logo
Trump's Education Department Pauses Social Security Change

Trump's Education Department Pauses Social Security Change

Newsweek2 days ago

Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Department of Education has said it will not be garnishing Social Security checks to collect unpaid student loans.
"The Department has not offset any Social Security benefits since restarting collections on May 5, and has put a pause on any future Social Security offsets," a spokesperson for the department said in a statement emailed to Newsweek.
Why It Matters
In May, the Education Department restarted involuntary collections on defaulted federal student loans for the first time since March 2020. As a result, hundreds of thousands of older borrowers faced the risk of having their Social Security benefits garnished.
According to a January report from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau, an estimated 452,000 people aged 62—the minimum age to collect retirement benefits—and older had student loans in default this year and were likely to face forced collections.
What To Know
Under the Treasury Offset Program, the federal government can collect delinquent debts owed to its agencies. Its rules state that up to 15 percent of a person's Social Security benefits can be withheld to recover defaulted federal student loans. Garnishments cannot lower the monthly benefit amount to less than $750.
For beneficiaries who claim retirement, spousal and survivor checks and receive the average $1,976 monthly payment from the Social Security Administration, a 15 percent garnishment would result in a loss of $296.40 every month.
The spokesperson said that "in the coming weeks," the Education Department would "begin proactive outreach to recipients about affordable loan repayment options and help them back into good standing."
A stock photo of a Social Security card with U.S. dollars.
A stock photo of a Social Security card with U.S. dollars.
GETTY
What People Are Saying
The Education Department said in its statement: "The Trump Administration is committed to protecting Social Security recipients who oftentimes rely on a fixed income."
Secretary of Education Linda McMahon said in a statement on May 5: "As we begin to help defaulted borrowers back into repayment, we must also fix a broken higher education finance system that has put upward pressure on tuition rates without ensuring that colleges and universities are delivering a high-value degree to students.
"For too long, insufficient transparency and accountability structures have allowed U.S. universities to saddle students with enormous debt loads without paying enough attention to whether their own graduates are truly prepared to succeed in the labor market."
Tom O'Hare, a holistic college adviser at Get College Going, told Newsweek in May: "It should be noted that these debt recovery practices are not new and have been in use for over two decades. They were suspended to assist delinquent borrowers during COVID-19 and during the remaining time the former Administration was in office."
What Happens Next
Other types of garnishment, including from wages and federal tax refunds, are expected to go ahead, according to the Education Department's announcement.
"Before the offset begins, a notice of intent to offset will be sent to your last-known address to inform you that the offset and negative credit reporting are scheduled to begin in 65 days," the Federal Student Aid website said. "The notice may only be sent once, and offsets will continue until your debt is paid or the default status is resolved."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

3 Nevada geothermal projects fast-tracked under Trump's quickie environmental review process
3 Nevada geothermal projects fast-tracked under Trump's quickie environmental review process

Yahoo

time25 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

3 Nevada geothermal projects fast-tracked under Trump's quickie environmental review process

Ormat's complex south of Reno. (Ormat press photo) Three proposed geothermal projects in Nevada will be among the first fast-tracked under the Trump administration's new streamlined environmental review process, the U.S. Department of the Interior announced last week. Under the new process hailed by Interior Secretary Doug Burhum in April, environmental assessments for small-scale projects will be limited to just 14 days — a sharp contrast to the typical year or more. Full environmental impact statements for more complex projects, which usually take up to 2 years, will now be finalized in just 28 days. During his first month in office President Donald Trump proclaimed an 'energy emergency' as grounds for fast-tracking lengthy environmental reviews and permitting processes for energy projects deemed critical to national security. Conservation groups have blasted what they see as a circumvention of bedrock environmental laws on the basis of Trump decreeing an 'emergency.' But Burgum, in a statement, said 'by cutting red tape and advancing President Trump's American Energy Dominance agenda, we're fast-tracking reliable energy projects while strengthening national security and supporting American workers.' Environmental assessments for the three Nevada projects — all proposed by Ormat Nevada — will be completed within a 14 day timeframe, according to Interior's May 29 statement. Feds green-light uranium mine in Utah, first project approved under Trump's energy declaration Those projects include the Diamond Flat Geothermal Project near Fallon; the McGinness Hills Geothermal Optimization Project in Lander County; and the Pinto Geothermal Project along the Oregon-Nevada border. Geothermal is one the few renewable energy sources the Trump administration is promoting as part of its 'American Energy Dominance' plan. U.S. Energy Secretary Chris Wright, the CEO of the oilfield services firm Liberty Energy, has called for expanding geothermal energy, citing its potential to enhance energy security and stabilize electricity prices. During a House Appropriations Committee hearing last month, Wright told Nevada Rep. Susie Lee he is 'bullish on the future of geothermal.' 'Permitting and a sober government is necessary to make that happen,' Wright said. Under Wright's leadership, Liberty Energy also invested millions in geothermal energy startup Fervo Energy. In 2023, Fervo Energy launched a geothermal pilot plant in Nevada in partnership with Google to power data centers. Nevada generates is second only to California in geothermal electricity generation, , according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. Nevada produces about 26% of total geothermal energy in the nation, and has the potential to grow. Last month, the U.S. Geological Survey released a report that said geothermal energy in the Great Basin — which covers most of Nevada — could produce electricity equivalent to 10% of the current U.S. power supply. Geothermal currently accounts for less than 1% of U.S. electricity generation, according to the EIA. In the last five years, the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) has put up more than 700,000 acres of land in Nevada to lease for geothermal. In a press release, USGS said commercial-scale geothermal development will largely depend on the 'successful application of evolving and emerging technologies.' Conservation groups argued the announcement is the latest effort by the Trump administration to target the National Environmental Policy Act, a bedrock environmental law that requires the federal government to conduct an indepth environmental review before moving forward with infrastructure projects. 'We support geothermal energy as a part of our clean energy mix, but like any projects on public lands these developments could cause environmental impacts,' said Patrick Donnelly, Great Basin director at the Center for Biological Diversity in a statement. 'Projects like these need full and complete environmental reviews to ensure they don't unduly harm endangered species or public lands resources.' While geothermal is a more environmentally sound alternative to traditional power sources like coal and natural gas, there are still environmental risks that require careful review. A recent study published in the journal Biological Conservation found that the presence of geothermal plants 'adversely affected' greater sage-grouse populations within sagebrush ecosystems. The study found that the presence of geothermal infrastructure near sage-grouse breeding grounds decreased nest survival. The study specifically reviewed the impact of Nevada's McGinness Hills Geothermal Development, the largest geothermal complex in Nevada and the fourth largest in the United States. The first McGinness Hills geothermal plant was established in July, 2012 and has been producing renewable power since. Throughout its construction and expansion, the McGinness Hills Geothermal Development has attracted pushback due to its impact on sage-grouse. In 2017, the Nevada Department of Wildlife wrote a letter to the BLM after the agency documented the downward trend of seven of eleven breeding sites near the McGinness Hills Geothermal Development. In the letter the agency accused Ormat of failing to monitor and mitigate the impact of the power plant on sage-grouse habitat, as required under the project approval. If the McGinness Hills Geothermal Optimization Project is approved under the new streamlined environmental review process, it would expand three geothermal power plants by adding new wells, heat exchangers, cooling fans, and a 15 megawatt solar photovoltaic field. Other Ormat geothermal energy projects have faced controversy and pushback in Nevada. In 2023, a planned geothermal project by Ormat was sent back to square one after federal land managers decided to reexamine the project's approval following the listing of a small rare toad living in adjacent springs as endangered. Another planned Ormat geothermal project near Gerlach, Nevada was thrown out by the Washoe County Board of County Commissioners in 2023 after locals fiercely opposed the project. Nevada Current is part of States Newsroom, a nonprofit news network supported by grants and a coalition of donors as a 501c(3) public charity. Nevada Current maintains editorial independence. Contact Editor Hugh Jackson for questions: info@ SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

NYC promises to hold school budgets steady despite enrollment declines
NYC promises to hold school budgets steady despite enrollment declines

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

NYC promises to hold school budgets steady despite enrollment declines

All New York City public schools will receive at least as much funding for the upcoming school year as their initial budgets last fall, Mayor Adams announced Wednesday evening as his Democratic challengers took the stage for the first mayoral debate. The funding is guaranteed to all principals, even those who are projected to lose enrollment. City Hall estimated the total cost of stabilizing school budgets would come to $128 million. The local Education Department may still claw back funding in the middle of next school year, depending on how many students ultimately enroll — a problem that may be Adams' successor's as the mayor faces an uphill battle to re-election as an independent. 'A strong city starts with strong schools, and that's why we're committing $128 million to stabilize schools budgets despite enrollment changes — so principals can plan with certainty, and our students can continue to learn, grow, and thrive,' Adams said in a statement. The school budget policy, known as 'hold harmless,' started during the COVID-19 pandemic with federal stimulus dollars. But as principals introduced new programs and hired additional staff, Adams has been under pressure to continue funding schools at the same levels. While schools logged steep enrollment declines during the pandemic era, those trends have mostly leveled, thanks in part to an influx of migrant students who face an uncertain future in the United States under President Trump. The promise of additional funding comes as the school system faces economic headwinds. This spring, Gov. Hochul and the state Legislature made tweaks to New York's primary education formula, resulting in New York City receiving $314 million less than if no changes had been introduced. And amid threats of federal funding cuts and moves to dismantle the U.S. Education Department, the leaders of the city's school system have remained tight-lipped on contingency plans. They have not announced any major cuts so far to the nation's largest school district.

Emboldened and out of government, Elon Musk emerges as a problem for the Trump White House
Emboldened and out of government, Elon Musk emerges as a problem for the Trump White House

Yahoo

time34 minutes ago

  • Yahoo

Emboldened and out of government, Elon Musk emerges as a problem for the Trump White House

WASHINGTON — Just days after he left his powerful position as one of Donald Trump's closest advisers, Elon Musk is orchestrating a pressure campaign to sink the mammoth tax and spending package that is the centerpiece of the president's policy agenda. Musk used X, his social media site, on Wednesday to implore Americans to call Congress and urge it to 'kill' the bill that Trump hails as 'big' and 'beautiful.' He also urged lawmakers to rewrite the bill from scratch, putting him squarely at odds with Trump, who had invited him into Cabinet meetings and empowered him to dismantle whole agencies and shrink the government workforce. The bill, which has already passed the House, faces an uncertain fate in the Senate, where just four Republican defections would spell defeat. It doesn't sit well with Trump world that Musk is the messenger. Trump is considering when and how to respond to Musk's gambit, a White House official said. He was 'caught off guard' but "not entirely surprised" by Musk's opposition, a senior official said. Trump had sent Musk off in style, giving him a golden key and staging a goodbye ceremony in the Oval Office that the media covered live. 'The president wanted to be a nice guy,' the senior official said. Musk's posts come a day after his surprising break with Trump over the bill's merits. On Tuesday, he called the measure a 'disgusting abomination,' warning that it would push the nation deeper into debt. Having elevated Musk and made him a prized sidekick, Trump may discover that the world's richest man is a potential nemesis beyond his control. A White House official downplayed the notion of a falling-out with Musk. 'Everyone here in a senior role understands who Elon Musk is, understands how he acts, understands how he plays,' the official said, speaking on condition of anonymity. 'There's been no surprise when it comes to Elon Musk, because he's been such a friend to the administration. 'And we all know this is coming from a place of business and is not personal.' But people in Trump's orbit were angry that Musk skewered the bill. They were particularly outraged by his not-so-veiled warning that Republicans who vote for it could lose their jobs come November 2026, a person familiar with the matter said. That assertion came after Musk said late last month that he would do 'a lot less' political spending going forward. A Republican lawmaker, in a private text chain with colleagues, wrote sarcastically of Musk: 'Team Player.' Trump is normally quick to clap back at those who publicly oppose his interests. When Sen. Rand Paul, R-Ky., objected Tuesday on CNBC that the bill would inflate the national debt, Trump swiftly denounced him. 'The people of Kentucky can't stand him,' Trump posted on Truth Social. In the case of Musk, Trump so far has been silent. The disparate treatment may be rooted in cold political reality. Paul doesn't have a national following, while Musk, with his capacity to influence the midterm elections, is someone Trump may not wish to antagonize. Musk spent more than $250 million to boost Trump last year and is free to pour money into a midterm campaign season in which control of Congress is up for grabs. If Democrats seize the majority, they could saddle Trump with serial investigations and perhaps impeachment proceedings in the back half of his term. Republican lawmakers, too, trod carefully Wednesday when they were asked about Musk's evisceration of Trump's key legislative priority. Sen. John Kennedy of Louisiana quipped: 'Well, let me say this about Elon. I wish he wouldn't sugarcoat stuff.' 'I think he's really smart,' Kennedy added. 'I think he's entitled to his opinion. He's frustrated. I think he believes, in my judgment correctly, that we're quickly becoming debt slaves.' Still, Musk's apostasy shows the inherent risks in Trump's executive style. As a centibillionaire, Musk never fit neatly in the Trump administration's chain of command. He squabbled with at least two Cabinet secretaries and found that his private interests clashed at times with Trump's policy goals. Trump's bill would curtail the electric vehicle and residential solar tax credits that are important to Musk's Tesla car and clean energy divisions. The measure would also impose a new annual $250 fee on EV drivers. Musk spoke to Trump personally about extending the electric vehicle credit, a person familiar with the matter said. He also pressed some senior lawmakers on Capitol Hill in recent weeks — before his recent X posts — including House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-La., to keep tax credits in the bill that would incentivize electric vehicle purchases, two people familiar with the conversations said. The tax credits had been eliminated to get the most conservative House members on board as part of the delicate negotiations to ensure the bill's passage. 'Abruptly ending the energy tax credits would threaten America's energy independence and the reliability of our grid — we urge the senate to enact legislation with a sensible wind down' of the credits, Tesla Energy posted on X on May 28, the day Musk officially left his government role. In opposing the bill, Musk has amplified a point that the more fiscally conservative Republicans also find troubling: The measure would greatly add to America's whopping debt. A new analysis from the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office holds that the House-passed version of the bill would inflate the debt by $2.4 trillion over the next decade. Paul, the senator from Kentucky, wrote Tuesday that he wants trillions in new debt 'removed' from the measure and that four of his colleagues 'feel this way.' An open question is the degree to which Americans care what Musk thinks. His public approval rating was underwater amid his association with the Department of Government Efficiency and the drastic cuts that left many government workers suddenly unemployed. An NBC News poll in March found that 51% of registered voters held negative views of Musk, with only 39% viewing him positively. Lawmakers seeking campaign donations may be solicitous of Musk and the news media may treat him with outsize interest because of the role Trump gave him, but can he shape public opinion on controversial legislation? Newt Gingrich, the Republican former House speaker, suggested the answer is no. 'I haven't seen any' public constituency for Musk, Gingrich told NBC News. 'If you can find one, call me.' 'I'm a big admirer of his as an entrepreneur, but he never understood the political business, and he doesn't now,' he added. That having been said, 'I'm sure no one on the Trump team thinks it's helpful,' Gingrich added. Democrats are delighted by Musk's dissent and the rift it exposes inside GOP ranks. 'Musk is right about this,' Rep. Adam Smith, D-Wash., told NBC News. 'He's been wrong about a whole lot of other things.' This article was originally published on

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store