Privacy bill could be sent to Attorney General for assessing RTI impact
Empower your mind, elevate your skills
India's proposed privacy bill—Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act—will be referred to the Attorney General of India R Venkataramani for an opinion on whether the much-awaited legislation violates the country's Right to Information (RTI) Act as alleged by opposition parties and members of civil society, people in the know said.The move may clear the clouds of uncertainty hovering over the legislation enacted by Parliament in August 2023, but which is not yet operational pending notification of its Rules.A draft of the proposed Rules was released for stakeholder consultation in January this year.At a meeting chaired by minister for electronics and IT, Ashwini Vaishnaw on Monday, the stalled Act, which bestows individuals with greater control over their personal data while also enabling responsible data processing practices, came up for discussion.'There are a couple of issues which need to be resolved,' a senior government official told ET.'It will be referred to the AG, but the government's view is that the DPDP Act doesn't dilute the RTI Act and amendment doesn't stop those seeking information under RTI to get access to it,' the official said.Minister Vaishnaw is expected to write to all the members of Parliament explaining the position.'Anyone accessing any information, be it about the MNREGA scheme or data about a farmer welfare scheme can do it without any issue through the RTI, " according to officials who said there are no restrictions for journalists seeking information either.There has been an outcry by the opposition, civil society over an amendment to the RTI Act's Section 8(1)(j) made through the DPDP Act, passed in 2023. It amended a section of the RTI Act, removing the earlier safeguard that allowed disclosure of personal information if it served public interest and did not amount to 'unwarranted' invasion of privacy.The amendment – allowing authorities to withhold any information containing personal details – restricts journalists, activists, lawyers, and others from accessing crucial information needed to hold governments accountable and expose corruption, members of the civil society have alleged.Officials who spoke to ET pointed out that the Rules are not being held in abeyance because of the outcry over the Act.'The Act was passed in 2023, where the RTI amendment was brought about, if there were concerns about it, they should have been raised then,' said people cited above.'The government is holding discussions about the Rules and keeping them ready while the political issue has to be resolved at the political level,' they added.The proposed legislation has also left out another provision that stated that "information which cannot be denied to the Parliament, or a state legislature shall not be denied to any person".On March 26, over 120 MPs from the INDIA bloc urged the repeal of Section 44(3) of the DPDP Act, warning that it undermines the RTI Act by removing the public interest test in Section 8(1)(j).Shortly after, in response to a letter by Congress leader Jairam Ramesh, Vaishnaw cited Section 3 of the DPDP Act and said that the RTI framework remains protected."The DPDP Act, as outlined in Section 3, provides exemptions for personal data that is 'made or caused to be made publicly available' by individuals or entities under legal obligations. This ensures transparency while maintaining the need for privacy," Vaishnaw had written in an April 10 letter to Jairam Ramesh.ET had reported on 22 March that more than 30 civil society organisations launched a campaign seeking the rollback of a provision in the Digital Personal Data Protection (DPDP) Act that amended the Right to Information (RTI) Act.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
India.com
24 minutes ago
- India.com
Inside BCCI's RTI Escape: How Indias Richest Sports Body Avoided Public Scrutiny In New Sports Bill
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has once again displayed its political and financial clout, dodging a long-looming inclusion under the Right to Information (RTI) Act. In a significant development that is already stirring debate across the sports fraternity, the Union Sports Ministry has amended the National Sports Governance Bill to exempt BCCI from being classified as a "public authority" — a title that would have opened it to public scrutiny. The earlier draft of the Sports Bill tabled in Parliament on July 23 had explicitly included all National Sports Federations (NSFs) within the scope of the RTI Act, 2005. It aimed to enforce accountability across Indian sport by mandating transparency in decision-making, team selections, fund usage, and governance. However, a key clause — 'a recognised sports organisation shall be considered a public authority under the Right to Information Act' — has now been quietly omitted. The revised version of the Bill specifies that only bodies 'receiving grants or financial assistance from the Central or State Government' will be considered public authorities under RTI, effectively sparing the BCCI, which is financially self-reliant and does not receive direct government funding. Why BCCI Was Let Off the Hook Sources within the Sports Ministry clarified that the amendment was necessary to remove legal grey areas and prevent the Bill from facing potential litigation. 'The amended clause defines public authority as an entity relying on government funds or assistance. This ensures compliance with the RTI Act,' a senior ministry official told The Indian Express. The exemption appears tailored to the BCCI's long-standing argument — that its operations are entirely independent of government subsidies, and hence it should not be forced into transparency obligations meant for publicly funded bodies. Despite this, watchdogs argue that the BCCI has enjoyed indirect government benefits such as tax exemptions, land grants, and access to public infrastructure. Olympic Push Forces BCCI's Partial Compliance While BCCI may have dodged the RTI net, it isn't walking away entirely unscathed. The amended Sports Bill still mandates that the BCCI must register as a National Sports Federation (NSF) — a pre-condition for India's ambition to include cricket in the 2036 Olympics, where India is bidding to be host. This compliance will bring new obligations: the formation of an Ethics Commission, Athletes Committee, and implementation of the Safe Sports policy, among others. Moreover, any instance of government assistance — including use of stadiums, security, or land — would open a window for scrutiny under the RTI Act, albeit limited to those specific interactions. Expert Opinions: Transparency vs Autonomy The move has reignited discussions around sports governance and accountability. Legal experts and former officials cite the Supreme Court's 2016 RM Lodha Committee recommendations and the Law Commission's 275th report in 2018, both of which endorsed the inclusion of BCCI under RTI due to its public function and historical government benefits. Critics argue that while financial independence is a valid point, the BCCI's monopolistic control over cricket in India — a sport followed by over a billion people — necessitates transparency. 'You can't be a private body when it suits you and a public institution when it benefits you,' noted a senior legal analyst.
New Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- New Indian Express
Kerala cabinet approves ordinance for permanent V-C at digital university
THIRUVANANTHAPURAM: In light of the recent court directives, the state government is all set to go for a permanent vice chancellor at the Digital University of Kerala (DUK). The cabinet on Wednesday gave nod to bring in amendments to the 2021 Digital University Act through an ordinance. Amendments will be introduced in sub-sections (3), (4) and (6) of Section 11 of the Act based on the 2018 UGC regulations and the court directives. The move comes five days after Governor Rajendra Arlekar reappointed Ciza Thomas as the university's interim V-C. The cabinet has recommended the governor to promulgate the ordinance. As part of eradicating extreme poverty in the state, the cabinet has also decided to provide relaxation of the norms to eligible people in municipal corporations and rural areas with an urban nature. The minimum area to apply for financial aid for home construction under the scheme has been reduced from 3 cents to 2 cents. If revenue land or other options are unavailable, the applicants can avail of up to `2 lakh. key decisions
Indian Express
24 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Why Mamata Banerjee allowed old lieutenant Kalyan Banerjee to quit as Chief Whip amid his feud with Mahua Moitra
Having accepted Kalyan Banerjee's resignation as the party's Chief Whip in the Lok Sabha, Trinamool Congress (TMC) chairperson and West Bengal Chief Minister Mamata Banerjee put a new leadership team in place in Parliament under her nephew and second-in-command Abhishek Banerjee. Mamata readily letting go of one of the party's old guard, while surprising to an extent, makes sense given that the TMC is months away from the West Bengal Assembly elections and needs a steady hand at the helm in Parliament, where the Opposition is looking to regroup and put forward a united front against the BJP over Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls. Given this, the feud between Kalyan, one of the CM's oldest party colleagues, and Krishnanagar MP Mahua Moitra had become a distraction for the party at such a crucial political juncture, and his inability to dial down the situation ultimately proved to be his undoing. At a meeting on Monday, Mamata is said to have expressed her displeasure at the two, saying two to three MPs were bringing the party 'into disrepute'. However, the most stinging remarks were reserved for Kalyan, whom she blamed for not properly coordinating between MPs in the absence of veterans Sudip Bandyopadhyay and Saugata Roy. This did not sit well with Kalyan who announced his resignation as Chief Whip after the meeting and took aim at the CM herself, telling a news channel he had done the job assigned and there was not much he could do when most of the MPs remained absent 'Does Mamata Banerjee know how the work in Parliament is going on?' he asked. The party decided to ignore this and Abhishek even requested his senior colleague to lay low till he arrives in Delhi on August 7 for a dinner meeting of the INDIA alliance at Leader of the Opposition Rahul Gandhi's home. The TMC number two requested Kalyan, with whom he has had differences in the past as he asserted his dominance in the party, to reconsider his decision. However, after Kalyan targeted Mahua again on Tuesday. Mamata and Abhishek were left with no choice but to accept the Serampore MP's resignation. 'Mamata Banerjee was not ready to accept Kalyan's resignation as he is one of her oldest lieutenants. But he continued his attacks on Mahua and 'Didi' even after Abhishek requested him to reconsider his decision. This forced her hand,' said a TMC leader. A senior TMC MP said the CM wanted the feud between Mahua and Kalyan to end so that there would be no distractions before the parliamentary group as the party pursues its political agenda. At the dinner meeting at Gandhi's home, discussions are expected to be held on the INDIA bloc walking in lockstep to take on the BJP and the Narendra Modi government over electoral roll revision. 'Mamata Banerjee wants the parliamentary party to concentrate on the political agenda. Sudip Bandyopadhyay (who was earlier the Parliamentary Party leader) and Kalyan Banerjee are now out of the picture and (Dum Dum MP) Saugata Roy is unwell. So, we have to see how the new faces of the party handle such a crucial situation in Parliament,' said the senior MP. Another TMC leader said that following the reshuffle, Abhishek, the Diamond Harbour MP, and his team are in charge of maintaining party discipline in Parliament. While Kakoli Ghosh Dastidar, who is close to both the CM and her nephew, has replaced Kalyan as Chief Whip, Birbhum MP Satabdi Roy is the Deputy Leader. The change appeared to have had an initial effect on Wednesday, with the TMC functionary saying that after a long time, 'we saw our MPs properly highlighting the Bengali issue in front of Parliament'. He was referring to the party's campaign against the alleged harassment of Bangla speakers in BJP-ruled states in the name of identifying undocumented immigrants from Bangladesh. For everyone in the party, the burning question is whether this is enough to de-escalate the situation and bring the TMC parliamentary party back on track as it looks to coordinate with the rest of the Opposition on cornering the BJP in the House. Atri Mitra is a Special Correspondent of The Indian Express with more than 20 years of experience in reporting from West Bengal, Bihar and the North-East. He has been covering administration and political news for more than ten years and has a keen interest in political development in West Bengal. Atri holds a Master degree in Economics from Rabindrabharati University and Bachelor's degree from Calcutta University. He is also an alumnus of St. Xavier's, Kolkata and Ramakrishna Mission Asrama, Narendrapur. He started his career with leading vernacular daily the Anandabazar Patrika, and worked there for more than fifteen years. He worked as Bihar correspondent for more than three years for Anandabazar Patrika. He covered the 2009 Lok Sabha election and 2010 assembly elections. He also worked with News18-Bangla and covered the Bihar Lok Sabha election in 2019. ... Read More
