Work from home a legal right in Australian-first reform
The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office.
The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home.
Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026.
It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win.
The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader.
Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy.
"Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said.
"If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right."
The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day.
NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices.
More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not.
Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed.
The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office.
The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home.
Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026.
It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win.
The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader.
Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy.
"Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said.
"If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right."
The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day.
NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices.
More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not.
Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed.
The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office.
The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home.
Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026.
It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win.
The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader.
Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy.
"Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said.
"If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right."
The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day.
NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices.
More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not.
Employees will be legally allowed to demand to work from home two days a week if an Australian-first proposed law is passed.
The Victorian government has promised to introduce legislation to make working from home a right in 2026, in contrast to other states that want public servants to spend more time in the office.
The proposed law would apply to all public and private sector employees in Victoria who can reasonably do their job from home.
Yet to be determined are the legislation's definition of remote work, who can do it and the types of businesses the law would apply to, but the government promised to consult before its introduction to parliament in 2026.
It sets up a major contest with business groups in an election year, with Labor seeking a fourth consecutive term that polls indicate it's on track to win.
The November 2026 election will be the first as premier for Jacinta Allan, who lags opposition leader Brad Battin as preferred state leader.
Ms Allan said legislating the right to work from home was good for families and the economy.
"Not everyone can work from home, but everyone can benefit," she said.
"If you can do your job from home, we'll make it your right."
The coalition's push to end to working-from-home for public servants was partly blamed for its unsuccessful result at the May federal election, despite abandoning the policy before polling day.
NSW Premier Chris Minns has described remote-work provisions as a thing of the past but stopped short of seeking an end to working from home, instead ordering public servants to work principally in offices.
More than one third of Australian employees usually work from home but that number swells to 60 per cent of managers and people in professional services, according to the Australian Bureau of Statistics.
The bureau says 43 per cent who work from home do overtime, compared to one quarter of those who do not.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Sky News AU
6 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
XL Express leaves hundreds of employees out of pocket as it faces almost $42m in debt, administrator FTI Consulting says
An Australian transport company that collapsed earlier this year faces almost $42m of debt, including $5.3m to former employees and $3.5m to the tax office. XL Express appointed FTI Consulting's Kelly-Anne Trenfield, Ross Blakely and Joanne Dunn as its administrators in June and went into liquidation at the beginning of this month after 35 years in business. About 200 employees were sacked prior to FTI's appointment and left without large sums of pay. The company was locked out of its Western Sydney premises on June 23 for failing to pay rent while workers were let go the next day, according to the administrator. It suffered losses throughout the 2023 and 2024 financial years and had solid tax debts from at least March 2023. FTI predicts XL could have been insolvent as far back as January 2023. Alongside hefty debts to its employees and the ATO, the company also owes almost $19m to major lenders, including NAB, ScotPac and Judo Bank. Other unsecured creditors are owed an additional $12.4m, according to the report. An unknown amount is owed to out-of-pocket former employees for injury compensation alongside the $5.3m of debt owed to former employees. This includes about $925,000 of superannuation, at least $970,000 of annual leave and more than $1.6m of redundancy pay. XL's attempted to sooth some of the crippling debt by engaging with Manheim Auctions to sell its fleet of vehicles just before appointing FTI as its administrator. Prior to its collapse, the Queensland-headquartered company offered transport services for an array of consumer and business customers across the country. On its website, XL Express said it delivered to retail stores, all major distribution centres and residential locations across the nation. It also boasted of a 'national network', which includes its parcel sortation systems and technology that allowed package tracking. 'We're a business that's built on the challenger model,' the company's website states. 'We're here to disrupt the status quo and think harder and act smarter for our clients and their businesses.' The company's collapse follows it establishing a partnership with the Brisbane Lions between 2020 and 2022. XL Express's logo featured on the front of the AFL team's jersey, while the Lions logo was seen on the company's trucks. The Brisbane-headquartered company operated depots around the country including Sydney, Melbourne, Cairns, Darwin, Perth and Adelaide.
Perth Now
6 minutes ago
- Perth Now
Bold plan to give you extra $3,300 a year
Teal independent Kate Chaney has floated a radical plan to hand everyone $3,300 a year in exchange for a hike in the GST. Ms Chaney has been working with Australian economist Richard Holden on a proposal to raise the GST from 10 to 15 per cent, and apply the tax to education, food and health. In exchange for the tax hike, every adult would be paid $3300 - effectively wiping out the GST expenses on someone's first $22,000 of spending. Ms Chaney and Professor Holden's plan has been submitted to the federal government to be considered at the productivity-focused economic roundtable, a summit to be held in Canberra from August 19 to 21. 'GST is an efficient tax – it is hard to avoid – and with lower and middle-income groups potentially better off under this proposal, it can be progressive,' Ms Chaney said. Kate Chaney supports the plan which would leave the lowest 60 per cent of income earners better off. NewsWire / Martin Ollman Credit: News Corp Australia 'Unlike personal income tax, it doesn't hamper productivity. 'Intergenerational inequity is built into our tax system - younger generations are facing the growing burden of funding an ageing population and will bear the cost of future interest payments to cover the structural deficit forecast for the next decade.' The WA MP's plan has been costed and would raise an additional $95.2bn for the government in its first year of operation, minus the $3300 rebate to every adult. Low and middle-income earners would be up to $371 better off, but the top-20 per cent of earners would be $2200 worse off. All that leaves the government with an additional $24bn a year. The Prime Minister and Treasurer have been hesitant in their language around GST reform leading up to the economic roundtable meetings. The economic roundtable meetings are being held in Canberra later this month. Mark Stewart / NewsWire Credit: News Corp Australia 'I expect that there'll be a whole range of ideas put forward, much of which is contradictory with each other,' Anthony Albanese said this week. 'It doesn't mean that they're government decisions we're making, because they're not.' But Mr Albanese was more explicit in his language on Thursday. 'The only tax policy that we're implementing is the one that we took to the election,' he said. While the current GST scheme is considered regressive, Professor Holden's plan is pitched as progressive. 'I'm a supporter of progressive taxation,' Mr Albanese told Sky News in July. 'Consumption taxes, by definition, are regressive in their nature. So that's something that you know doesn't fit with the agenda.' Parliamentary Budget Office costings of Professor Holden and Ms Chaney's scheme show the bottom 60 per cent of income earners would be better with the GST hike and $3300 rebate. Food is currently exempt from GST - Professor Holden's plan would remove that exemption. NewsWire / David Crosling Credit: News Corp Australia 'Our proposal would make our taxation system more efficient, make our economy more dynamic and provide the impetus for productivity growth,' Professor Holden said. 'It is widely accepted that the GST is an efficient tax, but it is thought to be regressive. 'This plan shows that it doesn't have to be that way. By providing every adult Australian with a $22,000 GST-free threshold the GST can be both efficient and progressive.' The government has promoted the roundtable meetings as being focused on productivity. The Australian Council of Social Services says the country's lagging productivity is widening inequality. In the council's submission to the roundtable, chief executive Cassandra Goldie calls for reform to the tax system to raise more revenue, reduce inequality and drive action to address climate change. 'For too long now, people with plenty have been showered with tax breaks that pull investment away from productive purposes and rob essential public services of the revenue they need,' Dr Goldie said. The council is advocating for changes to employment opportunities and streamlining income support. 'The extra revenue we need to fund care and community services, schools, and an income support system that protects people from poverty must come from those with the most capacity to pay - not those doing it toughest,' Dr Goldie said. 'We must better prepare and train people for jobs and finally lift income support to levels that don't trap people in poverty and destitution.'
West Australian
18 minutes ago
- West Australian
Australia ‘very concerned' by Donald Trump's 250 per cent pharmaceutical tariff threat
Australia's Health Minister has admitted he's 'very concerned' by Donald Trump's threat to raise pharmaceutical tariffs as high as 250 per cent and insisted PBS is off limits. Mark Butler has vowed Australia will continue to 'press the case' for the continuation of free trade with America — acknowledging it would be a major blow to Australian patients and producers. US President Donald Trump told CNBC this week he would expand this tariff regime by slapping new tariffs on foreign-made pharmaceuticals. 'It's going to go to 150 per cent and then it's going to go to 250 per cent,' he told the US business news channel. He said the final rate is expected to be announced within the next week or so, with a transitional period to give drug manufacturers time to adjust their supply chains. 'We are very concerned about the latest announcement from the administration around the possibility of pharmaceutical tariffs going as high as 250 per cent over the next couple of years,' Mr Butler told reporters in Melbourne on Thursday. 'That is why we're working so hard to press the case for the continuation of free trade.' Under the $18 billion-dollar Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme, the government negotiates with the drug companies to enable Australians to buy life-saving drugs worth thousands of dollars for as little as $25 a script. In a series of letters to 17 drug manufacturers on Friday, Mr Trump had also demanded they negotiate harder with 'foreign freeloading nations' he blamed for higher US drug prices. It comes after a submission was made to the US government March by the Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) claiming Australia's subsidised medical system was 'egregious and discriminatory'. Mr Butler said the US and Australian pharmaceutical trade relationship benefited both nations. 'America exports more pharmaceuticals to Australia than we do to them. They do it on a tariff-free basis,' he said. 'That's served both of our countries very well and we'll continue to argue the case for a continuation of free trade in pharmaceuticals.' Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said Australia would continue to support the PBS and spruiked his government's recent legislation in the first sitting black of the 48th Parliament to make PBS medicines even cheaper. 'We support the PBS. It is part of who we are as Australia. We're a sovereign nation, it's something that has produced massive benefits for Australia. It's a proud Labor creation and we are building on it,' he said on Thursday when asked if he was concerned by the latest development of Trump's ever-expanding tariffs. 'That's why we introduced legislation last week to reduce the cost of medicines to $25 that are listed on the PBS.' It comes as Mr Trump's country-specific 'reciprocal' tariffs, first floated on 'Liberation Day' in April, were scheduled to take effect on August 7. The US imposed a 10 per cent baseline tariff on imported goods from Australia which was the lowest rate of other nations.
