logo
Governments must act fast when the economic winds turn

Governments must act fast when the economic winds turn

Irish Times6 days ago

The macroeconomic effects of fiscal policy have long been understood: when an economy is growing below trend, government should stimulate activity, and when full employment is reached, governments should put on the brakes. That way, governments can smooth activity in the economy, minimising shocks to consumers and business.
However, the optimal economic policy often comes second to political pressures, especially in the run-up to an election. Whatever the state of the economic cycle, a politically astute government may sometimes put the fiscal brakes on early in its term, leaving more room for 'generosity' at election time.
The scale of the fiscal injection into the economy in last year's
budget
was inappropriate, given full-employment, rapid growth and capacity constraints. It added to inflationary pressures, including in the housing market. Whether it influenced the election outcome is for political scientists to analyse.
[
Tariff threat undermines State's ability to deliver economic forecasts, says Donohoe
Opens in new window
]
In the past there have been some notable examples where governments, rather masochistically and inappropriately, implemented very tough budgets in the run-up to an election, damaging both the economy and their political prospects.
READ MORE
The 1957 budget, implemented by the outgoing interparty coalition government, took about 2 per cent of national income out of the economy. As a consequence, output fell by almost 1 per cent. Coming on top of very low growth in 1955 and 1956, the miserable economic performance in 1957 saw a surge in emigration.
As Patrick Honohan and Cormac O'Gráda have shown, that coalition government had tried to keep interest rates in Ireland below UK rates despite a fixed exchange rate. As a result, there was a major outflow of funds to London as savers sought higher interest rate there. Instead of understanding that the outflow was due to the unwise interest rate policy, the government concluded that the outflow of funds was due to excessive domestic demand. Hence the inappropriately tough budget.
Understandably, this unwise fiscal action saw the outgoing coalition government lose the election later that year. It was 16 years before Fine Gael and Labour returned to office. They did so in 1973, despite the outgoing Fianna Fáil government having pumped a significant sum into the economy in 1972.
The new government was immediately faced with the first major oil crisis. In 1974 and 1975, the government tried to insulate the population from the effects of the dramatic change in the cost of energy and in world economic circumstances by generous budgetary measures. However, in 1976, when the economy was still suffering major damage from the oil crisis, the coalition government unleashed the toughest budget of the last 70 years. The cuts in capital expenditure were particularly savage. Again, not surprisingly, that coalition government suffered a massive defeat in the 1977 election.
The economy was well into recovery mode in 1977, with national income growing by over 6 per cent. However, the incoming victorious Fianna Fáil government implemented in full its wildly ambitious manifesto commitments, providing a massive stimulus at a time when the economy was already recovering. At the time, interest rates on the large borrowings to fund the giveaways were relatively low. However, the chickens came home to roost in 1979 when there was a second oil price shock. Interest rates then rose well above the rate of inflation, posing huge strain on the public finances. The result was a miserable decade of underperformance in the economy as five successive governments tried to undo the mess.
The first real action to tackle the 1980s fiscal crisis was implemented in 1983 and 1984 by the then coalition government. The main instrument used to try to bring order to the public finances was tax increases, with less attention to expenditure cuts. The government took about 2 per cent of national income out of the economy in both 1983 and 1984.
However, that was not enough to restore the economy to a sustainable path, and very limited further action was taken in 1985 and 1986. It was left to the incoming Fianna Fáil government to implement major cuts in expenditure in 1988 and 1989, completing the fiscal adjustment.
A key lesson from the miserable economic performance of the 1980s is that it is vital to act quickly when in a fiscal crisis. Spreading the adjustment out over the course of a decade made things worse rather than easier.
In the financial crisis that began in 2008-09, this lesson was learned. The really painful adjustment was completed between 2010 and 2013, resulting in a rapid and sustained recovery from 2014. While many at the time argued for a slower adjustment, it is likely that would only have prolonged the agony, as in the 1980s.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Taoiseach says decision on whether to scrap rent caps expected in next week
Taoiseach says decision on whether to scrap rent caps expected in next week

The Journal

time32 minutes ago

  • The Journal

Taoiseach says decision on whether to scrap rent caps expected in next week

A DECISION ON whether the Government will scrap or retain Rent Pressure Zones (RPZs) is expected in the next week, Taoiseach Micheál Martin has said. The Taoiseach caused panic earlier this year when he said the Government was considering getting rid of the intervention which limits how much landlords can increase rent for properties in certain areas. The Government has been assessing whether an alternative system, which protects renters but, as the Taoiseach has said, 'also enables people to have a clear, stable environment in which to invest', can be established. It is understood that the new plan will form part of the Government's new housing plan, which is set to be published by July. Senior sources have told The Journal that it is likely that there will be no cliff edge or sudden rent increases for tenants currently in tenancies. However, landlords may be given the right to reset rents between tenancies. RPZs are in parts of the country where rents are highest and rising, and where households have the greatest difficulty finding affordable accommodation. Rents in an RPZ cannot be increased by more than the general rate of inflation or 2% per year, whichever is lower. Advertisement They were first introduced in Dublin and Cork in 2016 for a period of three years, but RPZs have since been expanded across the country. They were to remain in place until 31 December 2024 but last May, the Government agreed to extend them until 31 December 2025 . Replacing the use of RPZs was a recommendation of a landmark report by the Housing Commission last year. This was because it said the available evidence about the effectiveness of RPZ is 'mixed'. The Housing Commission recommended that a system of 'reference rents' be established in its place. The system of 'reference rents' would peg rent increases to a reference rent for local dwellings of similar quality. The Housing Commission said such a reference should be reviewed at regular intervals. 'Rent would not rise more than a certain percentage above this reference rent over a specific period,' noted the Housing Commission. It added that unsubsidised market rental dwellings should solely inform reference rents and that the percentage rent increase allowed should take account of relevant factors such as 'management and maintenance costs, interest rates, household incomes and affordability'. Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone... A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article. Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation. Learn More Support The Journal

Scientist with ‘debilitating' condition alleges discrimination by not being allowed work from home
Scientist with ‘debilitating' condition alleges discrimination by not being allowed work from home

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

Scientist with ‘debilitating' condition alleges discrimination by not being allowed work from home

A scientist living with 'debilitating' endometriosis has accused international medical devices firm Abbott of discriminating against her by refusing to let her work from home to ease a daily commute of nearly four hours. The worker, who has over a decade of industry experience and advanced postgraduate qualifications, told the Workplace Relations Commission (WRC) on Tuesday she was given ten minutes to pick up her things and get off an Abbott site last autumn after being told she failed her probation. She said she was reduced to 'crying all the way back' in a colleague's arms during the drive home. Abbott Ireland Ltd is denying complaints of disability discrimination and discriminatory dismissal under the Employment Equality Act 1998 by the worker, Ms X, who has been afforded anonymity by the WRC. READ MORE Ms X was hired by Abbott in spring 2024 and spent just short of six months working in an office at an Abbott site in a county town analysing test data, but was deemed to have failed her probation and was let go that autumn, the tribunal heard. The company's representative, Fiona Egan of the Irish Business and Employers' Confederation (Ibec), submitted that Ms X failed her probation for 'conduct and performance' following a number of instances of lateness and uncertified absences from work. It had 'nothing to do with her condition', she said. Shaun Boylan BL, appearing for Ms X instructed by Sean Ormonde & Co Solicitors, said the firm's policy of refusing to allow probationary employees to work from home was 'implicitly discriminatory' against his client, as it put accommodations for her disability 'on hold for six months'. Ms X said she had been diagnosed with stage two endometriosis in 2022, a condition affecting the female reproductive organs. She said it causes her 'debilitating pain', accompanied by 'nausea, fainting and dizziness' which was at its worst during the 7-8 days of her period and required prescription-only codeine and opiate painkillers to manage. The daily drive from Ms X's home to the Abbott site was 'coming up on a four-hour commute to work every day', adjudication officer Brian Dolan remarked during the hearing on Tuesday. Ms X said she thought at first she should 'just endure' the commute. Her evidence was that she was 'promised in the interview that it would be a hybrid role' and that she had turned down roles elsewhere with a five-day-a-week on-site commitment because of that. Ms X said her immediate team consisted of six or seven colleagues, but 'nobody' was in office five days a week, and 'most' were working from home. On a date six weeks after she started, a 'very sudden' departmentwide meeting was called, at which she said a senior manager declared 'there would be no more work from home possible' at the site, barring the 'possibility' of one day a week. Ms X said she was in 'excruciating pain' that day and found the message 'difficult to take'. She told the commission she went straight to her team leader 'in visible distress, with tears in my eyes' and proceeded to tell him she had endometriosis. She said her team leader was 'empathetic' and 'supportive' at that stage and gave her an assurance that a 'one week in, one week out' work from home arrangement would be possible – but only once her probation was finished. Making it in for an on-site team meeting at 9.30am meant setting out from home at 6.30am or 6.45am, Ms X said. Over seven weeks before a probationary caution letter being issued in her final weeks on the job, Ms X was late eight times and absent without a medical cert on three occasions, leading to an occupational health referral. She said a senior manager later told her: 'The company cannot offer more than one day work from home past your probation,' and urged her to find somewhere to live closer to the site. The probation review continued into the following month, and concluded when her team leader called her into a conference room and read out a letter stating that her employment was being terminated, she said. The only reason stated was: 'Your standard of performance has not met company expectations.' 'I asked why. [My team leader] said: 'Everything is in the letter,'' Ms X said. After saying she could not continue with the meeting a company HR officer told her an outstanding pay matter could be handled by email and gave her 'ten minutes to leave, to grab [my] stuff and leave the premises'. 'Everyone was crying in the car,' she said. 'I hugged my colleague, in the car, and kept crying all the way back to Dublin,' she added. The adjudicator, Mr Dolan, told Ms X he had the power to order her reinstatement as a remedy under the equality legislation if she was successful in the case. Ms X replied: 'I'd probably never come back to Abbott.' The case has been adjourned to a later date, when three company witnesses, including Ms X's team leader and the senior manager are due to give evidence.

Teenager removed from Dublin ‘house of horrors' spent €30,000 in past year, court told
Teenager removed from Dublin ‘house of horrors' spent €30,000 in past year, court told

Irish Times

timean hour ago

  • Irish Times

Teenager removed from Dublin ‘house of horrors' spent €30,000 in past year, court told

A teenage boy, who is in State care having been removed from a 'house of horrors', has spent up to €30,000 in the past year, Dublin District Childcare Court heard on Wednesday. Judge John Campbell was told that social workers do not know where the boy got the money, but fear his father, who is being sought by gardaí in relation to alleged domestic violence, may have lodged it into his account. Alternatively, the court heard, the boy may be being 'groomed' by criminals or being used as a 'money mule'. The boy is one of several siblings removed from a home in the Dublin area after the authorities were prompted to visit after one of the children attempted suicide. The same court last week heard the home described as a 'house of horrors' . READ MORE On visiting the house, authorities found locks on internal doors, neglect of children and other factors that led to fears the children's mother had been severely restricted in her movements for many years, possibly more than a decade and a half. The woman was in court on Wednesday, with support. David Stafford, solicitor for the children's guardian ad litem – an independent person appointed by the court to represent the voice of the child – said it was assumed the money had come from the father, 'but we don't know that'. Mr Stafford said the guardian ad litem wanted to know the name of the account holder who was sending the boy money, but this was difficult to ascertain. There were 'very concerning' reports about the boy, the court was told. He had been seen in the company of four older men by staff at his care placement and there were concerns one may be his father, a man who had hit his children 'a lot' around the head. A Tusla staff member said the father had been 'leaving voicemails on the Tusla office phone', asking social workers to 'call back urgently'. When they called back, his phone was off. He was 'trying to control the narrative and find out information about his children', the judge heard. The court, which was hearing applications from Tusla to extend the children's interim care orders, was told there was a continued lack of an aftercare plan for the oldest child, who turns 18 later this month. 'We have no care plan ... we have no provision for where she is going to live,' Mr Stafford said. The judge was told Tusla and the HSE had identified an onward placement for her about which there had been 'good reviews', but both parties wanted to do 'due diligence' and await further checks, given the girl has 'such a high level of needs'. Both the HSE and Tusla appreciated 'the clock is ticking' and that the girl 'needs an answer', the judge was told.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store