logo
Australia's red wine glut set to worsen after increase in national grape crush

Australia's red wine glut set to worsen after increase in national grape crush

The Australian wine industry has been warned that the ongoing red wine glut could worsen.
A recent global downturn in wine drinking, particularly reds, has leading to a global oversupply and years of low prices for some wine grape growers.
Compounding the issue, Australia's wine grape crush increased overall this year, although it was still the third-smallest crush in more than a decade, according to Wine Australia's 2025 National Vintage Report.
Winemakers have been warned not to expect grape prices or demand to improve.
Wine Australia market insights manager Peter Bailey said the significant increase in red varieties was problematic and could exacerbate the industry's challenges.
"The increase in the red crush this year is not going to help that situation.
"Conditions are not likely to improve for red grapes until there is a significant reduction in the supply base."
The 2025 Australian wine grape crush was estimated at 1.57 million tonnes — worth an estimated $1.13 billion.
It represents an 11 per cent increase in volume on last year, but is still below the 10-year average of 1.71 million tonnes.
Chardonnay saw the biggest drop in volume — down nationally about 13 per cent — with seasonal issues playing more of a role than supply and demand.
Shiraz recorded one of the largest increases, up 23 per cent on the previous year.
Mr Bailey said that was at odds with consumer demand.
"There hasn't really been a strong increase in demand for shiraz in the market, so I can only imagine that the increase was really due to wineries taking in some of that fruit that was available," he said.
"The other point to make around some of those red varieties, is that the average price paid for the grapes is still very low and probably not economically sustainable for many of those grape growers.
"For example, with the Riverland shiraz, the crush itself was up 21 per cent on 2024 and the price was up 2 per cent, but at $204 per tonne is still exceptionally low and probably not economically viable for many of those growers."
Mr Bailey said the industry was working towards balancing supply and demand, but there was more to be done.
"This is the third vintage in a row that is below that 10-year average, so I think … the industry is starting to work together in bringing supply and demand back to more balance," he said.
"But the wine sector needs to continue to work together to get that balance, that profitable price point for growers and winemakers."
South Australia was once again the largest wine-grape-producing state, accounting for 48 per cent of the national crush.
Adelaide Hills grape grower and winemaker Peter Leske said he was surprised the nation had crushed more fruit than last year, given the global issue of oversupply.
"What we can't ignore is that, if and when people can't sell their fruit, or can't sell their fruit at a margin … the bad news of a smaller vintage is that [it] comes at a cost of individual growers' livelihoods," he said.
However, Mr Leske was very pleased with the quality produced.
"2025 was certainly a cracker in terms of quality in South Australia," he said.
"If we have to have too much very, very good wine in our cellars, it's better than too much poor wine."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Banked $10,000 30 years ago instead of buying shares? You've cost yourself $180,000
Banked $10,000 30 years ago instead of buying shares? You've cost yourself $180,000

7NEWS

timean hour ago

  • 7NEWS

Banked $10,000 30 years ago instead of buying shares? You've cost yourself $180,000

When investor Adrian Blazic first put his money into the share market, it was a leap of faith. 'No one knows what's going to happen,' he says. 'It's not about predicting the future, it's about sticking to a strategy.' That strategy — staying invested through the ups and downs — has delivered for him. 'I'd be expecting to average 9.5 to 10 per cent per annum,' Blazic says. His story echoes the findings of Vanguard's 2025 Index Chart, released on Friday, which lays bare the extraordinary gap in returns between long-term investing and parking money in cash. According to Vanguard, a $10,000 investment in Australian shares made on July 1, 1995 would have grown to $143,786 by June 30 this year. The same amount invested in US shares would now be worth $214,332, more than $180,000 ahead of the cash equivalent and about $72,000 more than Australian shares. By contrast, a $10,000 deposit left in a savings account over the same 30-year period would have grown to just $33,677. The average annual returns since mid-1995 were: US shares: 10.8 per cent Australian shares: 9.3 per cent International shares (ex-Australia): 8.3 per cent Australian listed property: 8 per cent Australian bonds: 5.5 per cent Cash: 4.1 per cent All figures assume income was reinvested and exclude investment acquisition costs, fees and taxes. 'Share market investors on average achieved at least triple the dollar returns of individuals who chose to keep their cash tied up in savings accounts over the last 30 years,' says Daniel Shrimksi, managing director of Vanguard Australia. The three-decade period tracked by the Index Chart includes some of the most severe market events in modern history, including the dot com crash in 2000, the September 11 terrorist attacks, the Global Financial Crisis in 2008–09, the COVID-19 plunge in 2020, and more recent volatility driven by high US tariffs on some countries. Each event triggered steep declines. September 11 sent global stocks tumbling. The GFC wiped trillions from markets. COVID sparked a 34 per cent crash. Yet every time, markets recovered. 'The index chart demonstrates how investment markets have kept rising strongly over time despite several significant share market corrections, economic downturns, changes in governments and world leaders, wars, natural disasters, and the impacts stemming from the COVID-19 pandemic,' added Shrimksi. He argues investing should be approached like a long-distance race. 'Just like superannuation, investors should be focused on achieving longer-term outcomes rather than on shorter-term wins and losses,' he said. 'The most successful investors have a disciplined approach and understand that volatility is typically transient. The best investment results are generally achieved through compound growth over time, not by trying to time when to buy and sell, that's a futile exercise.' Scott Phillips from The Motley Fool says volatility can rattle even experienced investors. 'It can look really volatile, and sometimes it is,' he says. Vanguard's data shows why chasing last year's winners can be risky. Asset class rankings often change dramatically from one year to the next. 'The best and worst performing asset classes in any one financial year rarely mirrors the returns of the previous financial year for a whole range of reasons,' Shrimksi says. 'That's why it's so important to have a diversified mix of investments across asset classes and regions. While shares have delivered the strongest returns over the longer term, there have been years when more defensive assets such as bonds, and even cash, have achieved the best returns.' For Blazic, the takeaway from decades of data and lived experience is simple: 'With investing, it's certainly a long-term game.' The advice from the experts is just as straightforward: save consistently, invest regularly, build wealth slowly over time and avoid get rich quick schemes.

Gen Z only cares about one thing now
Gen Z only cares about one thing now

News.com.au

time2 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Gen Z only cares about one thing now

Rising rents, grocery prices that climb by the week, and staggering bills – Gen Z is growing up in the middle of Australia's cost-of-living crisis, and they're feeling the crunch. It turns out the most fashionable thing a brand can be in 2025 is affordable – and those that can't deliver value for money are losing ground fast. For Aussies like Bella Herlihy, 19, and Rayyan Hodges, 21, every purchase is a decision. Ms Herlihy works full-time while studying for her Certificate III in childcare, but her real dream is landing an apprenticeship at a beauty brand. Due to the cost-of-living crisis, Ms Herlihy lives in her mother's four-bedroom home with seven other family members. 'We had to turn the second loungeroom into a bedroom. It's too expensive, so they need to save their money,' she told On $16 an hour, Ms Herlihy earns around $1000 a fortnight. Once the rent, bills and groceries are paid, she's left with $50 to $100 for anything else. 'It goes so fast after rent and bills. Even if I want a snack I have to think about whether I can afford it,' she said. 'I don't splurge – I have to make sure what's left goes to the right places.' And, that's the big takeaway from this year's Top 100 Youth Brands report by YouthInsight and Student Edge, which asked 1000 Aussies aged 14 to 24 to name and shame the brands they love and hate. Aldi has officially taken the crown as the favourite supermarket of young Aussies, sending Woolworths down into sixth place, and Coles to eighth. 'We want cheaper prices,' Ms Herlihy said. 'Big brands need to understand the cost-of-living more and factor it in. It would be nice if they made a video or ran a campaign where they were open about the struggle. I want to know how they plan to help Gen Z.' Kmart has reclaimed its retail crown with budget-friendly homewares and essentials, while KFC has overtaken McDonald's as the demographic's fast food of choice. In fashion, budget-friendly Uniqlo has overtaken Cotton On, reflecting a growing preference for quality basics over trend-driven fast fashion. Social media habits are shifting too. Instagram still holds the crown but TikTok, Snapchat and Facebook are slipping. Brands like Pinterest and Uber are on the rise, and Duolingo and UberEats have muscled into the top ten. At the very top of favourite brands sits YouTube, loved by nine out of ten young Aussies. And what's not to love? It's free, versatile and just as useful for study hacks as it is for late-night entertainment. Bella says some brands are overrated – Woolworths and high-end beauty label Drunk Elephant among them – because they simply don't offer the value she's looking for. And with just a small portion of her income left for 'extras' each fortnight, she's choosy about who gets her business. For Mr Hodges, the squeeze of cost-of-living feels permanent. 'It feels like we've been locked out of the Australian dream,' he said. Since finishing his diploma and Certificate III and IV in cybersecurity and IT, he hasn't been able to land a job in his field. 'It's overcrowded,' he said. 'I've been looking everywhere.' In the meantime, he lives with his parents and has no plans to move out anytime soon. 'Not in this economy,' he laughed. He's constantly hunting for discounts and cheaper rates. His favourite store is JB Hi-Fi, but he also rates Officeworks for its regular sales. Still, he's selective: 'Even if it's cheap, it's not worth it if the company doesn't have good ethics.' Woolworths and Coles, he said, are 'price gouging', while Aldi's prices are decent but lack variety. He prefers to shop at his local IGA to support small businesses. Both Ms Herlihy and Mr Hodge's habits reflect the bigger sacrifices that Gen Z are having to make in order to enjoy what should be 'the best years of their lives'. Student Edge co-founder Damien Langley said these results 'reflect the times we're in'. 'Economic pressures have made affordability a higher priority for many young people and because of that brands like KFC and Aldi have overtaken their main rivals by helping young people through these difficult high cost-of-living times,' Mr Langley said. 'Australian success stories include Kmart which has emerged as the favourite Australian brand of Gen Zs as it helps them get new clothes and furnish their rentals without breaking the bank.' Gen Z's priorities are clear: they want brands that show they understand the squeeze, deliver real value, and maybe even admit they know it's hard out here.

Developers push for new city at North Arm Cove north of Sydney
Developers push for new city at North Arm Cove north of Sydney

News.com.au

time4 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Developers push for new city at North Arm Cove north of Sydney

Like some Mayan mystery, a fully designed city lies hidden in the Australian bushland just two hours north of Sydney and it could soon become the country's newest settlement. Located in present-day North Arm Cove, just north of Newcastle in the Hunter Valley, the city includes a complex web of housing lots with plans for train and port terminals and administrative buildings. For years, it lay dormant as a 'paper subdivision', meaning it has been legally divided into lots but has never been physically developed with roads or power infrastructure. But that is now changing and a recent rezoning decision means the lost city could soon rise up out of the bush. 'It's going to be developed, it's just a question of how,' Desim Arch architect Dejan Simovic told NewsWire this week. 'It's part of the northern suburbs of Newcastle, so sooner or later … it's definitely going to be developed.' Mr Simovic and his wife Tatjana Djuric-Simovic are pushing for 'sustainable' development at North Arm Cove and hope to fulfil a vision for the city outlined by legendary Canberra architect Walter Burley Griffin a century ago. Mr Griffin sketched out the city, which he called Port Stephens City, on 'garden city' principles, typified by expanding concentric rings of development all connected via train. 'You can see that really clearly in the Port Stephens city design,' urban planning guru Sam Austin told NewsWire. 'It has a very central rail terminal and then you can see a concentric circle design that extends out of it.' The Simovics worry about 'western Sydney' style development engulfing the area and propose instead a 'circular economy' city that is self-reliant at a local level. 'It will be local, precinct based,' Mr Simovic said. 'We're going to have our own treatment plant for water and then generating electricity and data and for the roads. 'It's all based on a circular economy, all based on locals using and reusing water and power and recycling the waste. 'That's the basic principle. We would like to be the first circular city or town in Australia.' There are powerful reasons, however, why the city has remained bushland scrub for decades. The area sits within the Mid-Coast Council local government area and the council has long argued development at North Arm Cove would be 'prohibitively expensive' given the lack of any road, power or drainage infrastructure. The council pushed for the area to be rezoned to 'environmental management', which would have stopped any development. But in 2024, the state government instructed the council to rezone it into 'environmental living', which has cracked open the door to new building. 'Council has always rejected the notion they could rezone this land because there are too many constraints and the cost was too high,' North Arm Cove Ratepayers Association president David Buxton told NewsWire. 'But all of that seems to have changed in the past five years, for a number of things.' Mr Buxton said NSW's sharpening housing shortages had in part prompted the state government's rezoning push. The new local environment plan is expected to come into effect later this year. There are about 4000 lots at North Arm Cove, with about 1000 of them owned by the council. There were now 'two entities' eager to build out the area, Mr Buxton added. Those are Desim and a property developer called Alathan. Alathan has lodged a 'scoping proposal' with the council outlining how the company sees the future of the area. 'They (Alathan) are going down the investigative path, they are getting feedback,' Mr Buxton said. 'In my way of thinking, they are committed, they are willing to spend the money, as long as they don't get ridiculous hurdles put in front of them.' The next phase is a development control plan, which is a detailed document that outlines building dimensions, form and scale. Mr Buxton estimates the cost to produce a plan to be in the range of $5m to $10m. Mr Simovic said he would apply for federal government grant funding to finance his DEP. Building out infrastructure for the new city would likely cost north of $1bn, Mr Simovic said. 'We already have interest from infrastructure companies to fund doing the infrastructure and then later managing it and repayments through loans and other things,' Mr Simovic said. 'We have all of that structure set up, the question now is just who is going to fund preparation plans. 'That's where we expect support from the government, just to get the grant from the federal government.' But there are huge challenges in getting the city up. Aside from the cost of the infrastructure build-out, any development plan needs majority approval from landholders. Mr Austin, meanwhile, has expressed caution about building brand new cities. 'I much prefer to see urban consolidation or development around existing settlements, particularly given there is very strong ecological value in that area,' he said. 'I do have some reservations on broad scale development in essentially pristine bushland, which is what it is.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store