BREAKING NEWS NATO and Russia clash in Baltic Sea 'dog fight' as Polish jet tails SU-35 warplane and Estonian forces 'try to board 800ft Moscow oil tanker sanctioned by Britain'
Both NATO and Russia scrambled warplanes in a dramatic 'dogfight' above the Baltic after a major standoff over a tanker in Vladimir Putin 's shadow fleet.
Estonian forces sought to board the 'Gabon-flagged' oil tanker Jaguar using a patrol vessel and helicopter, as well as a surveillance vessel.
The Russian-bound ship is suspected of being used by Moscow as part of its shadow fleet to avoid international sanctions.
It was sanctioned by Britain on Friday.
NATO aircraft - including Polish MiG-29s were scrambled as the vessel refused to cooperate.
Russia also deployed a Su-35S fighter jet which allegedly violated Estonian airspace as it sought to provide cover for the fleeing Jaguar.
In dramatic footage, the Polish - NATO - plane was seen tailing the Russian Su-35 in a combat over the Gulf of Finland, which is part of the Baltic Sea.
A Russian voice on the bridge of the tanker accused the Estonians of being 'clowns' as they tried and failed to board the vessel.
The tanker ultimately anchored near Gotland Island - controlled by Russia - in the eastern Baltic Sea.
Footage shows the high drama in one of the most tense regions in the world amid disputes between Russia and NATO over Ukraine.
'This is how we're greeted with helicopters,' said a voice -apparently Russian - on the tanker.
'They're demanding we anchor.'
A message is heard saying: 'This is Estonian warship Papa 6732.
'Your request will be denied.
'Follow my instructions. Immediately change course to 105. Over.'
A voice from the tanker in Hindi says: 'That looks like our drone in front….'
A Russian voice demands: 'Go on, hit it running….'
Referring to the Estonians, he says: 'What a bunch of clowns!'
The Estonian vessel comes close to the tanker seeking to swerve it to the right.
An Estonian A139 helicopter and an M-28 Skytruck plane of the Estonian defence forces were seen circling the vessel.
Boasting a success against the West, pro-Kremlin news outlet Izvestia reported: 'Despite this show of force, the Estonian authorities were unable to stop the vessel.
'The Jaguar ultimately reached Gogland Island …. a Russian-controlled territory in the Gulf [of Finland], and resumed its route to Primorsk'.
Russian outlet News-Pravda reported, 'Sailors from the Baltic Republic [Estonia] twice tried to land troops from a helicopter.'
After the extraordinary clash, NATO state Estonia summoned the Russian Chargé d'Affaires in Tallinn, Lenar Salimullin, who was handed a note of protest, accusing the Putin warplane of violating the republic's airspace.
'From Estonia's point of view, this is a very serious and regrettable incident that is in no way unacceptable,' said Estonian Foreign Minister Margus Tsahkna.
He demanded that Russia 'must face tougher, faster sanctions' .
The tanker had been near Naissaar Island, off Tallinn, when the Estonian Navy communicated with it by radio at 1530 GMT on Tuesday, said Commander Ivo Vark.
It was sailing 'without a nationality' and Estonia 'had an obligation to verify the vessel's documents and legal status', said the Estonian.
'The vessel denied cooperation and continued its journey toward Russia... given the vessel's lack of nationality, the use of force, including boarding the vessel, was deemed unnecessary.'
Estonia escorted it until the vessel reached Russian waters.
Estonian Defence Minister Hanno Pevkur said the ship was sent from Estonian to Russian territorial waters to prevent a threat to his country's critical infrastructure.
'The issue was the ship's flag state, and our most important goal was to ensure the security of critical infrastructure. This was achieved,' he claimed.
The 800-ft long Jaguar is a crude oil tanker reportedly sailing under the flag of Gabon.
The Equasis database suggested the ship changed its name and flag state at the beginning of February.
According to this data its name is now Argent and its flag state is Guinea-Bissau.
Putin uses a vast network of non-Russian tankers - called a shadow fleet - to avoid oil sanctions.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Statesman
41 minutes ago
- New Statesman
Britain's gift to Putin
Photo byOn Wednesday, Volodymyr Zelensky announced that Russia has now used more than 27,000 aerial bombs, more than 11,000 armed drones and thousands more guided munitions to attack Ukraine. Among the victims of this week's attacks were an emergency worker, his wife and their one-year-old grandson, the 632nd child killed in Ukraine since Russia's invasion. And yet British businesses continue to enable the Russian state to secure its main source of income: revenue from oil and gas. New research shared exclusively with the New Statesman has found that since Russia's invasion of Ukraine, more than £200bn in Russian fossil fuel exports have been shipped using UK-based maritime services. A single UK-based firm has carried almost a quarter of Russia's exports of liquefied natural gas (LNG) since the war began. While our government seeks to increase its defence budget, Britain's active role in the Russian fossil fuel trade helps to maintain the military spending of a nuclear power currently at war with a close European ally. The study, which has been conducted by the Centre for Research on Energy and Clean Air (CREA), finds that the value of Russian crude oil, oil products and LNG shipped under British ownership or insurance since the war began has now reached £205.8bn. Three quarters of Russian LNG carriers were covered by UK insurance. Britain officially stopped importing Russian oil and oil products nine months after the invasion (it became illegal to do so on 5 December 2022). But a sanctions loophole means Britain keeps buying Putin's products: Russian crude is shipped to refineries in Turkey and India and then returns as oil products. CREA estimates that the UK has indirectly bought £1.4bn in Russian oil through this loophole, providing more than half a billion pounds' worth of revenue to the Kremlin. Much of the jet fuel taking British holidaymakers to sunnier climes this summer will have entered the supply chain in the oilfields of Siberia. Europe continues to buy Russian LNG directly, and in 2024 imported more LNG from Russia than ever before. Much of this is shipped, entirely legally, by a single British company: Seapeak, which is headquartered in Glasgow and which owns seven specialist LNG carriers, which can power through ice two metres thick. This is not subject to a ban and there is no suggestion that Seapeak has broken any laws. Seapeak was mentioned in an Early Day Motion on Russian LNG, which was signed by 34 cross-party MPs in January. CREA says that Seapeak alone has carried Russian LNG worth £13bn since the war began. Elsewhere, Russian fossil fuels are also shipped by a 'dark fleet' of uninsured vessels, whose ownership is obscured. As previously reported, these ships pass in sight of our shores on an almost daily basis as they sail through the English Channel. Since Labour came to power, the UK government has taken a more determined stance towards sanctioning these ships and those who enable their sale, including an accountant who allegedly arranged for the sale of vessels. A government spokesperson told the New Statesman: 'We are working with G7 and EU partners to eliminate remaining dependencies on Russian energy as soon as possible. We will not hesitate to take further action to increase economic pressure on Putin.' Why can't we stop paying Putin immediately? In a word: inflation. If Western countries entirely quit the Russian oil and gas habit, the wholesale price of energy would spike in a similar manner to 2022, bringing the price of almost everything else with it. The last inflationary surge cost the UK government £67bn in a single year in additional spending in support for consumers and businesses, and the population still endured a historic rise in the cost of living accompanied by strikes across the public sector. No government is going to impose that upon its voters, and even if it did, it wouldn't last long. Subscribe to The New Statesman today from only £8.99 per month Subscribe This doesn't mean there is nothing the UK can do. Energy analysts say it is a question of supply: when the oil and gas market has enough capacity to make a sudden drop in Russian fossil fuels less important, sanctions can be imposed and enforced. The pragmatic answer is probably then to secure LNG and crude from other countries. The most realistic answer to this problem therefore comes from productive diplomacy with the US for LNG, and Saudi Arabia and others for oil. In the long term, of course, it means not relying on fossil fuels, because we don't have enough to power our country. Amid all the talk of how much we're going to spend on our military, it's important we also try to avoid paying for our enemy's. [See also: Revealed: how the City of London keeps Putin's oil flowing] Related
Evening Standard
an hour ago
- Evening Standard
Zelensky 'complicity' swipe at Trump after Putin 400-drones attack on Ukraine kills four in Kyiv
Trump has floated the prospect of more sanctions against Putin's regime if he does not move towards ending the conflict but the US president has failed to follow through with his threats and at times has appeared to be siding with the Russian president during efforts to get a peace deal.
Sky News
an hour ago
- Sky News
Minister 'not going to speculate' on alleged UK involvement in Ukrainian drone attack
A government minister has declined to say if the UK was involved in a Ukrainian drone strike after the Russian ambassador partially blamed Britain for the attack. More than a hundred drones were used to attack sites inside Russia over the weekend, leading to more than 40 warplanes being destroyed. Speaking to The World With Yalda Hakim on Sky News following the attack, Russia's UK ambassador warned it could risk escalating the conflict to "World War III". 5:58 Andrei Kelin pointed the finger at the UK because of the nature of the strike. "[This] kind of attack involves, of course, provision of very high technology, so-called geospaced data, which only can be done by those who have it in possession. And this is London and Washington," he told Hakim. "I don't believe that America [is involved], that has been denied by President Trump, definitely, but it has not been denied by London. "We perfectly know how much London is involved, how deeply British forces are involved in working together with Ukraine." Asked if the UK had provided Ukraine with this technology, Steve Reed, the environment secretary, told Sky News: "I'm not going to speculate on something when I don't know what the facts were." He said that "we as a government, cross-party actually, are standing foursquare alongside Ukraine as they fight - try to defend themselves - against a brutal, unprovoked and illegal attack and invasion". Mr Reed added: "We want there to be peace talks. We want this conflict to end. But it's quite right that we should support Ukraine." Challenged if this escalation could risk Britain getting sucked into the conflict with Russia more directly, the cabinet minister responded: "I do know that the people of this country and the government of this country, want to stand alongside Ukraine. "We need peace to happen in that region, we can't allow Russia to get away with invading any more countries." It comes at a time of escalating tensions in the region, with both Russia and Ukraine upping their attacks. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky said his country's drone strikes at the weekend "will undoubtedly be in history books". 3:55 The blow is seen as one of the most daring of the war so far, though the US estimated only around 10 Russian bombers were blown up - and Russia said none were. Overnight, Russia claimed it downed 174 Ukrainian drones and three cruise missiles across the country. Meanwhile, Ukrainian authorities said Russia attacked towns and cities across Ukraine overnight. Mr Zelenskyy said the assault was formed of more than 400 drones and 40 missiles. 2:37 US President Donald Trump had urged Mr Putin not to retaliate on Thursday. He told reporters: "I don't like it, I said don't do it, you shouldn't do it, you should stop it." In response to the allegations of British involvement, a Downing Street spokesperson said: "We never comment on operational matters at home or abroad."
