
Zelenskyy defends contested anti-corruption law changes
Produced externally by an organization we trust to adhere to journalistic standards.
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy on Wednesday defended legislative changes removing the independence of two key anti-corruption bodies, sparking the first major protests in Ukraine since the start of Russia's invasion.
"We all share a common enemy: the Russian occupiers," Zelenskyy said after meeting with top law enforcement and anti-corruption officials.
"And defending the Ukrainian state requires a strong enough law enforcement system – one that ensures a real sense of justice," he added.
"We all hear what society is saying," he said, promising to "resolve existing issues."
The bill would place the National Anti-Corruption Bureau of Ukraine (NABU) and Specialised Anti-Corruption Prosecutor's Office (SAPO) under the direct authority of the prosecutor general, who is appointed by the president.
After meeting with Zelenskyy, NABU and SAPO repeated their criticism of the changes and said "unambiguous legislative steps are required to reinstate the guarantees revoked by parliament."
Zelenskyy signed off on the widely criticised law on Tuesday, the same day it was passed by parliament, prompting a steely response from the EU and G7.
The law sparked the first major protest in Kyiv since Russian troops invaded in 2022, with over 1,000 people taking part.
Large gatherings are banned under Ukraine's martial law.
While the government says the law will make the anti-corruption agencies function better, its critics say it consolidates power in Zelenskyy's hands.
Instead, supporters of the law warn that a political crisis over the legislation could work in Russia's favour by undermining unity in the country.
Commenting on the protests at a briefing, Kremlin spokesman Dmitry Peskov on Wednesday said there was "a lot of corruption" in the country and the issue was "a sensitive topic" for Ukraine.
(mm) Euractiv is part of the Trust Project

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Euractiv
13 hours ago
- Euractiv
Moldova bars Czech MEP over planned speech at pro-Russia event
PRAGUE – Moldovan authorities barred and deported Czech MEP Ondřej Dostál over national security concerns, linking his planned appearance at a pro-Russian event to efforts to undermine the country's democracy. Dostál was due to speak in Chisinau at the 'Make Europe Great Again' (M.E.G.A.) conference organised by pro-Russian Moldovan opposition figures. His diplomatic passport was temporarily withheld before he was deported to Romania, from where he later addressed the event online. 'There's a first time for everything. Even for being deported, as an MEP, from an EU candidate country,' Dostál said on X late on Sunday. Authorities also denied entry to US conservative activist Brian Brown and Dimos Tchanasoulas, spokesperson for Greece's far-right party Niki. Brown was held in detention for several hours before being allowed in, while Tchanasoulas remained at the airport. In a video posted on X, Dostál suggested his deportation may have been linked to past criticism of EU leaders and alleged interference in national sovereignty. 'All of that could have been the reason why my colleagues from the United States and Greece and I were not allowed in,' he said. 'I think this is quite a scandal,' he added. Moldova's Intelligence and Security Service (SIS) later confirmed multiple entry bans, saying the event lacked transparency and alleged links to the Shor criminal group, which is tied to fugitive oligarch Ilan Shor and accused of working to destabilise Moldova with Russian backing. 'These actions are part of a broader spectrum of hybrid actions undertaken by Russia,' SIS warned, urging public figures to exercise caution before engaging in such events.


Euractiv
13 hours ago
- Euractiv
Spain's Sánchez dodges backlash over Huawei deal amid EU and US concerns
The Spanish government is declining to comment on growing criticism over a controversial contract it awarded to Chinese tech giant Huawei, after both EU and US officials expressed concerns . As Pedro Sánchez prepares to depart for the Canary Islands on his annual summer retreat, yet another scandal has emerged that he is unwilling to address: his government's €12 million contract with China's Huawei, which involves the storage of sensitive judicial wiretap data. The deal, revealed earlier this month, has triggered sharp criticism at home and raised alarm in Brussels and Washington over alleged security risks related to Huawei's ties to Beijing. Sánchez made no mention of the controversy during his last press conference of the summer on Monday, and his government has refused further comment, despite growing pressure both domestically and from international allies. In a statement to Euractiv on Friday, a European Commission official called the contract with Huawei a "national decision" but emphasised that Huawei 'represents materially higher risks' in critical infrastructure like 5G. As first reported by the Financial Times , this muted warning came as Brussels urged EU member states to phase out the Chinese vendor in favour of more trusted EU alternatives. Washington also weighed in , with senior lawmakers on the US Senate and House intelligence committees calling for a review of intelligence sharing with Spain, fearing that secrets could be leaked to the Chinese Communist Party. The controversy over the contract comes at a sensitive time for Sánchez, who is already under scrutiny in a separate domestic scandal involving alleged influence-peddling. It also highlights Spain's unusually close ties to China at a moment when the EU is hardening its stance toward a country it has labelled as 'a systemic rival'. Bad optics A meeting on Sunday between Socialist Catalan leader Salvador Illa and Huawei executives in Beijing – though described as 'institutional' and unrelated to the contract – has added to the negative optics. The Spanish Interior Ministry, which had previously defended the procurement by asserting there were no security risks and that the public tender was independently awarded, declined to respond to a request for comment from Euractiv regarding the Commission's latest warning. A spokesperson for Sánchez did not respond either. A spokesperson for Huawei Europe said: ' All Huawei products available in the Spanish market fully comply with local laws, regulations, and applicable product admission criteria and standards.' Regarding the security concerns over storing judiciary wiretap, they added that 'all the information stored in hardware belongs to and is at the exclusive disposal of the customer.' Spain's China ties under scrutiny The decision to proceed with Huawei has drawn criticism from Spain's conservative opposition. Popular Party leader Alberto Núñez Feijóo accused Sánchez of compromising national security and questioned the influence of former Socialist premier José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero – a key figure in Spain's close relationship with Beijing. Zapatero, widely regarded as Sánchez's political mentor, reportedly lobbied for the implementation of the Huawei 5G network in Spain, despite the Commission's mandate for EU countries to phase out such 'high-risk' equipment over espionage concerns. Critics accuse him of being behind Spain's abstention in Brussels last October, when the EU voted on tariff measures against Chinese-made electric vehicles. Local media, including investigative outlet Voz Populi, have also highlighted his connections to Beijing through the Gate Center – a think tank known for promoting Chinese interests in Spain – where he serves as president of the advisory council. His multiple trips to China to promote diplomatic and commercial relations have led critics to accuse Zapatero of lobbying for China within the Sánchez government . Huawei troubles in Brussels While some governments – such as Spain and Hungary – continue to work with Huawei, others like Sweden or France have accelerated efforts to phase out Chinese equipment from their mobile networks, viewing it as a potential conduit for Chinese state espionage – a claim Huawei denies. Adding to the controversy, Huawei is under investigation in several EU member states, most recently in Belgium, where authorities launched a wide-ranging probe in 2025 into alleged corruption involving EU officials. According to exclusive reporting by Euractiv and its partners , investigators are examining whether the company's lobbying efforts may have crossed into bribery. Huawei has not been charged with any offence and denies instructing employees to break the law. Belgian intelligence services have also assessed potential espionage risks, having interviewed Huawei staff in recent years, according to documents seen by Euractiv . Since the investigation began, Huawei has been banned from meeting with members of the European Parliament and the Commission. (aw)


Euractiv
a day ago
- Euractiv
Brussels opens door to selected US food imports as tariff threat looms
'We stayed firm on agriculture,' says EU official after US trade concessions Euractiv is part of the Trust Project Sofia Sanchez Manzanaro Euractiv Jul 28, 2025 15:33 2 min. read News Based on facts, either observed and verified directly by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Brussels will facilitate more imports of US agri-food products deemed "non-sensitive" for EU farmers – including nuts, soybeans, fish, and bison meat – under a trade deal struck on Sunday. A senior EU official said Monday that the agreement, reached by Commission President Ursula von der Leyen and US President Donald Trump, also extends the so-called lobster deal, originally signed during Trump's first mandate in 2020. That deal has allowed duty-free US lobster exports to the EU ever since. While the US will continue to sell seafood and nuts to the EU, Brussels appears to have gained little in return for its agri-food sector, which remains exposed to Trump's 15% blanket tariff. American products – including pistachios, almonds, certain types of processed and raw fish, bison meat, some dairy products, and pet food – will enjoy greater market access to the EU, though final terms await a joint statement still being drafted. Notably, nuts and soybeans were among the products the EU had previously earmarked for retaliation in the event of new US tariffs. Tariff reductions could also extend to fertilisers, where the US could be an alternative supplier to Russia, the official said. More contentious items like beef, poultry, and sugar remain excluded from the concessions, they added. Brussels insists the move won't harm EU producers, as the goods are 'non-sensitive.' But European almond growers – especially in Spain, the world's second-largest producer – have long warned that cheaper Californian nuts threaten their survival. Meanwhile, Brussels is trying to salvage an exemption for spirits and wine – a highly lucrative export sector for the bloc that relies heavily on the US market – with negotiations still ongoing, the official said. The EU official maintained that the Commission 'stayed firm on agriculture' during talks with US counterparts.