Kota charges Karnataka government of slapping cases against its critics
Former BJP councillor for Mangaluru City Corporation, Shwetha Poojary, has been booked for 'criticising' police investigation of the murder of Suhas Shetty, a Bajrang Dal activist and a double murder accused, said Udupi-Chikkamagaluru MP Kota Srinivas Poojary, in Mangaluru on Wednesday.
Talking to reporters after releasing the BJP's 'chargesheet' on the two-year rule of Siddaramaiah-led Congress government, the MP said Ms. Poojary is the new entrant in the long list of people who have been booked for criticising the government's inaction.
Those booked include City South and City North MLAs D. Vedavyasa Kamath and Y. Bharath Shetty, respectively, Belthangady MLA Harish Poonja, Udupi MLA Yashpal Suvarna, activist Puneet Kerehalli, and Arun Ullal.
In the first post on her Facebook page, Ms. Poojary said that people will teach a lesson to the burqa-clad women 'who helped assailants to escape from the spot' after the murder of Suhas Shetty, as police have 'so far not taken any action' against those women.
In the second post, she criticised the district in-charge, Minister Dinesh Gundu Rao, in a 'demeaning way' for his statement that the BJP created many criminals during its rule.
'The whole substance of the posts is the criticism of government's action. She [Shwetha Poojary] was booked for criticising government's work. I am not aware of the language used by her' Kota Srinivas PoojaryMP, Udupi-Chikkamagaluru
When pointed to the derogatory terms found in the two posts found on the Facebook page of Ms. Poojary, the MP said, 'The whole substance of the posts is the criticism of government's action. She was booked for criticising government's work. I am not aware of the language used by her,' he said.
In the past two years, the Congress government has indulged in actions to divide people on communal lines. The government is embroiled in scams related to the allotment of sites pertaining to the Mysuru Urban Development Authority and the misuse of funds related to the Maharshi Valmiki Scheduled Tribe Development Corporation. The MP said the government is also accused of illegally diverting ₹34,500 crore of SC/ST funds for the five guarantee schemes.
The government has stopped contributing its share, thereby denying the farmers a yearly sum of ₹10,000 under the Krishi Samman Nidhi programme. The 54 lakh farmers of the State now get from the Central government an annual sum of ₹6,000. The State government is not correctly implementing the Central government's Jal Jeevan Mission of providing piped drinking water to households. Not a penny is being spent by the State government for improving rural roads, the Udupi MP said
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
30 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Defence may be the wrong word': Shashi Tharoor points at ‘China factor' in Pakistan conflict
Congress leader Shashi Tharoor said on Thursday that 81 percent of Pakistan's defence equipment comes from China, making the country an 'impossible factor' to ignore in the conflict with Islamabad. Tharoor, who is leading a parliamentary delegation to the US to expose Islamabad's nexus with terror after India's Operation Sindoor, said that New Delhi-Beijing relations were making good progress till last month's conflict with Pakistan. 'I'm not going to mince my words, but we are aware that China has immense stakes in Pakistan," PTI quoted Tharoor as telling the representatives of think tanks at the Indian Embassy in Washington DC. Tharoor pointed out that the largest single project under the Belt and Road Initiative (BRI) is the China-Pakistan Economic Corridor (CPEC), and that 81 percent of Pakistani defence equipment is from China. 'Defence may be the wrong word here. Offence in many ways……China is an absolutely impossible factor to ignore in what has been our confrontation with Pakistan,' Tharoor said. Shashi Tharoor told the gathering that India had seen good progress in its relationship with China after tensions since the 2020 Galwan Valley clashes. The Thiruvananthapuram MP added that during Operation Sindoor and the conflict with Pakistan, New Delhi saw a very different China in terms of its support for Islamabad, even on the UN Security Council. 'We have no illusions about what the challenges are in our neighbourhood, but I want to remind you all that India has consistently chosen a path of keeping open channels of communication, even with our adversaries. We have tried as much as possible to focus on development, on growth, on trade. Our trade with China is still at record levels. It's not that we are adopting a posture of hostility, but we would be naive not to be aware of these other currents around,' he said. The UN Security Council, on April 25, issued a press statement on the 'terrorist attack in Jammu and Kashmir' after the April 22 Pahalgam attack that killed 26 people, mostly tourists. The statement had condemned the attack in "the strongest terms' but did not mention The Resistance Front as Pakistan, which is a non-permanent member of the council, got it removed with China's help. 'The members of the Security Council underlined the need to hold perpetrators, organisers, financiers and sponsors of this reprehensible act of terrorism accountable and bring them to justice,' the press statement had said. Shashi Tharoor was asked about the Chinese military equipment that Pakistan used in the conflict during an earlier interaction at the Council on Foreign Relations. The delegation head said that when India saw what the Pakistanis were attempting to do using Chinese technology, for instance, the 'kill chain' that the Chinese specialise in, where the radar, GPS, planes and missiles are all linked together and they react instantly, 'we simply did things in a different way. Otherwise, we wouldn't have been able to hit' 11 Pakistani airfields, and "we wouldn't have been able to breach the Chinese-supplied air defences. 'So it's clear that assessments were taking place while the fighting was happening, and we were recalibrating our strategies in order to end as effectively as we were able to end,' Tharoor said.
Time of India
38 minutes ago
- Time of India
Stopped war between India and Pakistan, it could have gone nuclear: Trump
US President Donald Trump on Friday again claimed credit for brokering a cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan, adding that he used trade as a weapon, leading to both countries stopping the war immediately. Trump pointed out that a war between India and Pakistan could have gone nuclear if the US had not intervened between the two countries. "You know, I did something that people don't talk about, and I don't talk about very much, but we solved a big problem, a nuclear problem potentially with India and with Pakistan. I spoke to Pakistan, I spoke to India, they have really great leaders, but they were going at it, and they could have gone at it nuclear," Trump told reporters on Air Force One . Lauding the leadership of India and Pakistan, Trump said, "Both nuclear countries, strong nuclear countries, and I talked about trade and said, 'We're not doing trade if you guys are going to be throwing bombs at each other." They both stopped, and I stopped that war immediately. It was going much further, and hopefully, it would not go to nuclear, but it might have gone to nuclear. In fact, it might have gone to nuclear in the next round, but we stopped it, and I'd like to commend the leaders of both countries, Pakistan and India." The issue stands as a bone of contention between the US and India, as on Friday, Aide to Russian President Vladimir Putin, Yury Ushakov , endorsed US President Donald Trump's claim of having brokered a cessation of hostilities between India and Pakistan. Ushakov said that the India-Pakistan conflict was resolved with 'personal' involvement of US President Donald Trump, as was discussed in a telephonic conversation between Trump and Russian President Vladimir Putin. Live Events "The Middle East was discussed, as well as the armed conflict between India and Pakistan, which has been halted with the personal involvement of President Trump," he said. Earlier, All-Party Delegation Leader and Congress MP Shashi Tharoor said that the delegation, during their meeting with US Vice President JD Vance , cleared the air around US President Donald Trump's claim of mediating between the India-Pakistan crisis. "The meeting with Vice President Vance was outstanding, very good, very clear. I think we made our position amply clear on this question of mediation, and Vice President Vance fully understood our points," he said. US President Donald Trump has repeatedly claimed credit for stopping hostilities between India and Pakistan after New Delhi's effective response to Islamabad's aggression following precision strikes on terror infrastructure. India had conducted Operation Sindoor early on May 7 and hit terror infrastructure in Pakistan and PoJK in response to the Pahalgam terror attack . India effectively responded to subsequent Pakistan aggression and pounded its airbases. India and Pakistan agreed to stop military action following a call made by Pakistan's DGMO to his Indian counterpart.
New Indian Express
an hour ago
- New Indian Express
The 911 presidency: Trump flexes emergency powers in his second term
WASHINGTON: Call it the 911 presidency. Despite insisting that the United States is rebounding from calamity under his watch, President Donald Trump is harnessing emergency powers unlike any of his predecessors. Whether it's leveling punishing tariffs, deploying troops to the border or sidelining environmental regulations, Trump has relied on rules and laws intended only for use in extraordinary circumstances like war and invasion. An analysis by The Associated Press shows that 30 of Trump's 150 executive orders have cited some kind of emergency power or authority, a rate that far outpaces his recent predecessors. The result is a redefinition of how presidents can wield power. Instead of responding to an unforeseen crisis, Trump is using emergency powers to supplant Congress' authority and advance his agenda. "What's notable about Trump is the enormous scale and extent, which is greater than under any modern president," said Ilya Somin, who is representing five U.S. businesses who sued the administration, claiming they were harmed by Trump's so-called "Liberation Day" tariffs. Because Congress has the power to set trade policy under the Constitution, the businesses convinced a federal trade court that Trump overstepped his authority by claiming an economic emergency to impose the tariffs. An appeals court has paused that ruling while the judges review it.
