DOGE fired me. I'll be fine, but America is in trouble.
Since leaving my home state of Indiana in 2003, my professional life had orbited USAID: My first real job was for a USAID contractor, and then I worked with a series of organizations that received USAID funding — in India, Haiti, Niger, and the U.S. Despite this, I had never seriously considered joining the agency, preferring to work on the programs that USAID funded and perhaps restrained by a faint bias: Weren't government employees disengaged and uninspired, working for a paycheck and little else?
Opinion: What Trump gets right, and wrong, in cutting U.S. security costs abroad
My colleagues in USAID's Bureau for Humanitarian Assistance quickly put the lie to such prejudices. They were passionate, tireless professionals strenuously committed to the bureau's mission of saving lives and reducing the suffering of the world's most vulnerable people.
I saw them hop on planes with less than 24 hours' notice to respond to disasters in Turkey, Pakistan and Haiti; spoke to them after they spent nights in the basement of a Kyiv hotel while Russian drones attacked outside; and silently cheered as they prepared our top diplomats to try to stop a famine in Sudan.
In short, they were an inspiration. And, believe it or not, they're no exception. Across the government, federal employees are driven by a belief in the importance of public service, toil long hours to advance their missions and bring specialized skills and knowledge that can't easily be replaced.
But these workers — my colleagues at USAID and more than 2 million other federal employees around the country — are under attack.
Elon Musk's dubiously deployed Department of Government Efficiency is remarkable for the speed, cruelty and, above all, the thoughtlessness of its unleashing. Under the guise of rooting out corruption, fraud, and inefficiency, Musk and clan have laid waste to an increasing range of government functions and agencies — USAID for one, but also the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and the Department of Education.
The Social Security Administration and Department of Veterans Affairs are reportedly next in the crosshairs. This is not a rightsizing or reimagining of government based on reasoned analysis in pursuit of clear objectives; rather, it is a slapdash yet deliberate effort to cripple the federal bureaucracy through truly unilateral cuts, thereby consolidating power in the executive branch.
But why should this matter to Hoosiers who live far from Washington, D.C., most of whom no doubt would love to see a leaner, more effective government? First, this is only the beginning of Musk's and DOGE's campaign. The U.S. government is the world's largest purchaser of goods and services, and its grants to state and local governments and service providers invisibly underpin much of the world we take granted.
Even cuts made with clear justification and foresight have unintended effects. DOGE's frenetic slashing will have significant human and economic consequences in the state, some predictable and some not.
Second, our professional, apolitical civil service — the competent, dedicated people I described above — is one of the best things this country has going for it. All civil servants, including the 48,000 who make Indiana home, deserve humane treatment and a fair shake, a fair assessment of our value and contributions to the welfare of this great nation.
A capriciously diminished federal workforce will inevitably result in a less safe, less prosperous, and less strong America.
Musk and DOGE must be stopped before the worst comes to pass. It's too late for me — I was terminated Feb. 24, with the non-explanation that it was 'in the best interest of the U.S. government.' My wife lost her job with USAID, as well.
In the long run, our family of five will be fine — we have savings and strong support systems. I wish I could feel as hopeful about the future of our country and my home state. We must make our voices heard while there are things still left to save.
Peter Gaff is a former federal employee who lives in Washington, D.C. He grew up in LaPorte County.
This article originally appeared on Indianapolis Star: I worked for USAID. What I saw inspired me. | Opinion
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
11 minutes ago
- New York Post
Comey's ex-media whisperer can't remember if he leaked classified info to shape Russiagate narrative
A 'close friend' of former FBI Director James Comey, who served as his de facto media whisperer to help shape media narratives during Russiagate, said he couldn't be completely sure he didn't leak classified intelligence to the press, new documents show. Daniel Richman, who is now a Columbia University law professor, fessed up to repeatedly talking to journalists, seeking 'to correct stories critical of Comey, the FBI and to shape future press coverage,' he told the FBI in 2019. Richman, who became friends with Comey during their time working together in the Southern District of New York, admitted to speaking with New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt, in particular. Advertisement At one point in early 2017, Richman had a discussion with Schmidt, who mentioned unspecified classified information and 'knew more about it than he did,' an FBI memo obtained by The Post said. 'Richman was pretty sure he did not confirm the Classified Information. However, Richman told the interviewing agents he was sure 'with a discount' that he did not tell Schmidt about the Classified Information. Richman did not know who gave Schmidt the Classified Information.' 4 Daniel Richman cautiously downplayed concerns that he may have confirmed classified intelligence to a NYT reporter. Bloomberg via Getty Images Advertisement 4 The tranche of FBI documents reveals how James Comey's allies quietly worked to shape media narratives during Russiagate. Getty Images While the memo, first reported by Just the News, didn't specify the classified information discussed, it previously said Comey mentioned to Richman that the bureau had 'weird classified material related' to then-US Attorney General Lorretta Lynch. Lynch infamously met with Bill Clinton on the tarmac in 2016, just over a week before Comey announced he wasn't recommending charges against Hillary Clinton. 'Richman understood the information could be used to suggest Lynch might not be impartial with regards of the conclusion of the Midyear Exam investigation,' the FBI memo said before describing Richman's talk with Schmidt. Advertisement 'Richman understood the information about Lynch was highly classified and it should be protected.' The FBI memo in question comes from the bureau's 'Arctic Haze' investigation, a probe into the leaking of classified information that began in August 2017 in response to the 'unauthorized disclosure of classified information in eight articles published between April and June 2017.' Arctic Haze dealt with four of those stories specifically. The FBI memos on Arctic Haze were among the tranche of documents Director Kash Patel's team delivered to Congress earlier this week. One of Schmidt's articles cited by the FBI in its Arctic Haze probe was a piece that pointed to the existence of a document that seemed to 'raise questions about her [Lynch's] independence.' Advertisement That document, which was reportedly obtained in the aftermath of Russian hacking, revealed that a Democratic operative was remarkably confident Lynch wouldn't let the probe into Hillary Clinton go too far. The FBI files did not make it clear whether the document regarding Lynch was the classified information discussed between Richman and Schmidt referenced during his questioning. Schmidt had used Richman as a source for stories since at least 2008 and even visited his house on multiple occasions, the memo said. Richman was quoted in some stories during the height of Russiagate, but the FBI memo made clear he fed even more information to reporters anonymously. 4 President Trump's team has begun unearthing key Russiagate documents to share with the public. Notably, Schmidt, who is married to MSNBC anchor Nicolle Wallace, broke the story that Comey claimed President Trump directed him to quash a probe into Michael Flynn over his lobbying deal with Turkey. That story, coupled with Trump's May 9, 2017, firing of Comey, led to the Justice Department appointing former special counsel Robert Mueller to investigate allegations of Russian collusion and whether the president obstructed justice. Richman is known to have leaked Comey's memos on his behalf about Trump's alleged instructions on the Flynn investigation. Comey later admitted he hoped that leak 'might prompt the appointment of a special counsel.' Former DOJ inspector general Michael Horowitz previously blasted the leak of the 'Comey Memos' in his scathing report of the FBI's Crossfire Hurricane inquiry into whether there were ties between the 2016 Trump campaign and Russia. Advertisement 4 James Comey admitted to trying to spark the Mueller probe during the first Trump administration. Getty Images In 2015, Comey pushed the FBI to hire Richman as a special government employee and give him 'a Top Secret clearance.' 'Richman opined Comey took comfort in the fact Richman had talked to the press about his feelings regarding Comey's handling and decision-making on the Midyear Exam investigation,' the FBI memo said. 'Richman claimed Comey never asked him to talk to the media.' Advertisement Ultimately, the FBI ended its leak investigation in September 2021, and the DOJ declined to prosecute anyone over the sharing of classified information with reporters. The batch of files that Patel turned over to Congress this week also revealed the existence of other whimsically-named leak probes such as Riding Hood, Sirens Lure, Tropic Vortex, Foggy Falls, Echos Fate, and Genetic Christmas.
USA Today
11 minutes ago
- USA Today
Trump-Putin summit spotlights Alaska's strategic importance, vulnerability
Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson is a prime midway rest stop for dignitaries on the route from Washington to eastern Asia. WASHINGTON − The summit meeting between President Donald Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin will focus on ending Putin's war in Ukraine, with Alaska's awesome beauty and vulnerabilities as its backdrop. The two world leaders will meet at Joint Base Elmendorf-Richardson, the post that crowns Anchorage to its south. It's an installation that teems with airmen and soldiers − plenty of moose and bears, too, befitting its location on the edge of Alaska's vast stretches of black spruce-fringed wilderness. Cold, dark and snowy in the winter, the base gets near round-the-clock sun at summer's peak. It's a prime midway rest stop for dignitaries, like presidents and cabinet secretaries, on the route from Washington to eastern Asia. The flight from the East Coast to the southern coast of Alaska takes roughly eight hours, about the limit for air crews before mandated rest, and a convenient, secure location to refuel. Long before air travel and a superpower summit, U.S. and Russian leaders haggled over Alaska. In 1867, Secretary of State William Seward secretly negotiated with Russian officials to buy the territory of Alaska for $7.2 million. Derided at the time as Seward's Folly, the deal worked out for the Americans. Alaska – its people, awesome landscape and enormous natural resources – joined the union in 1959. Before statehood, the Army established the base that would become Elmendorf-Richardson in 1940 during the runup to World War II. Since then, soldiers and airmen along with smaller contingents from the Navy and Marine Corps have called the base home. In all, the joint base hosts about 30,000 service members, their family members and civilian employees. Its key location – near Russia and close to Arctic resources eyed by China – has made Elmendorf-Richardson and other Alaskan military installations increasingly valuable to the Pentagon. More personnel and money have been streaming into Alaska in recent years to bolster northern defenses. The base takes part in some of the military's most intricate annual war games, featuring sophisticated weapons like the F-22 fighter. Alaska is the land of superlatives. The state is more than twice the size of Texas; its 46,000 miles of shoreline are more than the lower 48 states combined; Denali's snow-capped peak towers over the interior at more than 20,000 feet. Brown and black bears, moose and wolves, roam tundra and black spruce forests. Temperatures routinely drop to 50 degrees below zero in the interior, where Fort Wainwright sits on the edge of Fairbanks. Dim sunlight smudges skies for only a few hours in the depth of winter. Cabin fever can be very real. In the summer, it truly is the Land of the Midnight Sun. Perpetual daylight has its downside, disrupting sleep, leading to irritability – and worse. Alaska routinely ranks among the nation's leaders in alcohol abuse and suicide. In recent years, Alaska's strategic, remote location has exposed its vulnerabilities. Suicide among soldiers spiked to alarming levels. Reporting by USA TODAY revealed a shortage of mental personnel to help them. The Army and Congress intervened, dispatching dozens of counselors and spending millions to improve living conditions for troops there. Suicide rates declined. Efforts by Chinese spies to gain access to Alaskan bases hasn't, however, USA TODAY has reported. The bases contain some of the military's top-end weaponry, sophisticated radars to track potential attacks on the homeland and missiles to intercept them. Russia, too, regularly probes America's northern flank. As recently as July, 22 the North American Aerospace Defense Command detected Russian warplanes operating in the Alaskan Air Defense Identification Zone. When aircraft enter the zone, they must be identified for national security purposes. The Russian planes remained in international airspace, a tactic they employ regularly. Mildly provocative, the flights are noted by NORAD but not considered a threat. Meanwhile, global warming has thawed permafrost beneath runways and rising water levels have damaged coastal facilities requiring remediation costing tens of millions of dollars. A skeptic of climate change, Trump could view for himself its effects, including cemeteries eroded by rising sea levels disgorging coffins of flu and smallpox victims from more than a century ago. The potential release of ancient pathogens from melting permafrost has captured the Pentagon's attention, too. Alas, Alaska may have been Putin's last, best choice for a summit. His brutal, unprovoked invasion of neighboring Ukraine has made him an international pariah. Denied entry into Europe, he and Trump could not repeat their summit in Helsinki, the capital of Finland that is now a member of NATO − due mainly to the invasion. Luckily for Putin and Trump, Anchorage is a delightful city, cool in midsummer and far from the death and destruction Putin he has wrought in Ukraine.
The Hill
11 minutes ago
- The Hill
Judge rejects Musk's bid to dismiss OpenAI harassment claims
A federal judge on Tuesday rejected Elon Musk's request to dismiss claims brought by OpenAI accusing the tech billionaire of engaging in a 'years-long harassment campaign' against the company. U.S. District Judge Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers ruled that OpenAI's counterclaims are 'sufficient' and can move forward as part of the lawsuit Musk brought against the ChatGPT maker last year. Musk, who helped found OpenAI in 2015, sued the artificial intelligence (AI) firm and its CEO Sam Altman last August. He accused Altman of manipulating him into supporting the non-profit by promising to focus on AI safety — a commitment Musk alleges he betrayed with OpenAI's partnership with Microsoft and push to become a for-profit company. OpenAI, in turn, filed counterclaims against Musk in April, accusing the tech billionaire of engaging in a 'relentless' campaign of attacks in the press and on his social platform X, as well as demands for corporate records and a 'sham bid' for the company's assets. 'Musk could not tolerate seeing such success for an enterprise he had abandoned and declared doomed,' the April filing reads. 'He made it his project to take down OpenAI, and to build a direct competitor that would seize the technological lead—not for humanity but for Elon Musk.' In March, the judge denied Musk's request to block OpenAI's for-profit conversion. However, Gonzalez Rogers said she was prepared to expedite the trial to the fall of 2025 'given the public interest at stake and potential for harm.' Musk and Altman have long been engaged in a feud, which flared up once again Monday when the former threatened to sue Apple for not including X or his AI chatbot Grok on the App Store's list of recommended apps. He accused Apple of making it 'impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store,' which he claimed was an 'unequivocal antitrust violation.' Altman hit back at Musk, calling it a 'remarkable claim given what I have heard alleged that Elon does to manipulate X to benefit himself and his own companies and harm his competitors and people he doesn't like.' 'I hope someone will get counter-discovery on this, I and many others would love to know what's been happening,' he added. 'But OpenAI will just stay focused on making great products.'
