Defence wraps up 1MDB misappropriation case
PUTRAJAYA: The defence in the case involving former prime minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak and the misappropriation of RM2.28bil from 1Malaysia Development Bhd (1MDB) officially closed its case after calling 26 witnesses.
Lead counsel Tan Sri Muhammad Shafee Abdullah informed the court that the defence had concluded its case following the testimony of its final witness, forensic document expert Tay Eue Kam.
'Yang Arif, we officially close our case after the 26th witness,' Muhammad Shafee told Justice Collin Lawrence Sequerah, the presiding judge, yesterday.
Justice Sequerah scheduled Sept 30 for the submissions from both parties, with replies due by Oct 10.
Oral submissions have also been set from Oct 21 to Oct 24 and from Oct 27 to Oct 31.
'I trust that the submissions will focus on the main issues raised by the defence. I do not need to give further instructions,' Justice Sequerah remarked.
The prosecution's phase of the trial began on Aug 28, 2019 and concluded on May 30, 2024.
Over 233 days, the prosecution called 50 witnesses to testify.
On Oct 30 last year, the High Court ordered Najib to enter his defence, with Najib himself taking the stand as the first defence witness on Dec 2, 2024.
The defence called 26 witnesses over 58 days.
Among the witnesses were former 1MDB chairman Tan Sri Che Lodin Wok Kamarudin and Tengku Datuk Rahimah Sultan Mahmud, the sister of Terengganu's Sultan Mizan Zainal Abidin.
Najib, 71, faces four charges of using his position to obtain gratification amounting to RM2.28bil in 1MDB funds at the AmIslamic Bank Berhad branch in Jalan Raja Chulan, Bukit Ceylon, between Feb 24, 2011, and Dec 19, 2014.
He is charged under Section 23(1) of the Malaysian Anti-Corruption Commission (MACC) Act, which carries a penalty under Section 24(1) of the same Act, including up to 20 years in prison and a fine of either five times the bribe amount or RM10,000, whichever is higher, if convicted.
In addition, Najib faces 21 charges of money laundering for offences committed at the same bank between March 22, 2013, and Aug 30, 2013.
These charges fall under Section 4(1)(a) of the Anti-Money Laundering, Anti-Terrorism Financing and Proceeds of Unlawful Activities Act 2001, which carries a maximum fine of RM5mil and up to five years' imprisonment, or both, upon conviction.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
33 minutes ago
- The Star
Court sets Aug 19 for decision in activist's appeal over challenge to online speech law
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has fixed Aug 19 to deliver its decision in an appeal brought by an activist over the dismissal of her lawsuit that had challenged the validity of parts of a provision in the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 that criminalises offensive online comments. A three-man bench consisting of Federal Court judge Datuk Lee Swee Seng and Court of Appeal judges Datuk Hashim Hamzah and Datuk Azman Abdullah set the decision date after parties completed their submissions earlier Wednesday (June 11). Heidy Quah Gaik Li, the founder of Refuge for Refugees is claiming the use of the words "offensive' and annoy' in Section 233 of the Act are invalid as it goes against two fundamental human rights protected by the Federal Constitution. Section 233(1)(a) states that it is an offence for a person to make, create or solicit, and initiate the transmission of any online comment which is "obscene, indecent, false, menacing or offensive' with "intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass another person. In September 2023, the Shah Alam High Court dismissed Quah's lawsuit, leading her to file an appeal in the Court of Appeal. The hearing today was a continuation of proceedings that had begun earlier. Justice Lee was serving as a Court of Appeal judge before being elevated to the Federal Court in May this year. During today's hearing, senior federal counsel Liew Horng Bin representing the Malaysian government submitted that speech involving expletives, profanity, crude references, hate speech or incitement to violence are not expressions protected under Article 10 (1) (a) of the Federal Constitution. He argued that the right to free speech should be used to disseminate truth, respect for human dignity and perform essential informing function. On the other hand, lawyer Datuk Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, representing Quah argued the words "offensive' or annoy contained in Section 233 is inconsistent with Article 10 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution, namely the right to equality and freedom of speech. He argued that the two words in Section 233 are not a "permissible restriction' under public order as prescribed in the Federal Constitution. In July 2021, Quah, 31, was charged in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court for allegedly making "offensive' online comments in a Facebook post. In April the following year, the Sessions Court granted her a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) due to the charge under section 233(1)(a) being defective. - Bernama
The Sun
37 minutes ago
- The Sun
Appeals Court set Aug 19 for decision in activist's appeal over challenge to online speech law
PUTRAJAYA: The Court of Appeal has fixed August 19 to deliver its decision in an appeal brought by an activist over the dismissal of her lawsuit that had challenged the validity of parts of a provision in the Communications and Multimedia Act 1998 that criminalises offensive online comments. A three-man bench consisting of Federal Court judge Datuk Lee Swee Seng and Court of Appeal judges Datuk Hashim Hamzah and Datuk Azman Abdullah set the decision date after parties completed their submissions earlier today. Heidy Quah Gaik Li, the founder of Refuge for Refugees is claiming the use of the words 'offensive' and annoy' in Section 233 of the Act are invalid as it goes against two fundamental human rights protected by the Federal Constitution. Section 233(1)(a) states that it is an offence for a person to make, create or solicit, and initiate the transmission of any online comment which is 'obscene, indecent, false, menacing or offensive' with 'intent to annoy, abuse, threaten or harass another person. In Sept 2023, the Shah Alam High Court dismissed Quah's lawsuit, leading her to file an appeal in the Court of Appeal. The hearing today was a continuation of proceedings that had begun earlier. Justice Lee was serving as a Court of Appeal judge before being elevated to the Federal Court in May this year. During today's hearing, senior federal counsel Liew Horng Bin representing the Malaysian government submitted that speech involving expletives, profanity, crude references, hate speech or incitement to violence are not expressions protected under Article 10 (1) (a) of the Federal Constitution. He argued that the right to free speech should be used to disseminate truth, respect for human dignity and perform essential informing function. On the other hand, lawyer Datuk Malik Imtiaz Sarwar, representing Quah argued the words 'offensive' or annoy contained in Section 233 is inconsistent with Article 10 and Article 8 of the Federal Constitution, namely the right to equality and freedom of speech. He argued that the two words in Section 233 are not a 'permissible restriction' under public order as prescribed in the Federal Constitution. In July 2021, Quah, 31, was charged in the Kuala Lumpur Sessions Court for allegedly making 'offensive' online comments in a Facebook post. In April the following year, the Sessions Court granted her a discharge not amounting to an acquittal (DNAA) due to the charge under section 233(1)(a) being defective.
The Sun
37 minutes ago
- The Sun
RM3,000 aid for families of UPSI students killed in crash
KUALA TERENGGANU: The Terengganu government will provide financial assistance of RM3,000 to each family of the 15 Universiti Pendidikan Sultan Idris (UPSI) students who perished in a bus crash on the East-West Highway (JRTB) near Tasik Banding, Gerik, Perak. Menteri Besar Datuk Seri Dr Ahmad Samsuri Mokhtar said RM1,000 of the amount had already been disbursed to the affected families. He said a separate RM1,000 in aid will also be channelled to each of the 33 individuals who were injured in the crash. 'The state government is deeply saddened by this tragedy and remains committed to assisting those impacted. We also call on all Terengganu residents to continue praying for the victims and for their families to be granted strength during this difficult time,' he said in a statement today. On Monday, 15 UPSI students were killed when the chartered bus they were travelling in from Jertih to the university's main campus in Tanjung Malim, Perak overturned after colliding with a Perodua Alza on the JRTB. The crash also left 33 others injured, including the bus driver and attendant, as well as the driver and three passengers of the Perodua Alza. Speaking to reporters, Ahmad Samsuri said he would personally hand over the financial aid to the victims' families next Tuesday. He said the state government would also cover all medical and hospital-related expenses, including surgery costs, and provide counselling sessions for victims and their families. 'The role of communities under the JPKK (Village Development and Security Committees) is also vital, and they have stepped up to offer extra comfort to affected families,' he said after presenting certificates of appointment to the president, vice-president, council members and honorary commissioners of the Terengganu Scouts at Wisma Darul Iman today. Meanwhile, Ahmad Samsuri urged all relevant quarters, including ministries, to conduct audits covering all aspects, such as law enforcement, road safety and bus operations, to prevent similar incidents. 'If a comprehensive audit cannot be carried out all at once, it can be done in phases, focusing first on high-risk locations,' he said.
