The true story behind Channel 4's Brian and Maggie
Channel 4's Brian and Maggie recreates one of the most infamous political TV interviews in history between journalist and former MP Brian Walden and then prime minister Margaret Thatcher.
The drama explores the friendship that developed between the pair in the years before they sat down for the interview in 1989, which has been credited for being one of the tipping points in Thatcher's career in the lead up to her fall from power. Steve Coogan takes on the role of Walden and stars opposite Harriet Walter's Thatcher in the two-part series.
Here is everything that you need to know about the real life event.
Walden was first a politician before he entered the world of TV, acting as Labour MP for Birmingham All Saints in 1964 before gaining the nomination in Birmingham Ladywood in 1974 until 1977. During this time, Walden is said to have become disillusioned by Labour's rise of left wing politics.
In 1977 Walden resigned from the House of Commons to pursue a career as a broadcaster and journalist, at the time he said: "I am not leaving because of any disenchantment with the Government. I have gone for positive, not negative reasons."
He joined Weekend World and worked for the programme for nine years, interviewing several leading political voices and becoming known as one of the "most feared" interviewers. As well as Weekend World, he fronted programmes The Walden Interview and Walden.
While it was their exchanges in TV interviews that became known to the public, Walden and Thatcher first met years earlier in the House of Commons when the latter became Conservative leader in 1975. They had a mutual respect for one another, which is why Thatcher went on to agree to multiple interviews with Walden when he went into broadcasting.
Read more: Harriet Walter on playing Margaret Thatcher: 'I shifted to seeing her as a human being' (The Independent, 11-min read)
In one such interview in 1983 the journalist coining the term "Victorian values" to describe her policies, a phrase which the prime minister later used herself. The broadcaster worked with Thatcher outside the newsroom too, writing a speech for her during the 1983 general election campaign, and later describing her as "the master spirit of our age".
They became friends, and were said to have a good rapport because Walden found Thatcher both funny and endearing, she was said to have reminded him of his mother because of her "wonderful dogmatism". The feeling appeared to be mutual, as Thatcher agreed to be interviewed by Walden on multiple occasions, even though she turned other programmes down.
Thatcher and Walden's friendship was tested to its limits in October 1989 when the prime minister agreed to be interviewed by the journalist on The Walden Interview.
Chancellor Nigel Lawson had resigned over Thatcher's refusal to sack Sir Alan Walters, her economics adviser, which changed the course of the interview. While the interview had been planned for months, Lawson's resignation became a key talking point especially as the Tories were turning against Thatcher.
Walden delivered his signature tenacity in the interview, grilling Thatcher over recent events and asking hard-hitting questions that eventually saw the Prime Minister flounder under pressure.
Read more: Thatcher so lacking in empathy she would have been diagnosed with disorder today, says Steve Coogan(The Telegraph, 3-min read)
In one memorable exchange, Walden asked Thatcher: "You come over as being someone who one of your backbenchers said is slightly off her trolley, authoritarian, domineering, refusing to listen to anybody else — why? Why can't you publicly project what you have just told me is your private character?"
Thatcher responded: "Brian, if anyone's coming over as domineering in this interview, it's you. It's you."
Later British political writer John Campbell wrote that Walden's 'journalistic instinct' and the then-PM's 'lack of candour' resulted in 3 million people witnessing a 'a devastating expose' of her. It is said the interview was instrumental in changing political opinion of her forever as it quickly became a national talking point.
The interview became Thatcher's final appearance on TV before she resigned from office on 28 November, 1990. Walden and Thatcher are said to have never spoken again.
Brian and Maggie premieres on Channel 4 on Wednesday, 29 January at 9pm.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
A huge political spat has broken out... over a playground
A plan to build a playground in Alkrington has been delayed once again. The suburb, on the edge of Middleton, had seen a number of playgrounds close down in recent years. The decision over where to build a new one has dragged on for years, with squabbles between politicians and locals over the most suitable spot. READ MORE: Blankety Blank viewers in shock after learning winning contestant died since filming show READ MORE: DWP confirms Winter Fuel Payment will only be £100 for some pensioners Last month, it appeared the matter was finally settled when rochdale-council>Rochdale council's township committee in Middleton approved funding of £84,840 for the new playground on a field off Mainway and Moss Lane. The money is expected to go towards paths, fencing, swings, see-saws and other play equipment. But now Labour councillors, who approved the funding, have been left furious after two Middleton Independent Party (MIP) politicians called in the decision. 'Calling in' a decision opens up the matter for further scrutiny if politicians feel there is an issue that hasn't properly been addressed. The call-in will mean further delays to a project that has already dragged since 2023. A statement issued by Middleton Labour read: 'The South Middleton councillors believe it is a disgrace that a legitimately arrived and very popular decision can be delayed without good cause by the MIP councillors' petty behaviour, especially when they do not have any seats in the South Middleton Ward. 'The decision taken to go ahead on May 22 was taken with 12 Labour councillors voting for, and two MIPs not even voting against - they abstained. 'Now they want to revoke the decision depriving kids of a long awaited play park in South Alkrington. We must add 1,200 Alkrington residents have signed a petition in favour of this new play park, backing our decision. 'The 'call-in' decision will take place at the end of July. However, South Middleton councillors had hoped to get spades in the ground this year to start building the play park. 'This will prevent planning and organisation until this 'call-in' decision is taken, which will inevitably delay the erection of the play park for many months.' Although other sites were considered by the local authority, Mainway field was the largest open space available, meaning potential noise and antisocial behaviour would be less of an issue. A council report went on to say they will look into mine shafts under the field as well as drainage issues before any building work. Lee Wolf, leader of the MIP, believes there was a lack of consultation before the process and has questioned the impartiality of the decision making. He said: "Our involvement in this matter began last year when I stood as the MIP candidate for Middleton South. From the outset, the site of the proposed play park in Alkrington emerged as a key issue for local residents. 'We have always supported the development of new recreational facilities across Middleton. These spaces are vital for families and young people, and we believe they should be delivered through a process that is fair, transparent, and inclusive of the community's voice. 'However, we have serious concerns about how the decision to site the play park at Mainway Field was reached. 'Our two MIP councillors could not support the report, as it failed to provide a clear and consistent rationale for selecting Mainway Field. 'Throughout this process, our aim has never been to obstruct progress. We want to work collaboratively with all stakeholders, including our Labour colleagues, to find a solution that genuinely reflects the needs and wishes of the community. There is still room for compromise, whether that means revisiting alternative sites or reconsidering the exact positioning within Mainway Field. 'We remain committed to ensuring that decisions about our shared spaces are made openly, fairly, and with the full involvement of the people who live here. Our community deserves nothing less.' Rochdale council confirmed the matter has been called in and will be discussed further at meeting next month.
Yahoo
10 hours ago
- Yahoo
Gavin Newsom Just Absolutely Dragged Trump's Military Parade, And Trump's Really, Really Not Gonna Like It
Donald Trump's $45 million military parade is this weekend in DC. The tanks have arrived. The barricades are up. The soldiers have been rehearsing. Related: "Let Them Eat Teslas": People At The "No Kings" Protests This Weekend Brought Signs That Were So Clever I'm Still Laughing About Them The stage has been set. The show will go on (unless there is lightning, which is a possibility). Related: This Conservative Said He Wears A Fake ICE Uniform For A Really, Really, Really Gross Reason Gavin Newsom gave his thoughts about the parade on Thursday and they're going viral: MSNBC/atrupar/Twitter: @atrupar "It's a vulgar display. It's the kind of thing you see with Kim Jong-un, you see it with Putin, you see with dictators around the world that are weak and just want to demonstrate strength. Weakness masquerading as strength. To fete the dear leader on his birthday? What an embarrassment." he said. "Honestly, that's about as small as it gets." "How weak, how weak do you have to be to commandeer the military to fete you on your birthday in a vulgar display of weakness? That's Donald Trump." As with just about everything Newsom has said this week, people are loving it: "Absolutely 100% correct," this person commented. Another person said, "You have to give the man points for hitting Trump right where it hurts most." Another person wrote, "Gavin Newsom is showing other Democrats how it's done." And this person said, "Newsom has cracked the code." Also in In the News: "Honestly Speechless At How Evil This Is": 26 Brutal, Brutal, Brutal Political Tweets Of The Week Also in In the News: This Dem Lawmaker Is Going Viral For His Extremely Shady Question To Secretary Kristi Noem Also in In the News: Well, Well, Well, For The Second Time In 2 Weeks, People Are Letting JD Vance Know EXACTLY How They Feel About Him In Public

16 hours ago
UK to hold national inquiry into organized child sex abuse after pressure from Musk
LONDON -- The British government announced Saturday it will hold a national inquiry into organized child sexual abuse, something it has long been pressured to do by opposition politicians — and Elon Musk. Prime Minister Keir Starmer said he would accept a recommendation from an independent reviewer for a judge-led inquiry with the power to summon witnesses. Starmer said he would 'look again' and hold a probe into what the press have dubbed 'grooming gangs' of men who prey on often young and vulnerable women. In some of the most high-profile cases to come to trial, the perpetrators were men of Pakistani heritage, and the issue has been taken up by right-of-center politicians including Reform UK leader Nigel Farage, and stoked by Musk, who took to his X platform to condemn Starmer over the issue. Musk criticized Starmer for not backing a national inquiry into the matter following a request from the local authority in the northern English town of Oldham, where police found girls under 18 were sexually exploited by groups of men in the 2000s and 2010s. Musk also alleged that Starmer failed to bring perpetrators to justice when he was England's chief prosecutor between 2008 and 2013, a charge that the prime minister vigorously denied. Because the cases in Oldham and similar ones in several other towns involved predominantly white girls abused by men largely from Pakistani backgrounds, the issue has been used to link child sexual abuse to immigration, and to accuse politicians of covering up the crimes out of a fear of appearing racist. A 2022 report into what happened in the northwest England town of Oldham between 2011 and 2014 found that children were failed by local agencies, but that there was no cover-up despite 'legitimate concerns' that the far-right would capitalize on 'the high-profile convictions of predominantly Pakistani offenders across the country.' In January the government said it would support several local inquiries into child exploitation in cities where gangs of men were prosecuted. It had previously said there was no need for further investigations following a string of previous inquiries, both local and national. A seven-year inquiry was held under the previous Conservative government, but many of the 20 recommendations it made in 2022 — including compensation for abuse victims — have yet to be implemented. Starmer's government also asked Louise Casey, an expert on victim's rights and social welfare, to review previous findings. Her review has been submitted to the government but has not yet been published. 'I have never said we should not look again at any issue,' Starmer said as he flew to Canada for a Group of Seven summit. 'I have wanted to be assured that on the question of any inquiry. That's why I asked Louise Casey who I hugely respect to do an audit. 'Her position when she started the audit was that there was not a real need for a national inquiry over and above what was going on. She has looked at the material she has looked at and she has come to the view that there should be a national inquiry on the basis of what she has seen. 'I have read every single word of her report and I am going to accept her recommendation.' The main opposition Conservative Party offered a swift response. 'Those in authority deliberately covered up the systematic rape of thousands of girls as young as 10 because the perpetrators were mainly of Pakistani origin. They thought race relations were more important than protecting young girls,'' Conservative law and order spokesman Chris Philp said. 'The truth must now come out and people in positions of authority responsible for the cover up held to account.''