economic policy and our political strategy'.
Marie Tidball
Raising the alarm about the impact of the measures on disabled people, and the lack of consultation of disabled people and groups, Dr Marie Tidball, herself a disabled MP, furiously attacked the government on Monday.
She said: "This is not just about the process ... the principle of fairness means disabled people have a legitimate expectation to be consulted, and in order to fulfil the Equality Act section 149 public sector equality duty.
"Why did the Department for Work and Pensions choose not to consult with disabled people on PIP proposals, and what work will her department do to win back the trust of disabled people?'
Sadiq Khan
While Labour MPs were gearing up to vote against Sir Keir in the Commons, the mayor of London used an interview with LBC to publicly encourage the rebellion.
He said 'I hope MPs vote against the whole bill when it comes before Parliament".
The public backing for rebel MPs from Sir Sadiq, another influential figure on Labour's soft left, will give cover to any wavering backbenchers opposed to the cuts.
Sir Sadiq added that 'the reforms needed radical transformation to be fit for purpose', calling the government's preparation of the plans further into question.
Andy Burnham
Another Labour figure who will not be able to vote, but carries huge sway in the party nonetheless, is the Greater Manchester mayor.
Not shy to butt heads with Sir Keir, Mr Burnham has called on Labour MPs to vote against the prime minister's welfare reforms.
He criticised the 'half U-turn' performed by Sir Keir and warned of disabled constituents showing up at MP surgeries to ask 'why did you vote to make me £6,000 worse off than someone exactly the same?'
The Manchester mayor added: 'I hope they think carefully before the vote, because the vote will create that unfairness and divide in disabled people.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Telegraph
8 minutes ago
- Telegraph
JK Rowling savages Sturgeon's book for ‘shameless denial of reality'
JK Rowling has reviewed Nicola Sturgeon 's memoir, Frankly, and said it 'reads like a PR statement that's been through sixteen drafts.' The Harry Potter author said the former first minister remained 'stubbornly wedded' to the idea that transgender women should be allowed into women-only spaces. Rowling said Sturgeon looked 'like a complete f***wit' when she was asked whether transgender rapist Isla Bryson was a man or a woman during a television interview. The author was a staunch critic of SNP plans, which were later ditched, to make it easier for transgender women to change their legal gender. Earlier this week the author mocked Sturgeon for using the memoir to warn about making public spaces safer for women. She tweeted a picture of the relevant pages of the newly-released book, across which she had scrawled in capital letters: 'Are you f-----g kidding me?' Rowling said she used to feel some 'non-partisan admiration' for Ms Sturgeon and empathised with her descriptions of being subjected to sexism. But in the review, she says Sturgeon 'denies there are any risks to a policy of gender self-identification.' Rowling added: 'She can't imagine any male predator capitalising on such policies, in spite of the fact that it has, demonstrably, happened many times. She is flat out Trumpian in her shameless denial of reality and hard facts.' Rowling began the review by comparing Ms Sturgeon to Bella Swan, the heroine of the teen fantasy Twilight novels, saying they both start out as 'a shy, awkward, bookish girl' and end up as a 'monomaniac'. She wrote: 'Both are consumed by a single, overriding ambition. In Nicola's case, it's independence for Scotland. 'In Bella's, it's having loads of hot sex with Edward Cullen without getting accidentally killed. Spoiler alert: only one of these ambitions is realised,' Rowling wrote. The Harry Potter author also mocked Ms Sturgeon's claim the 2014 independence referendum was not 'unpleasant and divisive', saying: 'No s***, Nicola. 'You, surrounded only by adoring nationalists, flying between public meetings in a helicopter bearing a large image of your own face, enjoying police protection and all the excitement of potentially bringing about your life's ambition, enjoyed the referendum? I'm amazed.' She added: 'Oddly, this message didn't resonate too well with No voters who were being threatened with violence, told to f*** off out of Scotland, quizzed on the amount of Scottish blood that ran in their veins, accused of treachery and treason and informed that they were on the wrong side of, as one 'cybernat' memorably put it, 'a straightforward battle between good and evil.'
The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
Ukraine cause akin to Second World War Allies, Starmer says before Alaska talks
Ukraine is fighting for the same values as the Allies did in the Second World War, Sir Keir Starmer has said ahead of a summit in Alaska that could see an end to the conflict against Russia. The Prime Minister addressed a reception, including veterans, to mark the 80th anniversary of VJ Day, which marked the Allies' defeat of Japan. Speaking in Downing Street, Sir Keir said: 'I sat on this terrace this very morning with President (Volodymyr) Zelensky, who is fighting for the same values as we were fighting for. And so when we say never forget, we must pass on the stories of those who have gone before us.' It came as US President Donald Trump suggested European leaders could be invited to a second meeting if the summit is successful, which could pave the way to peace in the war between Russia and Ukraine. Mr Trump will meet Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday at the summit which could see the drawing up of peace terms for Ukraine. Mr Trump and Sir Keir have spoken optimistically about a potential ceasefire, including at a virtual meeting of Ukrainian allies on Wednesday. Leaders of the European-led 'coalition of the willing' could then join talks between Mr Trump, Mr Putin and Ukrainian leader Mr Zelensky to end the war. The possibility was raised by Mr Trump in the White House on Thursday, before he flew to Anchorage where he will meet Mr Putin. He said: 'We have a meeting with President (Vladimir) Putin tomorrow, I think it's going to be a good meeting. 'But the more important meeting will be the second meeting that we're having. We're going to have a meeting with President Putin, President Zelensky, myself, and maybe we'll bring some of the European leaders along. Maybe not.' The PA news agency understands that Sir Keir will attend a meeting if he is invited. He has been a central player in the coalition group which also includes French President Emmanuel Macron and German Chancellor Friedrich Merz. Mr Trump added: 'I think President Putin will make peace. I think President Zelensky will make peace. We'll see if they can get along. And if they can it will be great.' The head of the British armed forces, Sir Tony Radakin, said the West should not be 'cowed' by Mr Putin and praised the strength of Britain and Nato. Writing in the Telegraph on the anniversary of VJ Day, he said: 'Putin doesn't want a war with Nato because he would lose. So we should not be cowed by his rhetoric or his campaign of sabotage, outrageous as it may be. 'The one weapon that is most needed in our arsenal is confidence. Despite the global instability, Britain is secure at home. Nato is strong. Russia is weak. It is not complacent to point this out.' Sir Keir met Mr Zelensky in Downing Street on Thursday. They both said there was 'strong resolve' for peace in Ukraine. The two leaders embraced as the red carpet was rolled out for Mr Zelensky's arrival in Downing Street, and they later discussed the conflict. They expressed cautious optimism about the prospect of a truce 'as long as Putin takes action to prove he is serious' about ending the war, a Downing Street statement said. In a separate statement, Mr Zelensky said there had been discussions about the security guarantees required to make any deal 'truly durable if the United States succeeds in pressing Russia to stop the killing'. But concerns linger over the prospect of Kyiv being excluded from negotiations over its own future, and pressured to cede territory, after Mr Trump suggested any agreement may need to involve 'swapping of land'.
The Independent
37 minutes ago
- The Independent
Economic uncertainty blamed for ‘lacklustre' retail performance last month
Analysists have blamed rising economic uncertainty for a 'lacklustre' July that saw Scottish retail sales fall in real terms compared with the same month last year. According to figures from the Scottish Retail Consortium (SRC) and KPMG, total sales in Scotland rose 0.1% last month compared with July 2024, when they had decreased by 0.9%. However when adjusted for inflation this represents a year-on-year fall of 0.5%. Food sales in Scotland were down 1.4% compared with July 2024, when they had decreased by just 0.3%. This was despite a strong opening to the month when hot weather led to a 'boost' in spending on barbecues and summer meals. Non-food sales on the other hand rose by 1.4% compared with the same period last year, with analysists saying phones and some furniture and toy ranges performed well. Adjusted for the effects of online sales, non-food sales increased 1.6% on July 2024, when they had decreased by 1.5%. Ewan MacDonald-Russell, deputy head of the SRC, said: 'July was a lacklustre month for Scottish retailers as sales again disappointed. 'When adjusted for inflation retail sales in Scotland fell by 0.5%. That's a slight improvement on June's figures, but demonstrates shoppers continue to cut back on shopping as economic uncertainty continues to rise. 'Within the general disappointment there were some bright spots. Food sales shone in the opening half of the month as Scots took advantage of the warm weather to cook barbeque and summer meals. 'Phone sales did well, as did some toys and furniture ranges. Against that televisions continue to disappoint, with few households investing in high-end entertainment despite the summer plethora of sporting events. 'Fashion ranges performed poorly, albeit the likelihood is shoppers did their summer wardrobe shopping earlier in the year when the sunshine emerged. 'The harsh truth is Scots are holding back spending as worries about the economy grow. 'That is leaving shops in the lurch – facing higher costs as a consequence of last year's UK Government budget without the growth needed to pay those bills. 'With little sight the economic weather will brighten, many retailers, especially those on the high street, face increasingly unpalatable choices in the coming months.' Linda Ellett, UK head of consumer, retail and leisure at KPMG, described the current trading environment as 'challenging' for retailers. 'The UK's fifth warmest July on Met Office record brought a boost to home appliance and food and drink sales,' she said. 'But rising inflation was also a driver of the latter and monthly non-food sales are only growing at around 1% on average at present. 'With employment costs having risen and inflation both a business and consumer side pressure, it remains a challenging trading environment for many retailers. 'While the majority of consumers that KPMG surveys are confident in their ability to balance their monthly household budgets, big ticket purchases are more considered in the context of rising essential costs and ongoing caution about the economy and labour market. 'Holidays are the priority for many this summer but those heading away have had to account for a higher cost of travel. 'Consequently, spending in some areas of the retail sector remains subdued and competition for consumer spend will remain fierce.' The figures were published in the SRC-KPMG Retail Sales Monitor for July.
