Trump's ominous warning to Rupert Murdoch and ‘his pile of garbage' WSJ over Epstein birthday card report
His threats to Murdoch — whose massive News Corp media conglomerate owns the Journal as well as Fox News and the The New York Post, among other titles — follow the newspaper's publication Thursday of a 50th birthday greeting that the president reportedly sent Epstein in 2003, which was described as including a sexually suggestive drawing and a birthday wish that says 'may every day be another wonderful secret.'
'I look forward to getting Rupert Murdoch to testify in my lawsuit against him and his 'pile of garbage' newspaper,' Trump wrote on his Truth Social on Friday. 'That will be an interesting experience!!!'
The president has denied ever writing such a greeting to Epstein or even drawing 'pictures of women,' though the allegations arrive in the middle of his administration's attempts to dismiss the so-called Epstein files as a Democratic 'hoax' after his Department of Justice announced it found no evidence to support conspiracy theories about the sex trafficking case.
The Justice Department's attempt to draw the investigation to a close has renewed scrutiny into the president's relationship with Epstein, who was accused of sexually abusing dozens of minors before he was found dead in his jail cell in 2019.
Donald Trump has repeatedly threatened to sue Rupert Murdoch over The Wall Street Journal's report about birthday card it claims the president wrote to Jeffrey Epstein in 2003 (Getty/Reuters)
'The Wall Street Journal printed a FAKE letter, supposedly to Epstein,' Trump wrote on Truth Social on Thursday night. 'These are not my words, not the way I talk. Also, I don't draw pictures. I told Rupert Murdoch it was a Scam, that he shouldn't print this Fake Story. But he did, and now I'm going to sue his ass off, and that of his third rate newspaper.'
Roughly one hour earlier, in a lengthier post, Trump said he 'personally' warned Murdoch against publishing the story, 'and, if they print it, they will be sued.'
'Mr Murdoch stated that he would take care of it but, obviously, did not have the power to do so,' Trump said.
Trump also said White House press secretary Karoline Leavitt 'directly' told The Journal's editor Emma Tucker that the letter was a 'FAKE.'
'Instead, they are going with a false, malicious, and defamatory story anyway. President Trump will be suing The Wall Street Journal, NewsCorp, and Mr Murdoch, shortly,' he wrote.
Following The Journal's report, the president — under growing pressure from his allies in Congress and in right-wing media — directed Attorney General Pam Bondi to 'produce any and all pertinent Grand Jury testimony, subject to Court approval,' in a social media post.
The president cited 'the ridiculous amount of publicity given to Jeffrey Epstein' for his directive, which falls far short of demands to make all case files public, not just limited testimony presented in federal court.
Bondi, accused by far-right allies and conspiracy theorists of participating in a cover-up, immediately responded to Trump's order.
'President Trump — we are ready to move the court tomorrow to unseal the grand jury transcripts,' she wrote.
It was not immediately clear what evidence she could produce, given that grand jury transcripts are highly protected.
Trump threatened lawsuits against several media outlets throughout his campaign, but Rupert Murdoch now finds himself in the firing line (AFP via Getty)
Trump routinely threatens media outlets, publishers and journalists with legal action over antagonistic coverage, and his allies in Congress and in his administration have promoted legislation and policy measures to kneecap public media, press access, and protections for confidential sources.
During his 2024 campaign, Trump sued ABC News and CBS News for monumental sums, and both networks recently agreed to settle, sparking fears among press freedom advocates that publishers are only emboldening the president's chilling message to the media.
Now Murdoch has found himself in the line of fire. His Fox News empire was accused of promoting bogus conspiracy theories surrounding the 2020 election to promote Trump's campaign. The network ultimately settled that defamation lawsuit, which was brought by voting machine company Dominion Voting Systems, for a record-breaking $787 million.
The Independent has requested comment from News Corp.
'These kinds of threats are not normal in a free society,' Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression Bob Corn-Revere said in a statement to The Independent. 'And let's be clear: Trump has won no rulings from any court in his previous clashes with other news organizations. Instead, he has been able to use the levers of government to coerce settlements from regulated media companies. This abuse of power doesn't convert frivolous claims into valid actions.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New York Post
a minute ago
- New York Post
SOS — Save Our Shipping: Trump must break China's chokehold on global trade
A high-stakes deal that would give an American company a major role in running dozens of strategically crucial global ports is now in limbo — as China aggressively demands a stake. The United States cannot let that happen. US asset manager BlackRock and its partners are vying for 43 of the world's most important shipping ports, including the two that straddle the Panama Canal. The seller is C.K. Hutchison, a major Hong Kong operator that is one of China's 'big three' port giants — and the only one not owned outright by the Chinese government. Prying these ports from China's oversight is a critical move for both US national security and the global economy. Now the Chinese Communist Party is trying to block the deal, unless its state-owned COSCO joins the buyers' group and gains veto rights over port operations. Alarmingly, all three main parties are reportedly open to letting that happen, apparently thinking that a compromised deal is better than no deal at all. But with all that's at stake, President Donald Trump should use every tool available — starting with the ongoing US-China trade talks — to push the original deal through and keep COSCO out. The 43 ports that Hutchison seeks to sell would launch a global liberation from oppressive Chinese surveillance and control. If the plan falls through — or if it's altered to add COSCO to the ownership group — China could tighten its grip on the global shipping system, by replacing a Beijing-influenced company with a Beijing-controlled one. While the media has dubbed this the 'Panama Canal deal,' it's actually much bigger. The canal, a vital artery that runs through the center of the western hemisphere, is certainly critical — but many of the other ports involved in the deal are equally so. For example, this deal would include a port inside the Malacca Strait, the only direct maritime pathway between the Indian and Pacific Oceans. It sees 90,000 ships and $3.5 trillion worth of global trade every year. Hutchison is also looking to sell five ports that it owns on both sides of the Suez Canal, the preferred maritime commercial route between the Asian and European markets. About 12% of global trade, $1 trillion a year, passes through Suez. As China's purchases of sanctioned Iranian oil draw greater US scrutiny, Hutchison's four ports on the southern side of the Strait of Hormuz are also critical. Nearly all Iranian oil must pass through the strait, along with oil and gas from Saudi Arabia, UAE, Iraq, Kuwait and Qatar. In Europe, Hutchison controls 13 ports that act as a key entry point for Chinese goods into the European Union. The original deal would reduce China's port foothold on the continent — and the geopolitical influence that comes with it. Keep up with today's most important news Stay up on the very latest with Evening Update. Thanks for signing up! Enter your email address Please provide a valid email address. By clicking above you agree to the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy. Never miss a story. Check out more newsletters Like all major commercial deals, this one is complicated. Apart from the two Panama Canal ports, BlackRock would retain 20% ownership of the remaining facilities; its partner, Europe-based Mediterranean Shipping Corp., would control 70%, with Singapore's Sovereign Wealth Fund owning the rest. Meanwhile, China's power in global shipping is massive. China produces 95% of world shipping containers and all of the refrigerated ones. Ports around the world are plugged into China's logistical software platform, LOGINK, which tracks sensitive trade, market, maritime and passenger data. Huawei's 'Smart Port' 5G telecommunication towers provide Wi-Fi — and ready surveillance capacity — at ports worldwide. A Chinese state-owned company makes more than 70% of the world's ship-to-shore cranes (and 80% of the cranes used in America) — a major risk, according to the House Homeland Security Committee, which has alleged those cranes may be engaging in covert surveillance on behalf of the CCP. Adding state-owned COSCO to ports deal would give the CCP the power to veto any attempts to replace Huawei towers, LOGINK systems, Chinese cranes or other tools that may already be spying on behalf of the state. With BlackRock's minority interest in the vast bulk of these ports, replacing a private Chinese company with a state-owned one is even worse for the United States than the status quo. Breaking China's maritime monopoly is urgent. At the same time, America's economic leverage has never been higher. As Beijing trumps up patently absurd anti-monopoly investigations to stall or scuttle the BlackRock-MSC deal, the United States should Trump right back. He must make the choice clear: Access to American markets cannot continue unless Beijing releases its maritime monopoly. Elaine Dezenski heads the Center on Economic and Financial Power at the Foundation for Defense of Democracies, where Susan Soh is a research associate.
Hamilton Spectator
a minute ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Trump signs executive order pushing tariffs on Canada to 35 per cent
WASHINGTON - U.S. President Donald Trump has signed an executive order pushing tariffs on Canada to 35 per cent beginning on Friday. The White House confirmed the tariffs would not hit goods compliant with the Canada-U.S.-Mexico Agreement on trade, commonly known as CUSMA. A fact sheet from the White House says Canada 'failed to cooperate in curbing the ongoing flood of fentanyl' and also pointed to Ottawa's implementation of retaliatory tarrifs. U.S. government data shows a miniscule amount of fentanyl is seized at the border with Canada compared to Mexico. Canadian officials had been tempering expectations that a trade deal would materialize ahead of Trump's deadline and Prime Minister Mark Carney has said he'll only make an agreement that is good for Canada. Trump said earlier Thursday he hadn't talked to Canada. This report by The Canadian Press was first published Aug. 31, 2025.
2 minutes ago
Trump signs executive order bringing Presidential Fitness Test back to schools
President Donald Trump took questions about trade, interest rates after signing an executive order that would bring back the Presidential Fitness Test in public schools.
