
Dems propose eliminating personal income taxes for certain working families
Mar. 14—SANTA FE — Democrats are proposing eliminating all personal income taxes for working-class households making $70,000 or less a year, a cost that would be offset by a new oil surtax.
The earned income tax credit proposal unveiled this week passed the House Taxation and Revenue Committee 7-5 along party lines Friday. Republicans dubbed it another effort to harm the oil and gas industry.
The proposal comes as New Mexico has seen a booming budget and surplus. But it is uncertain if actions by the Trump administration will result in the loss of federal dollars the state is heavily reliant upon.
The tax package also takes into consideration the increasing likelihood of a recession and high inflation rates, according to bill sponsors.
"We don't know how unaffordable life will become over the next few years," said House Speaker Javier Martínez, D-Albuquerque, a sponsor of the tax package.
House Bill 14 would expand the state's working families tax credit currently available for low- and middle-income households. An additional 100,000 New Mexicans would get the tax break if the Legislature also approves a new 0.28% severance and sale surtax on oil when prices per barrel are at or above $55, which they are today.
Tax credits would be available for workers making up to $82,400 annually, though the credits may not fully offset personal income taxes in all situations.
The state would lose out in fiscal year 2026 on about $72 million from the loss of personal income tax revenue, but that would be compensated with the roughly $130 million generated from the new oil surtax.
"Revenues raised by these provisions are used to help New Mexicans in the middle and working classes," said bill sponsor Rep. Derrick Lente, D-Sandia Pueblo.
The tax package would also slightly adjust emergency school tax rates — money that goes to the state's general fund. Gas tax rates would decrease from 4% to 3.9%, resulting in an $11.4 million loss of revenue. Oil tax rates would remain at 3.15%.
Current tax incentives offered for wells producing small amounts, known as stripper wells, would remain in place.
"New Mexico has an absolute right to negotiate what is equal and fair for our citizens and provide those opportunities," Lente said.
'A much more modest approach'
The tax package is a combination of 16 previously tabled bills, Lente explained. He described it as a calculated approach that doesn't go all-out on spending.
"We've taken a much more modest approach," he said.
In a round-about way, the package eliminates personal income taxes for many working families. That's because it would offer tax credits in increasing amounts depending on how much taxpayers make, their marital status and if they have children.
It would also make New Mexico's working-class tax incentives more independent of the federal government.
Eligibility for the state's working families tax credit is currently based on the federal earned income tax credit, but HB14 would allow the New Mexico Taxation and Revenue Department to directly adjust income thresholds based on inflation.
"The bill decouples New Mexico from the federal earned income tax credit, allowing us to tailor this program for the benefit of New Mexicans as we study the impacts of this program over the next several years," Lente said.
Taxing NM's big revenue source
Rep. Rod Montoya, R-Farmington, said he's always loved the working-class income tax credit. But "this year of all years does not justify raising taxes on the industry that pays for approximately half of our budget," he said.
Surging oil production in recent years has resulted in hundreds of millions of dollars more for the state, accounting for upward of a third of the currently proposed $10.8 billion budget.
But decreasing oil prices have raised red flags for Republicans, prompting Rep. Jonathan Allen Henry, R-Artesia, to call the state of the industry unstable.
The price of WTI (West Texas Intermediate) crude oil was $67 a barrel Friday, a drop of approximately $9 since the start of the session.
Henry said it's a sign to be cautious.
Oil and gas producers speaking against the bill during public comment, including the Independent Petroleum Association of New Mexico and the New Mexico Oil and Gas Association, voiced similar sentiments.
Bridget Dixson, president and CEO of the Santa Fe Chamber of Commerce, added that the tax package only worsens the state's dependence on the volatile oil and gas industry, which Lente rebutted.
"Our oil and gas industry is dependent on global dynamics, and not necessarily a small increase in this equalization," he said. "So when we talk about tariffs being waged and a federal administration waging certain wars with certain individuals, this is far more of a reach than a modest attempt to equalize New Mexico's tax rates."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Politico
16 minutes ago
- Politico
Bondi says violent LA protesters will face federal charges
At least nine people are facing federal charges for their involvement in protests against immigration enforcement in Los Angeles, Attorney General Pam Bondi said Monday. Demonstrators face charges for attacking police with Molotov cocktails, looting and spitting on law enforcement, Bondi said in a TV interview. 'We are going to prosecute them federally,' she said in an interview on Fox News. 'If California won't protect their law enforcement, we will protect the LAPD and the sheriff's office out there.' Sporadic but at times raucous protests broke out in several parts of the Los Angeles area in recent days, prompting President Donald Trump to deploy National Guard troops and Marines despite the fact that Gov. Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Karen Bass said the additional forces were not needed. Bondi said the Trump administration planned to take a hard line against demonstrators. 'You spit on a federal law enforcement officer no more,' she said. 'As President Trump said, you spit. we hit. Get ready. If you spit on a federal law enforcement officer, we are going to charge you with a crime federally. You are looking at up to five years maximum in prison.' Those charged already include David Huerta, president of the Service Employees International Union California, who was injured and arrested while protesting the arrest of workers in downtown Los Angeles. He was released Monday from federal custody on a $50,000 bond. The Trump administration's decisive treatment of demonstrators — and the president's focus on punishing those who assault police officers — stands in contrast to his sweeping pardons for roughly 1,500 people who stormed the Capitol on Jan. 6, 2021, seeking to overturn the election. Trump has deployed up to 4,000 soldiers from the California National Guard to help quell the demonstrations over the protests of Newsom and Bass — who say the moves are worsening tensions. The state has sued to reverse the deployments. The White House also ordered 700 Marines to join the National Guard, though it's unclear exactly what role they will play. The San Francisco Chronicle reported on Monday evening that Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem had asked Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth to direct military forces to arrest 'lawbreakers.' DHS did not immediately respond to request for comment from POLITICO, and the Department of Defense declined to comment on the story. 'You can run, you can't hide,' Bondi told Fox. 'We are coming after you federally. If you assault a police officer, if you rob a store, if you loot, if you spit on a police officer, we are coming after you.'

Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Sending money to family in foreign countries may be taxed more
Jun. 9—Families hoping to send money to loved ones in other countries may be hit with additional fees from a tax and spending bill proposed by the Trump administration that would slap a 3.5% tax on remittances sent by anyone who is not a U.S. citizen. The "One Big Beautiful Bill Act" passed through the House in May and is now being debated by the Senate. The budget bill has several proposed tax changes, which include taxing money sent from an estimated 40 million non-US citizens — including green card holders, temporary workers and undocumented immigrants — to family and friends in other countries. The bill had a 5% tax but was reduced to 3.5%. The bill is another way the Trump administration is hoping to dissuade immigrants, both documented and undocumented, from coming into the country and moving money out of the U.S. economy. Republicans believe the bill would increase the average take-home pay of U.S. citizens, while Democrats believe the bill and increased taxes are "a transfer of wealth from the working class to the rich," said Daniel Garcia, spokesperson for the Democratic Party of New Mexico. What is a remittance? Remittances refer to sending money from one person to another and is typically done between family members from one country to another. A person living and working in the U.S. would send money to family members typically living in a developing country, where this money is a source of income that contributes to the country's gross domestic product (GDP). Payments are typically sent using an electronic payment service or a money transfer app. Banks, credit unions and money transfer services charge a fee for processing remittances, and fees average 10%, according to the International Monetary Fund. Cryptocurrency exchanges are not as heavily regulated and can be a way to avoid additional taxes and surcharges. "Taxing remittances would amount to a form of double taxation, since migrants already pay taxes in the country where they work," Esteban Moctezuma Barragán, Mexican Ambassador, wrote in a statement. "Imposing a tax on these transfers would disproportionately affect those with the least, without accounting for their ability to pay," Barragán added. However, some believe the 3.5% tax fee would give financial support to public services and is the most "pro-worker, pro-family and pro-American legislation we've seen in decades," said Amy Barela, chairwoman of the Republican Party of New Mexico. "Let's be clear, this measure is not about targeting individuals," she wrote in a statement to the Journal. "It's about ensuring the 3.5% fee, although modest, would also have a very meaningful impact in helping offset costs associated with public services, border security, and community infrastructure — relieving some of the financial pressure on hardworking New Mexicans who continue to bear the burden of an imbalanced system." Crucial source of revenue Mexico is the second-largest receiver of personally wired money behind India, according to the Center for Strategic and International Studies. In 2024, Latin America received $160.9 billion, with the U.S. accounting for 96.6% of all remittances to Mexico. They also make up 20-30% of GDP in countries like El Salvador, Guatemala, Haiti and Honduras. "Remittance is a very important source of revenue in our government," said Patricia Pinzón, consul of Mexico. "This would affect Mexican families and the economy in general, but I would say the basic needs of Mexican families is the most worrying thing." However, "whatever happens in one economy will affect the other," said Pinzón. "Our economies are so interrelated that everything that happens here has a consequence in Mexico," she said. "Mexicans will not stop sending money; they'll just look for alternative ways to send it." Mexican migrant workers sent 16.7% of their labor income back to their families, and more than 80% of the income remains in the U.S. economy. The average amount of remittance sent to Mexico is roughly $350 every one to two months, which "could seem like nothing for the U.S., but it's money that a whole family lives on and covers their basics in Mexico," Pinzón said.
Yahoo
22 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Smithsonian rejects Trump's attempt to fire National Portrait Gallery director
The Smithsonian Institution asserted its independence Monday evening in a statement that could be read as a rejection of President Trump's late-May firing of National Portrait Gallery Director Kim Sajet. The Smithsonian's statement said the organization's secretary, Lonnie G. Bunch, "has the support of the Board of Regents in his authority and management of the Smithsonian." The statement suggested that all personnel decisions will be made by Bunch, not Trump. The announcement came after a much-anticipated Board of Regents meeting to discuss the fate of Sajet. The Washington Post had reported that Sajet quietly continued to show up for work each day after Trump's social media post, which said he was firing Sajet for being 'a highly partisan person, and a strong supporter of DEI.' The Smithsonian's statement Monday did not explicitly state that Sajet would remain in her position, and the institution did not respond to a Times question on that subject. But the text of the statement is clear in its intent, beginning: "In 1846, the Smithsonian was established by Congress as an independent entity." It continues: "Throughout its history, the Smithsonian has been governed and administered by a Board of Regents and a Secretary. The board is entrusted with the governance and independence of the Institution, and the board appoints a Secretary to manage the Institution." The Smithsonian's move comes shortly after the White House proposed a 12% reduction in funding to the Smithsonian in the 2026 budget — including the elimination of funding for the National Museum of the American Latino, which is in the development stages and aims to open on or near the National Mall; and the Anacostia Community Museum, which opened in 1967 and honors Black culture. The Smithsonian became a target for Trump beginning March 27, when he issued an executive order titled "Restoring truth and sanity to American history." That order demanded an end to federal funding for exhibitions and programs based on racial themes that 'divide Americans.' "Once widely respected as a symbol of American excellence and a global icon of cultural achievement, the Smithsonian Institution has, in recent years, come under the influence of a divisive, race-centered ideology," the order read. It also instructed Vice President JD Vance to remove 'improper ideology' from the Smithsonian's 21 museums and the National Zoo in Washington. The order followed Trump's ongoing attempts to reshape federal cultural institutions, including his February takeover of the Kennedy Center. One major difference between the Kennedy Center and the Smithsonian: The Kennedy Center's board is appointed by the president, but the Smithsonian's board consists of officials representing all three branches of government. Vance is on the Smithsonian's Board of Regents, as is Chief Justice John G. Roberts. "Since its inception, the Smithsonian has set out to be a nonpartisan institution," the statement Monday read. "As the nation's museum, the Smithsonian must be a welcoming place of knowledge and discovery for all Americans. The Board of Regents is committed to ensuring that the Smithsonian is a beacon of scholarship free from political or partisan influence, and we recognize that our institution can and must do more to further these foundational values. "To reinforce our nonpartisan stature, the Board of Regents has directed the Secretary to articulate specific expectations to museum directors and staff regarding content in Smithsonian museums, give directors reasonable time to make any needed changes to ensure unbiased content, and to report back to the Board on progress and any needed personnel changes based on success or lack thereof in making the needed changes." Get notified when the biggest stories in Hollywood, culture and entertainment go live. Sign up for L.A. Times entertainment alerts. This story originally appeared in Los Angeles Times.