logo
How Iran's Key Gas Refinery Fire Evokes Memories Of 1991 Kuwait Oil Infernos

How Iran's Key Gas Refinery Fire Evokes Memories Of 1991 Kuwait Oil Infernos

NDTV3 days ago

In the early hours of Saturday, a fireball lit up the Iranian skyline as an Israeli drone strike hit Phase 14 of the South Pars gas field, one of the world's most vital energy hubs. Within minutes, production came to a halt, choking off 12 million cubic metres of daily gas output. The strike threatened regional supply chains, and also stirred haunting echoes of another firestorm decades ago.
Operation Desert Storm
For months in 1991, the sky over Kuwait burned black. Not from nightfall, but from war. The air was thick with smoke, acrid and choking. The sun disappeared behind layers of soot. And across the desert, the horizon flickered in an eerie orange glow. Oil fields were on fire, hundreds of them. This was not a natural disaster. It was a deliberate act of destruction, the last time the Middle East's lifeblood, its oil, was turned into a weapon of vengeance.
It happened at the tail-end of the First Gulf War, when Iraqi forces, under dictator Saddam Hussein, began retreating from Kuwait after a massive international military campaign, codenamed Operation Desert Storm, forced their withdrawal.
But Saddam wasn't going to leave quietly. In a final act, his soldiers set fire to more than 600 oil wells across Kuwait. They used explosives, dynamite, and sophisticated traps. What followed was one of the largest man-made environmental catastrophes in history.
A Man-Made Apocalypse
The infernos began in February 1991. Within days, massive plumes of thick black smoke began billowing from the wells. The fires were not easy to extinguish. The intense pressure underground meant oil shot out of the wellheads like geysers, and burned non-stop. Some flames reached hundreds of feet into the air. It took nearly nine months and a global coalition of expert firefighters to control and extinguish them. The last blaze was capped on November 6, 1991.
Each day, as much as five million barrels of oil went up in flames. Crude oil also gushed into trenches and formed vast oil lakes, some the size of football fields. Others drained into the Persian Gulf, creating slicks that stretched for miles along the coastline.
One Kuwaiti scientist, Samira Omar, recalled seeing dead animals submerged in toxic pools of oil. "The sound of gushing oil and roaring fires is still in my memory," she said years later.
These weren't only environmental disasters, they were strategic attacks. Iraqi forces dumped oil into the sea and set fire to it, hoping to prevent a beach landing by the US Marines. They torched refineries and oil terminals, leaving nothing usable behind.
Life In The Fire Zone
For those living in Kuwait, the war wasn't over when the tanks rolled out. Residents emerged from shelter only to find a landscape turned alien.
It was a desert of fire.
Daylight vanished.
"The maximum you could see in front of you was two metres," said Sara Akbar, a chemical engineer who would later play a key role in firefighting efforts. "We didn't participate in the celebrations of the liberation. In the last days of the occupation, we ventured out to see our offices burning."
Ms Akbar and other engineers began work immediately, not just to stop the fires but to restart production. "We needed oil for cars and power plants, which were damaged," she said. She led a survey team in North Kuwait, where 85 per cent of infrastructure were destroyed. Working in the heart of the smoke zones, she later developed severe lung damage.
Firefighters from the US, Hungary, Canada, China, Russia, and elsewhere arrived in waves. They brought equipment and knowledge. Some used a bizarre tank-like vehicle nicknamed "Big Wind," with MiG-15 jet engines mounted on it, blasting water and steam at the fires. One by one, they capped the wells.
But the work was dangerous. The terrain was full of landmines. There was no proper planning space. Government buildings had been torched too. The port was mined, the airport wrecked, and the sea polluted.
The Aftermath
In the years that followed, Kuwait tried to recover. Oil production slowly resumed. But many scars remained. From the air, even today, you can still see dark, dead patches where oil lakes once stood. Health issues continued to plague firefighters and engineers. And Kuwait's fragile ecosystem, already stressed by the desert climate, has still not fully healed.
The Gulf War's oil fires changed global perspectives on warfare and the environment. The United Nations declared November 6 as the International Day for Preventing the Exploitation of the Environment in War and Armed Conflict, largely in response to what had happened in Kuwait.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Israeli hackers claim attack on Iran's state-owned bank, critical security websites
Israeli hackers claim attack on Iran's state-owned bank, critical security websites

First Post

time38 minutes ago

  • First Post

Israeli hackers claim attack on Iran's state-owned bank, critical security websites

The hack comes amid increasing hostilities between Israel and Iran, after Israel attacked multiple military and nuclear targets in Iran last week. Both sides have launched multiple missile attacks against each other in the days since read more An anti-Iranian government hacking group with potential ties to Israel and a track record of destructive cyberattacks on Iran claimed in social media posts on Tuesday that it had destroyed data at Iran's state-owned Bank Sepah. The group — known as Gonjeshke Darande, or 'Predatory Sparrow' — hacked the bank because they accused it of helping fund Iran's military, according to one of the messages posted online. The hack comes amid increasing hostilities between Israel and Iran, after Israel attacked multiple military and nuclear targets in Iran last week. Both sides have launched multiple missile attacks against each other in the days since. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Reuters could not immediately verify the attack on Bank Sepah. The bank's website was offline on Tuesday and its London-based subsidiary, Bank Sepah International plc, did not immediately respond to an emailed request for comment. Customers were having problems accessing their accounts, according to Israeli media, opens new tab Gonjeshke Darande did not respond to multiple messages sent via social media. 'Disrupting the availability of this bank's funds, or triggering a broader collapse of trust in Iranian banks, could have major impacts there,' Rob Joyce, the former top cybersecurity official at the NSA, said in a post on X. In 2022, Gonjeshke Darande claimed responsibility for a cyberattack against an Iranian steel production facility. The sophisticated attack caused a large fire at the facility, resulting in tangible, offline damage. Such attacks are usually beyond the capabilities of activist hackers, security experts say, and would be more in line with the capabilities of a nation state. The group has also been publicly linked by cybersecurity researchers to a 2021 cyberattack that caused widespread outages at gas stations across Iran. Israel has never formally acknowledged that it is behind the group, although Israeli media have widely reported Gonjeshke Darande as 'Israel-linked'.

Peace or war? What Trump's ‘unconditional surrender' message to Iran means
Peace or war? What Trump's ‘unconditional surrender' message to Iran means

First Post

time38 minutes ago

  • First Post

Peace or war? What Trump's ‘unconditional surrender' message to Iran means

Donald Trump has escalated the rhetoric against Iran, demanding for an 'unconditional surrender'. The remarks fuel speculation that America could join Israeli military action by providing bunker-busting bombs or other support. Others note that the comments are a part of Trump's mixed messaging campaign and could be his way of pressuring Tehran into a deal read more US President Donald Trump speaks with reporters while flying aboard Air Force One en route from Calgary, Canada to Joint Base Andrews. AP It's been almost a week since tensions between Israel and Iran escalated — military and residential sites have been pummelled and the death toll keeps mounting on both sides. But on Wednesday, the biggest bomb (not an actual one) was lobbed by US President Donald Trump when he called for Iran's 'unconditional surrender'. Trump made a series of comments that signalled America's possibility of entering the war just a day after he left the G7 summit in Canada early to focus on the war. The US president's latest comments on the Israel-Iran conflict is part of his mixed messaging about what he wants from Iran and just how involved the United States is or will be. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD But what has Trump now said? What does it mean for the ongoing Israel-Iran conflict? We try to decode it all. Trump's 'unconditional surrender' call to Iran On Tuesday (June 17), Trump escalated his rhetoric against Iran, issuing a threat on social media against its Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and taking credit for having 'complete and total control of the skies over Iran'. 'We know exactly where the so-called 'Supreme Leader' is hiding. He is an easy target, but is safe there – we are not going to take him out (kill!), at least not for now. But we don't want missiles shot at civilians, or American soldiers. Our patience is wearing thin. Thank you for your attention to this matter!' Trump posted on his social media platform Truth Social. He followed up with a second post a few minutes later, writing: 'UNCONDITIONAL SURRENDER!' Interestingly, these strong messages from the US president came just a day after he cut short his G7 visit to Canada and on his way back to Washington warned 'everyone in Tehran to evacuate'. After US President Donald Trump's stern warning, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei responded with a post of his own, 'In the name of the noble Haidar, the battle begins.' Smoke rises from a fire, as the Israel-Iran air war continues, in Tehran, Iran. Reuters Trump mulling to join the conflict According to several news reports, Trump's increasingly muscular comments against Tehran are an indicator of deepening American involvement in the West Asian crisis perhaps by providing the Israelis with bunker-busting bombs to penetrate Iranian nuclear sites built deep underground or offering other direct US military support. The New York Times has reported that Trump is weighing whether to use B-2 aircraft to drop bunker-busting bombs on Iran's underground nuclear facilities. Notably, Trump held an emergency meeting in the Situation Room of the White House. The meeting, which lasted an hour and twenty minutes, was held to discuss whether the US should join Israel to strike Iranian nuclear sites. As per a CBS news report, there isn't a full agreement among Trump's closest advisors. Moreover, the US is deploying more fighter aircraft to West Asia and extending the deployment of other warplanes. The deployments include F-16, F-22 and F-35 fighter aircraft. A US defence official also added that the Pentagon was redeploying the USS Nimitz aircraft carrier strike group to West Asia 'to sustain our defensive posture and safeguard American personnel'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, experts note that America's direct involvement in the conflict is a 'scary proposition'. US involvement would completely change the way the war is being waged by Iran,' said Dr Dara Conduit, a fellow and lecturer in political science at the University of Melbourne, to BBC. 'It would remove any ability for Iran to back down,' she said, adding that Iran would be forced into attacking US interests in West Asia. Men react as smoke rises following an Israeli attack on the IRIB building, the country's state broadcaster, in Tehran, Iran. Reuters Trump's mixed messages on Israel-Iran conflict For many watchers of the Israel-Iran conflict, Trump's comments on Tuesday are part of his ongoing mixed messaging. As Shira Efron, director of research at Israel Policy Forum, a New York-based research group, told the New York Times, 'It's very puzzling. 'You're seeing him say one thing and then another.' Meanwhile, Sky News in an analysis noted that the latest remarks by the US president are an extreme version of maximum pressure diplomacy. For instance, on Friday, the first day of the war, Trump initially called Israel's attacks 'excellent' and 'very successful,' but also said that he believed a diplomatic solution between Israel and Iran was possible. Then days later, on June 15, Trump said Iran would 'like to make a deal. They're talking. They continue to talk.' And on the following day during his visit to Canada for the G7 Summit, he told reporters that Iran was 'basically at the negotiating table. They want to make a deal. And as soon as I leave here we're going to be doing something.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD However, that quickly changed and on early Tuesday, he suggested that negotiations were going nowhere. 'They should have done the deal,' Trump said on Air Force One on his way back from Canada. 'I told them, 'Do the deal.' So I don't know. I'm not too much in the mood to negotiate.' Moreover, the Israel-Iran conflict and America's direct involvement has also led to deep divisions within Trump's core support base . Individuals such as former news anchor Tucker Carlson have urged that Washington doesn't enter this fight to which Trump responded, 'Somebody please explain to kooky Tucker Carlson that, 'Iran can not have a nuclear weapon'.' But Trump's second, Vice President JD Vance, has defended the US president's Iran policy. He said Trump 'may decide he needs to take further action to end Iranian enrichment,' but that he is 'only interested in using the American military to accomplish American people's goals.' He reiterated that Iran 'can't have a nuclear weapon.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD With inputs from agencies

‘IAEA Biased': Russia Blames West For Fuelling Israel–Iran Crisis, Warns Of Nuclear Catastrophe
‘IAEA Biased': Russia Blames West For Fuelling Israel–Iran Crisis, Warns Of Nuclear Catastrophe

Time of India

time40 minutes ago

  • Time of India

‘IAEA Biased': Russia Blames West For Fuelling Israel–Iran Crisis, Warns Of Nuclear Catastrophe

Russia has condemned Israel's airstrikes on Iranian nuclear facilities, calling them illegal and dangerous under international law. Moscow warned the attacks risk triggering a global nuclear catastrophe and further destabilizing the Middle East. Israel claims the strikes were necessary to halt Iran's alleged race toward a nuclear weapon, an accusation Iran denies. In response, Iran launched retaliatory missile and drone attacks. Russia also blamed Western nations for backing a biased IAEA resolution, accusing them of giving Israel political cover. Tehran maintains its nuclear program is peaceful and views the conflict as an attempt to sabotage diplomatic efforts with the United States.#russia #IranIsraelConflict #MiddleEastWar #ballisticmissiles #NoMercy #IDFStrikes #BreakingNews #khamenei #TehranUnderFire #IsraelUnderAttack #MissileWar Read More

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store