South Africans increasingly access retirement savings amid financial strain
South Africans are increasingly withdrawing from their retirement savings pots under the new two-pot system, with many making repeat withdrawals in a short span. Experts caution against this trend, highlighting the long-term impact on retirement funds.
South Africans are rapidly withdrawing funds from their savings pots under the new two-pot retirement system, with many dipping into their savings for a second time in just a few months, according to Natasha Huggett-Henchie, consulting actuary and member of the Actuarial Society of South Africa (ASSA) Retirement Matters Committee.
Retirement fund administrators have reported that 75% of applications for withdrawals in the current tax year are repeat claims, says Huggett-Henchie.
While the average withdrawal amount in the first round of two-pot withdrawals was R20,000, this year's applications have dropped to an average of R6,000, says Huggett-Henchie.
"We are finding that retirement members are taking all they can as soon as they can, she says.
Introduced on September 1, 2024, the two-pot retirement system was designed to help South Africans access a portion of their retirement savings for emergencies while preserving two-thirds of their pension. The system allows retirement fund members one withdrawal per tax year, as long as their savings pot contains at least R2,000 plus relevant fees.
To start the system, qualifying fund members had 10% of their total retirement savings (up to R30,000) transferred into their savings pots on September 1, 2024. Since then, many have emptied their accounts, leaving them without savings until they can make another withdrawal in March 2026, according to Huggett-Henchie.
She says that for those who emptied their savings pot in September last year but continued contributing, their pot would now hold one-third of their monthly contributions over the past six months. For someone contributing R3,000 per month, this means their savings pot would contain R6,000 plus any investment growth, which could be accessed at the start of the new tax year in March 2025.
Interestingly, Huggett-Henchie says that retirement fund members who did not touch their savings pot last September can withdraw the entire amount, even if it exceeds R30,000.
"Using the earlier example, if your savings pot was seeded with R30,000 last year and has grown to R36,000, you are allowed to withdraw the full amount. Just remember to check on the tax impact before you decide to withdraw."
While the new system provides flexibility, Huggett-Henchie cautions that fund members should carefully consider whether they should withdraw just because they can.
'Every time you make a withdrawal now to fund something other than an emergency, you must understand that you are reducing your future emergency fund. If you empty your savings pot every year, you will effectively have reduced your retirement savings by one-third, which is significant," she says.
One of the most unexpected beneficiaries of these withdrawals may be loan sharks, she speculates. "It seems banks have not seen a big paydown of loans, and retailers have not reported a massive uptick in sales."
However, Huggett-Henchie acknowledges that some retirement fund members are using their savings pots wisely, with one individual opting to borrow money from their savings pot instead of taking out a loan for school fees.
'Every year, she would have to take out a loan to fund her children's school fees. In January this year, she decided to borrow the money from her savings pot and repay it every month, just as she would have had she taken a loan. This way, the money is still there for next year's school fees, and she is no longer in debt," she says.
Looking ahead, Huggett-Henchie says the next major challenge facing the retirement funds industry is dealing with small accumulated amounts in retirement pots when employees resign or are retrenched. Many of these amounts are too small to move into a preservation fund or retirement annuity, but under two-pot rules, fund members cannot take the money in cash either.
'Until this is addressed in the next phase of the two-pot regulations, fund administrators will have to find cost-effective ways of dealing with these 'problem pots',' she says.
PERSONAL FINANCE
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


eNCA
2 hours ago
- eNCA
Bill Gates to donate majority of $200 Billion fortune to Africa
NEW YORK - Tech billionaire Bill Gates is giving away almost all of his money. And, some of it may assist South Africans READ: Gates Foundation to spend $200 bn through 2045 when it will shut down Gates says he is donating 99% of his fortune, that's a whopping 200 billion dollars. And, he intends to send the bulk of it to Africa. The philanthropist will disperse the money over the next 20 years to coincide with the closing of his foundation.

IOL News
5 hours ago
- IOL News
Unlocking tourism potential between China and South Africa
Unlocking tourism potential between China and South Africa For South Africans considering travel to China, the consulate has specific travel guidelines aimed at ensuring a smooth and enjoyable experience. This week, the Daily News had the opportunity to engage directly with the Chinese Consul General in Durban, Li Zhigong, who showcased the vast opportunities for tourism and travel between China and South Africa. With a shared vision of fostering stronger bilateral ties, the consul general outlined strategic initiatives aimed at not just facilitating travel but also enriching the cultural exchange between the two nations. One of the primary focuses of the Consulate General is to promote high-level exchanges between sister cities and provinces. "These efforts help spark greater interest in China among local communities and foster closer people-to-people ties," Li explained. Efforts include enhanced communication and collaboration on tourism initiatives, underpinned by a commitment to mutual understanding and friendship. In a notable development this year, the consulate has initiated an express visa option, designed to streamline the application process for Chinese tourists wishing to visit South Africa. "The express visa can be processed within three to four working days with simple and user-friendly requirements," Li said. This is a significant improvement, especially when the visa process has previously been a major hurdle for potential visitors. For South African tourism operators eager to attract Chinese visitors, Li offered several crucial recommendations. He urged operators to tailor their offerings to better meet the preferences of Chinese visitors. "This includes providing services in Chinese, accepting payment methods like UnionPay and Alipay, and promoting destinations through Chinese social media platforms," he said. Cultural sensitivity and a welcoming atmosphere are also vital in creating memorable travel experiences for Chinese tourists. The consul general acknowledged the ongoing challenges faced in attracting more tourists due to the complexities surrounding the visa application process. "We are actively engaging with the South African Department of Home Affairs, as obtaining a South African visa remains time-consuming and difficult for Chinese citizens," Li said, As for South Africans considering travel to China, the consulate has specific travel guidelines aimed at ensuring a smooth and enjoyable experience. According to Li, visitors are encouraged to meticulously plan their itineraries and familiarise themselves with essential apps such as WeChat, Alipay, and translation tools, as these are critical for navigating the vast cultural landscape. He added that key destinations such as Beijing, Xi'an, and Shanghai are highly recommended and travellers are advised to respect local customs and be aware of the legal framework to ensure a harmonious visit. "We truly hope more South Africans will visit China to see and experience more for themselves. South Africa is not only a partner but also a brother to China, and we sincerely wish for our people to grow closer and develop deeper mutual understanding," said Li. *This is Part 4 of a series of exclusive interviews that the Chinese Consul General in Durban, Li Zhigong, granted the Daily News' editor, Ayanda Mdluli.


Eyewitness News
7 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Parliament's finance committee approves fiscal framework, revenue proposals underpinning budget
CAPE TOWN - Parliament's standing committee on finance has approved the fiscal framework and revenue proposals that underpin the 2025 budget, setting the scene for the less contentious adoption of its report in the National Assembly than was the case in March. Following two days of deliberations, the African National Congress (ANC), Democratic Alliance (DA) and ActionSA voted in favour of the report. However, the uMkhonto weSizwe (MK) Party and Economic Freedom Fighters (EFF) dug in their heels saying the fuel levy is an unnecessary inclusion that will impact the poor. Wednesday's joint meeting of the finance committees of both houses was far less tense than when it considered an earlier version of the budget framework, which contained a value-added tax (VAT) increase that split the Government of National Unity (GNU). ALSO READ: Main opposition parties reject Treasury's assertion of pro-poor budget However, opposition parties took issue with the increase in the fuel levy, which was included in this third version of the budget tabled by the finance minister two weeks ago. The MK Party's Brian Molefe said other means could have been found to raise R4 billion in a R2 trillion budget. "The fuel levy is regressive and it is not pro-growth, because the fuel levy dampens consumption, expenditure, and it is inflationary as well." After losing Tuesday's court case on the matter, the EFF's Omphile Maotwe made one last appeal for the committee to retract the increase. "If we can stand up and say we reject the fuel levy, that's something we can give the people of South Africa." But with no support to force the finance minister's hand again, both opposition parties rejected the fiscal framework and the committee's report, which will be put to a house vote next Wednesday.