Trump Says 30% Tariff Is Coming To European, Mexican-Made Cars On August 1
In this morning's edition, Trump sets a new date for tariffs against vehicles made in the EU and Mexico, Elon Musk says he doesn't want Tesla and xAI to merge, GM idles its truck plant in Mexico, and Land Rover recalls thousands of Range Rover Evoques for an airbag issue.
Read more: Popular Cars Consumer Reports Recommends You Skip In Favor Of Something Better
1st Gear: New Tariffs Are Coming To The EU, Mexico
If you were tired of hearing about tariffs, then I've got some bad news for you. President Trump just unveiled his latest round of tariff ultimatum, setting a 30% duty on things made in Mexico and the European Union. He sees to be going with the "never let 'em know your next move" method of haphazard negotiation.
The President announced the changes in two letters posted on social media over the weekend. He informed some very important trade partners that the new rates would kick in on August 1 if they could not negotiate better terms. His past few weeks have been split between this confusing (and expensive) shuffling of tariffs and dodging questions about Jeffrey Epstein. These latest levels are tweaked from the tariff levels he proposed in April. From Automotive News:
The EU had been hoping to conclude a tentative deal with the U.S. to stave off higher tariffs, but Trump's letter punctured the recent optimism in Brussels over the prospects for an 11th-hour agreement between the major economies.
Trump did, however, leave an opening for additional adjustments.
"If you wish to open your heretofore closed Trading Market to the United States, and eliminate your Tariff, and Non-Tariff, Policy and Trade Barriers, we will, perhaps, consider an adjustment to this letter," Trump wrote.
The tariff rates would apply widely, though separate from the president's sectoral tariffs on products such as automobiles and steel. If implemented, it could place the EU at a competitive disadvantage on American exports to the neighboring U.K., which left the bloc in 2020 and was the first country to come to a top-line trade pact with Trump.
Germany's VDA auto association tells AutoNews that there is still no solution to easing the current 27.5% duty on cars imported from the EU to the U.S. At the same time, European automakers are still holding out hope (such a silly move) that the two entities can reach some sort of agreement to lower auto import tariffs, potentially including a so-called "netting mechanism" to offset imports with exports. Something like this could be based on the value of exports out of the U.S. market, rather than the number of exported vehicles.
In Mexico, Trump wants President Claudia Sheinbaum to continue supporting the securing of the border between the two North American countries.
Trump added that if Mexico "is successful in challenging the cartels and stopping the flow of Fentanyl," the U.S. would consider adjusting the levies.
"These tariffs may be modified, upward or downward, depending on our relationship with your country," he added.
The letter is silent on whether the U.S. will preserve a carve-out for goods traded under the USMCA trade deal, which have been exempt from the current 25 percent rate. The administration has previously said it will keep the exemption for Canada.
Other countries Trump has pointed to for tariff hikes in recent days include South Korea, South Africa, Indonesia, Thailand, and Cambodia, as well as Algeria, Libya, Iraq, and Sri Lanka.
What is bro doing?
2nd Gear: Musk Doesn't Want Tesla, xAI To Merge
Tesla CEO Elon Musk says he does not support a merger between the automaker and his artificial intelligence start-up, xAI, which owns the Grok chatbot that has been having some major issues with racism, sexism, homophobia, and antisemitism lately.
This news comes after Musk announced that Grok was on its way to being implemented in Tesla vehicles, something I've got no doubt would go totally smoothly. From Reuters:
In response to a user post on X that asked Tesla investors if they supported a merger between the two companies, Musk replied "No."
On Sunday, Musk had said he would ask Tesla shareholders to vote whether Tesla can invest in xAI, after earlier saying "it would be great" if Tesla could do so.
[...]
xAI acquired X, formerly called Twitter and also owned by Musk, in a $33 billion deal in March this year, valuing the combined group at $80 billion at the time.
Sources told Reuters in June that xAI had been in talks to raise money at a valuation of more than $120 billion, while a valuation of as high as $200 billion was also discussed.
The Wall Street Journal reported on Saturday that Musk's SpaceX had committed $2 billion to xAI as part of a $5 billion equity round.
The way Elon's companies invest in each other sort of makes me feel like rearranging deckchairs on the Titanic. It's quite the masterful gambit by Musk.
3rd Gear: GM Idles Mexican Plant
General Motors says it is idling production at a pickup truck plant in Silao, Mexico — where it builds the Chevy Silverado and GMC Sierra — for several weeks. The plant was down for the first two weeks of July, and it's scheduled to be idled again the weeks of August 4 and August 11. From Automotive News:
"Scheduled down weeks at GM Silao are part of a standard operating process focused on optimizing production at our manufacturing complex," GM said in response to a Reuters inquiry.
The Silverado and mechanically similar Sierra are by far GM's top sellers in the U.S., and major profit generators. GM also builds the Silverado and Sierra at factories in Fort Wayne, Ind., Flint, Mich. and Ontario, Canada.
It is common for automakers to halt factory work to perform maintenance or adjust assembly lines for model changes. Most of GM's U.S. factories were not operating last week as part of a usual down week for the July 4 holiday.
Trucks like the Sierra and Silverado — among some of the best-selling vehicles in America — are absolutely crucial for GM. The automaker sold 278,599 Silverados and 166,409 Sierras in the first half of 2025. Those numbers represent a 2% and 12% respective increase in sales over the same period in 2024. Any downtime seems sure to hurt sales efforts.
4th Gear: Thousnds Of Range Rover Evoques Recalled For Airbag Issue
Jaguar Land Rover -- which recently resumed shipping vehicles to the U.S. -- is recalling U.S.-market Range Rover Evoques built between 2021 and 2025 because the front passenger airbag could tear during deployment. Obviously, that's not ideal, and it could lead to a further risk of injury in a crash if the hot gases inside the bag escape. From AutoEvolution:
[T]he airbag module in question is produced by the Hungarian arm of Joyson Safety Systems.
[...]
Jaguar Land Rover started looking into this matter in May 2023, following a number of reports from the manufacturer of the fascia assembly over abnormal front passenger airbag deployments. After many analyses and much investigation, the British automaker concluded in June 2025 that the airbag material showed variability in the folds of suspect airbags.
The Recall Determination Committee ultimately decided on a safety recall on June 30, 2025. Thankfully for both customers and JLR's legal team, Jaguar Land Rover is not aware of any reported injuries resulting from this concern. The recall documentation filed with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does not explicitly state how the supplier corrected this condition in airbag production or if the remedy modules come from a different supplier.
Owners and lessees will have the possibly faulty airbag modules replaced at Land Rover dealerships, who will be informed no later than July 21. Owners can expect to be notified by mail on or before August 25. In total, 20,999 Evoques are being recalled, according to Reuters.
Reverse: Built Ford Tough
We really don't talk enough about how wild it is that ol' Gerry Ford was able to become the freaking President without receiving a single vote. The man was just built different. If you want to learn more about our 38th President (and the second who shared a name with a car brand), head over to History.com.
On The Radio: Cobra Starship - Good Girls Go Bad Feat. Leighton Meester
There's no better song in the world for hanging in the corner with your five best friends and jamming out.
Want more like this? Join the Jalopnik newsletter to get the latest auto news sent straight to your inbox...
Read the original article on Jalopnik.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Trump's new model to support Ukraine is a win-win
From the start, Ukraine's defense against Russia's full-scale invasion has been underpinned by a robust commitment from its Western partners. The Biden administration's pledge to support Ukraine 'as long as it takes' promised a sustained flow of military and financial aid directly from Washington. This 'direct donor' model was key to Ukraine's initial resilience, providing essential weaponry from U.S. stockpiles. Biden's approach primarily involved direct transfers from U.S. weapons inventories, prioritizing speed and ensuring that Ukraine received vital equipment quickly to counter Russian aggression. The American government provided extensive amounts of equipment, from air-defense missiles to artillery rounds and armored vehicles, directly to Kyiv. Now, under President Trump, the paradigm is shifting. The U.S. is transitioning from a direct donor to a 'strategic supplier,' where European allies purchase American weapons for Ukraine at their own expense. While this reorientation marks a significant change, it is far from the worst-case scenario for Ukraine. Instead, it represents a pragmatic and potentially more sustainable evolution of transatlantic burden-sharing, securing critical capabilities for Ukraine while invigorating the U.S. defense industrial base and recalibrating the nature of allied support. Support is still 'as long as it takes' but also 'at the others' expense.' This marks a departure from the traditional post-World War II donor-recipient model, particularly within the NATO alliance, towards a more transactional 'America First' approach. Future U.S. engagement in global security will likely be contingent upon tangible economic benefits and direct cost-sharing from allies. Such a shift could lead to a more predictable, albeit less altruistic, framework for security cooperation, where allies are compelled to demonstrate their commitment through direct financial contributions. This policy reorientation accelerates European strategic autonomy. While the immediate effect is Europe paying for U.S. weapons, the long-term implication is a forced impetus for greater European defense integration and self-sufficiency. European nations have already been increasing their defense spending and proactively planning for a future with less guaranteed U.S. aid. This new model, by making U.S. weapons available for purchase, encourages Europe to develop its own robust procurement mechanisms and potentially expand its own defense industrial base. Ukraine's most pressing and enduring need remains robust air defense against Russia's escalating missile and drone attacks. The U.S.-made Patriot air-defense system is critical, as it is one of the few systems capable of intercepting high-speed ballistic missiles. These systems are vital for protecting civilian infrastructure and population centers, which have been subjected to relentless Russian bombardment. A critical strategic reality for Ukraine is that not all American weapons are equally replaceable by European alternatives. While Europe is ramping up its own artillery production, the Patriot system's unique counter-ballistic missile capability makes it a requirement that only the U.S. can provide at scale. Europe, at the same time, has demonstrated a clear willingness and increasing capacity to shoulder a greater share of the burden. The European Union has already provided €165 billion in financial assistance and has launched an €800 billion Defense Readiness Plan. Frozen Russian sovereign assets may be used to finance what Ukraine needs. The shift to a foreign military sales model is explicitly intended to invigorate the U.S. defense industrial base. By integrating 'exportability features' into defense systems during the design phase, the U.S. seeks to advance its competitiveness abroad and potentially lower unit costs for both America and its allies. While the foreign military sales process has historically been slow and plagued by delivery backlogs, the new model offers a potential solution. Consistent, large-scale orders from European allies could provide the long-term contract certainty that the U.S. defense industry requires to invest significantly in surge capacity and overcome challenges. This transforms what was previously a 'drain' on American stockpiles, requiring replenishment at taxpayer expense, into a sustained stimulus for U.S. manufacturing, aligning with 'America First' economic principles. This shift is not merely about burden-sharing; it is about recapitalizing and modernizing the U.S. defense industrial base. While immediate fixes for current shortages remain challenging, this strategic reorientation creates a more sustainable industrial ecosystem. Trump's recent rhetoric marks a notable change from his earlier stance, which often appeared conciliatory toward Vladimir Putin. He has recognized that Russia, not Ukraine, is the core problem in negotiations, even threatening tariffs and sanctions on Russia and its trading partners if a peace deal is not reached within 50 days. The reality that Putin is not amenable to a quick 'deal' is now clear. There is now a crucial political opening for continued support to Ukraine, even if the funding mechanism changes. The narrative that Trump desires Ukraine's fall has been refuted. Instead, Trump is committed to ending the war on terms that align with his administration's interests. This represents a significant psychological advantage for Ukraine, as it lessens the fear of a complete U.S. abandonment.
The Hill
a few seconds ago
- The Hill
Columbia to pay $221M to restore funding cut by Trump administration
Columbia University said Wednesday it has agreed to pay the Trump administration $221 million to restore federal funding that was stripped following a probe into antisemitism on the campus. The school, according to the settlement, will pay a $200 million settlement to the federal government over a three-year period and $21 million to the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC). 'This agreement marks an important step forward after a period of sustained federal scrutiny and institutional uncertainty,' Acting University President Claire Shipman said in a statement. 'The settlement was carefully crafted to protect the values that define us and allow our essential research partnership with the federal government to get back on track,' she added. The interim president said the Trump administration deal will allow the school to maintain its academic independence after losing $400 million in grant funding earlier this year. In June, a judge dismissed a lawsuit led by Columbia's faculty, ruling that only the school had grounds to sue the government for revoking its funds. 'Columbia's longstanding research partnership with the federal government is vital to advancing our nation's progress in key areas of science, technology, and medicine,' Board of Trustees Co-Chairs David Greenwald and Jeh Johnson said in a statement on the matter. 'We are proud of the role we play in advancing this public service and preparing the next generations of students to meet complex challenges around the world,' they added. President Trump announced the agreement on Tuesday night in a Truth Social post celebrating the win for his administration. 'It's a great honor to have been involved, and I want to thank and congratulate Secretary Linda McMahon, and all those who worked with us on this important deal,' he wrote. 'I also want to thank and commend Columbia University for agreeing to do what is right. I look forward to watching them have a great future in our Country, maybe greater than ever before!' He warned earlier in the post that other schools could face similar measures to motivate the erasure of diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI) initiatives, which the administration has deemed discriminatory. 'Columbia has also committed to ending their ridiculous DEI policies, admitting students based ONLY on MERIT, and protecting the Civil Liberties of their students on campus,' he wrote in the post. 'Numerous other Higher Education Institutions that have hurt so many, and been so unfair and unjust, and have wrongly spent federal money, much of it from our government, are upcoming,' the president added.
Forbes
a few seconds ago
- Forbes
13 Ways Nonprofits Can Effectively Manage Changes In Leadership
A Woman Giving Presentation to Colleagues Change is constant in today's business landscape. While shifts like staff departures and goal pivots are often accepted as part of the normal business cycle, a change of leadership can rock a company's foundation, especially for mission-based organizations like nonprofits. From developing succession plans in advance to determining how to best communicate happenings to stakeholders at all levels, taking a proactive approach can help nonprofits successfully navigate substantial internal changes. Below, 13 Forbes Nonprofit Council members share advice on how nonprofit leaders can successfully manage leadership changes within their organizations, as well as why these strategies are effective. 1. Make Succession Planning A Priority Succession planning cannot be an afterthought, so make it a prioritized and strategic activity within your organization. Engage in conversations with leaders and board members to outline clear plans for leadership transitions. These discussions should not only address what happens when leadership shifts occur but also how to ensure continuity and maintain organizational stability. - Cortney Nicolato, United Way of Rhode Island 2. Seek Alignment Around A Shared Vision Centering leadership transitions around a shared vision helps create alignment and momentum. When teams actively participate in shaping that vision, they feel a sense of ownership and clarity about where the organization is headed. This inclusive approach builds trust and engagement, minimizing disruption. A co-created vision empowers staff, donors and volunteers to move forward together. - Alan Thomas, Association for Materials Protection & Performance 3. Leverage Storytelling Treat leadership transitions like storytelling, not just succession. Rather than just announcing the "who," explain the "why" behind the change, the values that will stay and the vision ahead. When people feel part of the next chapter, they invest in it. What works is inviting your team and supporters to be co-authors, not just readers, of what comes next. That's how you keep momentum. - Cherian Koshy, Kindsight 4. Implement A Phased Communication Plan A phased communication plan is key. When Well Aware was approaching a leadership transition, we began socializing the leadership change with key stakeholders on a deliberate timeline. For example, prior to the public announcement, we held private calls with key partners to build buy-in. By the time the news was shared widely, the leader had a strong foundation of support, enabling a smooth, successful start. - Sarah Evans, Well Aware 5. Focus On Communication Transparency There is nothing that rocks the boat more than a change in leadership. Fear of the unknown is unsettling. I have found that being communicative and generous with information during the hiring process is key, including timelines, candidates, etc. Conducting team interviews is also helpful, as they create mutual responsibility for the success of the hire. A pre- and post-hire meet and greet helps to break the ice. - Tara Chalakani, Preferred Behavioral Health Group 6. Regularly Meet With Internal Stakeholders Making sure to continue to meet with all board members individually and with staff at all levels is important. Hearing what is on people's mind is imperative, so you need to approach each interaction as a learning experience. - Rhonda Vetere, Laureus Sport For Good 7. Prioritize What's Working Well Focus on the things that are working well. There's no need to "disrupt" things to make your mark, and listen to suggestions from staff members. Conduct town hall meetings with staff to give them an opportunity to "kick the tires." - Gene O'Neill, NAVC (North American Veterinary Community) 8. Lead With Transparency And Continued Support One powerful strategy is leading with transparency and affirmation of continued support. Clearly communicate the leadership change, share the 'why' and reassure your team and community that the mission remains strong. This approach builds trust, eases uncertainty and reminds everyone they're still valued and supported through the transition. - Yujia Zhu, 9. Create Values-Embedded Infrastructure Effective leadership transitions require values-embedded infrastructure. Focus on weaving core principles into daily operations while documenting key decisions to preserve institutional memory. By building distributed leadership capacity rather than hero-driven models, we realize sustainable continuity and are therefore able to keep our focus on strengthening the systems that make us better as we evolve. - Tara Fitzpatrick-Navarro, USTA Mid-Atlantic Foundation 10. Develop A Leader Operations Manual Smooth leadership transitions start by understanding how a new leader learns and leads. A CEO operations manual that captures how the team makes decisions, gathers input and communicates builds clarity and trust faster when paired with team alignment. It's not just about onboarding the CEO; it's about 'reboarding' the whole organization. - Karen Cochran, Philanthropy Innovators 11. Prioritize Cultural Continuity Leadership may change, but the culture that connects your team should remain strong. We focus on consistent rituals like weekly check-ins, celebrating wins and welcoming new staff to keep morale high. A strong culture helps people stay grounded during uncertain times. - Michael Bellavia, HelpGood 12. Maintain The Succession Plan Our organization maintains a robust succession plan grounded in transparency and trust. When I experienced a stroke in April 2023, our COO seamlessly stepped in as interim CEO for 12 weeks. Thanks to clear protocols and open communication, our operations never missed a beat — and neither did our care to those we serve. - Nicole Lamoureux, NAFC 13. Stay Consistent In The Mission And Values The quote, "When your values are clear, your choices are easy" is attributed to Roy E. Disney. Leadership can, and will, change, but the mission and values must stay consistent. Consistency creates credibility. Ensure the staff, board and other stakeholders are all committed to the mission and values of the organization, as it will hold the leadership team accountable and keep the organization moving forward. - Aaron Alejandro, Texas FFA Foundation Forbes Nonprofit Council is an invitation-only organization for chief executives in successful nonprofit organizations. Do I qualify?
